Museum-goers visit the Sackler Wing in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The wing was named for the Sackler family, major donors to a number of major museums and the owners of Purdue Pharma, which fueled the opioid crisis by manufacturing the painkiller OxyContin. (Photo: Phil Roeder/Flickr/cc)
In Victory for Grassroots Campaign, Met Museum Will Stop Accepting Donations From Opioid Crisis-Fueling Sackler Family
A number of protests led by artist Nan Goldin has made the owners of Purdue Pharma "pariahs," one observer said
Organizers behind a campaign to pressure major art institutions into cutting ties with the Sackler family secured a major victory Wednesday when the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced it would no longer accept donations from the family, whose pharmaceutical empire helped fuel the opioid crisis.
Fourteen months after the grassroots group P.A.I.N. Sackler held its first public action at the museum, the Met said it determined the family's contributions--which include the $9.5 million Sackler Wing--to be counter to the New York City museum's mission.
"On occasion, we feel it's necessary to step away from gifts that are not in the public interest, or in our institution's interest," museum president Daniel Weiss told the New York Times.
"We would only not accept gifts from people if it in some way challenges or is counter to the core mission of the institution, in exceptional cases," he added. "The OxyContin crisis in this country is a legitimate and full-blown crisis."
OxyContin is the painkiller which the Sacklers' pharmaceutical company introduced in 1996, assuring doctors and the public that it was not addictive--even though it is chemically very similar to heroin. The aggressive marketing of OxyContin and other opioids for chronic pain helped fuel the opioid crisis, which now kills an average of 130 people per day, and killed a total of 47,000 in 2017.
In March 2018, members of P.A.I.N. Sackler--which is led by artist and opioid addiction survivor Nan Goldin--assembled in the Met's Sackler wing to scatter pill bottles and hand out pamplets with statistics about the epidemic, demanding the museum end its relationship with the Sacklers.
L.A. Kauffman, an activist who has participated in a number of protests by the group, applauded the Met's decision on Wednesday.
"Direct action gets the goods," Kauffman tweeted.
BREAKING: The @metmuseum and @AMNH announce they will not take future funds from the #Sackler family. Direct action gets the goods. @sacklerpain #SacklersKnew #ShameonSackler #opioidcrisis https://t.co/759NBH4GM8
-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Kauffman also called on the Met and other museums to rename wings and rooms that bear the Sackler name.
14 months ago @sacklerpain @nangoldin1 + our allies stormed the @metmuseum
Today the Met finally did the right thing!
Thanks to the 1000s who spoke up w/ us + the journalists who uncovered Sackler misdeeds
Now let's see museums take down the Sackler name
@benjaminshepard pic.twitter.com/c3i4gSymGI-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Art critic Andrew Russeth also took note, applauding Goldin for effectively making the Sackler family "pariahs" in just over a year.
Jerry Saltz, an art critic for New York Magazine, suggested that museums' shift away from the Sacklers may convince art institutions to refuse donations from other "toxic" contributers.
The American Museum of Natural History also announced Wednesday that it would suspend all donations from the Sacklers. In recent months, the Guggenheim Museum and London's Tate Modern did the same.
The Justice Department reported in 2018 that Purdue Pharma was well aware for almost two decades that OxyContin was addictive and should only be used for acute pain for short periods of time, even as it was marketing it for chronic use.
Announcements that the family's beneficiaries are distancing themselves come as the Sackler family faces a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in March. The lawsuit decribes the Sacklers as "masterminds" who illegally "profited off of the suffering and death" of Americans.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Organizers behind a campaign to pressure major art institutions into cutting ties with the Sackler family secured a major victory Wednesday when the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced it would no longer accept donations from the family, whose pharmaceutical empire helped fuel the opioid crisis.
Fourteen months after the grassroots group P.A.I.N. Sackler held its first public action at the museum, the Met said it determined the family's contributions--which include the $9.5 million Sackler Wing--to be counter to the New York City museum's mission.
"On occasion, we feel it's necessary to step away from gifts that are not in the public interest, or in our institution's interest," museum president Daniel Weiss told the New York Times.
"We would only not accept gifts from people if it in some way challenges or is counter to the core mission of the institution, in exceptional cases," he added. "The OxyContin crisis in this country is a legitimate and full-blown crisis."
OxyContin is the painkiller which the Sacklers' pharmaceutical company introduced in 1996, assuring doctors and the public that it was not addictive--even though it is chemically very similar to heroin. The aggressive marketing of OxyContin and other opioids for chronic pain helped fuel the opioid crisis, which now kills an average of 130 people per day, and killed a total of 47,000 in 2017.
In March 2018, members of P.A.I.N. Sackler--which is led by artist and opioid addiction survivor Nan Goldin--assembled in the Met's Sackler wing to scatter pill bottles and hand out pamplets with statistics about the epidemic, demanding the museum end its relationship with the Sacklers.
