President-elect Donald J. Trump and U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi smile for a photo during the 58th Presidential Inauguration in Washington, D.C., Jan. 20, 2017. (Photo: U.S. Air Force Staff Sgt. Marianique Santos/Department of Defense/cc)
Dec 01, 2019
Progressives on Monday criticized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for reportedly leaving a broadly popular bill boosting union membership on her desk for months while pushing for the passage of one of President Donald Trump's legislative priorities, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, by Christmas.
"I don't know exactly what the holdup is," said Rep. Pramila Jayapa (D-Wash.), a co-chair of the House Progressive Caucus, "it is taking longer than it should given the number of co-sponsors that we have."
Pelosi's decision to push the USMCA forward while leaving the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, or PRO Act, on her desk since it passed out of committee on September 25 was the subject of an article by Rachel Cohen at The Intercept Monday morning.
\u201c\u201cIf you want real strong worker excitement that will get union activists excited for 2020, this is what we need to get it; the PRO Act is really it,\u201d @dan_mauer of CWA said. \u201cWe absolutely think this is a key thing, not just legislatively but politically.\u201d https://t.co/dc7GHfE2CN\u201d— Rachel Cohen (@Rachel Cohen) 1575294330
According to Cohen's reporting, the USMCA is seen by moderates as a good example of bipartisan compromise leading up to the 2020 election while labor is antagonistic to the bill:
Centrist Democrats have been insisting privately that a quick passage for the trade deal is necessary for moderate members of Congress to win their competitive reelections in 2020, to show they can "do something." Unions have made clear, though, that from their perspective, USMCA lacks real labor enforcement mechanisms, which could undermine the whole deal, further drag down wages, and eliminate more jobs.
The PRO Act, on the other hand, is a bill with appeal across the party, with 215 House co-sponsors.
"Many other bills have come to the floor with fewer co-sponsors than this one," Jayapal told The Intercept.
Nevertheless, Pelosi is letting the PRO Act sit on her desk, a decision that left journalist Ryan Cooper frustrated.
"Grinding my teeth so hard they snap off at the roots," tweeted Cooper.
\u201cgrinding my teeth so hard they snap off at the roots https://t.co/DDAEKe1BLw\u201d— ryan cooper (@ryan cooper) 1575308197
It's not the first time Pelosi's leadership of a Democratic-controlled House has led to the shelving of labor-friendly legislation. In 2009, the chamber failed to pass the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which would have passed through the then-Democratic Senate and ended up on President Barack Obama's desk.
The parallels to this House bill are clear, The District Sentinel cohost Sam Knight said on Twitter.
"In 2009, EFCA was cosponsored by a majority of members when Dem leaders refused to even bring it up for a vote," said Knight. "Pelosi is so utterly devoted to serving her donor class friends."
DSA organizer Margaret McLaughlin did some math to figure out how she felt about implications of Cohen's reporting.
"Handing Trump a USMCA win without any strong labor enforcement mechanisms + not passing the PRO act which would sail through the House = gonna give me an aneurysm," said McLaughlin.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Progressives on Monday criticized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for reportedly leaving a broadly popular bill boosting union membership on her desk for months while pushing for the passage of one of President Donald Trump's legislative priorities, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, by Christmas.
"I don't know exactly what the holdup is," said Rep. Pramila Jayapa (D-Wash.), a co-chair of the House Progressive Caucus, "it is taking longer than it should given the number of co-sponsors that we have."
Pelosi's decision to push the USMCA forward while leaving the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, or PRO Act, on her desk since it passed out of committee on September 25 was the subject of an article by Rachel Cohen at The Intercept Monday morning.
\u201c\u201cIf you want real strong worker excitement that will get union activists excited for 2020, this is what we need to get it; the PRO Act is really it,\u201d @dan_mauer of CWA said. \u201cWe absolutely think this is a key thing, not just legislatively but politically.\u201d https://t.co/dc7GHfE2CN\u201d— Rachel Cohen (@Rachel Cohen) 1575294330
According to Cohen's reporting, the USMCA is seen by moderates as a good example of bipartisan compromise leading up to the 2020 election while labor is antagonistic to the bill:
Centrist Democrats have been insisting privately that a quick passage for the trade deal is necessary for moderate members of Congress to win their competitive reelections in 2020, to show they can "do something." Unions have made clear, though, that from their perspective, USMCA lacks real labor enforcement mechanisms, which could undermine the whole deal, further drag down wages, and eliminate more jobs.
