Mar 23, 2021
As rich nations like the United States and pharmaceutical companies face sustained calls to share Covid-19 vaccine knowledge, the head of the World Health Organization on Monday decried the "grotesque" global inequality of vaccine distribution.
"In January, I said that the world was on the brink of a catastrophic moral failure unless urgent steps were taken to ensure equitable distribution of vaccines," WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said at a press conference.
"The inequitable distribution of vaccines is not just a moral outrage, it's also economically and epidemiologically self-defeating."
--WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus"We have the means to avert this failure," he said, "but it's shocking how little has been done to avert it."
The gap in vaccine distribution, said Tedros, ultimately hurts all nations' effort to defeat the virus.
"The inequitable distribution of vaccines is not just a moral outrage," said Tedros, "it's also economically and epidemiologically self-defeating."
\u201cWe have the means to achieve #VaccinEquity, but the gap between the number of vaccines administered in rich countries versus #COVAX is growing every single day and becoming more grotesque. We appeal to countries to share #COVID19 vaccines out of self-interest, if nothing else!\u201d— Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (@Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus) 1616486008
"As long as the virus continues to circulate anywhere, people will continue to die, trade and travel will continue to be disrupted, and the economic recovery will be further delayed," the WHO chief said.
An analysis from Agence France-Presseputs the inequality in stark terms:
Some 56 percent of the doses have been administered in high-income countries accounting for 16 percent of the global population.
Just 0.1 percent have been administered in the 29 lowest-income countries, home to nine percent of the global population.
"The toll in Africa," the New York Timesreported Tuesday, "could be especially profound." Though it has 17% of the global population, the continent "has administered roughly 2 percent of the vaccine doses given globally."
\u201cIf you're telling me that we should do everything we can to fight the pandemic everywhere *while also protecting future pharma company profits* you're telling me that we shouldn't do everything we can to fight the pandemic everywhere.\u201d— Matt Duss (@Matt Duss) 1616517865
Putting focus on Kenya, one of the countries relying on the WHO-backed vaccine distribution scheme known as COVAX, the Times said that cases there are "soaring," and gave a sobering projection:
Even under the best of circumstances, the country is expecting to inoculate only 30 percent of its people, or about 16 million out of almost 50 million, by the middle of 2023. When the rest of the population will get their shots is anybody's guess.
Tedros, in his remarks Monday, pointed to AstraZeneca and said it's "the only company that has committed to not profiting from its Covid-19 vaccine during the pandemic" and praised it for having licensed vaccine technology to other companies. While concerns have been raised about AstraZeneca's vaccine causing blood-clotting in some people, the WHO said it has been shown to be safe and approved its use.
\u201cYes, it's not just IP, we know that, but freeing up the ability of actors around the globe is what we need right now, and not contract negotiations one-on-one. 8/\u201d— Gregg Gonsalves (@Gregg Gonsalves) 1616445232
Some public health experts, including Tedros, and progressive groups like the People's Vaccine Alliance have been calling for a suspension in the World Trade Organization's intellectual property rules to allow other companies to produce the vaccine and thus widen the scope and scale of doses.
But, as the Timesreported Monday, "Governments have resisted."
By partnering with drug companies, Western leaders bought their way to the front of the line. But they also ignored years of warnings--and explicit calls from the World Health Organization--to include contract language that would have guaranteed doses for poor countries or encouraged companies to share their knowledge and the patents they control.
"It was like a run on toilet paper. Everybody was like, 'Get out of my way. I'm gonna get that last package of Charmin,'" said Gregg Gonsalves, a Yale epidemiologist. "We just ran for the doses."
A proposal from South Africa and India and backed by scores of other nations urges a waiver in the WTO rule, but richer nations, including the U.S and U.K., blocked a measure to do exactly that earlier this month.
