An Uber Eats delivery worker is seen riding an electric scooter on March 19, 2020 in New York City. (Photo: Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images)
Regulators Urged to Block Uber's "Domination Game" Acquisition of Postmates
"These destructive delivery apps... were built to monopolize an essential service and reap profits for investors."
In a development that would expand the company's power in the food delivery app market, Uber announced Monday it agreed to acquire startup Postmates--prompting concern from anti-monopoly experts over the acquisition's threats to restaurants and delivery workers.
The news comes a month after Uber failed in its attempt to acquire Grubhub, a different food delivery app.
The boards of directors of Uber and Postmates have already signed off on the $2.65 billion all-stock transaction. The companies claimed in a joint statement that the deal would give customers "expanded choice" and delivery workers "more opportunities to earn income." The acquisition now faces regulatory review.
If approved, the Uber-Postmates joint venture would control a 37% share of food delivery sales in the U.S., putting it behind first place DoorDash at 45% and ahead of Grubhub at 17% share, the New York Times reported.
That playing field drew concern from the Open Markets Institute, which said "an oligopoly" of UberEats/Postmates, Grubhub, and DoorDash would control 99% of the food delivery app market, adding that the companies have engaged in "predatory behavior."
The group said the prospective merger raises Clayton Act concerns, referring to the legislation that bars acquisitions that stand to "substantially ...lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly."
As Gizmodo previously reported, Postmates, DoorDash, Uber Eats, and Grubhub were slapped with a class action lawsuit in April.
The complaint states that the companies are able to dictate pricing through the platform by imposing "unlawful" clauses against price competition
Additionally, the suit took aim at exploitative labor practices enabled by the gig economy and the delusional claim by these companies to their investors that eventually, the delivery drones of their wildest dreams will replace human workers who require actual pay--however meager--and who are driving up costs in the meantime.
The new statement from Open Markets says Uber will likely expand its market share even further, as it "deploys the myriad of anti-competitive tools at its disposal as a dominant tech platform."
The ultimate goal of the apps has always been clear, said Claire Kelloway, food researcher at Open Markets.
"These destructive delivery apps were not built to help restaurants, provide secure jobs, or even properly deliver food - they were built to monopolize an essential service and reap profits for investors," she said.
According to Kelloway, "To support small enterprising restaurateurs, protect workers, and rebuild vibrant main streets, enforcers need to stop Uber's domination game and block this deal."
The acquisition announcement also drew the attention of Stacy Mitchell, co-director of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, who pointed to a potential consequence on delivery workers:
The proposed acquisition is simply "bad news," wrote journalist Wilfred Chan, identifying himself in a Monday Twitter thread as a "as a part-time courier who works for both" Uber and Postmates.
"While both are staunch anti-worker companies, fewer and bigger players means even less worker leverage against platform capitalists," he wrote, warning that "with dwindling options, we'll be exploited even more harshly."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In a development that would expand the company's power in the food delivery app market, Uber announced Monday it agreed to acquire startup Postmates--prompting concern from anti-monopoly experts over the acquisition's threats to restaurants and delivery workers.
The news comes a month after Uber failed in its attempt to acquire Grubhub, a different food delivery app.
The boards of directors of Uber and Postmates have already signed off on the $2.65 billion all-stock transaction. The companies claimed in a joint statement that the deal would give customers "expanded choice" and delivery workers "more opportunities to earn income." The acquisition now faces regulatory review.
If approved, the Uber-Postmates joint venture would control a 37% share of food delivery sales in the U.S., putting it behind first place DoorDash at 45% and ahead of Grubhub at 17% share, the New York Times reported.
That playing field drew concern from the Open Markets Institute, which said "an oligopoly" of UberEats/Postmates, Grubhub, and DoorDash would control 99% of the food delivery app market, adding that the companies have engaged in "predatory behavior."
The group said the prospective merger raises Clayton Act concerns, referring to the legislation that bars acquisitions that stand to "substantially ...lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly."
As Gizmodo previously reported, Postmates, DoorDash, Uber Eats, and Grubhub were slapped with a class action lawsuit in April.
