To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
President Donald Trump speaks to Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh the State of the Union address before members of Congress in the House chamber of the U.S. Capitol February 5, 2019 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Melina Mara/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
The U.S. Supreme Court late Monday delivered a victory for the Republican Party by barring the crucial battleground state of Wisconsin from extending its Election Day deadline for the arrival of absentee ballots amid the pandemic, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh issuing an ominous concurring opinion that echoes President Donald Trump's false narrative on mail-in voting.
The 5-3 decision along ideological lines--with the court's five conservatives in the majority--blocked a request by Wisconsin Democrats and voting rights groups to revive a federal judge's ruling from last month that would have allowed mail-in ballots to be counted if postmarked by Election Day and received by November 9, a six-day extension of the current deadline of November 3 at 8:00 pm.
"Whatever the reasons behind Kavanaugh's performance on Monday, he has given the nation another legitimate reason to fear that this election may end with a Bush v. Gore-like disaster for American democracy, but even worse than the original."
--Mark Joseph Stern, Slate
Wisconsin Republicans quickly appealed the order, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit blocked the ruling earlier this month.
In raising alarm about the potential consequences of the Supreme Court's decision to uphold Wisconsin's strict Election Day deadline as ongoing mail delays heighten fears that many ballots could arrive late, legal analysts pointed with particular dismay at the reasoning of Kavanaugh, characterizing the right-wing justice's 18-page opinion (pdf) as a blaring signal of his willingness to abet a possible attempt by Trump to stop the counting of valid absentee ballots.
"For important reasons, most states, including Wisconsin, require absentee ballots to be received by Election Day, not just mailed by Election Day," Kavanaugh wrote. "Those states want to avoid the chaos and suspicions of impropriety that can ensue if thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the results of an election. And those states also want to be able to definitively announce the results of the election on Election Night, or as soon as possible thereafter."
\u201cKavanaugh is announcing to the world that if it will help Trump win he will join a decision to not count votes\u201d— Adam Serwer \ud83c\udf5d (@Adam Serwer \ud83c\udf5d) 1603758563
\u201cThis is chilling, from Justice Kavanaugh in the Wisconsin voting rights case:\n\n\u201cIf the apparent winner the morning after the election ends up losing due to late-arriving ballots, charges of a rigged election could explode.\u201d\n\nHe\u2019s down to steal this thing.\u201d— Elie Honig (@Elie Honig) 1603763007
Writing for Slate, court reporter Mark Joseph Stern argued that "it is genuinely alarming that the justice cast these aspersions on late-arriving ballots," noting that at least 18 states and the District of Columbia count ballots that arrive after Election Day.
"We need overwhelming turnout to overcome a looming constitutional crisis."
--Rep. Ro Khanna
"And, in these states, there is no result to 'flip' because there is no result to overturn until all valid ballots are counted," Stern wrote. "Further, George W. Bush's 2000 election legal team--which included [newly confirmed Justice Amy Coney] Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Roberts--argued during that contested election that ballots arriving late and without postmarks, which were thought to benefit Bush, must be counted in Florida."
"Whatever the reasons behind Kavanaugh's performance on Monday," Stern continued, "he has given the nation another legitimate reason to fear that this election may end with a Bush v. Gore-like disaster for American democracy, but even worse than the original."
Just minutes after the Supreme Court issued its ruling Monday night, Trump falsely tweeted that there are "big problems and discrepancies with Mail In Ballots all over the USA."
"Must have final total on November 3rd," Trump added. Twitter flagged the president's post as misleading and observers hastened to point out that the final vote count is never complete and final by Election Night.
Following the Supreme Court's ruling and Trump's tweet, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), first vice chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, urged the public to "forget the polls" showing Democratic nominee Joe Biden with a lead over the incumbent president.
"We need overwhelming turnout to overcome a looming constitutional crisis," Khanna said.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
The U.S. Supreme Court late Monday delivered a victory for the Republican Party by barring the crucial battleground state of Wisconsin from extending its Election Day deadline for the arrival of absentee ballots amid the pandemic, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh issuing an ominous concurring opinion that echoes President Donald Trump's false narrative on mail-in voting.
The 5-3 decision along ideological lines--with the court's five conservatives in the majority--blocked a request by Wisconsin Democrats and voting rights groups to revive a federal judge's ruling from last month that would have allowed mail-in ballots to be counted if postmarked by Election Day and received by November 9, a six-day extension of the current deadline of November 3 at 8:00 pm.
"Whatever the reasons behind Kavanaugh's performance on Monday, he has given the nation another legitimate reason to fear that this election may end with a Bush v. Gore-like disaster for American democracy, but even worse than the original."
--Mark Joseph Stern, Slate
Wisconsin Republicans quickly appealed the order, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit blocked the ruling earlier this month.
In raising alarm about the potential consequences of the Supreme Court's decision to uphold Wisconsin's strict Election Day deadline as ongoing mail delays heighten fears that many ballots could arrive late, legal analysts pointed with particular dismay at the reasoning of Kavanaugh, characterizing the right-wing justice's 18-page opinion (pdf) as a blaring signal of his willingness to abet a possible attempt by Trump to stop the counting of valid absentee ballots.
"For important reasons, most states, including Wisconsin, require absentee ballots to be received by Election Day, not just mailed by Election Day," Kavanaugh wrote. "Those states want to avoid the chaos and suspicions of impropriety that can ensue if thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the results of an election. And those states also want to be able to definitively announce the results of the election on Election Night, or as soon as possible thereafter."