\u201cA global pandemic requires a global effort to end it. That includes sharing critical info so other countries can produce the vaccine.\n\nThe U.S. must play its part in ending the vaccine apartheid.\nhttps://t.co/Lg1BHHVqXJ\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1616513821
According to BBC News, citing a leaked copy of the negotiating text of a WHO resolution, "wealthy nations... are pushing back on provisions in international law" to help poorer nations produce more vaccines. From the news outlet:
The WHO does not have the authority to sidestep patents--but it is trying to bring countries together to find a way to bolster vaccine supplies.
The discussions include using provisions in international law to get around patents and helping countries to have the technical ability to make them.
But the drug industry argues that eroding patents would hinder its ability to invest in future treatments for Covid and other illnesses.
Earlier this month, representatives of the U.S. drug industry wrote to U.S. President Joe Biden to share their concerns.
But that sharing of vaccine knowledge is a crucial competent of ending vaccine inequality and thus the global pandemic, according to a call released last week backed by over 1000 scientists and public health experts.
"We must use vaccines this year to control the pandemic around the entire world, not just in a few high-income countries," they wrote.
"In a world where there are enormous inequalities," they wrote, "Covid vaccinations offer us the opportunity to provide everyone globally, regardless of income, race, or nationality, immunological equity to be protected from SARS-CoV-2."
U.K.-based organization Global Justice Now issued a similar message on Tuesday.
"The covid-19 pandemic will not be over for us until it is over for everyone," the group tweeted.
"We can end the Covid-19 pandemic this year," the group said. "But pharma giants are standing in the way."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As rich nations like the United States and pharmaceutical companies face sustained calls to share Covid-19 vaccine knowledge, the head of the World Health Organization on Monday decried the "grotesque" global inequality of vaccine distribution.
"In January, I said that the world was on the brink of a catastrophic moral failure unless urgent steps were taken to ensure equitable distribution of vaccines," WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said at a press conference.
"The inequitable distribution of vaccines is not just a moral outrage, it's also economically and epidemiologically self-defeating."
--WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus"We have the means to avert this failure," he said, "but it's shocking how little has been done to avert it."
The gap in vaccine distribution, said Tedros, ultimately hurts all nations' effort to defeat the virus.
"The inequitable distribution of vaccines is not just a moral outrage," said Tedros, "it's also economically and epidemiologically self-defeating."
\u201cWe have the means to achieve #VaccinEquity, but the gap between the number of vaccines administered in rich countries versus #COVAX is growing every single day and becoming more grotesque. We appeal to countries to share #COVID19 vaccines out of self-interest, if nothing else!\u201d— Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (@Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus) 1616486008
"As long as the virus continues to circulate anywhere, people will continue to die, trade and travel will continue to be disrupted, and the economic recovery will be further delayed," the WHO chief said.
An analysis from Agence France-Presseputs the inequality in stark terms:
Some 56 percent of the doses have been administered in high-income countries accounting for 16 percent of the global population.
Just 0.1 percent have been administered in the 29 lowest-income countries, home to nine percent of the global population.
"The toll in Africa," the New York Timesreported Tuesday, "could be especially profound." Though it has 17% of the global population, the continent "has administered roughly 2 percent of the vaccine doses given globally."
\u201cIf you're telling me that we should do everything we can to fight the pandemic everywhere *while also protecting future pharma company profits* you're telling me that we shouldn't do everything we can to fight the pandemic everywhere.\u201d— Matt Duss (@Matt Duss) 1616517865
Putting focus on Kenya, one of the countries relying on the WHO-backed vaccine distribution scheme known as COVAX, the Times said that cases there are "soaring," and gave a sobering projection:
Even under the best of circumstances, the country is expecting to inoculate only 30 percent of its people, or about 16 million out of almost 50 million, by the middle of 2023. When the rest of the population will get their shots is anybody's guess.
Tedros, in his remarks Monday, pointed to AstraZeneca and said it's "the only company that has committed to not profiting from its Covid-19 vaccine during the pandemic" and praised it for having licensed vaccine technology to other companies. While concerns have been raised about AstraZeneca's vaccine causing blood-clotting in some people, the WHO said it has been shown to be safe and approved its use.
