SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"We have had systematic disenfranchisement of voters," said Stacey Abrams. "We have seen gross mismanagement of our elections. And we have seen an erosion of faith in democracy in our state. Those are all true facts." (Photo: CNN)
Less than two days after her deliverence of a "not a speech of concession" concession speech won applause from voting rights advocates nationwide, Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams said on Sunday morning that the fight for voter access is not over by a long shot and--even though she admits the her race for governor is over--what the nation witnessed in her state and elsewhere should now serve as "call to arms" for pro-democracy reforms nationwide.
Asked by CNN host Jake Tapper if her Friday speech--in which she accused her Republican opponent Brian Kemp of "deliberate" efforts to skew the election by preventing people from voting--would "undermine faith in the democratic process," Abrams said absolutely not, because she has chosen her words very carefully.
"We have had systematic disenfranchisement of voters," she said. "We have seen gross mismanagement of our elections. And we have seen an erosion of faith in democracy in our state. Those are all true facts."
Watch:
"This is someone who has compromised our systems," Abrams said subsequently of Kemp.
When Tapper pressed her on not using the word "legitimate" to describe the Republican victory, Abrams responded by saying that "what's not right is saying that something was done properly when it was not. I will never deny the legal imprimatur that says he is in this position, and I pray for his success. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Less than two days after her deliverence of a "not a speech of concession" concession speech won applause from voting rights advocates nationwide, Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams said on Sunday morning that the fight for voter access is not over by a long shot and--even though she admits the her race for governor is over--what the nation witnessed in her state and elsewhere should now serve as "call to arms" for pro-democracy reforms nationwide.
Asked by CNN host Jake Tapper if her Friday speech--in which she accused her Republican opponent Brian Kemp of "deliberate" efforts to skew the election by preventing people from voting--would "undermine faith in the democratic process," Abrams said absolutely not, because she has chosen her words very carefully.
"We have had systematic disenfranchisement of voters," she said. "We have seen gross mismanagement of our elections. And we have seen an erosion of faith in democracy in our state. Those are all true facts."
Watch:
"This is someone who has compromised our systems," Abrams said subsequently of Kemp.
When Tapper pressed her on not using the word "legitimate" to describe the Republican victory, Abrams responded by saying that "what's not right is saying that something was done properly when it was not. I will never deny the legal imprimatur that says he is in this position, and I pray for his success. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that."
Less than two days after her deliverence of a "not a speech of concession" concession speech won applause from voting rights advocates nationwide, Georgia Democrat Stacey Abrams said on Sunday morning that the fight for voter access is not over by a long shot and--even though she admits the her race for governor is over--what the nation witnessed in her state and elsewhere should now serve as "call to arms" for pro-democracy reforms nationwide.
Asked by CNN host Jake Tapper if her Friday speech--in which she accused her Republican opponent Brian Kemp of "deliberate" efforts to skew the election by preventing people from voting--would "undermine faith in the democratic process," Abrams said absolutely not, because she has chosen her words very carefully.
"We have had systematic disenfranchisement of voters," she said. "We have seen gross mismanagement of our elections. And we have seen an erosion of faith in democracy in our state. Those are all true facts."
Watch:
"This is someone who has compromised our systems," Abrams said subsequently of Kemp.
When Tapper pressed her on not using the word "legitimate" to describe the Republican victory, Abrams responded by saying that "what's not right is saying that something was done properly when it was not. I will never deny the legal imprimatur that says he is in this position, and I pray for his success. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that."