The BMJ last week announced its fossil fuel divestment campaign. (Photo: 350.org/flickr/cc)
Jan 26, 2020
Respected medical journal The BMJ drew praise online from climate activists and medical professionals for its newly-announced fossil fuel divestment campaign.
"Thank you for your leadership," pediatrician and child psychiatrist Elizabeth Pinsky wrote Friday on Twitter.
\u201cThe case for divestment from fossil fuels is clear. We call on health professionals and medical organisations to act now. Divestment is one way of exerting influence on politicians and industry on behalf of patients and the public @fgodlee @KamranAbbasi https://t.co/qjuHV2mgRX\u201d— The BMJ (@The BMJ) 1579800462
In an editorial published January 23 and entitled "Investing in Humanity: The BMJ's divestment campaign," the journal's executive editor, Kamran Abbasi, and editor in chief, Fiona Godlee, explained how fossil fuel divestment can restore hope that's "not yet abandoned in our world today" but "merely besieged" and exert pressure on politicians and the industry putting the planet's--and therefore humanity's--health in peril.
The publication will not accept funding or advertising from the industry, Abbasi and Godlee wrote. "We will also explore how else our business might be dependent on fossil fuel companies and take steps to end any such reliance. The BMA [the journal's owner] has no direct holdings in tobacco or fossil fuel companies."
"We are clear that income from companies that produce fossil fuels is revenue that The BMJ does not want now or in the future," they added.
The editorial praised other medical organizations like the AMA who have already pledged to divest from fossil fuels. "Health professionals and medical organizations should not accept the world as it is," wrote Abbasi and Godlee. "Taking action is a duty to the people we serve and to future generations."
The piece was also a call to action.
Abbasi and Godlee encouraged other medical professionals and health organizations to sign an online declaration of intent to divest from fossil fuels and to back that action up with divestment in personal finances.
"Divestment offers us an opportunity to end despair and disempowerment, to begin to reclaim our world from misguided political and commercial agendas," the editorial said. "By divesting now we wish to restore hope for the future wellbeing of our planet and for human health."
Keith Stewart, climate and energy campaigner with Greenpeace Canada, shared the editorial on social media, writing, "Fossil fuels are the new tobacco."
"The footnotes alone are devastating to the climate delayers' case," he added.
Others welcomed the new campaign as well:
\u201cSon of a gun, the British Medical Journal launches a campaign for fossil fuel divestment, also announces will no longer accept ads from fossil fuel companies or publish research they fund!!! https://t.co/yF5lpaVQ2Y\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1580080898
\u201cThe BMJ launches a fossil fuel divestment campaign! \nA stellar set of ambitions:\n- encourage medical organisations to divest\n- refuse advertising and research funded by fossil fuels\n- eliminate any dependency the BMJ has on fossil fuel companies\n\nhttps://t.co/ubYOfqWy9k\u201d— Divest Parliament (@Divest Parliament) 1580132302
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Respected medical journal The BMJ drew praise online from climate activists and medical professionals for its newly-announced fossil fuel divestment campaign.
"Thank you for your leadership," pediatrician and child psychiatrist Elizabeth Pinsky wrote Friday on Twitter.
\u201cThe case for divestment from fossil fuels is clear. We call on health professionals and medical organisations to act now. Divestment is one way of exerting influence on politicians and industry on behalf of patients and the public @fgodlee @KamranAbbasi https://t.co/qjuHV2mgRX\u201d— The BMJ (@The BMJ) 1579800462
In an editorial published January 23 and entitled "Investing in Humanity: The BMJ's divestment campaign," the journal's executive editor, Kamran Abbasi, and editor in chief, Fiona Godlee, explained how fossil fuel divestment can restore hope that's "not yet abandoned in our world today" but "merely besieged" and exert pressure on politicians and the industry putting the planet's--and therefore humanity's--health in peril.
The publication will not accept funding or advertising from the industry, Abbasi and Godlee wrote. "We will also explore how else our business might be dependent on fossil fuel companies and take steps to end any such reliance. The BMA [the journal's owner] has no direct holdings in tobacco or fossil fuel companies."
"We are clear that income from companies that produce fossil fuels is revenue that The BMJ does not want now or in the future," they added.
