SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
President Donald Trump declared a national emergency to obtain funding for a border wall on February 15, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Twitter)
While Democrats are preparing to propose a joint resolution challenging President Donald Trump's national emergency declaration in order to obtain funding for a border wall, one legal scholar is among those arguing the time has come to pursue a far more direct and effective method of combating the president's lawlessness: impeachment.
Ahead of Trump's national emergency declaration Friday morning, international law professor Francis Boyle said there is no time to lose.
"This should be initiated immediately," said Boyle. "All you need is one brave member of the U.S. House of Representatives to meaningfully assert that body's Power of the Purse. Trump's indications that he will override that legislative power and the seeming acquiescence by some Democrats is illegitimate and dangerous and subverts a fundamental premise of the Constitution.
Boyle--who worked closely with former Rep. Henry Gonzalez (D-Texas) to introduce a resolution to impeach President George H.W. Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors after he initiated the first Gulf War--said Congress has a solid case for bringing charges against Trump over his violation of the U.S. Constitution:
A Bill of Impeachment could consist of articles including for (1) violating Article 1, Section 7 of the United States Constitution: "All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives..." (2) Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution: "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law..." (3) It also violates the Federal Anti-Deficiency Statute.
With Trump preparing to unilaterally take control of government funds by declaring a national emergency, Boyle said, lawmakers' "most direct remedy is impeachment."
Journalist John Nichols, who has advocated for impeachment as "the cure for a constitutional crisis," was among those who agreed with Boyle on social media, arguing that the U.S. is indeed in a state of national emergency as Trump has claimed--just not an emergency that will be fixed with a wall at the U.S.-Mexico border.
\u201cI agree with President Trump that there is a national emergency. We just have different responses to what we deem to be a crisis.\n\nHe favors a wall.\n\nI favor impeachment.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1550207234
\u201cDeclaring a national emergency over nothing is also a despicable act of unconstitutional power grabbing. #ImpeachTrump\u201d— AlanB_1973 (@AlanB_1973) 1550234136
"President Trump's illegal declaration of a national emergency to build a wall on the southern border of the United States that Congress has not authorized is a clear abuse of power," said John Bonifaz, president of the pro-democracy group Free Speech For People, in a statement. "It is time--long past time--for members of the U.S. House of Representatives to carry out their constitutional responsibilities and to start impeachment proceedings now against this president. We cannot continue to have a lawless president in the White House."
Peter Gleick, a climate scientist and advocate for impeachment, wrote on Twitter Thursday evening that looking back at the Trump administration, future generations will likely be baffled if lawmakers fail to impeach the president.
\u201cHonestly, what's it going to say to us and future generations if we DON'T impeach Trump?\u201d— Peter Gleick \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@Peter Gleick \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1550184512
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
While Democrats are preparing to propose a joint resolution challenging President Donald Trump's national emergency declaration in order to obtain funding for a border wall, one legal scholar is among those arguing the time has come to pursue a far more direct and effective method of combating the president's lawlessness: impeachment.
Ahead of Trump's national emergency declaration Friday morning, international law professor Francis Boyle said there is no time to lose.
"This should be initiated immediately," said Boyle. "All you need is one brave member of the U.S. House of Representatives to meaningfully assert that body's Power of the Purse. Trump's indications that he will override that legislative power and the seeming acquiescence by some Democrats is illegitimate and dangerous and subverts a fundamental premise of the Constitution.
Boyle--who worked closely with former Rep. Henry Gonzalez (D-Texas) to introduce a resolution to impeach President George H.W. Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors after he initiated the first Gulf War--said Congress has a solid case for bringing charges against Trump over his violation of the U.S. Constitution:
A Bill of Impeachment could consist of articles including for (1) violating Article 1, Section 7 of the United States Constitution: "All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives..." (2) Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution: "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law..." (3) It also violates the Federal Anti-Deficiency Statute.
With Trump preparing to unilaterally take control of government funds by declaring a national emergency, Boyle said, lawmakers' "most direct remedy is impeachment."
