Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Corporate gatekeepers and big tech monopolists are making it more difficult than ever for independent media to survive. Please chip in today.

Drivers take part in a rally demanding more job security and livable incomes at Uber and Lyft New York City headquarters on May 8, 2019. (Photo: Johannes Eisele/AFP/Getty Images)

Uber-Postmates Lawsuit Targeting New California Labor Law Decried as 'Greedy Scheme' Against Workers

"Gig companies like Uber and Postmates are literally banking on the exploitation of workers who live beneath the poverty line."

Julia Conley

Pro-labor state lawmakers in California derided the Silicon Valley companies Uber and Postmates as "greedy" on Tuesday after the corporations filed a federal lawsuit to block the state's new law protecting freelancers from taking effect.

Assembly Bill 5 is set to enter into force on Wednesday, but the two companies are seeking an injunction and asking for more time to negotiate a deal with the state regarding how they must treat their workers.

Under the bill, all companies in California would be required to classify their workers as employees rather than independent contractors in most cases. Companies in the "gig economy— including Uber, Postmates, and Lyft—would have to provide their drivers with the state minimum wage of $12 per hour, protect them with overtime rules, workers' compensation, and unemployment insurance, and contribute payroll taxes for Medicare and Social Security. 

The attempt by Uber and Postmates to block the law amounts to "nothing but a greedy scheme to avoid paying workers the wages and benefits they are owed," said state Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon on Tuesday.

Uber and Postmates, along with two of their workers who joined the suit, argued in court filings that A.B. 5 is unfair because certain companies are exempt from the law; the rules would apply to companies which control when and how their employees work and to employees whose work is essential to the companies' business.

The companies claimed that state Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, the author of A.B. 5, acted "irrationally" when she "attacked" the gig economy, in which poverty wages have forced some Uber drivers into homelessness.

"This hostility toward the on-demand economy held by Assemblywoman Gonzalez and many of her colleagues in the California legislature ultimately led to the passage of A.B. 5," Uber and Postmates said in their lawsuit.

Gonzalez embraced the accusation on Twitter, writing, "I did, and do" call the companies "bad employers."

The characterization of Gonzalez as "irrational" was "kind of a strange way to characterize a lawmaker doing public policy," tweeted Avi Asher-Schapiro of the Committee to Protect Journalists.

In a statement, Gonzalez condemned the "bizarre" effort by Uber and Postmates to portray A.B. 5 as unconstitutional.

"The one clear thing we know about Uber is they will do anything to try to exempt themselves from state regulations that make us all safer and their driver employees self-sufficient," Gonzalez said, an apparent reference to Uber's claim shortly after A.B. 5 passed in September that the law would not apply to the company.

The United Food and Commercial Workers Western States Council, which represents more than 200,000 workers in California, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona, said the lawsuit was an attempt by the companies "to delay accountability."

"Gig companies like Uber and Postmates are literally banking on the exploitation of workers who live beneath the poverty line, who sleep in their cars, and who worry about having enough money for their next meal," said Andrea Zinder, president of the Council. "Workers showed their strength when they stood together to pass this landmark law, and UFCW members will continue to stand behind A.B. 5 to ensure workers across California can protect their workplace rights."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

Texas Democrat Demands Federal Probe of Police Response to Uvalde Shooting

"State officials have provided conflicting accounts that are at odds with those provided by witnesses," said U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro.

Jake Johnson ·

'No Time to Waste': New Nationwide March For Our Lives Protests Set for June 11

"Together, we rose up four years ago. One million of us demanded change. We built a movement. We voted for new leaders. And the gun deaths increased. Now is the moment we march again."

Brett Wilkins ·

'We Need Fewer Guns in Schools, Not More': Teachers Reject GOP Call for Armed Educators

"Teachers should be teaching, not acting as armed security guards," the president of a leading teachers' union asserted in the wake of the Robb Elementary School massacre in Texas.

Brett Wilkins ·

Faith Leaders, Teachers Mobilize for Protests at NRA's Houston Meeting in Wake of Uvalde Massacre

"Don't look away," said one advocacy group. "Rally against the NRA."

Julia Conley ·

NY Appeals Court Rules Trump and Two of His Kids Must Testify in Financial Fraud Case

"Our investigation will continue undeterred because no one is above the law," said New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Kenny Stancil ·

Common Dreams Logo