SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Members of a new climate movement, Ocean Rebellion, protest in the United Kingdom's Falmouth Harbor by projecting slogans on the bow of the cruise ship named The World. (Photo: Gavan Goulder)
A new grassroots climate movement called Ocean Rebellion officially launched this week with non-violent direct actions targeting a luxury cruise liner docked at the United Kingdom's Falmouth Harbor as part of a broader effort to raise awareness of the environmental impact of cruise shipping.
As the "sea-faring sister" of Extinction Rebellion (XR), Ocean Rebellion "has at its heart a commitment to engage with global high seas stakeholders, so as to address cascading collapses in biodiversity due to overfishing, human-caused climate change, deep sea mining, and other marine emergencies."
The marine-focused movement, also called OR, detailed its members' three key demands in a statement Wednesday:
The group added that "if the U.N. fails in this high purpose then a global citizens' assembly will convene to assume governance."
"The oceans are the lungs of the world, it creates our weather and life on the planet began there. And yet many of us have a real disconnect from it now," said Sophie Miller of XR Falmouth. "I feel it's so important to create and participate in actions like these to raise awareness and to engage people in a wider conversation about the seas and our future."
In a warning that shortly preceded the release of new satellite data revealing the Greenland ice sheet reached a new record loss of mass in 2019, Miller said that "with the melting of the Greenland ice shelf and the fact we are currently on track to significantly overshoot 1.5 degrees of warming, this is more important than ever."
"We also need to be aware that those in the global South are currently on the front line and are already experiencing the disastrous effects of this disconnect," she added. "Communities are suffering. People are dying and this is going to get worse unless we act now. I'm just a human and a mother who wants a habitable planet for the future."
Following a similar pre-launch action last week, OR activists on Tuesday night targeted The World, which reportedly claims to be "the largest residential cruise ship on the planet." The ship is currently moored in Falmouth Harbor in Cornwall without any residents in its multimillion-dollar apartments, due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
\u201c@OceanRebellion \ud83d\udea2 has taken to the seas with an escalating series of non-violent actions against The World luxury apartment \ud83d\udea2 liner, currently moored in Falmouth Harbour. \u2018The World\u2019 emits 10 x times more greenhouse gases per person per mile than a jumbo jet. \ud83d\udcf7 Guy Reece\u201d— Extinction Rebellion Hackney \ud83d\udeb2\ud83d\udc1d\ud83c\udf31 (@Extinction Rebellion Hackney \ud83d\udeb2\ud83d\udc1d\ud83c\udf31) 1597848809
OR projected on the cruise liner the messages "SORT YOUR SHIP OUT" and "THE WORLD IS DESTROYING OUR WORLD." The activists raised alarm about the polluting impact of the ship's fuel, citing 2019 research (pdf) by the European campaign group Transport & Environment (T&E).
"Luxury cruise ships are floating cities powered by some of the dirtiest fuel possible," said Faig Abbasov, shipping policy manager at T&E when the report was released, according to EuroNews. "Cities are rightly banning dirty diesel cars but they're giving a free pass to cruise companies that spew out toxic fumes that do immeasurable harm both to those on board and on nearby shores. This is unacceptable."
The fresh criticism from OR this past week prompted a spokesperson for the ship to push back in the press, telling reporters that "The World is a clean class vessel that conforms to industry best practices regarding emissions, water treatment, sewage plant, and waste management systems."
\u201cThe fuel cruise ships burn is 100 times more polluting than the fuel we allow on roads \ud83d\udea2vs \ud83d\ude97\ud83d\ude9b\n\n\u26a0\ufe0fThis has a huge environmental impact on oceans, their ecosystems and on air quality in the coastal communities visited by these ships\n\n#sortyourshipout\n\nhttps://t.co/4uZSWjVZB8\u201d— Transport & Environment (@Transport & Environment) 1597399214
While OR has set its sights on the cruise liner, and warns that "the climate impact of shipping is mushrooming," the movement also plans to pursue actions focused on overfishing and deep sea mining as well as how global heating threatens marine ecosystems. According to The Guardian, which reported on the movement Friday:
Rob Higgs, 44, a member of the group and inventor who lives in a 30-foot fishing boat in Falmouth with his family, said Ocean Rebellion was small, with about 50 activists, and grew out of the XR movement. But there were big differences between the two groups, he said, including a reluctance by OR to use arrest as a means of protest. Ocean Rebellion is a separate organization, with a non-hierarchical structure.
