

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaks at the closing press conference of the G7 summit in Biarritz, France. (Photo: Michael Kappeler/Picture Alliance via Getty Images)
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Wednesday announced plans to suspend the U.K. Parliament, a move lawmakers and commentators condemned as a flagrant abuse of power aimed at forcing an exit from the European Union--with or without a deal.
"This is a coup d'etat, and it must be fought," tweeted Guardian columnist Owen Jones.
The New York Times described Johnson's decision, which was approved by the queen, as "a surprise maneuver that would make it harder for lawmakers to prevent Britain from exiting the European Union without an agreement with the bloc," also known as No-Deal Brexit.
"In a letter sent Wednesday to all members of Parliament, Mr. Johnson said he intended to resume on Oct. 14, with a speech by Queen Elizabeth II, laying out the agenda of the Conservative government," the Times reported. "By scheduling [the queen's speech] before the Brexit deadline, he would further limit the time available to opponents of a No Deal Brexit."
Johnson has repeatedly stated the U.K. will leave the European Union at the end of October, even if an agreement is not reached.
Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn called Johnson's effort to suspend Parliament an attempt "to avoid scrutiny of his plans for a reckless No Deal Brexit."
"Labour will work across Parliament to hold the government to account," Corbyn tweeted, "and prevent a disastrous No Deal."
Other British MPs, including some from Johnson's Conservative Party, joined Corbyn in denouncing the move.
House of Commons Speaker John Bercow, a Conservative MP, called Johnson's plan "a constitutional outrage," echoing the widespread response to the news.
Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Wollaston said Johnson is "behaving like a tin pot dictator."
"Time for ministers to resign and Conservative MPs to cross the floor rather than be tainted with this outrage," tweeted Wollaston.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Wednesday announced plans to suspend the U.K. Parliament, a move lawmakers and commentators condemned as a flagrant abuse of power aimed at forcing an exit from the European Union--with or without a deal.
"This is a coup d'etat, and it must be fought," tweeted Guardian columnist Owen Jones.
The New York Times described Johnson's decision, which was approved by the queen, as "a surprise maneuver that would make it harder for lawmakers to prevent Britain from exiting the European Union without an agreement with the bloc," also known as No-Deal Brexit.
"In a letter sent Wednesday to all members of Parliament, Mr. Johnson said he intended to resume on Oct. 14, with a speech by Queen Elizabeth II, laying out the agenda of the Conservative government," the Times reported. "By scheduling [the queen's speech] before the Brexit deadline, he would further limit the time available to opponents of a No Deal Brexit."
Johnson has repeatedly stated the U.K. will leave the European Union at the end of October, even if an agreement is not reached.
Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn called Johnson's effort to suspend Parliament an attempt "to avoid scrutiny of his plans for a reckless No Deal Brexit."
"Labour will work across Parliament to hold the government to account," Corbyn tweeted, "and prevent a disastrous No Deal."
Other British MPs, including some from Johnson's Conservative Party, joined Corbyn in denouncing the move.
House of Commons Speaker John Bercow, a Conservative MP, called Johnson's plan "a constitutional outrage," echoing the widespread response to the news.
Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Wollaston said Johnson is "behaving like a tin pot dictator."
"Time for ministers to resign and Conservative MPs to cross the floor rather than be tainted with this outrage," tweeted Wollaston.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Wednesday announced plans to suspend the U.K. Parliament, a move lawmakers and commentators condemned as a flagrant abuse of power aimed at forcing an exit from the European Union--with or without a deal.
"This is a coup d'etat, and it must be fought," tweeted Guardian columnist Owen Jones.
The New York Times described Johnson's decision, which was approved by the queen, as "a surprise maneuver that would make it harder for lawmakers to prevent Britain from exiting the European Union without an agreement with the bloc," also known as No-Deal Brexit.
"In a letter sent Wednesday to all members of Parliament, Mr. Johnson said he intended to resume on Oct. 14, with a speech by Queen Elizabeth II, laying out the agenda of the Conservative government," the Times reported. "By scheduling [the queen's speech] before the Brexit deadline, he would further limit the time available to opponents of a No Deal Brexit."
Johnson has repeatedly stated the U.K. will leave the European Union at the end of October, even if an agreement is not reached.
Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn called Johnson's effort to suspend Parliament an attempt "to avoid scrutiny of his plans for a reckless No Deal Brexit."
"Labour will work across Parliament to hold the government to account," Corbyn tweeted, "and prevent a disastrous No Deal."
Other British MPs, including some from Johnson's Conservative Party, joined Corbyn in denouncing the move.
House of Commons Speaker John Bercow, a Conservative MP, called Johnson's plan "a constitutional outrage," echoing the widespread response to the news.
Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Wollaston said Johnson is "behaving like a tin pot dictator."
"Time for ministers to resign and Conservative MPs to cross the floor rather than be tainted with this outrage," tweeted Wollaston.