A volunteer holds a specimen bag while conducting drive-through coronavirus testing at Malibu City Hall on April 8, 2020. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Ocasio-Cortez Decries Trump Halt to Federal Funding of Coronavirus Testing as 'Completely Irresponsible' Amid Pandemic
"If anything, we should err on the side of testing 'too much'—we're *nowhere* near that."
Rep. Alexandria Coasio-Cortez slammed the Trump administration on Thursday in the wake of reporting that it will end federal funding for coronavirus testing sites around the country, reducing the number of places Americans can get checked for the deadly disease that has already infected at least 438,449 and killed 15,735 in the country.
The New York Democrat called the move "completely irresponsible."
"If anything, we should err on the side of testing 'too much,'" said Ocasio-Cortez, "we're *nowhere* near that."
The decision by President Donald Trump's administration to cease funding the Community-Based Testing Sites program was met with concern in states without the resources and internal funding mechanisms to handle continued testing for the virus at the level required.
As GQ reported, testing could help mitigate the spread of the coronavirus, but that doesn't seem to be Trump's top priority:
Widespread testing--a critical tool in fighting a pandemic--is still one of the biggest problems the country faces. But instead of expanded testing, the White House is taking the opposite approach. On Friday, the federal government will cut support for testing sites nationwide, forcing many cities and states to shut down some sites, according to NPR.
New York magazine's Matt Stieb noted that the president's main focus appears to be restarting the economy as soon as possible after the pandemic's peak. Such a move would require an aggressive public health initiative to test and track the virus, wrote Stieb, but that does not appear to be the strategy.
According to Stieb:
Instead of pursuing such a plan that is in line with its political goals, the White House will end federal support for coronavirus-testing sites on Friday, days before the crisis is expected to peak in the middle of next week. While the program providing resources was intended to serve as a stopgap measure, states have relied on it to help prop up their own testing efforts in the absence of a national coordinated testing strategy.
News of the funding shutdown was met with criticism from other progressives, including California state Senate hopeful Dave Min, who said on Twitter that the administration move "will worsen this pandemic" and bemoande the lack of leadership coming from Washington.
"What this crisis is making clear is that we need smart and competent people in the White House," said Min. "Trump and his merry band of idiots just don't cut it."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Rep. Alexandria Coasio-Cortez slammed the Trump administration on Thursday in the wake of reporting that it will end federal funding for coronavirus testing sites around the country, reducing the number of places Americans can get checked for the deadly disease that has already infected at least 438,449 and killed 15,735 in the country.
The New York Democrat called the move "completely irresponsible."
"If anything, we should err on the side of testing 'too much,'" said Ocasio-Cortez, "we're *nowhere* near that."
The decision by President Donald Trump's administration to cease funding the Community-Based Testing Sites program was met with concern in states without the resources and internal funding mechanisms to handle continued testing for the virus at the level required.
As GQ reported, testing could help mitigate the spread of the coronavirus, but that doesn't seem to be Trump's top priority:
Widespread testing--a critical tool in fighting a pandemic--is still one of the biggest problems the country faces. But instead of expanded testing, the White House is taking the opposite approach. On Friday, the federal government will cut support for testing sites nationwide, forcing many cities and states to shut down some sites, according to NPR.
New York magazine's Matt Stieb noted that the president's main focus appears to be restarting the economy as soon as possible after the pandemic's peak. Such a move would require an aggressive public health initiative to test and track the virus, wrote Stieb, but that does not appear to be the strategy.
According to Stieb:
Instead of pursuing such a plan that is in line with its political goals, the White House will end federal support for coronavirus-testing sites on Friday, days before the crisis is expected to peak in the middle of next week. While the program providing resources was intended to serve as a stopgap measure, states have relied on it to help prop up their own testing efforts in the absence of a national coordinated testing strategy.
News of the funding shutdown was met with criticism from other progressives, including California state Senate hopeful Dave Min, who said on Twitter that the administration move "will worsen this pandemic" and bemoande the lack of leadership coming from Washington.
"What this crisis is making clear is that we need smart and competent people in the White House," said Min. "Trump and his merry band of idiots just don't cut it."
Rep. Alexandria Coasio-Cortez slammed the Trump administration on Thursday in the wake of reporting that it will end federal funding for coronavirus testing sites around the country, reducing the number of places Americans can get checked for the deadly disease that has already infected at least 438,449 and killed 15,735 in the country.
The New York Democrat called the move "completely irresponsible."
"If anything, we should err on the side of testing 'too much,'" said Ocasio-Cortez, "we're *nowhere* near that."
The decision by President Donald Trump's administration to cease funding the Community-Based Testing Sites program was met with concern in states without the resources and internal funding mechanisms to handle continued testing for the virus at the level required.
As GQ reported, testing could help mitigate the spread of the coronavirus, but that doesn't seem to be Trump's top priority:
Widespread testing--a critical tool in fighting a pandemic--is still one of the biggest problems the country faces. But instead of expanded testing, the White House is taking the opposite approach. On Friday, the federal government will cut support for testing sites nationwide, forcing many cities and states to shut down some sites, according to NPR.
New York magazine's Matt Stieb noted that the president's main focus appears to be restarting the economy as soon as possible after the pandemic's peak. Such a move would require an aggressive public health initiative to test and track the virus, wrote Stieb, but that does not appear to be the strategy.
According to Stieb:
Instead of pursuing such a plan that is in line with its political goals, the White House will end federal support for coronavirus-testing sites on Friday, days before the crisis is expected to peak in the middle of next week. While the program providing resources was intended to serve as a stopgap measure, states have relied on it to help prop up their own testing efforts in the absence of a national coordinated testing strategy.
News of the funding shutdown was met with criticism from other progressives, including California state Senate hopeful Dave Min, who said on Twitter that the administration move "will worsen this pandemic" and bemoande the lack of leadership coming from Washington.
"What this crisis is making clear is that we need smart and competent people in the White House," said Min. "Trump and his merry band of idiots just don't cut it."