SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
President Donald Trump stops to speak to reporters as he prepared to board Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House on January 19, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Pete Marovich/Getty Images)
White House Strategy on Impeachment: It Didn't Happen
The administration is reportedly basing its argument on an opinion piece in Bloomberg that one former federal prosecutor called "ridiculous."
Dec 21, 2019
On December 18, minutes after the U.S. House of Representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump two articles of abuse of power and obstruction of justice, CNN's Brian Stelter took to Twitter to announce "there is no way to deny: Trump has been impeached."
Reporting Saturday from CBS News, however, indicates that the White House may be about to do just that.
The administration is reportedly looking at claiming Trump was not impeached because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is holding back on sending the articles to the Senate until the upper chamber's Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) lays out the rules for how Trump's trial will be run, technically the president has not been impeached.
CBS News broke the story Saturday evening, citing two sources in the administration.
According to CBS News, the White House believes that a Thursday opinion piece written for Bloomberg News by Harvard Law Professor Noah Feldman is a solid basis for denying the president's impeachment.
Feldman argues that Pelosi holding the articles could mean that technically the president has not been impeached.
"If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn't truly impeached at all," writes Feldman. "That's because 'impeachment' under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached."
That argument works for the administration, which has been trying to find a way to reject the outcome since the December 18 vote:
The sources told CBS News that the White House views Pelosi's delay as "a Christmas gift." They plan to use the delay to argue that the Democrats have so little faith in their own case for impeachment, they are too scared to trigger a trial they know they will lose. The two sources also say that the president, while "angry" about what he views as an unfair process, is actually in a "very good mood," and feels confident he can win the messaging war via Twitter while lawmakers are back home for the holidays.
Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Friday said that the House holding back, for now, from sending the articles to the Senate meant that the nation was watching "America's first fake impeachment."
"One could make a fairly decent argument that the president wasn't really even impeached," said Ingraham, citing Feldman's opinion piece.
Denying the legitimacy of the vote's outcome is not new to the president and his allies.
Trump rejected the December 18 vote the very next day in comments to reporters at the White House.
"I don't feel like I'm being impeached," the president said. "It's a hoax."
\u201cNEW: "What does it feel like to be the third president in U.S. history to be impeached?" Pres. Trump is asked.\n\n"Well, I don't feel like I'm being impeached," he says. "It's a hoax." https://t.co/ve4JTln6Jx\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1576787986
Former federal prosecutor Elie Honig on CNN Saturday called Feldman's argument "ridiculous" and the product of what happens when "law professors get a little too clever."
"The Constitution is clear here," said Honig. "The Constitution gives the House the sole power to impeach and the Senate to try impeachments. There's nothing about a formal transmission. This is something that is made up."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
On December 18, minutes after the U.S. House of Representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump two articles of abuse of power and obstruction of justice, CNN's Brian Stelter took to Twitter to announce "there is no way to deny: Trump has been impeached."
Reporting Saturday from CBS News, however, indicates that the White House may be about to do just that.
The administration is reportedly looking at claiming Trump was not impeached because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is holding back on sending the articles to the Senate until the upper chamber's Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) lays out the rules for how Trump's trial will be run, technically the president has not been impeached.
CBS News broke the story Saturday evening, citing two sources in the administration.
According to CBS News, the White House believes that a Thursday opinion piece written for Bloomberg News by Harvard Law Professor Noah Feldman is a solid basis for denying the president's impeachment.
Feldman argues that Pelosi holding the articles could mean that technically the president has not been impeached.
"If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn't truly impeached at all," writes Feldman. "That's because 'impeachment' under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached."
That argument works for the administration, which has been trying to find a way to reject the outcome since the December 18 vote:
The sources told CBS News that the White House views Pelosi's delay as "a Christmas gift." They plan to use the delay to argue that the Democrats have so little faith in their own case for impeachment, they are too scared to trigger a trial they know they will lose. The two sources also say that the president, while "angry" about what he views as an unfair process, is actually in a "very good mood," and feels confident he can win the messaging war via Twitter while lawmakers are back home for the holidays.
Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Friday said that the House holding back, for now, from sending the articles to the Senate meant that the nation was watching "America's first fake impeachment."
"One could make a fairly decent argument that the president wasn't really even impeached," said Ingraham, citing Feldman's opinion piece.
Denying the legitimacy of the vote's outcome is not new to the president and his allies.
Trump rejected the December 18 vote the very next day in comments to reporters at the White House.
"I don't feel like I'm being impeached," the president said. "It's a hoax."
\u201cNEW: "What does it feel like to be the third president in U.S. history to be impeached?" Pres. Trump is asked.\n\n"Well, I don't feel like I'm being impeached," he says. "It's a hoax." https://t.co/ve4JTln6Jx\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1576787986
Former federal prosecutor Elie Honig on CNN Saturday called Feldman's argument "ridiculous" and the product of what happens when "law professors get a little too clever."
"The Constitution is clear here," said Honig. "The Constitution gives the House the sole power to impeach and the Senate to try impeachments. There's nothing about a formal transmission. This is something that is made up."
On December 18, minutes after the U.S. House of Representatives voted to impeach President Donald Trump two articles of abuse of power and obstruction of justice, CNN's Brian Stelter took to Twitter to announce "there is no way to deny: Trump has been impeached."
Reporting Saturday from CBS News, however, indicates that the White House may be about to do just that.
The administration is reportedly looking at claiming Trump was not impeached because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is holding back on sending the articles to the Senate until the upper chamber's Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) lays out the rules for how Trump's trial will be run, technically the president has not been impeached.
CBS News broke the story Saturday evening, citing two sources in the administration.
According to CBS News, the White House believes that a Thursday opinion piece written for Bloomberg News by Harvard Law Professor Noah Feldman is a solid basis for denying the president's impeachment.
Feldman argues that Pelosi holding the articles could mean that technically the president has not been impeached.
"If the articles are not transmitted, Trump could legitimately say that he wasn't truly impeached at all," writes Feldman. "That's because 'impeachment' under the Constitution means the House sending its approved articles of to the Senate, with House managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached."
That argument works for the administration, which has been trying to find a way to reject the outcome since the December 18 vote:
The sources told CBS News that the White House views Pelosi's delay as "a Christmas gift." They plan to use the delay to argue that the Democrats have so little faith in their own case for impeachment, they are too scared to trigger a trial they know they will lose. The two sources also say that the president, while "angry" about what he views as an unfair process, is actually in a "very good mood," and feels confident he can win the messaging war via Twitter while lawmakers are back home for the holidays.
Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Friday said that the House holding back, for now, from sending the articles to the Senate meant that the nation was watching "America's first fake impeachment."
"One could make a fairly decent argument that the president wasn't really even impeached," said Ingraham, citing Feldman's opinion piece.
Denying the legitimacy of the vote's outcome is not new to the president and his allies.
Trump rejected the December 18 vote the very next day in comments to reporters at the White House.
"I don't feel like I'm being impeached," the president said. "It's a hoax."
\u201cNEW: "What does it feel like to be the third president in U.S. history to be impeached?" Pres. Trump is asked.\n\n"Well, I don't feel like I'm being impeached," he says. "It's a hoax." https://t.co/ve4JTln6Jx\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1576787986
Former federal prosecutor Elie Honig on CNN Saturday called Feldman's argument "ridiculous" and the product of what happens when "law professors get a little too clever."
"The Constitution is clear here," said Honig. "The Constitution gives the House the sole power to impeach and the Senate to try impeachments. There's nothing about a formal transmission. This is something that is made up."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.