SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) speaks as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) looks on during a press conference about student debt outside the U.S. Capitol on February 4, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
To 'Ensure Justice and Accountability for Police Brutality,' Pressley Leads New Bill to End Qualified Immunity
"There can be no justice without healing and accountability, and there can be no true accountability with qualified immunity."
Feb 28, 2021
Rep. Ayanna Pressley and two of her fellow Massachusetts Democrats introduced legislation Monday to abolish qualified immunity, a decades-old legal doctrine that shields police officers from civil liability and--according to critics--allows law enforcement to get away with brutality and murder.
In a statement, Pressley said the doctrine of qualified immunity has for too long "shielded law enforcement from accountability and denied recourse for the countless families robbed of their loved ones."
"There can be no justice without healing and accountability, and there can be no true accountability with qualified immunity," Pressley added. "We must act with urgency. We must be bold and unapologetic in our pursuit of policy that increases police accountability and addresses the crisis of police brutality plaguing Black and brown communities."
Joining Pressley in unveiling the Ending Qualified Immunity Act of 2021 (pdf) were Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), both of whom echoed Pressley's characterization of the legal doctrine as an enabler of the kinds of police abuses that killed George Floyd and sparked a nationwide uprising last year.
"It's cases like Daniel Prude, Elijah McClain, and countless others that make clear our justice system is failing to hold accountable law enforcement officers who engage in police brutality and kill Black and brown Americans," Markey said in a statement.
"It's time we end the outdated and judge-made doctrine of qualified immunity," Markey added, "and start delivering accountability for the officers who abuse their positions of trust and responsibility in our communities. There will not be true racial justice until we end qualified immunity."
As Pressley's office notes in a summary (pdf) of the new legislation, "Congress granted individuals the right to sue state and local officials who violate their rights, including police officers, in the Civil Rights Act of 1871, now found under Section 1983."
"However, since 1967 the Supreme Court has issued several decisions gutting this protection by inventing the qualified immunity doctrine, rendering police officers from being successfully sued for misconduct, negligence, or abuse, a unique protection that no other profession holds," the summary states.
If passed, the Ending Qualified Immunity Act would, according to Pressley's office, "amend Section 1983 to explicitly state that the qualified immunity doctrine invented by the Supreme Court does NOT provide police officers that brutalize or otherwise violate civil rights with defense or immunity from liability for their actions."
The Intercept, which first reported the new bill's introduction Monday, noted that the measure comes as the House is set to vote on the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act (JPA) of 2021, legislation that contains provisions to reform but not end qualified immunity.
"A group of moderate lawmakers--including Reps. Josh Gottheimer, (D-N.J.); Tom O'Halleran, (D-Ariz); and Fred Upton, (R-Mich.)--is now pushing to water down the JPA's provision on qualified immunity before the bill comes to the House floor for a vote," The Intercept reported, citing a Politico story from last week. "They are arguing that the current provision will endanger their chances of reelection and make it harder to work with Republicans down the road."
Speaking to The Intercept, Pressley slammed that group's efforts as "bad-faith attempts from people in the pockets of special interests spreading misinformation to undermine our progress on ending qualified immunity."
"We will not back down in our pursuit of true justice and accountability," Pressley said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Rep. Ayanna Pressley and two of her fellow Massachusetts Democrats introduced legislation Monday to abolish qualified immunity, a decades-old legal doctrine that shields police officers from civil liability and--according to critics--allows law enforcement to get away with brutality and murder.
In a statement, Pressley said the doctrine of qualified immunity has for too long "shielded law enforcement from accountability and denied recourse for the countless families robbed of their loved ones."
"There can be no justice without healing and accountability, and there can be no true accountability with qualified immunity," Pressley added. "We must act with urgency. We must be bold and unapologetic in our pursuit of policy that increases police accountability and addresses the crisis of police brutality plaguing Black and brown communities."
Joining Pressley in unveiling the Ending Qualified Immunity Act of 2021 (pdf) were Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), both of whom echoed Pressley's characterization of the legal doctrine as an enabler of the kinds of police abuses that killed George Floyd and sparked a nationwide uprising last year.
"It's cases like Daniel Prude, Elijah McClain, and countless others that make clear our justice system is failing to hold accountable law enforcement officers who engage in police brutality and kill Black and brown Americans," Markey said in a statement.
"It's time we end the outdated and judge-made doctrine of qualified immunity," Markey added, "and start delivering accountability for the officers who abuse their positions of trust and responsibility in our communities. There will not be true racial justice until we end qualified immunity."
