Immigrant children at an aid center after being released from U.S. government detention on November 3, 2018 in McAllen, Texas. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
Aug 15, 2019
Rights groups expressed relief on Thursday after a federal court dismissed a Trump administration appeal which argued that safe and sanitary conditions for detained immigrant children does not include providing basic hygiene necessities such as toothbrushes, soap, showers, and towels.
That the court decision was necessary underscores the cruelty of the Trump White House, said observers.
"The government of the United States of America was fighting against having to provide toothbrushes, soap, and showers to children," tweeted Andy Donohue, managing editor of Reveal.
Others expressed similar dismay:
\u201cHow is it possible that the courts have to force our government to give children in their captivity soap and water? What kind of morality is in charge in this country that it would EVEN OCCUR to someone not to give kids basics like this? It's indefensible.\u201d— Felicia Day\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@Felicia Day\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1565891810
\u201cSad that i have to cheer for this\u201d— Ludovic (@Ludovic) 1565888911
In its opinion (pdf), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals strongly rejected the Trump administration's argument that certain basic necessities may not be required in some circumstances.
"Assuring that children eat enough edible food, drink clean water, are housed in hygienic facilities with sanitary bathrooms, have soap and toothpaste, and are not sleep-deprived," the ruling stated, "are without doubt essential to the children's safety."
Aura Bogado, immigration reporter for Reveal, called the decision a "big win for children and their advocates."
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 GOOD NEWS: The 9th circuit dismissed the government\u2019s appeal that safe and sanitary conditions for migrant children doesn't include things like toothbrushes, soap and showers.\u201d— RAICES (@RAICES) 1565891470
The court's ruling comes just weeks after Justice Department attorney Sarah Fabian stood before Ninth Circuit judges and argued that the Trump administration should not necessarily be required to provide detained immigrant children with toothbrushes, toothpaste, soap, and other items.
Fabian's remarks quickly went viral and sparked widespread outrage.
\u201cA Trump official tried to argue that detained children don\u2019t need soap, toothbrushes, or beds to be \u2018safe and sanitary\u2019 while in Border Patrol custody\u201d— NowThis (@NowThis) 1561145035
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Rights groups expressed relief on Thursday after a federal court dismissed a Trump administration appeal which argued that safe and sanitary conditions for detained immigrant children does not include providing basic hygiene necessities such as toothbrushes, soap, showers, and towels.
That the court decision was necessary underscores the cruelty of the Trump White House, said observers.
"The government of the United States of America was fighting against having to provide toothbrushes, soap, and showers to children," tweeted Andy Donohue, managing editor of Reveal.
Others expressed similar dismay:
\u201cHow is it possible that the courts have to force our government to give children in their captivity soap and water? What kind of morality is in charge in this country that it would EVEN OCCUR to someone not to give kids basics like this? It's indefensible.\u201d— Felicia Day\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@Felicia Day\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1565891810
\u201cSad that i have to cheer for this\u201d— Ludovic (@Ludovic) 1565888911
In its opinion (pdf), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals strongly rejected the Trump administration's argument that certain basic necessities may not be required in some circumstances.
"Assuring that children eat enough edible food, drink clean water, are housed in hygienic facilities with sanitary bathrooms, have soap and toothpaste, and are not sleep-deprived," the ruling stated, "are without doubt essential to the children's safety."
Aura Bogado, immigration reporter for Reveal, called the decision a "big win for children and their advocates."
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 GOOD NEWS: The 9th circuit dismissed the government\u2019s appeal that safe and sanitary conditions for migrant children doesn't include things like toothbrushes, soap and showers.\u201d— RAICES (@RAICES) 1565891470
The court's ruling comes just weeks after Justice Department attorney Sarah Fabian stood before Ninth Circuit judges and argued that the Trump administration should not necessarily be required to provide detained immigrant children with toothbrushes, toothpaste, soap, and other items.
Fabian's remarks quickly went viral and sparked widespread outrage.
\u201cA Trump official tried to argue that detained children don\u2019t need soap, toothbrushes, or beds to be \u2018safe and sanitary\u2019 while in Border Patrol custody\u201d— NowThis (@NowThis) 1561145035
Rights groups expressed relief on Thursday after a federal court dismissed a Trump administration appeal which argued that safe and sanitary conditions for detained immigrant children does not include providing basic hygiene necessities such as toothbrushes, soap, showers, and towels.
That the court decision was necessary underscores the cruelty of the Trump White House, said observers.
"The government of the United States of America was fighting against having to provide toothbrushes, soap, and showers to children," tweeted Andy Donohue, managing editor of Reveal.
Others expressed similar dismay:
\u201cHow is it possible that the courts have to force our government to give children in their captivity soap and water? What kind of morality is in charge in this country that it would EVEN OCCUR to someone not to give kids basics like this? It's indefensible.\u201d— Felicia Day\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@Felicia Day\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1565891810
\u201cSad that i have to cheer for this\u201d— Ludovic (@Ludovic) 1565888911
In its opinion (pdf), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals strongly rejected the Trump administration's argument that certain basic necessities may not be required in some circumstances.
"Assuring that children eat enough edible food, drink clean water, are housed in hygienic facilities with sanitary bathrooms, have soap and toothpaste, and are not sleep-deprived," the ruling stated, "are without doubt essential to the children's safety."
Aura Bogado, immigration reporter for Reveal, called the decision a "big win for children and their advocates."
\u201c\ud83d\udea8 GOOD NEWS: The 9th circuit dismissed the government\u2019s appeal that safe and sanitary conditions for migrant children doesn't include things like toothbrushes, soap and showers.\u201d— RAICES (@RAICES) 1565891470
The court's ruling comes just weeks after Justice Department attorney Sarah Fabian stood before Ninth Circuit judges and argued that the Trump administration should not necessarily be required to provide detained immigrant children with toothbrushes, toothpaste, soap, and other items.
Fabian's remarks quickly went viral and sparked widespread outrage.
\u201cA Trump official tried to argue that detained children don\u2019t need soap, toothbrushes, or beds to be \u2018safe and sanitary\u2019 while in Border Patrol custody\u201d— NowThis (@NowThis) 1561145035
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.