SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Brian Hook, the U.S. Special Representative for Iran, looks on during a press conference in Kuwait City on June 23, 2019. (Photo: Yasser Al-Zayyat/AFP/Getty Images)
Trump Admin. Ratchets Up Tensions With Threat to Sanction Any Nation That Imports Iranian Oil
"Sanctions aren't [an] alternative to war; they ARE war," said Iranian foreign minister after U.S. imposed new economic penalties
Jun 28, 2019
President Donald Trump's special envoy for Iran further stoked tensions between Iran and the U.S. on Friday when he said the United States will sanction any country that imports Iranian crude oil.
Envoy Brian Hook, in his comments to reporters in London, said that there were no exemptions, reiterating a threat the Trump administration made two months earlier.
"We will sanction any imports of Iranian crude oil," Hook said, according to Reuters.
"There are right now no oil waivers in place," said Hook, who added the administration intends to "sanction any illicit purchases of Iranian crude oil."
Hook's comments came four days after the Trump administration announced new economic sanctions against Iran and one day after Iran Foreign Minister Javad Zarif told Trump on Twitter that "Sanctions aren't [an] alternative to war; they ARE war."
"Negotiations and threats are mutually exclusive," Zarif added.
Special envoy Hook's new statements came as representatives to the remaining parties to the 2015 nuclear accord--the U.S. ditched it last year--met in the Austrian capital.
Per The Associated Press:
At the heart of the meeting in Vienna is Iran's desire for European countries to deliver on promises of financial relief from U.S. sanctions. Iran is insisting that it wants to save the agreement and has urged the Europeans to start buying Iranian oil or give Iran a credit line to keep the accord alive.
President Trump, who's at the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan through Saturday, indicated that his administration is keeping an attack on Iran still on table.
"I think that in the end, hopefully, it's going to work out," said Trump of the conflict between the two nations. "If it does, great. And if doesn't, you'll be hearing about it."
Hook offered a similar take on Thursday in comments to AP.
Hook said that "we are not looking for any conflict in the region," but if the U.S. is attacked, "we will respond with military force."
Last week, Trump called off a strike he'd approved against Iran just minutes before it would have taken place. The Senate, on Friday, has a chance to rein in such military force.
The chamber began a vote Friday on a measure (pdf) to prevent an unauthorized war on Iran--a possibility that has some lawmakers bristling.
"A war with Iran would be a colossal mistake," said co-sponsor Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) on the floor Thursday ahead of the vote.
"After 18 years of two wars in the Middle East, both of which where we still have troops deployed," said Kaine, "we should not be fomenting, encouraging, blundering toward, rushing into a third war in the Middle East."
Rep. Ro Khanna, sponsor of companion measure in the House, agreed.
In a Twitter thread Thursday, the California Democrat said that "the Senate is responding to a growing desire to avoid endless wars by voting to ensure Congress has a say before America is committed to another regime change conflict in the Middle East."
"With the House soon voting on our amendment to prevent an unauthorized war against Iran," Khanna continued, "it is clear there is bicameral, bipartisan momentum for Congress to reclaim its constitutional jurisdiction."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump's special envoy for Iran further stoked tensions between Iran and the U.S. on Friday when he said the United States will sanction any country that imports Iranian crude oil.
Envoy Brian Hook, in his comments to reporters in London, said that there were no exemptions, reiterating a threat the Trump administration made two months earlier.
"We will sanction any imports of Iranian crude oil," Hook said, according to Reuters.
"There are right now no oil waivers in place," said Hook, who added the administration intends to "sanction any illicit purchases of Iranian crude oil."
Hook's comments came four days after the Trump administration announced new economic sanctions against Iran and one day after Iran Foreign Minister Javad Zarif told Trump on Twitter that "Sanctions aren't [an] alternative to war; they ARE war."
"Negotiations and threats are mutually exclusive," Zarif added.
Special envoy Hook's new statements came as representatives to the remaining parties to the 2015 nuclear accord--the U.S. ditched it last year--met in the Austrian capital.
Per The Associated Press:
At the heart of the meeting in Vienna is Iran's desire for European countries to deliver on promises of financial relief from U.S. sanctions. Iran is insisting that it wants to save the agreement and has urged the Europeans to start buying Iranian oil or give Iran a credit line to keep the accord alive.
