SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) walk through Statuary Hall to the House Chamber for the State of the Union on February 4, 2020 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images)
You Mean 'Publicly Complicit,' Says AOC Over GOP Being 'Publicly Silent' About Trump Election Threats
"This is exactly the problem," added Rep. Pramila Jayapal. "Republicans who are silent are enabling all this behavior and we will not forget that."
Nov 02, 2020
"Publicly complicit" is more like it.
That was the message from Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez midday on Election Day in response to a Politico article detailing how Republican Party lawmakers have remained "publicly silent" on President Donald Trump's repeated attacks on mail-in voting and election integrity despite the reporting which states they are "privately disgusted" over it.
According to Politico, "most Republicans, from critics to allies of Trump, have remained publicly silent" despite months of Trump openly trying to delegitimatize mail-in votes and claiming that valid ballots counted after Election should not be counted.
"It's not new for Trump's party brethren to duck and cover when he says something troubling. But after five years of perfecting the art of explaining how they "didn't see the tweet"--the much parodied talking point to which Republicans on Capitol Hill often resort--it is shocking but not surprising that they aren't speaking up now, even when the integrity of America's electoral system is under attack by their party's leader."
The news outlet reached out to many GOP lawmakers and officials on the issue, but few responded to their request:
Efforts to solicit on the record comment from a broad range of party leaders Monday were met with indifference.
Sen. Ben Sasse didn't respond to a DM. Chris Christie didn't return a text. A message to the spokesman for Sen. Josh Hawley, an up-and-comer in the party, went unanswered. Sen. Lindsey Graham didn't return a call after POLITICO left a voicemail for him. (Graham's outgoing message offered the option of sending a fax but a reporter did not avail himself of that method of communication.)
White House spokeswoman Alyssa Farah promised to call back but never did. Rudy Giuliani went silent, even though a reporter sweetened the deal by agreeing to hear him out on the Hunter Biden intrigue, a current Giuliani obsession. Karl Rove was kind enough to respond, but he was too busy to discuss the president's comments sowing doubt and mistrust about the sanctity of the election process, because, he said, his "flight is getting ready to shut the door and pull away from the gate."
With official returns in the highly-anticipated election just hours away on Tuesday, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, echoed Ocasio-Cortez by suggesting that the GOP's ongoing silence speaks volumes.
"This is exactly the problem," tweeted Jayapal. "Republicans who are silent are enabling all this behavior and we will not forget that. Private disgust does nothing to stop a dictator from stealing an election."
Senate Democrats also weighed in, with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) accusing his GOP colleagues of having "spines of foam."
Speaking with Politico, Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) characterized Trump's attack on election as outrage--calling it an "incompetent attempt at autocracy"--but said nobody should be surprised that the modern Republican Party has stood by and let him get away with it.
"There are lots of reasons to believe that what Trump is talking about or contemplating cannot be accomplished," said Schatz. "But if your plan includes congressional Republicans standing up to Trump, you need a new plan."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
"Publicly complicit" is more like it.
That was the message from Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez midday on Election Day in response to a Politico article detailing how Republican Party lawmakers have remained "publicly silent" on President Donald Trump's repeated attacks on mail-in voting and election integrity despite the reporting which states they are "privately disgusted" over it.
According to Politico, "most Republicans, from critics to allies of Trump, have remained publicly silent" despite months of Trump openly trying to delegitimatize mail-in votes and claiming that valid ballots counted after Election should not be counted.
"It's not new for Trump's party brethren to duck and cover when he says something troubling. But after five years of perfecting the art of explaining how they "didn't see the tweet"--the much parodied talking point to which Republicans on Capitol Hill often resort--it is shocking but not surprising that they aren't speaking up now, even when the integrity of America's electoral system is under attack by their party's leader."
The news outlet reached out to many GOP lawmakers and officials on the issue, but few responded to their request:
Efforts to solicit on the record comment from a broad range of party leaders Monday were met with indifference.