\u201cKavanaugh is announcing to the world that if it will help Trump win he will join a decision to not count votes\u201d— Adam Serwer \ud83c\udf5d (@Adam Serwer \ud83c\udf5d) 1603758563
\u201cThis is chilling, from Justice Kavanaugh in the Wisconsin voting rights case:\n\n\u201cIf the apparent winner the morning after the election ends up losing due to late-arriving ballots, charges of a rigged election could explode.\u201d\n\nHe\u2019s down to steal this thing.\u201d— Elie Honig (@Elie Honig) 1603763007
Writing for Slate, court reporter Mark Joseph Stern argued that "it is genuinely alarming that the justice cast these aspersions on late-arriving ballots," noting that at least 18 states and the District of Columbia count ballots that arrive after Election Day.
"We need overwhelming turnout to overcome a looming constitutional crisis."
--Rep. Ro Khanna
"And, in these states, there is no result to 'flip' because there is no result to overturn until all valid ballots are counted," Stern wrote. "Further, George W. Bush's 2000 election legal team--which included [newly confirmed Justice Amy Coney] Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Roberts--argued during that contested election that ballots arriving late and without postmarks, which were thought to benefit Bush, must be counted in Florida."
"Whatever the reasons behind Kavanaugh's performance on Monday," Stern continued, "he has given the nation another legitimate reason to fear that this election may end with a Bush v. Gore-like disaster for American democracy, but even worse than the original."
Just minutes after the Supreme Court issued its ruling Monday night, Trump falsely tweeted that there are "big problems and discrepancies with Mail In Ballots all over the USA."
"Must have final total on November 3rd," Trump added. Twitter flagged the president's post as misleading and observers hastened to point out that the final vote count is never complete and final by Election Night.
Following the Supreme Court's ruling and Trump's tweet, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), first vice chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, urged the public to "forget the polls" showing Democratic nominee Joe Biden with a lead over the incumbent president.
"We need overwhelming turnout to overcome a looming constitutional crisis," Khanna said.
The U.S. Supreme Court late Monday delivered a victory for the Republican Party by barring the crucial battleground state of Wisconsin from extending its Election Day deadline for the arrival of absentee ballots amid the pandemic, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh issuing an ominous concurring opinion that echoes President Donald Trump's false narrative on mail-in voting.
The 5-3 decision along ideological lines--with the court's five conservatives in the majority--blocked a request by Wisconsin Democrats and voting rights groups to revive a federal judge's ruling from last month that would have allowed mail-in ballots to be counted if postmarked by Election Day and received by November 9, a six-day extension of the current deadline of November 3 at 8:00 pm.
"Whatever the reasons behind Kavanaugh's performance on Monday, he has given the nation another legitimate reason to fear that this election may end with a Bush v. Gore-like disaster for American democracy, but even worse than the original."
--Mark Joseph Stern, Slate
Wisconsin Republicans quickly appealed the order, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit blocked the ruling earlier this month.
In raising alarm about the potential consequences of the Supreme Court's decision to uphold Wisconsin's strict Election Day deadline as ongoing mail delays heighten fears that many ballots could arrive late, legal analysts pointed with particular dismay at the reasoning of Kavanaugh, characterizing the right-wing justice's 18-page opinion (pdf) as a blaring signal of his willingness to abet a possible attempt by Trump to stop the counting of valid absentee ballots.
"For important reasons, most states, including Wisconsin, require absentee ballots to be received by Election Day, not just mailed by Election Day," Kavanaugh wrote. "Those states want to avoid the chaos and suspicions of impropriety that can ensue if thousands of absentee ballots flow in after Election Day and potentially flip the results of an election. And those states also want to be able to definitively announce the results of the election on Election Night, or as soon as possible thereafter."
\u201cKavanaugh is announcing to the world that if it will help Trump win he will join a decision to not count votes\u201d— Adam Serwer \ud83c\udf5d (@Adam Serwer \ud83c\udf5d) 1603758563
\u201cThis is chilling, from Justice Kavanaugh in the Wisconsin voting rights case:\n\n\u201cIf the apparent winner the morning after the election ends up losing due to late-arriving ballots, charges of a rigged election could explode.\u201d\n\nHe\u2019s down to steal this thing.\u201d— Elie Honig (@Elie Honig) 1603763007
Writing for Slate, court reporter Mark Joseph Stern argued that "it is genuinely alarming that the justice cast these aspersions on late-arriving ballots," noting that at least 18 states and the District of Columbia count ballots that arrive after Election Day.
"We need overwhelming turnout to overcome a looming constitutional crisis."
--Rep. Ro Khanna
"And, in these states, there is no result to 'flip' because there is no result to overturn until all valid ballots are counted," Stern wrote. "Further, George W. Bush's 2000 election legal team--which included [newly confirmed Justice Amy Coney] Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Roberts--argued during that contested election that ballots arriving late and without postmarks, which were thought to benefit Bush, must be counted in Florida."
"Whatever the reasons behind Kavanaugh's performance on Monday," Stern continued, "he has given the nation another legitimate reason to fear that this election may end with a Bush v. Gore-like disaster for American democracy, but even worse than the original."
Just minutes after the Supreme Court issued its ruling Monday night, Trump falsely tweeted that there are "big problems and discrepancies with Mail In Ballots all over the USA."
"Must have final total on November 3rd," Trump added. Twitter flagged the president's post as misleading and observers hastened to point out that the final vote count is never complete and final by Election Night.
Following the Supreme Court's ruling and Trump's tweet, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), first vice chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, urged the public to "forget the polls" showing Democratic nominee Joe Biden with a lead over the incumbent president.
"We need overwhelming turnout to overcome a looming constitutional crisis," Khanna said.