The editorial praised other medical organizations like the AMA who have already pledged to divest from fossil fuels. "Health professionals and medical organizations should not accept the world as it is," wrote Abbasi and Godlee. "Taking action is a duty to the people we serve and to future generations."
The piece was also a call to action.
Abbasi and Godlee encouraged other medical professionals and health organizations to sign an online declaration of intent to divest from fossil fuels and to back that action up with divestment in personal finances.
"Divestment offers us an opportunity to end despair and disempowerment, to begin to reclaim our world from misguided political and commercial agendas," the editorial said. "By divesting now we wish to restore hope for the future wellbeing of our planet and for human health."
Keith Stewart, climate and energy campaigner with Greenpeace Canada, shared the editorial on social media, writing, "Fossil fuels are the new tobacco."
"The footnotes alone are devastating to the climate delayers' case," he added.
Others welcomed the new campaign as well:
\u201cSon of a gun, the British Medical Journal launches a campaign for fossil fuel divestment, also announces will no longer accept ads from fossil fuel companies or publish research they fund!!! https://t.co/yF5lpaVQ2Y\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1580080898
\u201cThe BMJ launches a fossil fuel divestment campaign! \nA stellar set of ambitions:\n- encourage medical organisations to divest\n- refuse advertising and research funded by fossil fuels\n- eliminate any dependency the BMJ has on fossil fuel companies\n\nhttps://t.co/ubYOfqWy9k\u201d— Divest Parliament (@Divest Parliament) 1580132302
Respected medical journal The BMJ drew praise online from climate activists and medical professionals for its newly-announced fossil fuel divestment campaign.
"Thank you for your leadership," pediatrician and child psychiatrist Elizabeth Pinsky wrote Friday on Twitter.
\u201cThe case for divestment from fossil fuels is clear. We call on health professionals and medical organisations to act now. Divestment is one way of exerting influence on politicians and industry on behalf of patients and the public @fgodlee @KamranAbbasi https://t.co/qjuHV2mgRX\u201d— The BMJ (@The BMJ) 1579800462
In an editorial published January 23 and entitled "Investing in Humanity: The BMJ's divestment campaign," the journal's executive editor, Kamran Abbasi, and editor in chief, Fiona Godlee, explained how fossil fuel divestment can restore hope that's "not yet abandoned in our world today" but "merely besieged" and exert pressure on politicians and the industry putting the planet's--and therefore humanity's--health in peril.
The publication will not accept funding or advertising from the industry, Abbasi and Godlee wrote. "We will also explore how else our business might be dependent on fossil fuel companies and take steps to end any such reliance. The BMA [the journal's owner] has no direct holdings in tobacco or fossil fuel companies."
"We are clear that income from companies that produce fossil fuels is revenue that The BMJ does not want now or in the future," they added.
The editorial praised other medical organizations like the AMA who have already pledged to divest from fossil fuels. "Health professionals and medical organizations should not accept the world as it is," wrote Abbasi and Godlee. "Taking action is a duty to the people we serve and to future generations."
The piece was also a call to action.
Abbasi and Godlee encouraged other medical professionals and health organizations to sign an online declaration of intent to divest from fossil fuels and to back that action up with divestment in personal finances.
"Divestment offers us an opportunity to end despair and disempowerment, to begin to reclaim our world from misguided political and commercial agendas," the editorial said. "By divesting now we wish to restore hope for the future wellbeing of our planet and for human health."
Keith Stewart, climate and energy campaigner with Greenpeace Canada, shared the editorial on social media, writing, "Fossil fuels are the new tobacco."
"The footnotes alone are devastating to the climate delayers' case," he added.
Others welcomed the new campaign as well:
\u201cSon of a gun, the British Medical Journal launches a campaign for fossil fuel divestment, also announces will no longer accept ads from fossil fuel companies or publish research they fund!!! https://t.co/yF5lpaVQ2Y\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1580080898
\u201cThe BMJ launches a fossil fuel divestment campaign! \nA stellar set of ambitions:\n- encourage medical organisations to divest\n- refuse advertising and research funded by fossil fuels\n- eliminate any dependency the BMJ has on fossil fuel companies\n\nhttps://t.co/ubYOfqWy9k\u201d— Divest Parliament (@Divest Parliament) 1580132302
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.