SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A picture taken on August 9, 2018 during a trip in Yemen organized by the UAE's National Media Council (NMC) shows Yemeni children whose legs were amputated after they were injured by landmines playing in the country's second city of Aden which is under control by the Saudi and UAE-backed government. (Photo: Karim Sahib/AFP via Getty Images)
'Deadly and Dangerous': Biden Rebuked for Embrace of Trump's Policy on Landmines
"This is the wrong approach," said the U.S. Campaign to Ban Landmines.
Apr 06, 2021
The Biden administration was accused Tuesday of holding an "indefensible" position after the Pentagon said landmines "remain a vital tool" in the U.S. military's arsenal.
"This is the wrong approach," tweeted the United States Campaign to Ban Landmines (USCBL).
The group said President Joe Biden "should be moving away from landmines, not embracing their use," the group said, and pointed to the president's campaign vow to undo the Trump administration's widely condemned rollback of landmine restrictions.
The criticism Monday followed a tweet from Daily Beast reporter Spencer Ackerman in which he wrote that "Biden's Pentagon is going to keep the Trump Pentagon's policy of embracing landmines" and shared a screenshot of a Defense Department spokesperson describing the department's landmine policy as "unchanged since January 21, 2020."
"Landmines, including anti-personnel landmines, remain a vital tool in conventional warfare that the Unites States military cannot responsibly forgo," the statement read. The department also asserts U.S. landmines "have self-destruct capability and self-deactivate features" that curb "the risk of unintended harm to civilians."
The Trump administration announced in January of 2020 that it was rescinding former President Barack Obama's 2014 order limiting U.S. landmine use to the Korean Peninsula. Among those expressing outrage at the time was Michael Payne with Physicians for Human Rights, who rejected the assertion that "advanced" landmines would spare civilians harm.
"Despite any purported technological advancements, landmines are still capable of causing indiscriminate harm and egregious injury and suffering," he said at the time.
In response to the Pentagon's statement Tuesday, the USCBL expressed grave concern.
Jeff Meer, steering committee chair for the USCBL-Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC), said landmines should not be considered "conventional" weaponry.
"When 164 countries have banned antipersonnel landmines, then this weapon, which hungers for civilians, becomes nothing but 'unconventional,'" said Meer, who also serves as the executive director of Humanity & Inclusion, a Nobel Prize-winning human rights group.
"The decision to continue the development and deployment of landmines is deadly and dangerous."
--Adotei Akwei, Amnesty International USA The new statement also sparked criticism from Adotei Akwei, advocacy director at Amnesty International USA. "It is hard to imagine a policy more outdated and destructive than United States policy on antipersonnel landmines."
"The decision to continue the development and deployment of landmines is deadly and dangerous," said Akwei, urging Biden to "immediately reverse this decision" and join the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty.
Also known as the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the treaty bans the use, stockpiling, and transfer of the weapons and requires the destruction of such weaponry.
"President Biden has an opportunity right now to make a move that the world has been waiting for the U.S. to take since the 1990s: join the Mine Ban Treaty," said Steve Goose, Human Rights Watch's Arms Division director, in a statement Tuesday.
The Pentagon statement came two days after the International Day for Mine Awareness and Assistance in Mine Action and a call from United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres for all nations to join the treaty "without delay."
In a statement last month urging the U.S. to join the global pact, USCBL-CMC said, "While the [U.S.] policy claims that 'non-persistent' mines minimize civilian harm, the Mine Ban Treaty rejects the use of such mines and the faulty premise underpinning them. Decades of efforts to enhance the 'safety' of landmines have failed."
"No matter the technology, landmines are indiscriminate weapons," the group said. "Regardless of their lifespan, they are victim-activated and do not distinguish between a combatant or a civilian while active, rendering them incompatible with international humanitarian law."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Biden administration was accused Tuesday of holding an "indefensible" position after the Pentagon said landmines "remain a vital tool" in the U.S. military's arsenal.
"This is the wrong approach," tweeted the United States Campaign to Ban Landmines (USCBL).
The group said President Joe Biden "should be moving away from landmines, not embracing their use," the group said, and pointed to the president's campaign vow to undo the Trump administration's widely condemned rollback of landmine restrictions.
The criticism Monday followed a tweet from Daily Beast reporter Spencer Ackerman in which he wrote that "Biden's Pentagon is going to keep the Trump Pentagon's policy of embracing landmines" and shared a screenshot of a Defense Department spokesperson describing the department's landmine policy as "unchanged since January 21, 2020."
"Landmines, including anti-personnel landmines, remain a vital tool in conventional warfare that the Unites States military cannot responsibly forgo," the statement read. The department also asserts U.S. landmines "have self-destruct capability and self-deactivate features" that curb "the risk of unintended harm to civilians."
The Trump administration announced in January of 2020 that it was rescinding former President Barack Obama's 2014 order limiting U.S. landmine use to the Korean Peninsula. Among those expressing outrage at the time was Michael Payne with Physicians for Human Rights, who rejected the assertion that "advanced" landmines would spare civilians harm.
"Despite any purported technological advancements, landmines are still capable of causing indiscriminate harm and egregious injury and suffering," he said at the time.