The PRO Act, on the other hand, is a bill with appeal across the party, with 215 House co-sponsors.
"Many other bills have come to the floor with fewer co-sponsors than this one," Jayapal told The Intercept.
Nevertheless, Pelosi is letting the PRO Act sit on her desk, a decision that left journalist Ryan Cooper frustrated.
"Grinding my teeth so hard they snap off at the roots," tweeted Cooper.
\u201cgrinding my teeth so hard they snap off at the roots https://t.co/DDAEKe1BLw\u201d— ryan cooper (@ryan cooper) 1575308197
It's not the first time Pelosi's leadership of a Democratic-controlled House has led to the shelving of labor-friendly legislation. In 2009, the chamber failed to pass the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which would have passed through the then-Democratic Senate and ended up on President Barack Obama's desk.
The parallels to this House bill are clear, The District Sentinel cohost Sam Knight said on Twitter.
"In 2009, EFCA was cosponsored by a majority of members when Dem leaders refused to even bring it up for a vote," said Knight. "Pelosi is so utterly devoted to serving her donor class friends."
DSA organizer Margaret McLaughlin did some math to figure out how she felt about implications of Cohen's reporting.
"Handing Trump a USMCA win without any strong labor enforcement mechanisms + not passing the PRO act which would sail through the House = gonna give me an aneurysm," said McLaughlin.
Progressives on Monday criticized House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for reportedly leaving a broadly popular bill boosting union membership on her desk for months while pushing for the passage of one of President Donald Trump's legislative priorities, the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, by Christmas.
"I don't know exactly what the holdup is," said Rep. Pramila Jayapa (D-Wash.), a co-chair of the House Progressive Caucus, "it is taking longer than it should given the number of co-sponsors that we have."
Pelosi's decision to push the USMCA forward while leaving the Protecting the Right to Organize Act, or PRO Act, on her desk since it passed out of committee on September 25 was the subject of an article by Rachel Cohen at The Intercept Monday morning.
\u201c\u201cIf you want real strong worker excitement that will get union activists excited for 2020, this is what we need to get it; the PRO Act is really it,\u201d @dan_mauer of CWA said. \u201cWe absolutely think this is a key thing, not just legislatively but politically.\u201d https://t.co/dc7GHfE2CN\u201d— Rachel Cohen (@Rachel Cohen) 1575294330
According to Cohen's reporting, the USMCA is seen by moderates as a good example of bipartisan compromise leading up to the 2020 election while labor is antagonistic to the bill:
Centrist Democrats have been insisting privately that a quick passage for the trade deal is necessary for moderate members of Congress to win their competitive reelections in 2020, to show they can "do something." Unions have made clear, though, that from their perspective, USMCA lacks real labor enforcement mechanisms, which could undermine the whole deal, further drag down wages, and eliminate more jobs.
The PRO Act, on the other hand, is a bill with appeal across the party, with 215 House co-sponsors.
"Many other bills have come to the floor with fewer co-sponsors than this one," Jayapal told The Intercept.
Nevertheless, Pelosi is letting the PRO Act sit on her desk, a decision that left journalist Ryan Cooper frustrated.
"Grinding my teeth so hard they snap off at the roots," tweeted Cooper.
\u201cgrinding my teeth so hard they snap off at the roots https://t.co/DDAEKe1BLw\u201d— ryan cooper (@ryan cooper) 1575308197
It's not the first time Pelosi's leadership of a Democratic-controlled House has led to the shelving of labor-friendly legislation. In 2009, the chamber failed to pass the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), which would have passed through the then-Democratic Senate and ended up on President Barack Obama's desk.
The parallels to this House bill are clear, The District Sentinel cohost Sam Knight said on Twitter.
"In 2009, EFCA was cosponsored by a majority of members when Dem leaders refused to even bring it up for a vote," said Knight. "Pelosi is so utterly devoted to serving her donor class friends."
DSA organizer Margaret McLaughlin did some math to figure out how she felt about implications of Cohen's reporting.
"Handing Trump a USMCA win without any strong labor enforcement mechanisms + not passing the PRO act which would sail through the House = gonna give me an aneurysm," said McLaughlin.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.