SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
LGBTQ Americans and allies rally outside the White House to protest President Donald Trump's effort to ban trans people from military service. (Photo: Ted Eytan/Flickr/cc)
'Shameful, Bigoted, Cruel': Supreme Court Gives Green Light to Trump's Ban on Transgender Service Members
"We will all keep fighting to take down this discriminatory ban. In court, at the ballot, and through our transformation of public discourse and understanding."
Jan 21, 2019
In a decision LGBTQ rights advocates immediately denounced as an "awful attack" on the rights of transgender Americans, the Supreme Court's conservative majority on Tuesday gave a green light to President Donald Trump's widely condemned ban on transgender people serving in the military.
While one nationwide injunction against the ban remains in effect--meaning Trump's policy cannot yet be implemented--Slate's Mark Joseph Stern noted that the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling makes it likely that the remaining injunction will "soon be reversed."
"This is heartbreaking and temporary," declared ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, expressing hope that Trump's ban will be defeated in the lower courts. "We will all keep fighting to take down this discriminatory ban. In court, at the ballot, and through our transformation of public discourse and understanding."
\u201cThe impact of SCOTUS action on trans military cases:\n\n1. Legally - 1 nationwide injunction is still in place. So ban not yet in effect.\n\n2. Practically - This is an awful attack on trans people and we will keep fighting.\n\nYour "both sides" takes on trans existence are not wanted.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1548170639
\u201cIt's deeply upsetting that the Supreme Court lifted blocks on the trans military ban that were secured by two lawsuits while federal courts continue to review.\n\nIt did NOT lift the nationwide block secured in our case, Stone v. Trump, which is before a court in Maryland.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1548172641
"Disgusting, shameful, bigoted, cruel. Trans people have the right to exist, to serve, to live with dignity," added LGBTQ rights advocate and writer Lauren Rankin. "This is frightening indication of what's to come from this far-right Supreme Court."
Trump's initial plan, unveiled in 2017, would have completely barred transgender individuals from serving in the military, but several courts ruled that the proposal was unconstitutional.
As the Washington Post notes, the plan the Supreme Court approved on Tuesday--devised by former Defense Secretary James Mattis--would "bar those from the military who identify with a gender different from their birth gender and who are seeking to transition. Mattis's plan makes exceptions, for instance, for about 900 transgender individuals who are already serving openly and for others who would serve in accordance with their birth gender."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In a decision LGBTQ rights advocates immediately denounced as an "awful attack" on the rights of transgender Americans, the Supreme Court's conservative majority on Tuesday gave a green light to President Donald Trump's widely condemned ban on transgender people serving in the military.
While one nationwide injunction against the ban remains in effect--meaning Trump's policy cannot yet be implemented--Slate's Mark Joseph Stern noted that the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling makes it likely that the remaining injunction will "soon be reversed."
"This is heartbreaking and temporary," declared ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, expressing hope that Trump's ban will be defeated in the lower courts. "We will all keep fighting to take down this discriminatory ban. In court, at the ballot, and through our transformation of public discourse and understanding."
\u201cThe impact of SCOTUS action on trans military cases:\n\n1. Legally - 1 nationwide injunction is still in place. So ban not yet in effect.\n\n2. Practically - This is an awful attack on trans people and we will keep fighting.\n\nYour "both sides" takes on trans existence are not wanted.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1548170639
\u201cIt's deeply upsetting that the Supreme Court lifted blocks on the trans military ban that were secured by two lawsuits while federal courts continue to review.\n\nIt did NOT lift the nationwide block secured in our case, Stone v. Trump, which is before a court in Maryland.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1548172641
"Disgusting, shameful, bigoted, cruel. Trans people have the right to exist, to serve, to live with dignity," added LGBTQ rights advocate and writer Lauren Rankin. "This is frightening indication of what's to come from this far-right Supreme Court."
Trump's initial plan, unveiled in 2017, would have completely barred transgender individuals from serving in the military, but several courts ruled that the proposal was unconstitutional.
As the Washington Post notes, the plan the Supreme Court approved on Tuesday--devised by former Defense Secretary James Mattis--would "bar those from the military who identify with a gender different from their birth gender and who are seeking to transition. Mattis's plan makes exceptions, for instance, for about 900 transgender individuals who are already serving openly and for others who would serve in accordance with their birth gender."
In a decision LGBTQ rights advocates immediately denounced as an "awful attack" on the rights of transgender Americans, the Supreme Court's conservative majority on Tuesday gave a green light to President Donald Trump's widely condemned ban on transgender people serving in the military.
While one nationwide injunction against the ban remains in effect--meaning Trump's policy cannot yet be implemented--Slate's Mark Joseph Stern noted that the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling makes it likely that the remaining injunction will "soon be reversed."
"This is heartbreaking and temporary," declared ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, expressing hope that Trump's ban will be defeated in the lower courts. "We will all keep fighting to take down this discriminatory ban. In court, at the ballot, and through our transformation of public discourse and understanding."
\u201cThe impact of SCOTUS action on trans military cases:\n\n1. Legally - 1 nationwide injunction is still in place. So ban not yet in effect.\n\n2. Practically - This is an awful attack on trans people and we will keep fighting.\n\nYour "both sides" takes on trans existence are not wanted.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1548170639
\u201cIt's deeply upsetting that the Supreme Court lifted blocks on the trans military ban that were secured by two lawsuits while federal courts continue to review.\n\nIt did NOT lift the nationwide block secured in our case, Stone v. Trump, which is before a court in Maryland.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1548172641
"Disgusting, shameful, bigoted, cruel. Trans people have the right to exist, to serve, to live with dignity," added LGBTQ rights advocate and writer Lauren Rankin. "This is frightening indication of what's to come from this far-right Supreme Court."
Trump's initial plan, unveiled in 2017, would have completely barred transgender individuals from serving in the military, but several courts ruled that the proposal was unconstitutional.
As the Washington Post notes, the plan the Supreme Court approved on Tuesday--devised by former Defense Secretary James Mattis--would "bar those from the military who identify with a gender different from their birth gender and who are seeking to transition. Mattis's plan makes exceptions, for instance, for about 900 transgender individuals who are already serving openly and for others who would serve in accordance with their birth gender."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.