
Last year, the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition led the fight for Amendment 4, a ballot measure to restore voting rights for people who had served their sentences for felony convictions. (Photo: @FLRightsRestore/Twitter)
Florida GOP Condemned for Undermining Hard-Won Voting Rights for Felons With 'Modern Day Poll Tax'
"Disturbingly, this legislation will cause de facto lifetime disenfranchisement for large swaths of formerly incarcerated individuals who have completed their sentences."
Florida state lawmakers are under fire for passing legislation critics call a "modern day poll tax" on the state's newly re-enfranchised felon voters.
The legislation, H.B. 7089, would undermine last year's successful ballot initiative to restore voting rights for more than a million Floridians who have completed felony sentences by requiring them to pay all court fines and fees before they can participate in elections.
The bill passed Florida's Republican-controlled state House 71-45 Wednesday, largely along party lines. Though it still needs final approval from state senators and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, progressive politicians, voting rights advocates, and civil liberties groups are speaking out against it.
Kara Gross, the ACLU of Florida's legislative director, warned that "disturbingly, this legislation will cause de facto lifetime disenfranchisement for large swaths of formerly incarcerated individuals who have completed their sentences--precisely the opposite of the entire purpose of Amendment 4."
As Common Dreams reported last November, some 64 percent of voters supported the amendment to the state constitution to allow people who have served their sentences--excluding those convicted of murder or felony sexual crimes--to vote. The "huge and hard fought victory," was celebrated as a repeal of "one of the country's worst Jim Crow laws" and "the largest expansion in voting rights since the Voting Rights Act."
Opponents charge that the legislation defies the will of Florida voters and, as Gross put it, "merely replaces one unjust system for another."
"Florida's citizens spoke clearly on election day--1.4 million disenfranchised individuals deserve a second chance," said Gross. "This historic citizens initiative will only be thwarted by this legislation."
"The Florida House just subverted their wishes by passing a poll tax that will continue to disenfranchise low-income citizens," tweeted Georgetown University public policy professor Don Moynihan.
Neil Volz, political director of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, which led the fight for the constitutional amendment, told HuffPost in a statement that the "partisan vote in the House represented a failure to live up to the bipartisan commitment Florida voters showed with the passage of Amendment 4."
Looking ahead, HuffPost reported that the final legislation could look different after the state Senate votes on its companion bill.
The Florida Senate is still considering its own version of the legislation. The Senate version requires people with felonies to repay all restitution before they can vote again. But unlike the House version, the Senate bill would allow people to vote if fines and fees are converted to a civil lien. Lawmakers are expected to eventually negotiate a final version of the bill, according to Florida Politics.
While Volz still has concerns with the Senate bill, he said it was closer to something advocates could support.
"We believe the Senate bill better reflects the spirit of Amendment 4 and hope that Republicans and Democrats can come together to produce a bipartisan bill that aligns with the will of Florida's voters," he said.
The legislative battle in Florida comes amid a lively national debate about restoring voting rights not only for people who were formerly incarcerated for felonies, but also those who are currently behind bars.
After the Florida House approved the bill Wednesday, multiple candidates for the Democratic nomination for president took to Twitter to denounce it.
"This is a poll tax," said Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who called for a "new Voting Rights Act" last week.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--the first 2020 hopeful to publicly support allowing all people who are currently in prison to retain their right to vote--tweeted: "Enough with the racist and unconstitutional efforts to deny people the right to vote. If you are an American citizen you must be able to vote. End of discussion."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Florida state lawmakers are under fire for passing legislation critics call a "modern day poll tax" on the state's newly re-enfranchised felon voters.
The legislation, H.B. 7089, would undermine last year's successful ballot initiative to restore voting rights for more than a million Floridians who have completed felony sentences by requiring them to pay all court fines and fees before they can participate in elections.
The bill passed Florida's Republican-controlled state House 71-45 Wednesday, largely along party lines. Though it still needs final approval from state senators and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, progressive politicians, voting rights advocates, and civil liberties groups are speaking out against it.
Kara Gross, the ACLU of Florida's legislative director, warned that "disturbingly, this legislation will cause de facto lifetime disenfranchisement for large swaths of formerly incarcerated individuals who have completed their sentences--precisely the opposite of the entire purpose of Amendment 4."
As Common Dreams reported last November, some 64 percent of voters supported the amendment to the state constitution to allow people who have served their sentences--excluding those convicted of murder or felony sexual crimes--to vote. The "huge and hard fought victory," was celebrated as a repeal of "one of the country's worst Jim Crow laws" and "the largest expansion in voting rights since the Voting Rights Act."
Opponents charge that the legislation defies the will of Florida voters and, as Gross put it, "merely replaces one unjust system for another."