\u201cYes, it's not just IP, we know that, but freeing up the ability of actors around the globe is what we need right now, and not contract negotiations one-on-one. 8/\u201d— Gregg Gonsalves (@Gregg Gonsalves) 1616445232
Some public health experts, including Tedros, and progressive groups like the People's Vaccine Alliance have been calling for a suspension in the World Trade Organization's intellectual property rules to allow other companies to produce the vaccine and thus widen the scope and scale of doses.
But, as the Timesreported Monday, "Governments have resisted."
By partnering with drug companies, Western leaders bought their way to the front of the line. But they also ignored years of warnings--and explicit calls from the World Health Organization--to include contract language that would have guaranteed doses for poor countries or encouraged companies to share their knowledge and the patents they control.
"It was like a run on toilet paper. Everybody was like, 'Get out of my way. I'm gonna get that last package of Charmin,'" said Gregg Gonsalves, a Yale epidemiologist. "We just ran for the doses."
A proposal from South Africa and India and backed by scores of other nations urges a waiver in the WTO rule, but richer nations, including the U.S and U.K., blocked a measure to do exactly that earlier this month.
\u201cA global pandemic requires a global effort to end it. That includes sharing critical info so other countries can produce the vaccine.\n\nThe U.S. must play its part in ending the vaccine apartheid.\nhttps://t.co/Lg1BHHVqXJ\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1616513821
According to BBC News, citing a leaked copy of the negotiating text of a WHO resolution, "wealthy nations... are pushing back on provisions in international law" to help poorer nations produce more vaccines. From the news outlet:
The WHO does not have the authority to sidestep patents--but it is trying to bring countries together to find a way to bolster vaccine supplies.
The discussions include using provisions in international law to get around patents and helping countries to have the technical ability to make them.
But the drug industry argues that eroding patents would hinder its ability to invest in future treatments for Covid and other illnesses.
Earlier this month, representatives of the U.S. drug industry wrote to U.S. President Joe Biden to share their concerns.
But that sharing of vaccine knowledge is a crucial competent of ending vaccine inequality and thus the global pandemic, according to a call released last week backed by over 1000 scientists and public health experts.
"We must use vaccines this year to control the pandemic around the entire world, not just in a few high-income countries," they wrote.
"In a world where there are enormous inequalities," they wrote, "Covid vaccinations offer us the opportunity to provide everyone globally, regardless of income, race, or nationality, immunological equity to be protected from SARS-CoV-2."
U.K.-based organization Global Justice Now issued a similar message on Tuesday.
"The covid-19 pandemic will not be over for us until it is over for everyone," the group tweeted.
"We can end the Covid-19 pandemic this year," the group said. "But pharma giants are standing in the way."
As rich nations like the United States and pharmaceutical companies face sustained calls to share Covid-19 vaccine knowledge, the head of the World Health Organization on Monday decried the "grotesque" global inequality of vaccine distribution.
"In January, I said that the world was on the brink of a catastrophic moral failure unless urgent steps were taken to ensure equitable distribution of vaccines," WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said at a press conference.
"The inequitable distribution of vaccines is not just a moral outrage, it's also economically and epidemiologically self-defeating."
--WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus"We have the means to avert this failure," he said, "but it's shocking how little has been done to avert it."
The gap in vaccine distribution, said Tedros, ultimately hurts all nations' effort to defeat the virus.
"The inequitable distribution of vaccines is not just a moral outrage," said Tedros, "it's also economically and epidemiologically self-defeating."
\u201cWe have the means to achieve #VaccinEquity, but the gap between the number of vaccines administered in rich countries versus #COVAX is growing every single day and becoming more grotesque. We appeal to countries to share #COVID19 vaccines out of self-interest, if nothing else!\u201d— Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (@Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus) 1616486008
"As long as the virus continues to circulate anywhere, people will continue to die, trade and travel will continue to be disrupted, and the economic recovery will be further delayed," the WHO chief said.
An analysis from Agence France-Presseputs the inequality in stark terms:
Some 56 percent of the doses have been administered in high-income countries accounting for 16 percent of the global population.
