SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Cars approach a mail-in ballot drop off location on October 13, 2020 in Austin, Texas. (Photo: Sergio Flores/Getty Images)
'Attempted Judicial Coup in Progress': Alarms Sound as Texas Republicans Ask Federal Judge to Toss Nearly 130,000 Ballots
"This lawsuit is another desperate and ludicrous attempt by extremists to block the will of the people and disrupt democracy."
Nov 01, 2020
Voting rights advocates are sounding the alarm and taking emergency legal action as a right-wing federal judge Monday morning is set to hear a lawsuit by Texas Republicans seeking to invalidate nearly 130,000 legally cast ballots in heavily Democratic Harris County, an alarming last-ditch ploy one observer described as an "attempted judicial coup in progress."
The hearing, scheduled for 10:30 am local time, will come less than 24 hours after the Texas Supreme Court rejected a nearly identical GOP effort to toss out ballots cast through Harris County's drive-thru voting system, which has been in place for months as a safer voting option amid the coronavirus pandemic.
"Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
--Andre Segura, ACLU of Texas
"Ten of Harris County's 120 early voting sites are drive-thru locations," CNN noted over the weekend. "As of Friday, nearly 127,000 votes had been cast via drive-thru, marking nearly nine percent of the total votes cast in the country's third most populous county. While curbside voting in Harris County is limited to voters with a disability and located at all polling sites, the drive-thru voting locations are open to all voters."
The Republican lawsuit--filed by wealthy conservative activist Steven Hotze, state Rep. Steve Toth, and a pair of GOP candidates for office--alleges that drive-thru voting is unconstitutional because only the state legislature has the authority to make changes to election law. Slate court reporter Mark Joseph Stern wrote late Saturday that "there are so many flaws in Republicans' argument that it's hard to know where to begin."
"The GOP operatives probably don't have standing to challenge a voting procedure that merely makes it easier and safer to vote," Stern wrote. "But leave that aside and look at the merits. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the legislature does not have sole authority over elections."
"And yet there is good reason to worry that Republicans will prevail, at least initially," Stern warned. "[U.S. District Judge Andrew] Hanen, the federal judge overseeing the case, is a rabid partisan... Alarmingly, he scheduled a hearing in this case for Monday morning--without even giving Harris County a chance to file a response brief. It is possible that Hanen is rushing to throw a wrench into Texas' election, purporting to void a vast number of votes in a critical battleground state."
On behalf of several voters who cast their ballots using the drive-thru voting process, the ACLU of Texas late Sunday filed a motion to intervene (pdf) in the Republican-led lawsuit, the third GOP effort to invalidate more than 120,000 ballots in the key battleground state.
According to FiveThirtyEight, President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden are neck-and-neck in Texas, which has seen record-shattering early voting in the days leading up to November 3.
"This lawsuit is another desperate and ludicrous attempt by extremists to block the will of the people and disrupt democracy," Andre Segura, legal director for the ACLU of Texas, said in a statement. "Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Voting rights advocates are sounding the alarm and taking emergency legal action as a right-wing federal judge Monday morning is set to hear a lawsuit by Texas Republicans seeking to invalidate nearly 130,000 legally cast ballots in heavily Democratic Harris County, an alarming last-ditch ploy one observer described as an "attempted judicial coup in progress."
The hearing, scheduled for 10:30 am local time, will come less than 24 hours after the Texas Supreme Court rejected a nearly identical GOP effort to toss out ballots cast through Harris County's drive-thru voting system, which has been in place for months as a safer voting option amid the coronavirus pandemic.
"Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
--Andre Segura, ACLU of Texas
"Ten of Harris County's 120 early voting sites are drive-thru locations," CNN noted over the weekend. "As of Friday, nearly 127,000 votes had been cast via drive-thru, marking nearly nine percent of the total votes cast in the country's third most populous county. While curbside voting in Harris County is limited to voters with a disability and located at all polling sites, the drive-thru voting locations are open to all voters."