"Florida's citizens spoke clearly on election day--1.4 million disenfranchised individuals deserve a second chance," said Gross. "This historic citizens initiative will only be thwarted by this legislation."
"The Florida House just subverted their wishes by passing a poll tax that will continue to disenfranchise low-income citizens," tweeted Georgetown University public policy professor Don Moynihan.
Neil Volz, political director of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, which led the fight for the constitutional amendment, told HuffPost in a statement that the "partisan vote in the House represented a failure to live up to the bipartisan commitment Florida voters showed with the passage of Amendment 4."
Looking ahead, HuffPost reported that the final legislation could look different after the state Senate votes on its companion bill.
The Florida Senate is still considering its own version of the legislation. The Senate version requires people with felonies to repay all restitution before they can vote again. But unlike the House version, the Senate bill would allow people to vote if fines and fees are converted to a civil lien. Lawmakers are expected to eventually negotiate a final version of the bill, according to Florida Politics.
While Volz still has concerns with the Senate bill, he said it was closer to something advocates could support.
"We believe the Senate bill better reflects the spirit of Amendment 4 and hope that Republicans and Democrats can come together to produce a bipartisan bill that aligns with the will of Florida's voters," he said.
The legislative battle in Florida comes amid a lively national debate about restoring voting rights not only for people who were formerly incarcerated for felonies, but also those who are currently behind bars.
After the Florida House approved the bill Wednesday, multiple candidates for the Democratic nomination for president took to Twitter to denounce it.
"This is a poll tax," said Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who called for a "new Voting Rights Act" last week.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--the first 2020 hopeful to publicly support allowing all people who are currently in prison to retain their right to vote--tweeted: "Enough with the racist and unconstitutional efforts to deny people the right to vote. If you are an American citizen you must be able to vote. End of discussion."
Florida state lawmakers are under fire for passing legislation critics call a "modern day poll tax" on the state's newly re-enfranchised felon voters.
The legislation, H.B. 7089, would undermine last year's successful ballot initiative to restore voting rights for more than a million Floridians who have completed felony sentences by requiring them to pay all court fines and fees before they can participate in elections.
The bill passed Florida's Republican-controlled state House 71-45 Wednesday, largely along party lines. Though it still needs final approval from state senators and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, progressive politicians, voting rights advocates, and civil liberties groups are speaking out against it.
Kara Gross, the ACLU of Florida's legislative director, warned that "disturbingly, this legislation will cause de facto lifetime disenfranchisement for large swaths of formerly incarcerated individuals who have completed their sentences--precisely the opposite of the entire purpose of Amendment 4."
As Common Dreams reported last November, some 64 percent of voters supported the amendment to the state constitution to allow people who have served their sentences--excluding those convicted of murder or felony sexual crimes--to vote. The "huge and hard fought victory," was celebrated as a repeal of "one of the country's worst Jim Crow laws" and "the largest expansion in voting rights since the Voting Rights Act."
Opponents charge that the legislation defies the will of Florida voters and, as Gross put it, "merely replaces one unjust system for another."
"Florida's citizens spoke clearly on election day--1.4 million disenfranchised individuals deserve a second chance," said Gross. "This historic citizens initiative will only be thwarted by this legislation."
"The Florida House just subverted their wishes by passing a poll tax that will continue to disenfranchise low-income citizens," tweeted Georgetown University public policy professor Don Moynihan.
Neil Volz, political director of the Florida Rights Restoration Coalition, which led the fight for the constitutional amendment, told HuffPost in a statement that the "partisan vote in the House represented a failure to live up to the bipartisan commitment Florida voters showed with the passage of Amendment 4."
Looking ahead, HuffPost reported that the final legislation could look different after the state Senate votes on its companion bill.
The Florida Senate is still considering its own version of the legislation. The Senate version requires people with felonies to repay all restitution before they can vote again. But unlike the House version, the Senate bill would allow people to vote if fines and fees are converted to a civil lien. Lawmakers are expected to eventually negotiate a final version of the bill, according to Florida Politics.
While Volz still has concerns with the Senate bill, he said it was closer to something advocates could support.
"We believe the Senate bill better reflects the spirit of Amendment 4 and hope that Republicans and Democrats can come together to produce a bipartisan bill that aligns with the will of Florida's voters," he said.
The legislative battle in Florida comes amid a lively national debate about restoring voting rights not only for people who were formerly incarcerated for felonies, but also those who are currently behind bars.
After the Florida House approved the bill Wednesday, multiple candidates for the Democratic nomination for president took to Twitter to denounce it.
"This is a poll tax," said Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), who called for a "new Voting Rights Act" last week.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.)--the first 2020 hopeful to publicly support allowing all people who are currently in prison to retain their right to vote--tweeted: "Enough with the racist and unconstitutional efforts to deny people the right to vote. If you are an American citizen you must be able to vote. End of discussion."