In response to the Pentagon's statement Tuesday, the USCBL expressed grave concern.
Jeff Meer, steering committee chair for the USCBL-Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC), said landmines should not be considered "conventional" weaponry.
"When 164 countries have banned antipersonnel landmines, then this weapon, which hungers for civilians, becomes nothing but 'unconventional,'" said Meer, who also serves as the executive director of Humanity & Inclusion, a Nobel Prize-winning human rights group.
"The decision to continue the development and deployment of landmines is deadly and dangerous."
--Adotei Akwei, Amnesty International USA The new statement also sparked criticism from Adotei Akwei, advocacy director at Amnesty International USA. "It is hard to imagine a policy more outdated and destructive than United States policy on antipersonnel landmines."
"The decision to continue the development and deployment of landmines is deadly and dangerous," said Akwei, urging Biden to "immediately reverse this decision" and join the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty.
Also known as the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the treaty bans the use, stockpiling, and transfer of the weapons and requires the destruction of such weaponry.
"President Biden has an opportunity right now to make a move that the world has been waiting for the U.S. to take since the 1990s: join the Mine Ban Treaty," said Steve Goose, Human Rights Watch's Arms Division director, in a statement Tuesday.
The Pentagon statement came two days after the International Day for Mine Awareness and Assistance in Mine Action and a call from United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres for all nations to join the treaty "without delay."
In a statement last month urging the U.S. to join the global pact, USCBL-CMC said, "While the [U.S.] policy claims that 'non-persistent' mines minimize civilian harm, the Mine Ban Treaty rejects the use of such mines and the faulty premise underpinning them. Decades of efforts to enhance the 'safety' of landmines have failed."
"No matter the technology, landmines are indiscriminate weapons," the group said. "Regardless of their lifespan, they are victim-activated and do not distinguish between a combatant or a civilian while active, rendering them incompatible with international humanitarian law."
The Biden administration was accused Tuesday of holding an "indefensible" position after the Pentagon said landmines "remain a vital tool" in the U.S. military's arsenal.
"This is the wrong approach," tweeted the United States Campaign to Ban Landmines (USCBL).
The group said President Joe Biden "should be moving away from landmines, not embracing their use," the group said, and pointed to the president's campaign vow to undo the Trump administration's widely condemned rollback of landmine restrictions.
The criticism Monday followed a tweet from Daily Beast reporter Spencer Ackerman in which he wrote that "Biden's Pentagon is going to keep the Trump Pentagon's policy of embracing landmines" and shared a screenshot of a Defense Department spokesperson describing the department's landmine policy as "unchanged since January 21, 2020."
"Landmines, including anti-personnel landmines, remain a vital tool in conventional warfare that the Unites States military cannot responsibly forgo," the statement read. The department also asserts U.S. landmines "have self-destruct capability and self-deactivate features" that curb "the risk of unintended harm to civilians."
The Trump administration announced in January of 2020 that it was rescinding former President Barack Obama's 2014 order limiting U.S. landmine use to the Korean Peninsula. Among those expressing outrage at the time was Michael Payne with Physicians for Human Rights, who rejected the assertion that "advanced" landmines would spare civilians harm.
"Despite any purported technological advancements, landmines are still capable of causing indiscriminate harm and egregious injury and suffering," he said at the time.
In response to the Pentagon's statement Tuesday, the USCBL expressed grave concern.
Jeff Meer, steering committee chair for the USCBL-Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC), said landmines should not be considered "conventional" weaponry.
"When 164 countries have banned antipersonnel landmines, then this weapon, which hungers for civilians, becomes nothing but 'unconventional,'" said Meer, who also serves as the executive director of Humanity & Inclusion, a Nobel Prize-winning human rights group.
"The decision to continue the development and deployment of landmines is deadly and dangerous."
--Adotei Akwei, Amnesty International USA The new statement also sparked criticism from Adotei Akwei, advocacy director at Amnesty International USA. "It is hard to imagine a policy more outdated and destructive than United States policy on antipersonnel landmines."
"The decision to continue the development and deployment of landmines is deadly and dangerous," said Akwei, urging Biden to "immediately reverse this decision" and join the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty.
Also known as the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, the treaty bans the use, stockpiling, and transfer of the weapons and requires the destruction of such weaponry.
"President Biden has an opportunity right now to make a move that the world has been waiting for the U.S. to take since the 1990s: join the Mine Ban Treaty," said Steve Goose, Human Rights Watch's Arms Division director, in a statement Tuesday.
The Pentagon statement came two days after the International Day for Mine Awareness and Assistance in Mine Action and a call from United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres for all nations to join the treaty "without delay."
In a statement last month urging the U.S. to join the global pact, USCBL-CMC said, "While the [U.S.] policy claims that 'non-persistent' mines minimize civilian harm, the Mine Ban Treaty rejects the use of such mines and the faulty premise underpinning them. Decades of efforts to enhance the 'safety' of landmines have failed."
"No matter the technology, landmines are indiscriminate weapons," the group said. "Regardless of their lifespan, they are victim-activated and do not distinguish between a combatant or a civilian while active, rendering them incompatible with international humanitarian law."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.