SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell addresses the chamber on March 25, 2019. (Photo: screenshot, Majority Leader YouTube)
Senate Republicans will be able to fill the nation's federal courts with conservative justices even more rapidly under a new rule change proposed by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, infuriating progressives.
McConnell's latest salvo in the battle over the courts is less dramatic than his work to stack the Supreme Court for President Donald Trump, but the Kentucky Republican is nonetheless making moves that will have longstanding effects on the makeup of the country's judicial system.
The newest "nuclear option" being considered by the majority leader would slash debate time on district court nominees from 30 hours to two. McConnell justified the move in a floor speech Thursday that, at best, referred to ideas of comity and legislative fairness that were inconsistent with his behavior during the President Barack Obama administration.
During the last year of the Obama administration, McConnell used his power in the Senate to keep the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of Antonin Scalia open in spite of Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the position--simply by refusing to allow Garland to come up for a vote.
On Thursday, McConnell sounded a different tune, bemoaning the disappearance of bipartisanship and calling for a reduction in debate time to allow Trump's nominees to go through in bulk.
\u201cToday I took the first step under regular order towards ending systematic obstruction on nominees and getting the Senate back to its normal pattern for handling presidential nominations.\nhttps://t.co/bFJ8DSLKZy\u201d— Leader McConnell (@Leader McConnell) 1553803896
"This is a reform that every member should embrace," said McConnell, "when their party controls the White House and when it does not control the White House."
\u201cNuclear Option Alert \u2014 McConnell says plans to change Senate rules to cut debate time on district court nominees from 30 hours to 2 hours.\n\nThis would clear the way for Republicans to speedily confirm a boatload of Trump judges.\n\n"This is a change the institution needs."\u201d— Sahil Kapur (@Sahil Kapur) 1553801251
In a statement, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer hit McConnell for the proposed change and called the Republican move a manipulation of the system.
"Sen. McConnell's approach has always been to manipulate Senate rules when it helps him and then change Senate rules when the tables turn," said Schumer. "This is just another step in his effort to limit the rights of the minority and cede authority to the administration."
\u201c.@SenateMajLdr McConnell\u2019s approach has always been to manipulate Senate rules when it helps him and then change Senate rules when the tables turn.\n \nThis is just another step in his effort to limit the rights of the minority and cede authority to the administration.\u201d— Chuck Schumer (@Chuck Schumer) 1553805491
Progressives were furious.
Alexis Goldstein, cohost of the podcast Humorless Queers, pointed to McConnell's success already in forcing through nominee after nominee with extreme right wing positions. That's not enough for the majority leader, though, she said.
"He's TOTALLY DRUNK on his own power and just wants MORE," said Goldstein.
Splinter's Sophie Weiner was aghast at the hypocrisy. In an essay on the rule change, Weiner pointed to Garland and McConnell's use of the rules to stop any forward progress on any progressive principles while calling for bipartisanship on his party's priorities.
"Do we even need to point out how absurdly craven a move this is from MITCH FUCKING MCCONNELL?!?" wrote Weiner.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Senate Republicans will be able to fill the nation's federal courts with conservative justices even more rapidly under a new rule change proposed by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, infuriating progressives.
McConnell's latest salvo in the battle over the courts is less dramatic than his work to stack the Supreme Court for President Donald Trump, but the Kentucky Republican is nonetheless making moves that will have longstanding effects on the makeup of the country's judicial system.
The newest "nuclear option" being considered by the majority leader would slash debate time on district court nominees from 30 hours to two. McConnell justified the move in a floor speech Thursday that, at best, referred to ideas of comity and legislative fairness that were inconsistent with his behavior during the President Barack Obama administration.
During the last year of the Obama administration, McConnell used his power in the Senate to keep the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of Antonin Scalia open in spite of Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the position--simply by refusing to allow Garland to come up for a vote.
On Thursday, McConnell sounded a different tune, bemoaning the disappearance of bipartisanship and calling for a reduction in debate time to allow Trump's nominees to go through in bulk.
\u201cToday I took the first step under regular order towards ending systematic obstruction on nominees and getting the Senate back to its normal pattern for handling presidential nominations.\nhttps://t.co/bFJ8DSLKZy\u201d— Leader McConnell (@Leader McConnell) 1553803896
"This is a reform that every member should embrace," said McConnell, "when their party controls the White House and when it does not control the White House."