President Trump, who's at the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan through Saturday, indicated that his administration is keeping an attack on Iran still on table.
"I think that in the end, hopefully, it's going to work out," said Trump of the conflict between the two nations. "If it does, great. And if doesn't, you'll be hearing about it."
Hook offered a similar take on Thursday in comments to AP.
Hook said that "we are not looking for any conflict in the region," but if the U.S. is attacked, "we will respond with military force."
Last week, Trump called off a strike he'd approved against Iran just minutes before it would have taken place. The Senate, on Friday, has a chance to rein in such military force.
The chamber began a vote Friday on a measure (pdf) to prevent an unauthorized war on Iran--a possibility that has some lawmakers bristling.
"A war with Iran would be a colossal mistake," said co-sponsor Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) on the floor Thursday ahead of the vote.
"After 18 years of two wars in the Middle East, both of which where we still have troops deployed," said Kaine, "we should not be fomenting, encouraging, blundering toward, rushing into a third war in the Middle East."
Rep. Ro Khanna, sponsor of companion measure in the House, agreed.
In a Twitter thread Thursday, the California Democrat said that "the Senate is responding to a growing desire to avoid endless wars by voting to ensure Congress has a say before America is committed to another regime change conflict in the Middle East."
"With the House soon voting on our amendment to prevent an unauthorized war against Iran," Khanna continued, "it is clear there is bicameral, bipartisan momentum for Congress to reclaim its constitutional jurisdiction."
President Donald Trump's special envoy for Iran further stoked tensions between Iran and the U.S. on Friday when he said the United States will sanction any country that imports Iranian crude oil.
Envoy Brian Hook, in his comments to reporters in London, said that there were no exemptions, reiterating a threat the Trump administration made two months earlier.
"We will sanction any imports of Iranian crude oil," Hook said, according to Reuters.
"There are right now no oil waivers in place," said Hook, who added the administration intends to "sanction any illicit purchases of Iranian crude oil."
Hook's comments came four days after the Trump administration announced new economic sanctions against Iran and one day after Iran Foreign Minister Javad Zarif told Trump on Twitter that "Sanctions aren't [an] alternative to war; they ARE war."
"Negotiations and threats are mutually exclusive," Zarif added.
Special envoy Hook's new statements came as representatives to the remaining parties to the 2015 nuclear accord--the U.S. ditched it last year--met in the Austrian capital.
Per The Associated Press:
At the heart of the meeting in Vienna is Iran's desire for European countries to deliver on promises of financial relief from U.S. sanctions. Iran is insisting that it wants to save the agreement and has urged the Europeans to start buying Iranian oil or give Iran a credit line to keep the accord alive.
President Trump, who's at the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan through Saturday, indicated that his administration is keeping an attack on Iran still on table.
"I think that in the end, hopefully, it's going to work out," said Trump of the conflict between the two nations. "If it does, great. And if doesn't, you'll be hearing about it."
Hook offered a similar take on Thursday in comments to AP.
Hook said that "we are not looking for any conflict in the region," but if the U.S. is attacked, "we will respond with military force."
Last week, Trump called off a strike he'd approved against Iran just minutes before it would have taken place. The Senate, on Friday, has a chance to rein in such military force.
The chamber began a vote Friday on a measure (pdf) to prevent an unauthorized war on Iran--a possibility that has some lawmakers bristling.
"A war with Iran would be a colossal mistake," said co-sponsor Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) on the floor Thursday ahead of the vote.
"After 18 years of two wars in the Middle East, both of which where we still have troops deployed," said Kaine, "we should not be fomenting, encouraging, blundering toward, rushing into a third war in the Middle East."
Rep. Ro Khanna, sponsor of companion measure in the House, agreed.
In a Twitter thread Thursday, the California Democrat said that "the Senate is responding to a growing desire to avoid endless wars by voting to ensure Congress has a say before America is committed to another regime change conflict in the Middle East."
"With the House soon voting on our amendment to prevent an unauthorized war against Iran," Khanna continued, "it is clear there is bicameral, bipartisan momentum for Congress to reclaim its constitutional jurisdiction."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.