

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Sarah Pitlyk (R) is seen with other former law clerks for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh at an event at the Heritage Foundation on August 9, 2018. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
Democrats and progressive groups expressed outrage after the U.S. Senate voted Wednesday to confirm lawyer Sarah Pitlyk for a lifetime appointment on the federal bench.
The 49-44 vote to confirm Pitlyk for judge on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri continues the Trump administration's rapid, rightward shift of the federal courts, an accomplishment about which Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell regularly brags.
Currently special counsel at the anti-choice law firm Thomas More Society, Pitlyk was previously clerk to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh when he was judge for the federal appeals court for the District of Columbia Circuit. Pitlyk was among a group of Kavanaugh's former female law clerks who wrote to the Senate to express their "uniformly positive experiences" with Kavanaugh, who stands accused of sexual assault, during his confirmation process.
Pitlyk's record, according to Marge Baker, PFAW's executive vice president for policy and program, "is one of the worst we've seen among Trump judicial nominees." NARAL Pro-Choice America president lyse Hogue, for her part, called Pitlyk's confirmation to the Missouri federal court "a dream come true for the anti-choice movement and a profound danger to women and families in the state."
Among the factors driving the criticism is that the American Bar Association, in a letter (pdf) to the Senate in September, unanimously said that Pitlyk was "not qualified" for the position, citing her lack of "requisite trail or litigation experience or its equivalent."
In addition, HuffPost reported Tuesday on how Pitlyk has written and spoken against fertility treatments and surrogacy--a record that prompted Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) to write an op-ed published Wednesday at The Hill urging her colleagues to vote no. She wrote, "if Donald Trump's recent judicial nominees has her way, thousands of women like me may never be able to become moms."
Pitlyk's problematic background goes further, lawyers Kimya Forouzan and Jacqueline Tosto wrote at Rewire.news Wednesday.
Pitlyk's advocacy as a lawyer has focused on policies that unequally harm women of color, such as her work supporting the Title X final rule, which disproportionately limits access to reproductive health care for women of color. She also co-authored an amicus brief in opposition to insurance coverage of birth control for employees, and has publicly opposed the Affordable Care Act, which has significantly expanded health-care access for communities of color.
One of the most concerning aspects of Pitlyk's work is her misguided advocacy for bans on so-called race- and sex-selective abortion. These bans prohibit abortion providers from performing abortions if the provider knows or suspects that a pregnant person's reason for the abortion is the race or sex of the fetus. But those suspicions are often rooted in harmful racist stereotypes--as are Pitlyk's arguments.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, called Pitlyk's confirmation "deeply distubring" and said Pitlyk "has spent her career focused on restricting reproductive rights and women's access to healthcare."
Planned Parenthood Action's reaction to Pitlyk's confirmation was similarly bleak.
"Missourians already have to navigate an impossible landscape just to access abortion," the group said. "Sarah Pitlyk's confirmation to a lifetime federal judgeship now puts their health and rights in even greater jeopardy. Appalling."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Democrats and progressive groups expressed outrage after the U.S. Senate voted Wednesday to confirm lawyer Sarah Pitlyk for a lifetime appointment on the federal bench.
The 49-44 vote to confirm Pitlyk for judge on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri continues the Trump administration's rapid, rightward shift of the federal courts, an accomplishment about which Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell regularly brags.
Currently special counsel at the anti-choice law firm Thomas More Society, Pitlyk was previously clerk to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh when he was judge for the federal appeals court for the District of Columbia Circuit. Pitlyk was among a group of Kavanaugh's former female law clerks who wrote to the Senate to express their "uniformly positive experiences" with Kavanaugh, who stands accused of sexual assault, during his confirmation process.
Pitlyk's record, according to Marge Baker, PFAW's executive vice president for policy and program, "is one of the worst we've seen among Trump judicial nominees." NARAL Pro-Choice America president lyse Hogue, for her part, called Pitlyk's confirmation to the Missouri federal court "a dream come true for the anti-choice movement and a profound danger to women and families in the state."
Among the factors driving the criticism is that the American Bar Association, in a letter (pdf) to the Senate in September, unanimously said that Pitlyk was "not qualified" for the position, citing her lack of "requisite trail or litigation experience or its equivalent."