"What we were doing is entirely legal," he said of the first protest. "My motive is to raise awareness out there, to get people talking. I didn't know how polluting the cruise industry is, but I do now. We need systemic change in shipping."
Ocean Rebellion activists plan to participate in a "rebellion" in London scheduled to start September 1, the group's statement said. OR members will also "join other movements for the Marine Extinction March celebrating the glorious, beautiful biodiversity found in our seas," the group added. "We will grieve the destruction of our oceans and marine life due to climate breakdown and human interference, and the loss of lives, homes, and livelihoods from rising sea levels."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
A new grassroots climate movement called Ocean Rebellion officially launched this week with non-violent direct actions targeting a luxury cruise liner docked at the United Kingdom's Falmouth Harbor as part of a broader effort to raise awareness of the environmental impact of cruise shipping.
As the "sea-faring sister" of Extinction Rebellion (XR), Ocean Rebellion "has at its heart a commitment to engage with global high seas stakeholders, so as to address cascading collapses in biodiversity due to overfishing, human-caused climate change, deep sea mining, and other marine emergencies."
The marine-focused movement, also called OR, detailed its members' three key demands in a statement Wednesday:
The group added that "if the U.N. fails in this high purpose then a global citizens' assembly will convene to assume governance."
"The oceans are the lungs of the world, it creates our weather and life on the planet began there. And yet many of us have a real disconnect from it now," said Sophie Miller of XR Falmouth. "I feel it's so important to create and participate in actions like these to raise awareness and to engage people in a wider conversation about the seas and our future."
In a warning that shortly preceded the release of new satellite data revealing the Greenland ice sheet reached a new record loss of mass in 2019, Miller said that "with the melting of the Greenland ice shelf and the fact we are currently on track to significantly overshoot 1.5 degrees of warming, this is more important than ever."
"We also need to be aware that those in the global South are currently on the front line and are already experiencing the disastrous effects of this disconnect," she added. "Communities are suffering. People are dying and this is going to get worse unless we act now. I'm just a human and a mother who wants a habitable planet for the future."
Following a similar pre-launch action last week, OR activists on Tuesday night targeted The World, which reportedly claims to be "the largest residential cruise ship on the planet." The ship is currently moored in Falmouth Harbor in Cornwall without any residents in its multimillion-dollar apartments, due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
\u201c@OceanRebellion \ud83d\udea2 has taken to the seas with an escalating series of non-violent actions against The World luxury apartment \ud83d\udea2 liner, currently moored in Falmouth Harbour. \u2018The World\u2019 emits 10 x times more greenhouse gases per person per mile than a jumbo jet. \ud83d\udcf7 Guy Reece\u201d— Extinction Rebellion Hackney \ud83d\udeb2\ud83d\udc1d\ud83c\udf31 (@Extinction Rebellion Hackney \ud83d\udeb2\ud83d\udc1d\ud83c\udf31) 1597848809
OR projected on the cruise liner the messages "SORT YOUR SHIP OUT" and "THE WORLD IS DESTROYING OUR WORLD." The activists raised alarm about the polluting impact of the ship's fuel, citing 2019 research (pdf) by the European campaign group Transport & Environment (T&E).
"Luxury cruise ships are floating cities powered by some of the dirtiest fuel possible," said Faig Abbasov, shipping policy manager at T&E when the report was released, according to EuroNews. "Cities are rightly banning dirty diesel cars but they're giving a free pass to cruise companies that spew out toxic fumes that do immeasurable harm both to those on board and on nearby shores. This is unacceptable."