The complaint states that the companies are able to dictate pricing through the platform by imposing "unlawful" clauses against price competition
Additionally, the suit took aim at exploitative labor practices enabled by the gig economy and the delusional claim by these companies to their investors that eventually, the delivery drones of their wildest dreams will replace human workers who require actual pay--however meager--and who are driving up costs in the meantime.
The new statement from Open Markets says Uber will likely expand its market share even further, as it "deploys the myriad of anti-competitive tools at its disposal as a dominant tech platform."
The ultimate goal of the apps has always been clear, said Claire Kelloway, food researcher at Open Markets.
"These destructive delivery apps were not built to help restaurants, provide secure jobs, or even properly deliver food - they were built to monopolize an essential service and reap profits for investors," she said.
According to Kelloway, "To support small enterprising restaurateurs, protect workers, and rebuild vibrant main streets, enforcers need to stop Uber's domination game and block this deal."
The acquisition announcement also drew the attention of Stacy Mitchell, co-director of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, who pointed to a potential consequence on delivery workers:
The proposed acquisition is simply "bad news," wrote journalist Wilfred Chan, identifying himself in a Monday Twitter thread as a "as a part-time courier who works for both" Uber and Postmates.
"While both are staunch anti-worker companies, fewer and bigger players means even less worker leverage against platform capitalists," he wrote, warning that "with dwindling options, we'll be exploited even more harshly."
In a development that would expand the company's power in the food delivery app market, Uber announced Monday it agreed to acquire startup Postmates--prompting concern from anti-monopoly experts over the acquisition's threats to restaurants and delivery workers.
The news comes a month after Uber failed in its attempt to acquire Grubhub, a different food delivery app.
The boards of directors of Uber and Postmates have already signed off on the $2.65 billion all-stock transaction. The companies claimed in a joint statement that the deal would give customers "expanded choice" and delivery workers "more opportunities to earn income." The acquisition now faces regulatory review.
If approved, the Uber-Postmates joint venture would control a 37% share of food delivery sales in the U.S., putting it behind first place DoorDash at 45% and ahead of Grubhub at 17% share, the New York Times reported.
That playing field drew concern from the Open Markets Institute, which said "an oligopoly" of UberEats/Postmates, Grubhub, and DoorDash would control 99% of the food delivery app market, adding that the companies have engaged in "predatory behavior."
The group said the prospective merger raises Clayton Act concerns, referring to the legislation that bars acquisitions that stand to "substantially ...lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly."
As Gizmodo previously reported, Postmates, DoorDash, Uber Eats, and Grubhub were slapped with a class action lawsuit in April.
The complaint states that the companies are able to dictate pricing through the platform by imposing "unlawful" clauses against price competition
Additionally, the suit took aim at exploitative labor practices enabled by the gig economy and the delusional claim by these companies to their investors that eventually, the delivery drones of their wildest dreams will replace human workers who require actual pay--however meager--and who are driving up costs in the meantime.
The new statement from Open Markets says Uber will likely expand its market share even further, as it "deploys the myriad of anti-competitive tools at its disposal as a dominant tech platform."
The ultimate goal of the apps has always been clear, said Claire Kelloway, food researcher at Open Markets.
"These destructive delivery apps were not built to help restaurants, provide secure jobs, or even properly deliver food - they were built to monopolize an essential service and reap profits for investors," she said.
According to Kelloway, "To support small enterprising restaurateurs, protect workers, and rebuild vibrant main streets, enforcers need to stop Uber's domination game and block this deal."
The acquisition announcement also drew the attention of Stacy Mitchell, co-director of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, who pointed to a potential consequence on delivery workers:
The proposed acquisition is simply "bad news," wrote journalist Wilfred Chan, identifying himself in a Monday Twitter thread as a "as a part-time courier who works for both" Uber and Postmates.
"While both are staunch anti-worker companies, fewer and bigger players means even less worker leverage against platform capitalists," he wrote, warning that "with dwindling options, we'll be exploited even more harshly."