Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell addresses the chamber on March 25, 2019. (Photo: screenshot, Majority Leader YouTube)
'Absurdly Craven': McConnell Pursues New Nuclear Option on Judges, Enraging Progressives
"He’s TOTALLY DRUNK on his own power and just wants MORE."
Senate Republicans will be able to fill the nation's federal courts with conservative justices even more rapidly under a new rule change proposed by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, infuriating progressives.
McConnell's latest salvo in the battle over the courts is less dramatic than his work to stack the Supreme Court for President Donald Trump, but the Kentucky Republican is nonetheless making moves that will have longstanding effects on the makeup of the country's judicial system.
The newest "nuclear option" being considered by the majority leader would slash debate time on district court nominees from 30 hours to two. McConnell justified the move in a floor speech Thursday that, at best, referred to ideas of comity and legislative fairness that were inconsistent with his behavior during the President Barack Obama administration.
During the last year of the Obama administration, McConnell used his power in the Senate to keep the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of Antonin Scalia open in spite of Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the position--simply by refusing to allow Garland to come up for a vote.
On Thursday, McConnell sounded a different tune, bemoaning the disappearance of bipartisanship and calling for a reduction in debate time to allow Trump's nominees to go through in bulk.
"This is a reform that every member should embrace," said McConnell, "when their party controls the White House and when it does not control the White House."
In a statement, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer hit McConnell for the proposed change and called the Republican move a manipulation of the system.
"Sen. McConnell's approach has always been to manipulate Senate rules when it helps him and then change Senate rules when the tables turn," said Schumer. "This is just another step in his effort to limit the rights of the minority and cede authority to the administration."
Progressives were furious.
Alexis Goldstein, cohost of the podcast Humorless Queers, pointed to McConnell's success already in forcing through nominee after nominee with extreme right wing positions. That's not enough for the majority leader, though, she said.
"He's TOTALLY DRUNK on his own power and just wants MORE," said Goldstein.
Splinter's Sophie Weiner was aghast at the hypocrisy. In an essay on the rule change, Weiner pointed to Garland and McConnell's use of the rules to stop any forward progress on any progressive principles while calling for bipartisanship on his party's priorities.
"Do we even need to point out how absurdly craven a move this is from MITCH FUCKING MCCONNELL?!?" wrote Weiner.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Senate Republicans will be able to fill the nation's federal courts with conservative justices even more rapidly under a new rule change proposed by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, infuriating progressives.
McConnell's latest salvo in the battle over the courts is less dramatic than his work to stack the Supreme Court for President Donald Trump, but the Kentucky Republican is nonetheless making moves that will have longstanding effects on the makeup of the country's judicial system.
The newest "nuclear option" being considered by the majority leader would slash debate time on district court nominees from 30 hours to two. McConnell justified the move in a floor speech Thursday that, at best, referred to ideas of comity and legislative fairness that were inconsistent with his behavior during the President Barack Obama administration.
During the last year of the Obama administration, McConnell used his power in the Senate to keep the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of Antonin Scalia open in spite of Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the position--simply by refusing to allow Garland to come up for a vote.
On Thursday, McConnell sounded a different tune, bemoaning the disappearance of bipartisanship and calling for a reduction in debate time to allow Trump's nominees to go through in bulk.
"This is a reform that every member should embrace," said McConnell, "when their party controls the White House and when it does not control the White House."
In a statement, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer hit McConnell for the proposed change and called the Republican move a manipulation of the system.
"Sen. McConnell's approach has always been to manipulate Senate rules when it helps him and then change Senate rules when the tables turn," said Schumer. "This is just another step in his effort to limit the rights of the minority and cede authority to the administration."
Progressives were furious.
Alexis Goldstein, cohost of the podcast Humorless Queers, pointed to McConnell's success already in forcing through nominee after nominee with extreme right wing positions. That's not enough for the majority leader, though, she said.
"He's TOTALLY DRUNK on his own power and just wants MORE," said Goldstein.
Splinter's Sophie Weiner was aghast at the hypocrisy. In an essay on the rule change, Weiner pointed to Garland and McConnell's use of the rules to stop any forward progress on any progressive principles while calling for bipartisanship on his party's priorities.
"Do we even need to point out how absurdly craven a move this is from MITCH FUCKING MCCONNELL?!?" wrote Weiner.
Senate Republicans will be able to fill the nation's federal courts with conservative justices even more rapidly under a new rule change proposed by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, infuriating progressives.
McConnell's latest salvo in the battle over the courts is less dramatic than his work to stack the Supreme Court for President Donald Trump, but the Kentucky Republican is nonetheless making moves that will have longstanding effects on the makeup of the country's judicial system.
The newest "nuclear option" being considered by the majority leader would slash debate time on district court nominees from 30 hours to two. McConnell justified the move in a floor speech Thursday that, at best, referred to ideas of comity and legislative fairness that were inconsistent with his behavior during the President Barack Obama administration.
During the last year of the Obama administration, McConnell used his power in the Senate to keep the Supreme Court seat vacated by the death of Antonin Scalia open in spite of Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the position--simply by refusing to allow Garland to come up for a vote.
On Thursday, McConnell sounded a different tune, bemoaning the disappearance of bipartisanship and calling for a reduction in debate time to allow Trump's nominees to go through in bulk.
"This is a reform that every member should embrace," said McConnell, "when their party controls the White House and when it does not control the White House."
In a statement, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer hit McConnell for the proposed change and called the Republican move a manipulation of the system.
"Sen. McConnell's approach has always been to manipulate Senate rules when it helps him and then change Senate rules when the tables turn," said Schumer. "This is just another step in his effort to limit the rights of the minority and cede authority to the administration."
Progressives were furious.
Alexis Goldstein, cohost of the podcast Humorless Queers, pointed to McConnell's success already in forcing through nominee after nominee with extreme right wing positions. That's not enough for the majority leader, though, she said.
"He's TOTALLY DRUNK on his own power and just wants MORE," said Goldstein.
Splinter's Sophie Weiner was aghast at the hypocrisy. In an essay on the rule change, Weiner pointed to Garland and McConnell's use of the rules to stop any forward progress on any progressive principles while calling for bipartisanship on his party's priorities.
"Do we even need to point out how absurdly craven a move this is from MITCH FUCKING MCCONNELL?!?" wrote Weiner.