Museum-goers visit the Sackler Wing in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The wing was named for the Sackler family, major donors to a number of major museums and the owners of Purdue Pharma, which fueled the opioid crisis by manufacturing the painkiller OxyContin. (Photo: Phil Roeder/Flickr/cc)
In Victory for Grassroots Campaign, Met Museum Will Stop Accepting Donations From Opioid Crisis-Fueling Sackler Family
A number of protests led by artist Nan Goldin has made the owners of Purdue Pharma "pariahs," one observer said
Organizers behind a campaign to pressure major art institutions into cutting ties with the Sackler family secured a major victory Wednesday when the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced it would no longer accept donations from the family, whose pharmaceutical empire helped fuel the opioid crisis.
Fourteen months after the grassroots group P.A.I.N. Sackler held its first public action at the museum, the Met said it determined the family's contributions--which include the $9.5 million Sackler Wing--to be counter to the New York City museum's mission.
"On occasion, we feel it's necessary to step away from gifts that are not in the public interest, or in our institution's interest," museum president Daniel Weiss told the New York Times.
"We would only not accept gifts from people if it in some way challenges or is counter to the core mission of the institution, in exceptional cases," he added. "The OxyContin crisis in this country is a legitimate and full-blown crisis."
OxyContin is the painkiller which the Sacklers' pharmaceutical company introduced in 1996, assuring doctors and the public that it was not addictive--even though it is chemically very similar to heroin. The aggressive marketing of OxyContin and other opioids for chronic pain helped fuel the opioid crisis, which now kills an average of 130 people per day, and killed a total of 47,000 in 2017.
In March 2018, members of P.A.I.N. Sackler--which is led by artist and opioid addiction survivor Nan Goldin--assembled in the Met's Sackler wing to scatter pill bottles and hand out pamplets with statistics about the epidemic, demanding the museum end its relationship with the Sacklers.
L.A. Kauffman, an activist who has participated in a number of protests by the group, applauded the Met's decision on Wednesday.
"Direct action gets the goods," Kauffman tweeted.
BREAKING: The @metmuseum and @AMNH announce they will not take future funds from the #Sackler family. Direct action gets the goods. @sacklerpain #SacklersKnew #ShameonSackler #opioidcrisis https://t.co/759NBH4GM8
-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Kauffman also called on the Met and other museums to rename wings and rooms that bear the Sackler name.
14 months ago @sacklerpain @nangoldin1 + our allies stormed the @metmuseum
Today the Met finally did the right thing!
Thanks to the 1000s who spoke up w/ us + the journalists who uncovered Sackler misdeeds
Now let's see museums take down the Sackler name
@benjaminshepard pic.twitter.com/c3i4gSymGI-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Art critic Andrew Russeth also took note, applauding Goldin for effectively making the Sackler family "pariahs" in just over a year.
Jerry Saltz, an art critic for New York Magazine, suggested that museums' shift away from the Sacklers may convince art institutions to refuse donations from other "toxic" contributers.
The American Museum of Natural History also announced Wednesday that it would suspend all donations from the Sacklers. In recent months, the Guggenheim Museum and London's Tate Modern did the same.
The Justice Department reported in 2018 that Purdue Pharma was well aware for almost two decades that OxyContin was addictive and should only be used for acute pain for short periods of time, even as it was marketing it for chronic use.
Announcements that the family's beneficiaries are distancing themselves come as the Sackler family faces a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in March. The lawsuit decribes the Sacklers as "masterminds" who illegally "profited off of the suffering and death" of Americans.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Organizers behind a campaign to pressure major art institutions into cutting ties with the Sackler family secured a major victory Wednesday when the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced it would no longer accept donations from the family, whose pharmaceutical empire helped fuel the opioid crisis.
Fourteen months after the grassroots group P.A.I.N. Sackler held its first public action at the museum, the Met said it determined the family's contributions--which include the $9.5 million Sackler Wing--to be counter to the New York City museum's mission.
"On occasion, we feel it's necessary to step away from gifts that are not in the public interest, or in our institution's interest," museum president Daniel Weiss told the New York Times.
"We would only not accept gifts from people if it in some way challenges or is counter to the core mission of the institution, in exceptional cases," he added. "The OxyContin crisis in this country is a legitimate and full-blown crisis."
OxyContin is the painkiller which the Sacklers' pharmaceutical company introduced in 1996, assuring doctors and the public that it was not addictive--even though it is chemically very similar to heroin. The aggressive marketing of OxyContin and other opioids for chronic pain helped fuel the opioid crisis, which now kills an average of 130 people per day, and killed a total of 47,000 in 2017.
In March 2018, members of P.A.I.N. Sackler--which is led by artist and opioid addiction survivor Nan Goldin--assembled in the Met's Sackler wing to scatter pill bottles and hand out pamplets with statistics about the epidemic, demanding the museum end its relationship with the Sacklers.