The fresh criticism from OR this past week prompted a spokesperson for the ship to push back in the press, telling reporters that "The World is a clean class vessel that conforms to industry best practices regarding emissions, water treatment, sewage plant, and waste management systems."
\u201cThe fuel cruise ships burn is 100 times more polluting than the fuel we allow on roads \ud83d\udea2vs \ud83d\ude97\ud83d\ude9b\n\n\u26a0\ufe0fThis has a huge environmental impact on oceans, their ecosystems and on air quality in the coastal communities visited by these ships\n\n#sortyourshipout\n\nhttps://t.co/4uZSWjVZB8\u201d— Transport & Environment (@Transport & Environment) 1597399214
While OR has set its sights on the cruise liner, and warns that "the climate impact of shipping is mushrooming," the movement also plans to pursue actions focused on overfishing and deep sea mining as well as how global heating threatens marine ecosystems. According to The Guardian, which reported on the movement Friday:
Rob Higgs, 44, a member of the group and inventor who lives in a 30-foot fishing boat in Falmouth with his family, said Ocean Rebellion was small, with about 50 activists, and grew out of the XR movement. But there were big differences between the two groups, he said, including a reluctance by OR to use arrest as a means of protest. Ocean Rebellion is a separate organization, with a non-hierarchical structure.
"What we were doing is entirely legal," he said of the first protest. "My motive is to raise awareness out there, to get people talking. I didn't know how polluting the cruise industry is, but I do now. We need systemic change in shipping."
Ocean Rebellion activists plan to participate in a "rebellion" in London scheduled to start September 1, the group's statement said. OR members will also "join other movements for the Marine Extinction March celebrating the glorious, beautiful biodiversity found in our seas," the group added. "We will grieve the destruction of our oceans and marine life due to climate breakdown and human interference, and the loss of lives, homes, and livelihoods from rising sea levels."
A new grassroots climate movement called Ocean Rebellion officially launched this week with non-violent direct actions targeting a luxury cruise liner docked at the United Kingdom's Falmouth Harbor as part of a broader effort to raise awareness of the environmental impact of cruise shipping.
As the "sea-faring sister" of Extinction Rebellion (XR), Ocean Rebellion "has at its heart a commitment to engage with global high seas stakeholders, so as to address cascading collapses in biodiversity due to overfishing, human-caused climate change, deep sea mining, and other marine emergencies."
The marine-focused movement, also called OR, detailed its members' three key demands in a statement Wednesday:
The group added that "if the U.N. fails in this high purpose then a global citizens' assembly will convene to assume governance."
"The oceans are the lungs of the world, it creates our weather and life on the planet began there. And yet many of us have a real disconnect from it now," said Sophie Miller of XR Falmouth. "I feel it's so important to create and participate in actions like these to raise awareness and to engage people in a wider conversation about the seas and our future."
In a warning that shortly preceded the release of new satellite data revealing the Greenland ice sheet reached a new record loss of mass in 2019, Miller said that "with the melting of the Greenland ice shelf and the fact we are currently on track to significantly overshoot 1.5 degrees of warming, this is more important than ever."
"We also need to be aware that those in the global South are currently on the front line and are already experiencing the disastrous effects of this disconnect," she added. "Communities are suffering. People are dying and this is going to get worse unless we act now. I'm just a human and a mother who wants a habitable planet for the future."
Following a similar pre-launch action last week, OR activists on Tuesday night targeted The World, which reportedly claims to be "the largest residential cruise ship on the planet." The ship is currently moored in Falmouth Harbor in Cornwall without any residents in its multimillion-dollar apartments, due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
\u201c@OceanRebellion \ud83d\udea2 has taken to the seas with an escalating series of non-violent actions against The World luxury apartment \ud83d\udea2 liner, currently moored in Falmouth Harbour. \u2018The World\u2019 emits 10 x times more greenhouse gases per person per mile than a jumbo jet. \ud83d\udcf7 Guy Reece\u201d— Extinction Rebellion Hackney \ud83d\udeb2\ud83d\udc1d\ud83c\udf31 (@Extinction Rebellion Hackney \ud83d\udeb2\ud83d\udc1d\ud83c\udf31) 1597848809
OR projected on the cruise liner the messages "SORT YOUR SHIP OUT" and "THE WORLD IS DESTROYING OUR WORLD." The activists raised alarm about the polluting impact of the ship's fuel, citing 2019 research (pdf) by the European campaign group Transport & Environment (T&E).