As Pressley's office notes in a summary (pdf) of the new legislation, "Congress granted individuals the right to sue state and local officials who violate their rights, including police officers, in the Civil Rights Act of 1871, now found under Section 1983."
"However, since 1967 the Supreme Court has issued several decisions gutting this protection by inventing the qualified immunity doctrine, rendering police officers from being successfully sued for misconduct, negligence, or abuse, a unique protection that no other profession holds," the summary states.
If passed, the Ending Qualified Immunity Act would, according to Pressley's office, "amend Section 1983 to explicitly state that the qualified immunity doctrine invented by the Supreme Court does NOT provide police officers that brutalize or otherwise violate civil rights with defense or immunity from liability for their actions."
The Intercept, which first reported the new bill's introduction Monday, noted that the measure comes as the House is set to vote on the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act (JPA) of 2021, legislation that contains provisions to reform but not end qualified immunity.
"A group of moderate lawmakers--including Reps. Josh Gottheimer, (D-N.J.); Tom O'Halleran, (D-Ariz); and Fred Upton, (R-Mich.)--is now pushing to water down the JPA's provision on qualified immunity before the bill comes to the House floor for a vote," The Intercept reported, citing a Politico story from last week. "They are arguing that the current provision will endanger their chances of reelection and make it harder to work with Republicans down the road."
Speaking to The Intercept, Pressley slammed that group's efforts as "bad-faith attempts from people in the pockets of special interests spreading misinformation to undermine our progress on ending qualified immunity."
"We will not back down in our pursuit of true justice and accountability," Pressley said.
Rep. Ayanna Pressley and two of her fellow Massachusetts Democrats introduced legislation Monday to abolish qualified immunity, a decades-old legal doctrine that shields police officers from civil liability and--according to critics--allows law enforcement to get away with brutality and murder.
In a statement, Pressley said the doctrine of qualified immunity has for too long "shielded law enforcement from accountability and denied recourse for the countless families robbed of their loved ones."
"There can be no justice without healing and accountability, and there can be no true accountability with qualified immunity," Pressley added. "We must act with urgency. We must be bold and unapologetic in our pursuit of policy that increases police accountability and addresses the crisis of police brutality plaguing Black and brown communities."
Joining Pressley in unveiling the Ending Qualified Immunity Act of 2021 (pdf) were Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), both of whom echoed Pressley's characterization of the legal doctrine as an enabler of the kinds of police abuses that killed George Floyd and sparked a nationwide uprising last year.
"It's cases like Daniel Prude, Elijah McClain, and countless others that make clear our justice system is failing to hold accountable law enforcement officers who engage in police brutality and kill Black and brown Americans," Markey said in a statement.
"It's time we end the outdated and judge-made doctrine of qualified immunity," Markey added, "and start delivering accountability for the officers who abuse their positions of trust and responsibility in our communities. There will not be true racial justice until we end qualified immunity."
As Pressley's office notes in a summary (pdf) of the new legislation, "Congress granted individuals the right to sue state and local officials who violate their rights, including police officers, in the Civil Rights Act of 1871, now found under Section 1983."
"However, since 1967 the Supreme Court has issued several decisions gutting this protection by inventing the qualified immunity doctrine, rendering police officers from being successfully sued for misconduct, negligence, or abuse, a unique protection that no other profession holds," the summary states.
If passed, the Ending Qualified Immunity Act would, according to Pressley's office, "amend Section 1983 to explicitly state that the qualified immunity doctrine invented by the Supreme Court does NOT provide police officers that brutalize or otherwise violate civil rights with defense or immunity from liability for their actions."
The Intercept, which first reported the new bill's introduction Monday, noted that the measure comes as the House is set to vote on the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act (JPA) of 2021, legislation that contains provisions to reform but not end qualified immunity.
"A group of moderate lawmakers--including Reps. Josh Gottheimer, (D-N.J.); Tom O'Halleran, (D-Ariz); and Fred Upton, (R-Mich.)--is now pushing to water down the JPA's provision on qualified immunity before the bill comes to the House floor for a vote," The Intercept reported, citing a Politico story from last week. "They are arguing that the current provision will endanger their chances of reelection and make it harder to work with Republicans down the road."
Speaking to The Intercept, Pressley slammed that group's efforts as "bad-faith attempts from people in the pockets of special interests spreading misinformation to undermine our progress on ending qualified immunity."
"We will not back down in our pursuit of true justice and accountability," Pressley said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.