Sen. Ben Sasse didn't respond to a DM. Chris Christie didn't return a text. A message to the spokesman for Sen. Josh Hawley, an up-and-comer in the party, went unanswered. Sen. Lindsey Graham didn't return a call after POLITICO left a voicemail for him. (Graham's outgoing message offered the option of sending a fax but a reporter did not avail himself of that method of communication.)
White House spokeswoman Alyssa Farah promised to call back but never did. Rudy Giuliani went silent, even though a reporter sweetened the deal by agreeing to hear him out on the Hunter Biden intrigue, a current Giuliani obsession. Karl Rove was kind enough to respond, but he was too busy to discuss the president's comments sowing doubt and mistrust about the sanctity of the election process, because, he said, his "flight is getting ready to shut the door and pull away from the gate."
With official returns in the highly-anticipated election just hours away on Tuesday, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, echoed Ocasio-Cortez by suggesting that the GOP's ongoing silence speaks volumes.
"This is exactly the problem," tweeted Jayapal. "Republicans who are silent are enabling all this behavior and we will not forget that. Private disgust does nothing to stop a dictator from stealing an election."
Senate Democrats also weighed in, with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) accusing his GOP colleagues of having "spines of foam."
Speaking with Politico, Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) characterized Trump's attack on election as outrage--calling it an "incompetent attempt at autocracy"--but said nobody should be surprised that the modern Republican Party has stood by and let him get away with it.
"There are lots of reasons to believe that what Trump is talking about or contemplating cannot be accomplished," said Schatz. "But if your plan includes congressional Republicans standing up to Trump, you need a new plan."
"Publicly complicit" is more like it.
That was the message from Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez midday on Election Day in response to a Politico article detailing how Republican Party lawmakers have remained "publicly silent" on President Donald Trump's repeated attacks on mail-in voting and election integrity despite the reporting which states they are "privately disgusted" over it.
According to Politico, "most Republicans, from critics to allies of Trump, have remained publicly silent" despite months of Trump openly trying to delegitimatize mail-in votes and claiming that valid ballots counted after Election should not be counted.
"It's not new for Trump's party brethren to duck and cover when he says something troubling. But after five years of perfecting the art of explaining how they "didn't see the tweet"--the much parodied talking point to which Republicans on Capitol Hill often resort--it is shocking but not surprising that they aren't speaking up now, even when the integrity of America's electoral system is under attack by their party's leader."
The news outlet reached out to many GOP lawmakers and officials on the issue, but few responded to their request:
Efforts to solicit on the record comment from a broad range of party leaders Monday were met with indifference.
Sen. Ben Sasse didn't respond to a DM. Chris Christie didn't return a text. A message to the spokesman for Sen. Josh Hawley, an up-and-comer in the party, went unanswered. Sen. Lindsey Graham didn't return a call after POLITICO left a voicemail for him. (Graham's outgoing message offered the option of sending a fax but a reporter did not avail himself of that method of communication.)
White House spokeswoman Alyssa Farah promised to call back but never did. Rudy Giuliani went silent, even though a reporter sweetened the deal by agreeing to hear him out on the Hunter Biden intrigue, a current Giuliani obsession. Karl Rove was kind enough to respond, but he was too busy to discuss the president's comments sowing doubt and mistrust about the sanctity of the election process, because, he said, his "flight is getting ready to shut the door and pull away from the gate."
With official returns in the highly-anticipated election just hours away on Tuesday, Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, echoed Ocasio-Cortez by suggesting that the GOP's ongoing silence speaks volumes.
"This is exactly the problem," tweeted Jayapal. "Republicans who are silent are enabling all this behavior and we will not forget that. Private disgust does nothing to stop a dictator from stealing an election."
Senate Democrats also weighed in, with Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) accusing his GOP colleagues of having "spines of foam."
Speaking with Politico, Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) characterized Trump's attack on election as outrage--calling it an "incompetent attempt at autocracy"--but said nobody should be surprised that the modern Republican Party has stood by and let him get away with it.
"There are lots of reasons to believe that what Trump is talking about or contemplating cannot be accomplished," said Schatz. "But if your plan includes congressional Republicans standing up to Trump, you need a new plan."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.