L.A. Kauffman, an activist who has participated in a number of protests by the group, applauded the Met's decision on Wednesday.
"Direct action gets the goods," Kauffman tweeted.
BREAKING: The @metmuseum and @AMNH announce they will not take future funds from the #Sackler family. Direct action gets the goods. @sacklerpain #SacklersKnew #ShameonSackler #opioidcrisis https://t.co/759NBH4GM8
-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Kauffman also called on the Met and other museums to rename wings and rooms that bear the Sackler name.
14 months ago @sacklerpain @nangoldin1 + our allies stormed the @metmuseum
Today the Met finally did the right thing!
Thanks to the 1000s who spoke up w/ us + the journalists who uncovered Sackler misdeeds
Now let's see museums take down the Sackler name
@benjaminshepard pic.twitter.com/c3i4gSymGI-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Art critic Andrew Russeth also took note, applauding Goldin for effectively making the Sackler family "pariahs" in just over a year.
Jerry Saltz, an art critic for New York Magazine, suggested that museums' shift away from the Sacklers may convince art institutions to refuse donations from other "toxic" contributers.
The American Museum of Natural History also announced Wednesday that it would suspend all donations from the Sacklers. In recent months, the Guggenheim Museum and London's Tate Modern did the same.
The Justice Department reported in 2018 that Purdue Pharma was well aware for almost two decades that OxyContin was addictive and should only be used for acute pain for short periods of time, even as it was marketing it for chronic use.
Announcements that the family's beneficiaries are distancing themselves come as the Sackler family faces a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in March. The lawsuit decribes the Sacklers as "masterminds" who illegally "profited off of the suffering and death" of Americans.
Organizers behind a campaign to pressure major art institutions into cutting ties with the Sackler family secured a major victory Wednesday when the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced it would no longer accept donations from the family, whose pharmaceutical empire helped fuel the opioid crisis.
Fourteen months after the grassroots group P.A.I.N. Sackler held its first public action at the museum, the Met said it determined the family's contributions--which include the $9.5 million Sackler Wing--to be counter to the New York City museum's mission.
"On occasion, we feel it's necessary to step away from gifts that are not in the public interest, or in our institution's interest," museum president Daniel Weiss told the New York Times.
"We would only not accept gifts from people if it in some way challenges or is counter to the core mission of the institution, in exceptional cases," he added. "The OxyContin crisis in this country is a legitimate and full-blown crisis."
OxyContin is the painkiller which the Sacklers' pharmaceutical company introduced in 1996, assuring doctors and the public that it was not addictive--even though it is chemically very similar to heroin. The aggressive marketing of OxyContin and other opioids for chronic pain helped fuel the opioid crisis, which now kills an average of 130 people per day, and killed a total of 47,000 in 2017.
In March 2018, members of P.A.I.N. Sackler--which is led by artist and opioid addiction survivor Nan Goldin--assembled in the Met's Sackler wing to scatter pill bottles and hand out pamplets with statistics about the epidemic, demanding the museum end its relationship with the Sacklers.
L.A. Kauffman, an activist who has participated in a number of protests by the group, applauded the Met's decision on Wednesday.
"Direct action gets the goods," Kauffman tweeted.
BREAKING: The @metmuseum and @AMNH announce they will not take future funds from the #Sackler family. Direct action gets the goods. @sacklerpain #SacklersKnew #ShameonSackler #opioidcrisis https://t.co/759NBH4GM8
-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Kauffman also called on the Met and other museums to rename wings and rooms that bear the Sackler name.
14 months ago @sacklerpain @nangoldin1 + our allies stormed the @metmuseum
Today the Met finally did the right thing!
Thanks to the 1000s who spoke up w/ us + the journalists who uncovered Sackler misdeeds
Now let's see museums take down the Sackler name
@benjaminshepard pic.twitter.com/c3i4gSymGI-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Art critic Andrew Russeth also took note, applauding Goldin for effectively making the Sackler family "pariahs" in just over a year.
Jerry Saltz, an art critic for New York Magazine, suggested that museums' shift away from the Sacklers may convince art institutions to refuse donations from other "toxic" contributers.
The American Museum of Natural History also announced Wednesday that it would suspend all donations from the Sacklers. In recent months, the Guggenheim Museum and London's Tate Modern did the same.
The Justice Department reported in 2018 that Purdue Pharma was well aware for almost two decades that OxyContin was addictive and should only be used for acute pain for short periods of time, even as it was marketing it for chronic use.
Announcements that the family's beneficiaries are distancing themselves come as the Sackler family faces a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in March. The lawsuit decribes the Sacklers as "masterminds" who illegally "profited off of the suffering and death" of Americans.