L.A. Kauffman, an activist who has participated in a number of protests by the group, applauded the Met's decision on Wednesday.
"Direct action gets the goods," Kauffman tweeted.
BREAKING: The @metmuseum and @AMNH announce they will not take future funds from the #Sackler family. Direct action gets the goods. @sacklerpain #SacklersKnew #ShameonSackler #opioidcrisis https://t.co/759NBH4GM8
-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Kauffman also called on the Met and other museums to rename wings and rooms that bear the Sackler name.
14 months ago @sacklerpain @nangoldin1 + our allies stormed the @metmuseum
Today the Met finally did the right thing!
Thanks to the 1000s who spoke up w/ us + the journalists who uncovered Sackler misdeeds
Now let's see museums take down the Sackler name
@benjaminshepard pic.twitter.com/c3i4gSymGI-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Art critic Andrew Russeth also took note, applauding Goldin for effectively making the Sackler family "pariahs" in just over a year.
Jerry Saltz, an art critic for New York Magazine, suggested that museums' shift away from the Sacklers may convince art institutions to refuse donations from other "toxic" contributers.
The American Museum of Natural History also announced Wednesday that it would suspend all donations from the Sacklers. In recent months, the Guggenheim Museum and London's Tate Modern did the same.
The Justice Department reported in 2018 that Purdue Pharma was well aware for almost two decades that OxyContin was addictive and should only be used for acute pain for short periods of time, even as it was marketing it for chronic use.
Announcements that the family's beneficiaries are distancing themselves come as the Sackler family faces a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in March. The lawsuit decribes the Sacklers as "masterminds" who illegally "profited off of the suffering and death" of Americans.
Organizers behind a campaign to pressure major art institutions into cutting ties with the Sackler family secured a major victory Wednesday when the Metropolitan Museum of Art announced it would no longer accept donations from the family, whose pharmaceutical empire helped fuel the opioid crisis.
Fourteen months after the grassroots group P.A.I.N. Sackler held its first public action at the museum, the Met said it determined the family's contributions--which include the $9.5 million Sackler Wing--to be counter to the New York City museum's mission.
"On occasion, we feel it's necessary to step away from gifts that are not in the public interest, or in our institution's interest," museum president Daniel Weiss told the New York Times.
"We would only not accept gifts from people if it in some way challenges or is counter to the core mission of the institution, in exceptional cases," he added. "The OxyContin crisis in this country is a legitimate and full-blown crisis."
OxyContin is the painkiller which the Sacklers' pharmaceutical company introduced in 1996, assuring doctors and the public that it was not addictive--even though it is chemically very similar to heroin. The aggressive marketing of OxyContin and other opioids for chronic pain helped fuel the opioid crisis, which now kills an average of 130 people per day, and killed a total of 47,000 in 2017.
In March 2018, members of P.A.I.N. Sackler--which is led by artist and opioid addiction survivor Nan Goldin--assembled in the Met's Sackler wing to scatter pill bottles and hand out pamplets with statistics about the epidemic, demanding the museum end its relationship with the Sacklers.
L.A. Kauffman, an activist who has participated in a number of protests by the group, applauded the Met's decision on Wednesday.
"Direct action gets the goods," Kauffman tweeted.
BREAKING: The @metmuseum and @AMNH announce they will not take future funds from the #Sackler family. Direct action gets the goods. @sacklerpain #SacklersKnew #ShameonSackler #opioidcrisis https://t.co/759NBH4GM8
-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Kauffman also called on the Met and other museums to rename wings and rooms that bear the Sackler name.
14 months ago @sacklerpain @nangoldin1 + our allies stormed the @metmuseum
Today the Met finally did the right thing!
Thanks to the 1000s who spoke up w/ us + the journalists who uncovered Sackler misdeeds
Now let's see museums take down the Sackler name
@benjaminshepard pic.twitter.com/c3i4gSymGI-- L.A. Kauffman (@LAKauffman) May 15, 2019
Art critic Andrew Russeth also took note, applauding Goldin for effectively making the Sackler family "pariahs" in just over a year.
Jerry Saltz, an art critic for New York Magazine, suggested that museums' shift away from the Sacklers may convince art institutions to refuse donations from other "toxic" contributers.
The American Museum of Natural History also announced Wednesday that it would suspend all donations from the Sacklers. In recent months, the Guggenheim Museum and London's Tate Modern did the same.
The Justice Department reported in 2018 that Purdue Pharma was well aware for almost two decades that OxyContin was addictive and should only be used for acute pain for short periods of time, even as it was marketing it for chronic use.
Announcements that the family's beneficiaries are distancing themselves come as the Sackler family faces a lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James in March. The lawsuit decribes the Sacklers as "masterminds" who illegally "profited off of the suffering and death" of Americans.