Just 0.1 percent have been administered in the 29 lowest-income countries, home to nine percent of the global population.
"The toll in Africa," the New York Timesreported Tuesday, "could be especially profound." Though it has 17% of the global population, the continent "has administered roughly 2 percent of the vaccine doses given globally."
\u201cIf you're telling me that we should do everything we can to fight the pandemic everywhere *while also protecting future pharma company profits* you're telling me that we shouldn't do everything we can to fight the pandemic everywhere.\u201d— Matt Duss (@Matt Duss) 1616517865
Putting focus on Kenya, one of the countries relying on the WHO-backed vaccine distribution scheme known as COVAX, the Times said that cases there are "soaring," and gave a sobering projection:
Even under the best of circumstances, the country is expecting to inoculate only 30 percent of its people, or about 16 million out of almost 50 million, by the middle of 2023. When the rest of the population will get their shots is anybody's guess.
Tedros, in his remarks Monday, pointed to AstraZeneca and said it's "the only company that has committed to not profiting from its Covid-19 vaccine during the pandemic" and praised it for having licensed vaccine technology to other companies. While concerns have been raised about AstraZeneca's vaccine causing blood-clotting in some people, the WHO said it has been shown to be safe and approved its use.
\u201cYes, it's not just IP, we know that, but freeing up the ability of actors around the globe is what we need right now, and not contract negotiations one-on-one. 8/\u201d— Gregg Gonsalves (@Gregg Gonsalves) 1616445232
Some public health experts, including Tedros, and progressive groups like the People's Vaccine Alliance have been calling for a suspension in the World Trade Organization's intellectual property rules to allow other companies to produce the vaccine and thus widen the scope and scale of doses.
But, as the Timesreported Monday, "Governments have resisted."
By partnering with drug companies, Western leaders bought their way to the front of the line. But they also ignored years of warnings--and explicit calls from the World Health Organization--to include contract language that would have guaranteed doses for poor countries or encouraged companies to share their knowledge and the patents they control.
"It was like a run on toilet paper. Everybody was like, 'Get out of my way. I'm gonna get that last package of Charmin,'" said Gregg Gonsalves, a Yale epidemiologist. "We just ran for the doses."
A proposal from South Africa and India and backed by scores of other nations urges a waiver in the WTO rule, but richer nations, including the U.S and U.K., blocked a measure to do exactly that earlier this month.
\u201cA global pandemic requires a global effort to end it. That includes sharing critical info so other countries can produce the vaccine.\n\nThe U.S. must play its part in ending the vaccine apartheid.\nhttps://t.co/Lg1BHHVqXJ\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1616513821
According to BBC News, citing a leaked copy of the negotiating text of a WHO resolution, "wealthy nations... are pushing back on provisions in international law" to help poorer nations produce more vaccines. From the news outlet:
The WHO does not have the authority to sidestep patents--but it is trying to bring countries together to find a way to bolster vaccine supplies.
The discussions include using provisions in international law to get around patents and helping countries to have the technical ability to make them.
But the drug industry argues that eroding patents would hinder its ability to invest in future treatments for Covid and other illnesses.
Earlier this month, representatives of the U.S. drug industry wrote to U.S. President Joe Biden to share their concerns.
But that sharing of vaccine knowledge is a crucial competent of ending vaccine inequality and thus the global pandemic, according to a call released last week backed by over 1000 scientists and public health experts.
"We must use vaccines this year to control the pandemic around the entire world, not just in a few high-income countries," they wrote.
"In a world where there are enormous inequalities," they wrote, "Covid vaccinations offer us the opportunity to provide everyone globally, regardless of income, race, or nationality, immunological equity to be protected from SARS-CoV-2."
U.K.-based organization Global Justice Now issued a similar message on Tuesday.
"The covid-19 pandemic will not be over for us until it is over for everyone," the group tweeted.
"We can end the Covid-19 pandemic this year," the group said. "But pharma giants are standing in the way."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.