SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Open Internet advocates are criticizing European Union member states' passage of the Copyright Directive. (Photo: SaveYourInternet.eu)
European Union member states were accused of threatening freedom of speech and online expression--and ignoring the will of millions of people--after they adopted controversial new copyright rules.
\u201cEU Member States give green light for copyright censorship https://t.co/JGAvYK2O8J \n\n#SaveYourInternet #FixCopyright #CensorshipMachine #copyright #censorship\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1555338517
Six member states--Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Finland, and Sweden--voted against the proposal. Three others--Belgium, Estonia, and Slovenia--abstained. Nineteen voted in favor.
\u201cCouncil (= #EU Member States) APPROVED #CopyrightDirective (= Adopted #Article13/#Article17) \ud83d\udc49Check how your country voted \ud83d\udc47\nhttps://t.co/ctgx5KBqr6 #SaveYourInternet #Artikel13 #Artikel17 #UploadFilter #Urheberrechtsreform #UploadFilters\u201d— Fix it, dear EU (@Fix it, dear EU) 1555316600
The completion of the final hurdle of the new Copyright Directive comes after the European Parliament passed the rules last month--a move German MEP Julia Reda called a "dark day for internet freedom."
"With today's agreement," European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said Monday, "we are making copyright rules fit for the digital age. Europe will now have clear rules that guarantee fair remuneration for creators, strong rights for users, and responsibility for platforms."
Not so, says the Save Your Internet campaign, which argues that the overhaul "only benefits big businesses."
The devil is in two provisions, which the Wikimedia Foundation summed up last month. They are Article 15, which was formerly called Article 11, and Article 17, formerly called 13.
Article 15 will require certain news websites to purchase licenses for the content they display. As a result, many websites that helped people find and make sense of the news may choose not to offer this type of service, making it harder to find high-quality news items from trusted sources online. Article 17 will introduce a new liability regime across the EU, under which websites can be sued for copyright violations by their users. This will incentivize websites to filter all uploads and keep only "safe" copyrighted content on their sites, eroding essential exceptions and limitations to copyright by making platforms the judges of what is and isn't infringement.
The end result, says the Save Your Internet campaign, is detrimental to users, creators, and competition:
Given such impacts, Catherine Stihler, chief executive of the Open Knowledge Foundation, said the adoption of the rules is "a deeply disappointing result which will have a far-reaching and negative impact on freedom of speech and expression online."
"We now risk the creation of a more closed society at the very time we should be using digital advances to build a more open world where knowledge creates power for the many, not the few," she said.
Still, Stihler said that all hope is not lost.
"The battle is not over," she said. "Next month's European elections are an opportunity to elect a strong cohort of open champions at the European Parliament who will work to build a more open world."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
European Union member states were accused of threatening freedom of speech and online expression--and ignoring the will of millions of people--after they adopted controversial new copyright rules.
\u201cEU Member States give green light for copyright censorship https://t.co/JGAvYK2O8J \n\n#SaveYourInternet #FixCopyright #CensorshipMachine #copyright #censorship\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1555338517
Six member states--Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Finland, and Sweden--voted against the proposal. Three others--Belgium, Estonia, and Slovenia--abstained. Nineteen voted in favor.
\u201cCouncil (= #EU Member States) APPROVED #CopyrightDirective (= Adopted #Article13/#Article17) \ud83d\udc49Check how your country voted \ud83d\udc47\nhttps://t.co/ctgx5KBqr6 #SaveYourInternet #Artikel13 #Artikel17 #UploadFilter #Urheberrechtsreform #UploadFilters\u201d— Fix it, dear EU (@Fix it, dear EU) 1555316600
The completion of the final hurdle of the new Copyright Directive comes after the European Parliament passed the rules last month--a move German MEP Julia Reda called a "dark day for internet freedom."
"With today's agreement," European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said Monday, "we are making copyright rules fit for the digital age. Europe will now have clear rules that guarantee fair remuneration for creators, strong rights for users, and responsibility for platforms."
