Surrounded by members of law enforcement, President Donald Trump holds up an executive order he signed on "Safe Policing for Safe Communities" during an event in the Rose Garden at the White House June 16, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
In Authoritarian Tirade, Trump Claims Americans 'Want Law and Order' Policing Whether They Know It or Not
Civil rights advocates slammed the president's law enforcement executive order as "a band-aid for a bullet wound."
Prior to signing an executive order approving law enforcement reforms that civil rights groups criticized as severely tone-deaf and inadequate, President Donald Trump on Tuesday delivered a rambling and authoritarian speech in which he defended U.S. police, attacked racial justice demonstrators, and proclaimed that Americans "want law and order" whether they know it or not.
"They demand law and order," Trump said of the U.S. public. "They may not say it, they may not be talking about it, but that's what they want. Some of them don't even know that's what they want, but that's what they want."
"This executive order is a woeful attempt to shift focus from the dangerous rhetoric and policies he has previously promoted. Piecemeal reform efforts will not achieve the transformative change needed to heal our country."
--Vanita Gupta, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Speaking in the Rose Garden of the White House to an audience filled with law enforcement officials and members of Congress, Trump downplayed the police violence that killed George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and countless others as the bad behavior of a "very tiny" number of officers.
The president was far less charitable when discussing the historic demonstrations against police violence that have spread across the United States and around the world since Floyd's killing at the hands of Minneapolis police officers on May 25.
"There will be no more looting or arson, and the penalty will be very grave for those who get caught," Trump said, zeroing in on property destruction by a small number of demonstrators. "Violence and destruction will not be tolerated. We cannot do that... Every day police officers make great sacrifices to make our communities secure and safe."
Trump also made a thinly-veiled and disapproving reference to the toppling of Confederate monuments by demonstrators in recent days. "We must build upon our heritage," the president said, "not tear it down."
Following his speech, Trump signed what the White House labeled an "Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safe Communities" that authorizes several limited reforms, including a ban on law enforcement use of chokeholds--"except if an officer's life is at risk"--and incentives for police departments to increase training for officers.
The measure falls far short of what civil rights activists and demonstrators have been demanding since Floyd's killing. Amnesty International's Kristina Roth immediately slammed the order as "a band-aid for a bullet wound."
"Trump's executive order is woefully anemic and fails to address critical issues such as racial profiling, qualified immunity for officers, and the need for national standards concerning use-of-force."
--Kristen Clarke, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under LawVanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said in a statement that while the order "takes some steps forward, it is an inadequate response to a nation demanding sweeping, bold action."
"Trump and his administration have taken every opportunity to dismantle federal police reform efforts, undercut accountability, and threaten the public with a militarized law enforcement response," said Gupta. "This executive order is a woeful attempt to shift focus from the dangerous rhetoric and policies he has previously promoted. Piecemeal reform efforts will not achieve the transformative change needed to heal our country and usher in a new era of public safety in which all communities thrive."
Trump signed the executive order in the Rose Garden while flanked by uniformed law enforcement officials who posed for a photo-op with the president.
Just before signing the order, Trump boasted that the measure was endorsed by "the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, the Fraternal Order of Police, International Association of Chiefs of Police, International Union of Police Associations, Major County Sheriffs of America Association, National Association of Police Organizations, National District Attorneys Association, National Sheriffs Association, Sergeants Benevolent Association, and many others."
Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said Trump's order is "not nearly as strong as his attacks on peaceful protesters."
"Trump's executive order is woefully anemic and fails to address critical issues such as racial profiling, qualified immunity for officers, and the need for national standards concerning use-of-force," said Clarke. "The order sugarcoats the grave national crisis of police violence and fails to acknowledge that racism and systemic discrimination have led to the deaths of unarmed black people at alarming rates."
"The order bears the imprint of police unions as reflected by the absence of any procedures for promoting accountability," said Clarke.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Prior to signing an executive order approving law enforcement reforms that civil rights groups criticized as severely tone-deaf and inadequate, President Donald Trump on Tuesday delivered a rambling and authoritarian speech in which he defended U.S. police, attacked racial justice demonstrators, and proclaimed that Americans "want law and order" whether they know it or not.
"They demand law and order," Trump said of the U.S. public. "They may not say it, they may not be talking about it, but that's what they want. Some of them don't even know that's what they want, but that's what they want."
"This executive order is a woeful attempt to shift focus from the dangerous rhetoric and policies he has previously promoted. Piecemeal reform efforts will not achieve the transformative change needed to heal our country."
--Vanita Gupta, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Speaking in the Rose Garden of the White House to an audience filled with law enforcement officials and members of Congress, Trump downplayed the police violence that killed George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and countless others as the bad behavior of a "very tiny" number of officers.
The president was far less charitable when discussing the historic demonstrations against police violence that have spread across the United States and around the world since Floyd's killing at the hands of Minneapolis police officers on May 25.
"There will be no more looting or arson, and the penalty will be very grave for those who get caught," Trump said, zeroing in on property destruction by a small number of demonstrators. "Violence and destruction will not be tolerated. We cannot do that... Every day police officers make great sacrifices to make our communities secure and safe."
Trump also made a thinly-veiled and disapproving reference to the toppling of Confederate monuments by demonstrators in recent days. "We must build upon our heritage," the president said, "not tear it down."