"Luxury cruise ships are floating cities powered by some of the dirtiest fuel possible," said Faig Abbasov, shipping policy manager at T&E when the report was released, according to EuroNews. "Cities are rightly banning dirty diesel cars but they're giving a free pass to cruise companies that spew out toxic fumes that do immeasurable harm both to those on board and on nearby shores. This is unacceptable."
The fresh criticism from OR this past week prompted a spokesperson for the ship to push back in the press, telling reporters that "The World is a clean class vessel that conforms to industry best practices regarding emissions, water treatment, sewage plant, and waste management systems."
\u201cThe fuel cruise ships burn is 100 times more polluting than the fuel we allow on roads \ud83d\udea2vs \ud83d\ude97\ud83d\ude9b\n\n\u26a0\ufe0fThis has a huge environmental impact on oceans, their ecosystems and on air quality in the coastal communities visited by these ships\n\n#sortyourshipout\n\nhttps://t.co/4uZSWjVZB8\u201d— Transport & Environment (@Transport & Environment) 1597399214
While OR has set its sights on the cruise liner, and warns that "the climate impact of shipping is mushrooming," the movement also plans to pursue actions focused on overfishing and deep sea mining as well as how global heating threatens marine ecosystems. According to The Guardian, which reported on the movement Friday:
Rob Higgs, 44, a member of the group and inventor who lives in a 30-foot fishing boat in Falmouth with his family, said Ocean Rebellion was small, with about 50 activists, and grew out of the XR movement. But there were big differences between the two groups, he said, including a reluctance by OR to use arrest as a means of protest. Ocean Rebellion is a separate organization, with a non-hierarchical structure.
"What we were doing is entirely legal," he said of the first protest. "My motive is to raise awareness out there, to get people talking. I didn't know how polluting the cruise industry is, but I do now. We need systemic change in shipping."
Ocean Rebellion activists plan to participate in a "rebellion" in London scheduled to start September 1, the group's statement said. OR members will also "join other movements for the Marine Extinction March celebrating the glorious, beautiful biodiversity found in our seas," the group added. "We will grieve the destruction of our oceans and marine life due to climate breakdown and human interference, and the loss of lives, homes, and livelihoods from rising sea levels."
The senator said the negotiations could be "a positive step forward" after three and a half years of war.
Echoing the concerns of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders about an upcoming summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday said the interests of Ukrainians must be represented in any talks regarding an end to the fighting between the two countries—but expressed hope that the negotiations planned for August 15 will be "a positive step forward."
On CNN's "State of the Union," Sanders (I-Vt.) told anchor Dana Bash that Ukraine "has got to be part of the discussion" regarding a potential cease-fire between Russia and Ukraine, which Putin said last week he would agree to in exchange for major land concessions in Eastern Ukraine.
Putin reportedly proposed a deal in which Ukraine would withdraw its armed forces from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, giving Russia full control of the two areas along with Crimea, which it annexed in 2014.
On Friday, Trump said a peace deal could include "some swapping of territories"—but did not mention potential security guarantees for Ukraine, or what territories the country might gain control of—and announced that talks had been scheduled between the White House and Putin in Alaska this coming Friday.
As Trump announced the meeting, a deadline he had set earlier for Putin to agree to a cease-fire or face "secondary sanctions" targeting countries that buy oil from Russia passed.
Zelenskyy on Saturday rejected the suggestion that Ukraine would accept any deal brokered by the U.S. and Russia without the input of his government—especially one that includes land concessions. In a video statement on the social media platform X, Zelenskyy said that "Ukraine is ready for real decisions that can bring peace."
"Any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace," he said. "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier."
