

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Smoke plume from the Maria Fire rises as seen from Santa Paula, California on Oct. 31, 2019. (Photo: Marcus Yam/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
New research published Monday warns that extreme weather driven by the climate crisis could bring about an economic recession "the likes of which we've never seen before" if markets don't do a better job assessing climate risks.
Paul Griffin, an accounting professor at the University of California, Davis Graduate School of Management, wrote in a paper for Nature Energy that financial markets have not sufficiently accounted for the major economic risks posed by the global climate crisis, even as extreme weather--from destructive hurricanes to prolonged drought--wreaks havoc across the globe.
"Unpriced risk was the main cause of the Great Recession in 2007-2008," Griffin wrote. "Right now, energy companies shoulder much of that risk. The market needs to better assess risk, and factor a risk of extreme weather into securities prices... Without better knowledge of this risk, the average energy investor can only hope that the next extreme event will not trigger a sudden correction to the market values of energy firms."
Griffin continued:
This past summer, the United States and Europe experienced record-breaking heat. Now linked reliably to climate change, excessive high temperature is among the deadliest of weather extremes. Not only can it disrupt agriculture, harm human health, and stunt economic growth, it can also overwhelm--and temporarily shut down--large parts of a state's or a nation's energy system, as in the case of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) in California.
Extreme heat events can create uncertain and longer duration power outages, threaten critical infrastructure, exacerbate energy supply and demand imbalances, and trigger significant legal liability for energy firms. Newer reports of an increase in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, moreover, amplify those risks for energy firms.
Despite these obvious risks, investors and asset managers have been conspicuously slow to connect physical climate risk from extreme weather events to company market valuations.
Griffin is not the first financial expert to raise alarm about the potentially calamitous economic impacts of the climate crisis--which would come in addition to the emergency's incalculable effects on humans, animals, plants, insects, and the planet as a whole.
The Switzerland-based Bank for International Settlements warned in a 115-page report (pdf) last month that the "increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events could trigger non-linear and irreversible financial losses."
"Climate change poses unprecedented challenges to human societies," the report stated, "and our community of central banks and supervisors cannot consider itself immune to the risks ahead of us."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
New research published Monday warns that extreme weather driven by the climate crisis could bring about an economic recession "the likes of which we've never seen before" if markets don't do a better job assessing climate risks.
Paul Griffin, an accounting professor at the University of California, Davis Graduate School of Management, wrote in a paper for Nature Energy that financial markets have not sufficiently accounted for the major economic risks posed by the global climate crisis, even as extreme weather--from destructive hurricanes to prolonged drought--wreaks havoc across the globe.
"Unpriced risk was the main cause of the Great Recession in 2007-2008," Griffin wrote. "Right now, energy companies shoulder much of that risk. The market needs to better assess risk, and factor a risk of extreme weather into securities prices... Without better knowledge of this risk, the average energy investor can only hope that the next extreme event will not trigger a sudden correction to the market values of energy firms."
Griffin continued:
This past summer, the United States and Europe experienced record-breaking heat. Now linked reliably to climate change, excessive high temperature is among the deadliest of weather extremes. Not only can it disrupt agriculture, harm human health, and stunt economic growth, it can also overwhelm--and temporarily shut down--large parts of a state's or a nation's energy system, as in the case of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) in California.
Extreme heat events can create uncertain and longer duration power outages, threaten critical infrastructure, exacerbate energy supply and demand imbalances, and trigger significant legal liability for energy firms. Newer reports of an increase in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, moreover, amplify those risks for energy firms.
Despite these obvious risks, investors and asset managers have been conspicuously slow to connect physical climate risk from extreme weather events to company market valuations.
Griffin is not the first financial expert to raise alarm about the potentially calamitous economic impacts of the climate crisis--which would come in addition to the emergency's incalculable effects on humans, animals, plants, insects, and the planet as a whole.
The Switzerland-based Bank for International Settlements warned in a 115-page report (pdf) last month that the "increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events could trigger non-linear and irreversible financial losses."
"Climate change poses unprecedented challenges to human societies," the report stated, "and our community of central banks and supervisors cannot consider itself immune to the risks ahead of us."
New research published Monday warns that extreme weather driven by the climate crisis could bring about an economic recession "the likes of which we've never seen before" if markets don't do a better job assessing climate risks.
Paul Griffin, an accounting professor at the University of California, Davis Graduate School of Management, wrote in a paper for Nature Energy that financial markets have not sufficiently accounted for the major economic risks posed by the global climate crisis, even as extreme weather--from destructive hurricanes to prolonged drought--wreaks havoc across the globe.
"Unpriced risk was the main cause of the Great Recession in 2007-2008," Griffin wrote. "Right now, energy companies shoulder much of that risk. The market needs to better assess risk, and factor a risk of extreme weather into securities prices... Without better knowledge of this risk, the average energy investor can only hope that the next extreme event will not trigger a sudden correction to the market values of energy firms."
Griffin continued:
This past summer, the United States and Europe experienced record-breaking heat. Now linked reliably to climate change, excessive high temperature is among the deadliest of weather extremes. Not only can it disrupt agriculture, harm human health, and stunt economic growth, it can also overwhelm--and temporarily shut down--large parts of a state's or a nation's energy system, as in the case of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) in California.
Extreme heat events can create uncertain and longer duration power outages, threaten critical infrastructure, exacerbate energy supply and demand imbalances, and trigger significant legal liability for energy firms. Newer reports of an increase in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, moreover, amplify those risks for energy firms.
Despite these obvious risks, investors and asset managers have been conspicuously slow to connect physical climate risk from extreme weather events to company market valuations.
Griffin is not the first financial expert to raise alarm about the potentially calamitous economic impacts of the climate crisis--which would come in addition to the emergency's incalculable effects on humans, animals, plants, insects, and the planet as a whole.
The Switzerland-based Bank for International Settlements warned in a 115-page report (pdf) last month that the "increase in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events could trigger non-linear and irreversible financial losses."
"Climate change poses unprecedented challenges to human societies," the report stated, "and our community of central banks and supervisors cannot consider itself immune to the risks ahead of us."