Not so, says the Save Your Internet campaign, which argues that the overhaul "only benefits big businesses."
The devil is in two provisions, which the Wikimedia Foundation summed up last month. They are Article 15, which was formerly called Article 11, and Article 17, formerly called 13.
Article 15 will require certain news websites to purchase licenses for the content they display. As a result, many websites that helped people find and make sense of the news may choose not to offer this type of service, making it harder to find high-quality news items from trusted sources online. Article 17 will introduce a new liability regime across the EU, under which websites can be sued for copyright violations by their users. This will incentivize websites to filter all uploads and keep only "safe" copyrighted content on their sites, eroding essential exceptions and limitations to copyright by making platforms the judges of what is and isn't infringement.
The end result, says the Save Your Internet campaign, is detrimental to users, creators, and competition:
Given such impacts, Catherine Stihler, chief executive of the Open Knowledge Foundation, said the adoption of the rules is "a deeply disappointing result which will have a far-reaching and negative impact on freedom of speech and expression online."
"We now risk the creation of a more closed society at the very time we should be using digital advances to build a more open world where knowledge creates power for the many, not the few," she said.
Still, Stihler said that all hope is not lost.
"The battle is not over," she said. "Next month's European elections are an opportunity to elect a strong cohort of open champions at the European Parliament who will work to build a more open world."
European Union member states were accused of threatening freedom of speech and online expression--and ignoring the will of millions of people--after they adopted controversial new copyright rules.
\u201cEU Member States give green light for copyright censorship https://t.co/JGAvYK2O8J \n\n#SaveYourInternet #FixCopyright #CensorshipMachine #copyright #censorship\u201d— EDRi (@EDRi) 1555338517
Six member states--Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland, Finland, and Sweden--voted against the proposal. Three others--Belgium, Estonia, and Slovenia--abstained. Nineteen voted in favor.
\u201cCouncil (= #EU Member States) APPROVED #CopyrightDirective (= Adopted #Article13/#Article17) \ud83d\udc49Check how your country voted \ud83d\udc47\nhttps://t.co/ctgx5KBqr6 #SaveYourInternet #Artikel13 #Artikel17 #UploadFilter #Urheberrechtsreform #UploadFilters\u201d— Fix it, dear EU (@Fix it, dear EU) 1555316600
The completion of the final hurdle of the new Copyright Directive comes after the European Parliament passed the rules last month--a move German MEP Julia Reda called a "dark day for internet freedom."
"With today's agreement," European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said Monday, "we are making copyright rules fit for the digital age. Europe will now have clear rules that guarantee fair remuneration for creators, strong rights for users, and responsibility for platforms."
Not so, says the Save Your Internet campaign, which argues that the overhaul "only benefits big businesses."
The devil is in two provisions, which the Wikimedia Foundation summed up last month. They are Article 15, which was formerly called Article 11, and Article 17, formerly called 13.
Article 15 will require certain news websites to purchase licenses for the content they display. As a result, many websites that helped people find and make sense of the news may choose not to offer this type of service, making it harder to find high-quality news items from trusted sources online. Article 17 will introduce a new liability regime across the EU, under which websites can be sued for copyright violations by their users. This will incentivize websites to filter all uploads and keep only "safe" copyrighted content on their sites, eroding essential exceptions and limitations to copyright by making platforms the judges of what is and isn't infringement.
The end result, says the Save Your Internet campaign, is detrimental to users, creators, and competition:
Given such impacts, Catherine Stihler, chief executive of the Open Knowledge Foundation, said the adoption of the rules is "a deeply disappointing result which will have a far-reaching and negative impact on freedom of speech and expression online."
"We now risk the creation of a more closed society at the very time we should be using digital advances to build a more open world where knowledge creates power for the many, not the few," she said.
Still, Stihler said that all hope is not lost.
"The battle is not over," she said. "Next month's European elections are an opportunity to elect a strong cohort of open champions at the European Parliament who will work to build a more open world."