Following his speech, Trump signed what the White House labeled an "Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safe Communities" that authorizes several limited reforms, including a ban on law enforcement use of chokeholds--"except if an officer's life is at risk"--and incentives for police departments to increase training for officers.
The measure falls far short of what civil rights activists and demonstrators have been demanding since Floyd's killing. Amnesty International's Kristina Roth immediately slammed the order as "a band-aid for a bullet wound."
"Trump's executive order is woefully anemic and fails to address critical issues such as racial profiling, qualified immunity for officers, and the need for national standards concerning use-of-force."
--Kristen Clarke, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under LawVanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said in a statement that while the order "takes some steps forward, it is an inadequate response to a nation demanding sweeping, bold action."
"Trump and his administration have taken every opportunity to dismantle federal police reform efforts, undercut accountability, and threaten the public with a militarized law enforcement response," said Gupta. "This executive order is a woeful attempt to shift focus from the dangerous rhetoric and policies he has previously promoted. Piecemeal reform efforts will not achieve the transformative change needed to heal our country and usher in a new era of public safety in which all communities thrive."
Trump signed the executive order in the Rose Garden while flanked by uniformed law enforcement officials who posed for a photo-op with the president.
Just before signing the order, Trump boasted that the measure was endorsed by "the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, the Fraternal Order of Police, International Association of Chiefs of Police, International Union of Police Associations, Major County Sheriffs of America Association, National Association of Police Organizations, National District Attorneys Association, National Sheriffs Association, Sergeants Benevolent Association, and many others."
Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said Trump's order is "not nearly as strong as his attacks on peaceful protesters."
"Trump's executive order is woefully anemic and fails to address critical issues such as racial profiling, qualified immunity for officers, and the need for national standards concerning use-of-force," said Clarke. "The order sugarcoats the grave national crisis of police violence and fails to acknowledge that racism and systemic discrimination have led to the deaths of unarmed black people at alarming rates."
"The order bears the imprint of police unions as reflected by the absence of any procedures for promoting accountability," said Clarke.
Prior to signing an executive order approving law enforcement reforms that civil rights groups criticized as severely tone-deaf and inadequate, President Donald Trump on Tuesday delivered a rambling and authoritarian speech in which he defended U.S. police, attacked racial justice demonstrators, and proclaimed that Americans "want law and order" whether they know it or not.
"They demand law and order," Trump said of the U.S. public. "They may not say it, they may not be talking about it, but that's what they want. Some of them don't even know that's what they want, but that's what they want."
"This executive order is a woeful attempt to shift focus from the dangerous rhetoric and policies he has previously promoted. Piecemeal reform efforts will not achieve the transformative change needed to heal our country."
--Vanita Gupta, Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Speaking in the Rose Garden of the White House to an audience filled with law enforcement officials and members of Congress, Trump downplayed the police violence that killed George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and countless others as the bad behavior of a "very tiny" number of officers.
The president was far less charitable when discussing the historic demonstrations against police violence that have spread across the United States and around the world since Floyd's killing at the hands of Minneapolis police officers on May 25.
"There will be no more looting or arson, and the penalty will be very grave for those who get caught," Trump said, zeroing in on property destruction by a small number of demonstrators. "Violence and destruction will not be tolerated. We cannot do that... Every day police officers make great sacrifices to make our communities secure and safe."
Trump also made a thinly-veiled and disapproving reference to the toppling of Confederate monuments by demonstrators in recent days. "We must build upon our heritage," the president said, "not tear it down."
Following his speech, Trump signed what the White House labeled an "Executive Order on Safe Policing for Safe Communities" that authorizes several limited reforms, including a ban on law enforcement use of chokeholds--"except if an officer's life is at risk"--and incentives for police departments to increase training for officers.
The measure falls far short of what civil rights activists and demonstrators have been demanding since Floyd's killing. Amnesty International's Kristina Roth immediately slammed the order as "a band-aid for a bullet wound."
"Trump's executive order is woefully anemic and fails to address critical issues such as racial profiling, qualified immunity for officers, and the need for national standards concerning use-of-force."
--Kristen Clarke, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under LawVanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said in a statement that while the order "takes some steps forward, it is an inadequate response to a nation demanding sweeping, bold action."
"Trump and his administration have taken every opportunity to dismantle federal police reform efforts, undercut accountability, and threaten the public with a militarized law enforcement response," said Gupta. "This executive order is a woeful attempt to shift focus from the dangerous rhetoric and policies he has previously promoted. Piecemeal reform efforts will not achieve the transformative change needed to heal our country and usher in a new era of public safety in which all communities thrive."
Trump signed the executive order in the Rose Garden while flanked by uniformed law enforcement officials who posed for a photo-op with the president.
Just before signing the order, Trump boasted that the measure was endorsed by "the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, the Fraternal Order of Police, International Association of Chiefs of Police, International Union of Police Associations, Major County Sheriffs of America Association, National Association of Police Organizations, National District Attorneys Association, National Sheriffs Association, Sergeants Benevolent Association, and many others."
Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, said Trump's order is "not nearly as strong as his attacks on peaceful protesters."
"Trump's executive order is woefully anemic and fails to address critical issues such as racial profiling, qualified immunity for officers, and the need for national standards concerning use-of-force," said Clarke. "The order sugarcoats the grave national crisis of police violence and fails to acknowledge that racism and systemic discrimination have led to the deaths of unarmed black people at alarming rates."
"The order bears the imprint of police unions as reflected by the absence of any procedures for promoting accountability," said Clarke.