SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva during a protest on June 10, 2016 in Sao Paulo, Brazil. (Photo: Victor Moriyama/Getty Images)
'Truth Will Prevail,' Says Lula, After Leaked Documents Suggest He Was Imprisoned to Prevent Victory in Brazil's Presidential Election
"There is no question the procedures against former President Lula are tainted by extremely serious issues when it comes to violations of fundamental guarantees and denial of one's rights."
Jun 10, 2019
A massive trove of documents leaked to The Intercept added weight to longstanding allegations that the judge and team of prosecutors behind the imprisonment of former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva were motivated by a desire to prevent Lula and his party from winning the country's 2018 elections.
"Lula should be released immediately and the courts should recognize once and for all that he has not committed any crime."
--Legal team of former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva
According to The Intercept, the documents provide significant evidence that Sergio Moro--the judge who found Lula guilty--unlawfully conspired with prosecutors to construct the corruption case against the former Brazilian president, who polled as the frontrunner in the 2018 presidential election even while he was imprisoned.
"Overall, the documents depict a task force of prosecutors seemingly intent on exploiting its legal powers for blatantly political ends," The Intercept reported Sunday, "led by its goal of preventing a return to power of the Workers' Party generally, and Lula specifically."
Lula's imprisonment in 2018 on corruption charges cleared the way for the rapid ascent and victory of Brazil's current far-right president Jair Bolsonaro over Fernando Haddad, who replaced Lula as the presidential candidate for the Workers' Party (PT).
"[M]any of these documents show improper and unethical plotting... on how to best structure the corruption case against Lula--although Moro was legally required to judge the case as a neutral arbiter," The Intercept reported. "Other documents include private admissions among the prosecutors that the evidence proving Lula's guilt was lacking."
Following his victory in the presidential election, Bolsonaro appointed Moro as justice minister--a move The Intercept said created "the obvious perception (real or not) of a quid pro quo."
The Intercept highlighted a particularly egregious example of the team of prosecutors coordinating to ensure Lula's party would not prevail in the 2018 election after the former president was imprisoned and barred from running:
One glaring example occurred 10 days before the first round of presidential voting last year, when a Supreme Court justice granted a petition from the country's largest newspaper, Folha de Sao Paulo, to interview Lula, who was in prison on corruption charges...
Immediately upon learning of that decision on September 28, 2018, the team of prosecutors who handled Lula's corruption case--who spent years vehemently denying that they were driven by political motives of any kind--began discussing in a private Telegram chat group how to block, subvert, or undermine the Supreme Court decision. This was based on their expressed fear that the decision would help the PT--Lula's party--win the election. Based on their stated desire to prevent the PT's return to power, they spent hours debating strategies to prevent or dilute the political impact of Lula's interview.
In response to the leaked documents, Lula's legal team demanded that the former president be released from prison "immediately."
"There is no question the procedures against former President Lula are tainted by extremely serious issues when it comes to violations of fundamental guarantees and denial of one's rights," Lula's lawyers said in a statement. "Lula should be released immediately and the courts should recognize once and for all that he has not committed any crime."
Lula's official Twitter account responded to The Intercept's reporting with a simple message:
The trove of documents, provided to The Intercept by an anonymous source, immediately provoked national controversy in Brazil.
"It's like stopping the other team from playing. Its like they decided to play the ball alone," Carlos Melo, a professor of political science at the Sao Paulo business school Insper, told The Guardian in response to the documents. "A basic principle of law is that those who accuse do not judge."
The prosecutors implicated by the documents issued a statement saying they are the victim of a "criminal act" by a hacker, but did not dispute the authenticity of the documents.
The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald, whose byline appeared on the three stories about the leaks published Sunday, called the documents "one of the largest and most important archives of leaked material in years."
"In sum," Greenwald tweeted, "the process that imprisoned Lula and rendered him ineligible to run--paving the way for Bolsonaro's ascension to power--was fueled by wrongdoing, politicized abuse of power, and deceit: all of which will now be revealed due to this massive leaked archive of their secrets."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A massive trove of documents leaked to The Intercept added weight to longstanding allegations that the judge and team of prosecutors behind the imprisonment of former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva were motivated by a desire to prevent Lula and his party from winning the country's 2018 elections.
"Lula should be released immediately and the courts should recognize once and for all that he has not committed any crime."
--Legal team of former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva
According to The Intercept, the documents provide significant evidence that Sergio Moro--the judge who found Lula guilty--unlawfully conspired with prosecutors to construct the corruption case against the former Brazilian president, who polled as the frontrunner in the 2018 presidential election even while he was imprisoned.
"Overall, the documents depict a task force of prosecutors seemingly intent on exploiting its legal powers for blatantly political ends," The Intercept reported Sunday, "led by its goal of preventing a return to power of the Workers' Party generally, and Lula specifically."
Lula's imprisonment in 2018 on corruption charges cleared the way for the rapid ascent and victory of Brazil's current far-right president Jair Bolsonaro over Fernando Haddad, who replaced Lula as the presidential candidate for the Workers' Party (PT).
"[M]any of these documents show improper and unethical plotting... on how to best structure the corruption case against Lula--although Moro was legally required to judge the case as a neutral arbiter," The Intercept reported. "Other documents include private admissions among the prosecutors that the evidence proving Lula's guilt was lacking."
Following his victory in the presidential election, Bolsonaro appointed Moro as justice minister--a move The Intercept said created "the obvious perception (real or not) of a quid pro quo."