Sanders on Sunday agreed that "it can't be Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump" deciding the terms of a peace deal to end the war that the United Nations says has killed more than 13,000 Ukrainian civilians since Russia began its invasion in February 2022.
"If in fact an agreement can be negotiated which does not compromise what the Ukrainians feel they need, I think that's a positive step forward. We all want to see an end to the bloodshed," said Sanders. "The people of Ukraine obviously have got to have a significant say. It is their country, so if the people of Ukraine feel it is a positive agreement, that's good. If not, that's another story."
A senior White House official told NewsNation that the president is "open to a trilateral summit with both leaders."
"Right now, the White House is planning the bilateral meeting requested by President Putin," they said.
On Saturday, Vice President JD Vance took part in talks with European Union and Ukrainian officials in the United Kingdom, where Andriy Yermak, head of the Office of the President in Ukraine, said the country's positions were made "clear: a reliable, lasting peace is only possible with Ukraine at the negotiating table, with full respect for our sovereignty and without recognizing the occupation."
European leaders pushed for the inclusion of Zelenskyy in talks in a statement Saturday, saying Ukraine's vital interests "include the need for robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity."
"Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a cease-fire or reduction of hostilities," said the leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Cancellor Friedrich Merz, and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force."
At the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, British journalist and analyst Anatol Lieven wrote Saturday that the talks scheduled for next week are "an essential first step" toward ending the bloodshed in Ukraine, even though they include proposed land concessions that would be "painful" for Kyiv.
If Ukraine were to ultimately agree to ceding land to Russia, said Lieven, "Russia will need drastically to scale back its demands for Ukrainian 'denazification' and 'demilitarization,' which in their extreme form would mean Ukrainian regime change and disarmament—which no government in Kyiv could or should accept."
A recent Gallup poll showed 69% of Ukrainians now favor a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. In 2022, more than 70% believed the country should continue fighting until it achieved victory.
Suleiman Al-Obeid was killed by the Israel Defense Forces while seeking humanitarian aid.
Mohamed Salah, the Egyptian soccer star who plays for Liverpool's Premiere League club and serves as captain of Egypt's national team, had three questions for the Union of European Football Associations on Saturday after the governing body acknowledged the death of another venerated former player.
"Can you tell us how he died, where, and why?" asked Salah in response to the UEFA's vague tribute to Suleiman Al-Obeid, who was nicknamed the "Palestinian Pelé" during his career with the Palestinian National Team.
The soccer organization had written a simple 21-word "farewell" message to Al-Obeid, calling him "a talent who gave hope to countless children, even in the darkest of times."
The UEFA made no mention of reports from the Palestine Football Association that Al-Obeid last week became one of the nearly 1,400 Palestinians who have been killed while seeking aid since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israel- and U.S.-backed, privatized organization, began operating aid hubs in Gaza.
As with the Israel Defense Forces' killings of aid workers and bombings of so-called "safe zones" since Israel began bombarding Gaza in October 2023, the IDF has claimed its killings of Palestinians seeking desperately-needed food have been inadvertent—but Israeli soldiers themselves have described being ordered to shoot at civilians who approach the aid sites.
Salah has been an outspoken advocate for Palestinians since Israel began its attacks, which have killed more than 61,000 people, and imposed a near-total blockade that has caused an "unfolding" famine, according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification. At least 217 Palestinians have now starved to death, including at least 100 children.
The Peace and Justice Project, founded by British Parliament member Jeremy Corbyn, applauded Salah's criticism of UEFA.
The Palestine Football Association released a statement saying, "Former national team player and star of the Khadamat al-Shati team, Suleiman Al-Obeid, was martyred after the occupation forces targeted those waiting for humanitarian aid in the southern Gaza Strip on Wednesday."
Al-Obeid represented the Palestinian team 24 times internationally and scored a famous goal against Yemen's National Team in the East Asian Federation's 2010 cup.
He is survived by his wife and five children, Al Jazeera reported.