Journalist John Nichols, who has advocated for impeachment as "the cure for a constitutional crisis," was among those who agreed with Boyle on social media, arguing that the U.S. is indeed in a state of national emergency as Trump has claimed--just not an emergency that will be fixed with a wall at the U.S.-Mexico border.
\u201cI agree with President Trump that there is a national emergency. We just have different responses to what we deem to be a crisis.\n\nHe favors a wall.\n\nI favor impeachment.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1550207234
\u201cDeclaring a national emergency over nothing is also a despicable act of unconstitutional power grabbing. #ImpeachTrump\u201d— AlanB_1973 (@AlanB_1973) 1550234136
"President Trump's illegal declaration of a national emergency to build a wall on the southern border of the United States that Congress has not authorized is a clear abuse of power," said John Bonifaz, president of the pro-democracy group Free Speech For People, in a statement. "It is time--long past time--for members of the U.S. House of Representatives to carry out their constitutional responsibilities and to start impeachment proceedings now against this president. We cannot continue to have a lawless president in the White House."
Peter Gleick, a climate scientist and advocate for impeachment, wrote on Twitter Thursday evening that looking back at the Trump administration, future generations will likely be baffled if lawmakers fail to impeach the president.
\u201cHonestly, what's it going to say to us and future generations if we DON'T impeach Trump?\u201d— Peter Gleick \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@Peter Gleick \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1550184512
While Democrats are preparing to propose a joint resolution challenging President Donald Trump's national emergency declaration in order to obtain funding for a border wall, one legal scholar is among those arguing the time has come to pursue a far more direct and effective method of combating the president's lawlessness: impeachment.
Ahead of Trump's national emergency declaration Friday morning, international law professor Francis Boyle said there is no time to lose.
"This should be initiated immediately," said Boyle. "All you need is one brave member of the U.S. House of Representatives to meaningfully assert that body's Power of the Purse. Trump's indications that he will override that legislative power and the seeming acquiescence by some Democrats is illegitimate and dangerous and subverts a fundamental premise of the Constitution.
Boyle--who worked closely with former Rep. Henry Gonzalez (D-Texas) to introduce a resolution to impeach President George H.W. Bush for high crimes and misdemeanors after he initiated the first Gulf War--said Congress has a solid case for bringing charges against Trump over his violation of the U.S. Constitution:
A Bill of Impeachment could consist of articles including for (1) violating Article 1, Section 7 of the United States Constitution: "All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives..." (2) Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution: "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law..." (3) It also violates the Federal Anti-Deficiency Statute.
With Trump preparing to unilaterally take control of government funds by declaring a national emergency, Boyle said, lawmakers' "most direct remedy is impeachment."
Journalist John Nichols, who has advocated for impeachment as "the cure for a constitutional crisis," was among those who agreed with Boyle on social media, arguing that the U.S. is indeed in a state of national emergency as Trump has claimed--just not an emergency that will be fixed with a wall at the U.S.-Mexico border.
\u201cI agree with President Trump that there is a national emergency. We just have different responses to what we deem to be a crisis.\n\nHe favors a wall.\n\nI favor impeachment.\u201d— John Nichols (@John Nichols) 1550207234
\u201cDeclaring a national emergency over nothing is also a despicable act of unconstitutional power grabbing. #ImpeachTrump\u201d— AlanB_1973 (@AlanB_1973) 1550234136
"President Trump's illegal declaration of a national emergency to build a wall on the southern border of the United States that Congress has not authorized is a clear abuse of power," said John Bonifaz, president of the pro-democracy group Free Speech For People, in a statement. "It is time--long past time--for members of the U.S. House of Representatives to carry out their constitutional responsibilities and to start impeachment proceedings now against this president. We cannot continue to have a lawless president in the White House."
Peter Gleick, a climate scientist and advocate for impeachment, wrote on Twitter Thursday evening that looking back at the Trump administration, future generations will likely be baffled if lawmakers fail to impeach the president.
\u201cHonestly, what's it going to say to us and future generations if we DON'T impeach Trump?\u201d— Peter Gleick \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 (@Peter Gleick \ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8) 1550184512