In addition, HuffPost reported Tuesday on how Pitlyk has written and spoken against fertility treatments and surrogacy--a record that prompted Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) to write an op-ed published Wednesday at The Hill urging her colleagues to vote no. She wrote, "if Donald Trump's recent judicial nominees has her way, thousands of women like me may never be able to become moms."
Pitlyk's problematic background goes further, lawyers Kimya Forouzan and Jacqueline Tosto wrote at Rewire.news Wednesday.
Pitlyk's advocacy as a lawyer has focused on policies that unequally harm women of color, such as her work supporting the Title X final rule, which disproportionately limits access to reproductive health care for women of color. She also co-authored an amicus brief in opposition to insurance coverage of birth control for employees, and has publicly opposed the Affordable Care Act, which has significantly expanded health-care access for communities of color.
One of the most concerning aspects of Pitlyk's work is her misguided advocacy for bans on so-called race- and sex-selective abortion. These bans prohibit abortion providers from performing abortions if the provider knows or suspects that a pregnant person's reason for the abortion is the race or sex of the fetus. But those suspicions are often rooted in harmful racist stereotypes--as are Pitlyk's arguments.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, called Pitlyk's confirmation "deeply distubring" and said Pitlyk "has spent her career focused on restricting reproductive rights and women's access to healthcare."
Planned Parenthood Action's reaction to Pitlyk's confirmation was similarly bleak.
"Missourians already have to navigate an impossible landscape just to access abortion," the group said. "Sarah Pitlyk's confirmation to a lifetime federal judgeship now puts their health and rights in even greater jeopardy. Appalling."
Democrats and progressive groups expressed outrage after the U.S. Senate voted Wednesday to confirm lawyer Sarah Pitlyk for a lifetime appointment on the federal bench.
The 49-44 vote to confirm Pitlyk for judge on the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri continues the Trump administration's rapid, rightward shift of the federal courts, an accomplishment about which Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell regularly brags.
Currently special counsel at the anti-choice law firm Thomas More Society, Pitlyk was previously clerk to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh when he was judge for the federal appeals court for the District of Columbia Circuit. Pitlyk was among a group of Kavanaugh's former female law clerks who wrote to the Senate to express their "uniformly positive experiences" with Kavanaugh, who stands accused of sexual assault, during his confirmation process.
Pitlyk's record, according to Marge Baker, PFAW's executive vice president for policy and program, "is one of the worst we've seen among Trump judicial nominees." NARAL Pro-Choice America president lyse Hogue, for her part, called Pitlyk's confirmation to the Missouri federal court "a dream come true for the anti-choice movement and a profound danger to women and families in the state."
Among the factors driving the criticism is that the American Bar Association, in a letter (pdf) to the Senate in September, unanimously said that Pitlyk was "not qualified" for the position, citing her lack of "requisite trail or litigation experience or its equivalent."
In addition, HuffPost reported Tuesday on how Pitlyk has written and spoken against fertility treatments and surrogacy--a record that prompted Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) to write an op-ed published Wednesday at The Hill urging her colleagues to vote no. She wrote, "if Donald Trump's recent judicial nominees has her way, thousands of women like me may never be able to become moms."
Pitlyk's problematic background goes further, lawyers Kimya Forouzan and Jacqueline Tosto wrote at Rewire.news Wednesday.
Pitlyk's advocacy as a lawyer has focused on policies that unequally harm women of color, such as her work supporting the Title X final rule, which disproportionately limits access to reproductive health care for women of color. She also co-authored an amicus brief in opposition to insurance coverage of birth control for employees, and has publicly opposed the Affordable Care Act, which has significantly expanded health-care access for communities of color.
One of the most concerning aspects of Pitlyk's work is her misguided advocacy for bans on so-called race- and sex-selective abortion. These bans prohibit abortion providers from performing abortions if the provider knows or suspects that a pregnant person's reason for the abortion is the race or sex of the fetus. But those suspicions are often rooted in harmful racist stereotypes--as are Pitlyk's arguments.
Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, called Pitlyk's confirmation "deeply distubring" and said Pitlyk "has spent her career focused on restricting reproductive rights and women's access to healthcare."
Planned Parenthood Action's reaction to Pitlyk's confirmation was similarly bleak.
"Missourians already have to navigate an impossible landscape just to access abortion," the group said. "Sarah Pitlyk's confirmation to a lifetime federal judgeship now puts their health and rights in even greater jeopardy. Appalling."