The Republican lawsuit--filed by wealthy conservative activist Steven Hotze, state Rep. Steve Toth, and a pair of GOP candidates for office--alleges that drive-thru voting is unconstitutional because only the state legislature has the authority to make changes to election law. Slate court reporter Mark Joseph Stern wrote late Saturday that "there are so many flaws in Republicans' argument that it's hard to know where to begin."
"The GOP operatives probably don't have standing to challenge a voting procedure that merely makes it easier and safer to vote," Stern wrote. "But leave that aside and look at the merits. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the legislature does not have sole authority over elections."
"And yet there is good reason to worry that Republicans will prevail, at least initially," Stern warned. "[U.S. District Judge Andrew] Hanen, the federal judge overseeing the case, is a rabid partisan... Alarmingly, he scheduled a hearing in this case for Monday morning--without even giving Harris County a chance to file a response brief. It is possible that Hanen is rushing to throw a wrench into Texas' election, purporting to void a vast number of votes in a critical battleground state."
On behalf of several voters who cast their ballots using the drive-thru voting process, the ACLU of Texas late Sunday filed a motion to intervene (pdf) in the Republican-led lawsuit, the third GOP effort to invalidate more than 120,000 ballots in the key battleground state.
According to FiveThirtyEight, President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden are neck-and-neck in Texas, which has seen record-shattering early voting in the days leading up to November 3.
"This lawsuit is another desperate and ludicrous attempt by extremists to block the will of the people and disrupt democracy," Andre Segura, legal director for the ACLU of Texas, said in a statement. "Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
Voting rights advocates are sounding the alarm and taking emergency legal action as a right-wing federal judge Monday morning is set to hear a lawsuit by Texas Republicans seeking to invalidate nearly 130,000 legally cast ballots in heavily Democratic Harris County, an alarming last-ditch ploy one observer described as an "attempted judicial coup in progress."
The hearing, scheduled for 10:30 am local time, will come less than 24 hours after the Texas Supreme Court rejected a nearly identical GOP effort to toss out ballots cast through Harris County's drive-thru voting system, which has been in place for months as a safer voting option amid the coronavirus pandemic.
"Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
--Andre Segura, ACLU of Texas
"Ten of Harris County's 120 early voting sites are drive-thru locations," CNN noted over the weekend. "As of Friday, nearly 127,000 votes had been cast via drive-thru, marking nearly nine percent of the total votes cast in the country's third most populous county. While curbside voting in Harris County is limited to voters with a disability and located at all polling sites, the drive-thru voting locations are open to all voters."
The Republican lawsuit--filed by wealthy conservative activist Steven Hotze, state Rep. Steve Toth, and a pair of GOP candidates for office--alleges that drive-thru voting is unconstitutional because only the state legislature has the authority to make changes to election law. Slate court reporter Mark Joseph Stern wrote late Saturday that "there are so many flaws in Republicans' argument that it's hard to know where to begin."
"The GOP operatives probably don't have standing to challenge a voting procedure that merely makes it easier and safer to vote," Stern wrote. "But leave that aside and look at the merits. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the legislature does not have sole authority over elections."
"And yet there is good reason to worry that Republicans will prevail, at least initially," Stern warned. "[U.S. District Judge Andrew] Hanen, the federal judge overseeing the case, is a rabid partisan... Alarmingly, he scheduled a hearing in this case for Monday morning--without even giving Harris County a chance to file a response brief. It is possible that Hanen is rushing to throw a wrench into Texas' election, purporting to void a vast number of votes in a critical battleground state."
On behalf of several voters who cast their ballots using the drive-thru voting process, the ACLU of Texas late Sunday filed a motion to intervene (pdf) in the Republican-led lawsuit, the third GOP effort to invalidate more than 120,000 ballots in the key battleground state.
According to FiveThirtyEight, President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden are neck-and-neck in Texas, which has seen record-shattering early voting in the days leading up to November 3.
"This lawsuit is another desperate and ludicrous attempt by extremists to block the will of the people and disrupt democracy," Andre Segura, legal director for the ACLU of Texas, said in a statement. "Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.