Bassil Mikdadi, the founder of Football Palestine, told the outlet that he was surprised the UEFA acknowledged Al-Obeid's killing at all, considering the silence of international soccer federations regarding Israel's assault on Gaza, which is the subject of a genocide case at the International Court of Justice and has been called a genocide by numerous Holocaust scholars and human rights groups.
As Jules Boykoff wrote in a column at Common Dreams in June, the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) has mostly "looked the other way when it comes to Israel's attacks on Palestinians," and although the group joined the UEFA in expressing solidarity with Ukrainian players and civilians when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, "no such solidarity has been forthcoming for Palestinians."
Mikdadi noted that Al-Obeid "is not the first Palestinian footballer to perish in this genocide—there's been over 400—but he's by far the most prominent as of now."
Al-Obeid was killed days before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approved a plan to take over Gaza City—believed to be the first step in the eventual occupation of all of Gaza.
The United Nations Security Council was holding an emergency meeting Sunday to discuss Israel's move, with U.N. Assistant Secretary-General for Europe, Central Asia, and the Americas Miroslav Jenca warning the council that a full takeover would risk "igniting another horrific chapter in this conflict."
"We are already witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe of unimaginable scale in Gaza," said Jenca. "If these plans are implemented, they will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza, reverberating across the region and causing further forced displacement, killings, and destruction, compounding the unbearable suffering of the population."
"Whoever said West Virginia was a conservative state?" Sanders asked the crowd in Wheeling. "Somebody got it wrong."
On the latest leg of his Fighting Oligarchy Tour, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders headed to West Virginia for rallies on Friday and Saturday where he continued to speak out against the billionaire class's control over the political system and the Republican Party's cuts to healthcare, food assistance, and other social programs for millions of Americans—and prove that his message resonates with working people even in solidly red districts.
"Whoever said West Virginia was a conservative state?" Sanders (I-Vt.) asked a roaring, standing-room-only crowd at the Capitol Theater in Wheeling. "Somebody got it wrong."
As the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported, some in the crowd sported red bandanas around their necks—a nod to the state's long history of labor organizing and the thousands of coal mine workers who formed a multiracial coalition in 1921 and marched wearing bandanas for the right to join a union with fair pay and safety protections.
Sanders spoke to the crowd about how President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which was supported by all five Republican lawmakers who represent the districts Sanders is visiting this weekend, could impact their families and neighbors.
"Fifteen million Americans, including 50,000 right here in West Virginia, are going to lose their healthcare," Sanders said of the Medicaid cuts that are projected to amount to more than $1 trillion over the next decade. "Cuts to nutrition—literally taking food out of the mouths of hungry kids."
Seven hospitals are expected to shut down in the state as a result of the law's Medicaid cuts, and 84,000 West Virginians will lose Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, according to estimates.
Sanders continued his West Virginia tour with a stop in the small town of Lenore on Saturday afternoon and was scheduled to address a crowd in Charleston Saturday evening before heading to North Carolina for more rallies on Sunday.
The event in Lenore was a town hall, where the senator heard from residents of the area—which Trump won with 74% of the vote in 2024. Anna Bahr, Sanders' communications director, said more than 400 people came to hear the senator speak—equivalent to about a third of Lenore's population.
Sanders invited one young attendee on stage after she asked how Trump's domestic policy law's cuts to education are likely to affect poverty rates in West Virginia, which are some of the highest in the nation.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes a federal voucher program which education advocates warn will further drain funding from public schools, and the loss of Medicaid funding for states could lead to staff cuts in K-12 schools. The law also impacts higher education, imposing new limits for federal student loans.
"Sometimes I am attacked by my opponents for being far-left, fringe, out of touch with where America is," said Sanders. "Actually, much of what I talk about is exactly where America is... You are living in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, and if we had good policy and the courage to take on the billionaire class, there is no reason that every kid in this country could not get an excellent higher education, regardless of his or her income. That is not a radical idea."
Sanders' events scheduled for Sunday in North Carolina include a rally at 2:00 pm ET at the Steven Tanger Center for the Performing Arts in Greensboro and one at 6:00 pm ET at the Harrah Cherokee Center in Asheville.