\u201cNuclear Option Alert \u2014 McConnell says plans to change Senate rules to cut debate time on district court nominees from 30 hours to 2 hours.\n\nThis would clear the way for Republicans to speedily confirm a boatload of Trump judges.\n\n"This is a change the institution needs."\u201d— Sahil Kapur (@Sahil Kapur) 1553801251
In a statement, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer hit McConnell for the proposed change and called the Republican move a manipulation of the system.
"Sen. McConnell's approach has always been to manipulate Senate rules when it helps him and then change Senate rules when the tables turn," said Schumer. "This is just another step in his effort to limit the rights of the minority and cede authority to the administration."
\u201c.@SenateMajLdr McConnell\u2019s approach has always been to manipulate Senate rules when it helps him and then change Senate rules when the tables turn.\n \nThis is just another step in his effort to limit the rights of the minority and cede authority to the administration.\u201d— Chuck Schumer (@Chuck Schumer) 1553805491
Progressives were furious.
Alexis Goldstein, cohost of the podcast Humorless Queers, pointed to McConnell's success already in forcing through nominee after nominee with extreme right wing positions. That's not enough for the majority leader, though, she said.
"He's TOTALLY DRUNK on his own power and just wants MORE," said Goldstein.
Splinter's Sophie Weiner was aghast at the hypocrisy. In an essay on the rule change, Weiner pointed to Garland and McConnell's use of the rules to stop any forward progress on any progressive principles while calling for bipartisanship on his party's priorities.
"Do we even need to point out how absurdly craven a move this is from MITCH FUCKING MCCONNELL?!?" wrote Weiner.
Senate Republicans will be able to fill the nation's federal courts with conservative justices even more rapidly under a new rule change proposed by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, infuriating progressives.
McConnell's latest salvo in the battle over the courts is less dramatic than his work to stack the Supreme Court for President Donald Trump, but the Kentucky Republican is nonetheless making moves that will have longstanding effects on the makeup of the country's judicial system.
The newest "nuclear option" being considered by the majority leader would slash debate time on district court nominees from 30 hours to two. McConnell justified the move in a floor speech Thursday that, at best, referred to ideas of comity and legislative fairness that were inconsistent with his behavior during the President Barack Obama administration.
During the last year of the Obama administration, McConnell used his power in the Senate to keep the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of Antonin Scalia open in spite of Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the position--simply by refusing to allow Garland to come up for a vote.
On Thursday, McConnell sounded a different tune, bemoaning the disappearance of bipartisanship and calling for a reduction in debate time to allow Trump's nominees to go through in bulk.
\u201cToday I took the first step under regular order towards ending systematic obstruction on nominees and getting the Senate back to its normal pattern for handling presidential nominations.\nhttps://t.co/bFJ8DSLKZy\u201d— Leader McConnell (@Leader McConnell) 1553803896
"This is a reform that every member should embrace," said McConnell, "when their party controls the White House and when it does not control the White House."
\u201cNuclear Option Alert \u2014 McConnell says plans to change Senate rules to cut debate time on district court nominees from 30 hours to 2 hours.\n\nThis would clear the way for Republicans to speedily confirm a boatload of Trump judges.\n\n"This is a change the institution needs."\u201d— Sahil Kapur (@Sahil Kapur) 1553801251
In a statement, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer hit McConnell for the proposed change and called the Republican move a manipulation of the system.
"Sen. McConnell's approach has always been to manipulate Senate rules when it helps him and then change Senate rules when the tables turn," said Schumer. "This is just another step in his effort to limit the rights of the minority and cede authority to the administration."
\u201c.@SenateMajLdr McConnell\u2019s approach has always been to manipulate Senate rules when it helps him and then change Senate rules when the tables turn.\n \nThis is just another step in his effort to limit the rights of the minority and cede authority to the administration.\u201d— Chuck Schumer (@Chuck Schumer) 1553805491
Progressives were furious.
Alexis Goldstein, cohost of the podcast Humorless Queers, pointed to McConnell's success already in forcing through nominee after nominee with extreme right wing positions. That's not enough for the majority leader, though, she said.
"He's TOTALLY DRUNK on his own power and just wants MORE," said Goldstein.
Splinter's Sophie Weiner was aghast at the hypocrisy. In an essay on the rule change, Weiner pointed to Garland and McConnell's use of the rules to stop any forward progress on any progressive principles while calling for bipartisanship on his party's priorities.
"Do we even need to point out how absurdly craven a move this is from MITCH FUCKING MCCONNELL?!?" wrote Weiner.