The Intercept highlighted a particularly egregious example of the team of prosecutors coordinating to ensure Lula's party would not prevail in the 2018 election after the former president was imprisoned and barred from running:
One glaring example occurred 10 days before the first round of presidential voting last year, when a Supreme Court justice granted a petition from the country's largest newspaper, Folha de Sao Paulo, to interview Lula, who was in prison on corruption charges...
Immediately upon learning of that decision on September 28, 2018, the team of prosecutors who handled Lula's corruption case--who spent years vehemently denying that they were driven by political motives of any kind--began discussing in a private Telegram chat group how to block, subvert, or undermine the Supreme Court decision. This was based on their expressed fear that the decision would help the PT--Lula's party--win the election. Based on their stated desire to prevent the PT's return to power, they spent hours debating strategies to prevent or dilute the political impact of Lula's interview.
In response to the leaked documents, Lula's legal team demanded that the former president be released from prison "immediately."
"There is no question the procedures against former President Lula are tainted by extremely serious issues when it comes to violations of fundamental guarantees and denial of one's rights," Lula's lawyers said in a statement. "Lula should be released immediately and the courts should recognize once and for all that he has not committed any crime."
Lula's official Twitter account responded to The Intercept's reporting with a simple message:
The trove of documents, provided to The Intercept by an anonymous source, immediately provoked national controversy in Brazil.
"It's like stopping the other team from playing. Its like they decided to play the ball alone," Carlos Melo, a professor of political science at the Sao Paulo business school Insper, told The Guardian in response to the documents. "A basic principle of law is that those who accuse do not judge."
The prosecutors implicated by the documents issued a statement saying they are the victim of a "criminal act" by a hacker, but did not dispute the authenticity of the documents.
The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald, whose byline appeared on the three stories about the leaks published Sunday, called the documents "one of the largest and most important archives of leaked material in years."
"In sum," Greenwald tweeted, "the process that imprisoned Lula and rendered him ineligible to run--paving the way for Bolsonaro's ascension to power--was fueled by wrongdoing, politicized abuse of power, and deceit: all of which will now be revealed due to this massive leaked archive of their secrets."
A massive trove of documents leaked to The Intercept added weight to longstanding allegations that the judge and team of prosecutors behind the imprisonment of former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva were motivated by a desire to prevent Lula and his party from winning the country's 2018 elections.
"Lula should be released immediately and the courts should recognize once and for all that he has not committed any crime."
--Legal team of former Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva
According to The Intercept, the documents provide significant evidence that Sergio Moro--the judge who found Lula guilty--unlawfully conspired with prosecutors to construct the corruption case against the former Brazilian president, who polled as the frontrunner in the 2018 presidential election even while he was imprisoned.
"Overall, the documents depict a task force of prosecutors seemingly intent on exploiting its legal powers for blatantly political ends," The Intercept reported Sunday, "led by its goal of preventing a return to power of the Workers' Party generally, and Lula specifically."
Lula's imprisonment in 2018 on corruption charges cleared the way for the rapid ascent and victory of Brazil's current far-right president Jair Bolsonaro over Fernando Haddad, who replaced Lula as the presidential candidate for the Workers' Party (PT).
"[M]any of these documents show improper and unethical plotting... on how to best structure the corruption case against Lula--although Moro was legally required to judge the case as a neutral arbiter," The Intercept reported. "Other documents include private admissions among the prosecutors that the evidence proving Lula's guilt was lacking."
Following his victory in the presidential election, Bolsonaro appointed Moro as justice minister--a move The Intercept said created "the obvious perception (real or not) of a quid pro quo."
The Intercept highlighted a particularly egregious example of the team of prosecutors coordinating to ensure Lula's party would not prevail in the 2018 election after the former president was imprisoned and barred from running:
One glaring example occurred 10 days before the first round of presidential voting last year, when a Supreme Court justice granted a petition from the country's largest newspaper, Folha de Sao Paulo, to interview Lula, who was in prison on corruption charges...
Immediately upon learning of that decision on September 28, 2018, the team of prosecutors who handled Lula's corruption case--who spent years vehemently denying that they were driven by political motives of any kind--began discussing in a private Telegram chat group how to block, subvert, or undermine the Supreme Court decision. This was based on their expressed fear that the decision would help the PT--Lula's party--win the election. Based on their stated desire to prevent the PT's return to power, they spent hours debating strategies to prevent or dilute the political impact of Lula's interview.
In response to the leaked documents, Lula's legal team demanded that the former president be released from prison "immediately."
"There is no question the procedures against former President Lula are tainted by extremely serious issues when it comes to violations of fundamental guarantees and denial of one's rights," Lula's lawyers said in a statement. "Lula should be released immediately and the courts should recognize once and for all that he has not committed any crime."
Lula's official Twitter account responded to The Intercept's reporting with a simple message:
The trove of documents, provided to The Intercept by an anonymous source, immediately provoked national controversy in Brazil.
"It's like stopping the other team from playing. Its like they decided to play the ball alone," Carlos Melo, a professor of political science at the Sao Paulo business school Insper, told The Guardian in response to the documents. "A basic principle of law is that those who accuse do not judge."
The prosecutors implicated by the documents issued a statement saying they are the victim of a "criminal act" by a hacker, but did not dispute the authenticity of the documents.
The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald, whose byline appeared on the three stories about the leaks published Sunday, called the documents "one of the largest and most important archives of leaked material in years."
"In sum," Greenwald tweeted, "the process that imprisoned Lula and rendered him ineligible to run--paving the way for Bolsonaro's ascension to power--was fueled by wrongdoing, politicized abuse of power, and deceit: all of which will now be revealed due to this massive leaked archive of their secrets."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.