Axios' Jonathan Swan (l) and Jim VandeHei interview Donald Trump in the White House for their upcoming show on HBO. (Screenshot: Axios/YouTube)
Oct 30, 2018
Denouncing the U.S. right to birthright citizenship--guaranteed by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution--as "ridiculous," President Donald Trump has falsely claimed that he has the power to subvert that guarantee by presidential fiat - his latest effort to mainstream a noxious lie and xenophobic trope while also furthering what critics call his authoritarian approach to governance by once more exploiting certain members of the White House press corps willing to carry his water for him.
"[Axios'] Jonathan Swan is an operative of the Trump White House and all his 'scoops' are really just messaging that this fascist administration wants disseminated to the public." --Sam Sacks, DC SentinelInjected into a White House interview by Axios' Jonathan Swan, a reporter who prides himself on receiving inside information from anonymous top-level Trump officials, the president appeared surprised (or feigned surprise) that anybody knew his internal desire and plan to end birthright citizenship but said "it will happen" and that "now they're saying I can do it just with an executive order."
It's not clear who Trump is referring to when he says "they," but it's reasonable to assume--given that Trump says he didn't think anybody else knew about it--that it's the very same staff person or people who told Swan to ask him the question in the first place.
Watch:
But pushing back against the idea that Swan had somehow scooped a new White House proposal, other journalists warned that Swan was playing--wittingly or not--right into Trump's hands by letting the president and his White House staff put out into the world another piece of red meat for Trump's racist, xenophobic base.
\u201cGuys. Trump can\u2019t terminate amendments via executive order. To respond as if he\u2019s ending birthright citizenship because he told an outlet he is ending birthright citizenship is to allow him to be our assignment editor. It\u2019s an obvious stunt\u201d— Sam Stein (@Sam Stein) 1540894798
\u201cNews organizations shouldn\u2019t tweet quotes that are lies without labeling them lies. Many other countries, including Canada and Mexico, have birthright citizenship.\u201d— James Surowiecki (@James Surowiecki) 1540901241
\u201c30 countries offer birthright citizenship. https://t.co/J76DwMIige\u201d— Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org (@Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org) 1540901381
Sam Sacks, reporter and co-founder of the DC Sentinel, minced no words. "Jonathan Swan is an operative of the Trump White House and all his 'scoops' are really just messaging that this fascist administration wants disseminated to the public," Sacks said in a tweeted response to the report. "Much like Fox News, except Axios caters to beltway elites that have long enabled this extremism."
\u201cAxios enabling fascism. Notice how Jonathan Swan does a lot of the heavy lifting for Trump\u2019s racist and unconstitutional proposal by prefacing question with: \u201cSome legal scholars believe you can get rid of birthright citizenship without changing the constitution.\u201d\u201d— Sam Sacks (@Sam Sacks) 1540899182
And that wasn't the end of fellow journalists criticizing both the nature and implication of the reporting. Matthew Yglesia of Vox was among those pointing out how Trump's false legal claims went unchallenged by both Swan and VandeHei. The legal practice of birthright citizenship, also known by the Latin Jus Soli (or right of the soil), explained Yglesias, "is standard procedure in most Western Hemisphere countries and the rule Trump says nobody follows can be found in such exotic locales as Canada and Mexico." Also a very clear mistruth, he added, "The President cannot change the Constitution by executive order."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Denouncing the U.S. right to birthright citizenship--guaranteed by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution--as "ridiculous," President Donald Trump has falsely claimed that he has the power to subvert that guarantee by presidential fiat - his latest effort to mainstream a noxious lie and xenophobic trope while also furthering what critics call his authoritarian approach to governance by once more exploiting certain members of the White House press corps willing to carry his water for him.
"[Axios'] Jonathan Swan is an operative of the Trump White House and all his 'scoops' are really just messaging that this fascist administration wants disseminated to the public." --Sam Sacks, DC SentinelInjected into a White House interview by Axios' Jonathan Swan, a reporter who prides himself on receiving inside information from anonymous top-level Trump officials, the president appeared surprised (or feigned surprise) that anybody knew his internal desire and plan to end birthright citizenship but said "it will happen" and that "now they're saying I can do it just with an executive order."
It's not clear who Trump is referring to when he says "they," but it's reasonable to assume--given that Trump says he didn't think anybody else knew about it--that it's the very same staff person or people who told Swan to ask him the question in the first place.
Watch:
But pushing back against the idea that Swan had somehow scooped a new White House proposal, other journalists warned that Swan was playing--wittingly or not--right into Trump's hands by letting the president and his White House staff put out into the world another piece of red meat for Trump's racist, xenophobic base.
\u201cGuys. Trump can\u2019t terminate amendments via executive order. To respond as if he\u2019s ending birthright citizenship because he told an outlet he is ending birthright citizenship is to allow him to be our assignment editor. It\u2019s an obvious stunt\u201d— Sam Stein (@Sam Stein) 1540894798
\u201cNews organizations shouldn\u2019t tweet quotes that are lies without labeling them lies. Many other countries, including Canada and Mexico, have birthright citizenship.\u201d— James Surowiecki (@James Surowiecki) 1540901241
\u201c30 countries offer birthright citizenship. https://t.co/J76DwMIige\u201d— Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org (@Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org) 1540901381
Sam Sacks, reporter and co-founder of the DC Sentinel, minced no words. "Jonathan Swan is an operative of the Trump White House and all his 'scoops' are really just messaging that this fascist administration wants disseminated to the public," Sacks said in a tweeted response to the report. "Much like Fox News, except Axios caters to beltway elites that have long enabled this extremism."
\u201cAxios enabling fascism. Notice how Jonathan Swan does a lot of the heavy lifting for Trump\u2019s racist and unconstitutional proposal by prefacing question with: \u201cSome legal scholars believe you can get rid of birthright citizenship without changing the constitution.\u201d\u201d— Sam Sacks (@Sam Sacks) 1540899182
And that wasn't the end of fellow journalists criticizing both the nature and implication of the reporting. Matthew Yglesia of Vox was among those pointing out how Trump's false legal claims went unchallenged by both Swan and VandeHei. The legal practice of birthright citizenship, also known by the Latin Jus Soli (or right of the soil), explained Yglesias, "is standard procedure in most Western Hemisphere countries and the rule Trump says nobody follows can be found in such exotic locales as Canada and Mexico." Also a very clear mistruth, he added, "The President cannot change the Constitution by executive order."
Denouncing the U.S. right to birthright citizenship--guaranteed by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution--as "ridiculous," President Donald Trump has falsely claimed that he has the power to subvert that guarantee by presidential fiat - his latest effort to mainstream a noxious lie and xenophobic trope while also furthering what critics call his authoritarian approach to governance by once more exploiting certain members of the White House press corps willing to carry his water for him.
"[Axios'] Jonathan Swan is an operative of the Trump White House and all his 'scoops' are really just messaging that this fascist administration wants disseminated to the public." --Sam Sacks, DC SentinelInjected into a White House interview by Axios' Jonathan Swan, a reporter who prides himself on receiving inside information from anonymous top-level Trump officials, the president appeared surprised (or feigned surprise) that anybody knew his internal desire and plan to end birthright citizenship but said "it will happen" and that "now they're saying I can do it just with an executive order."
It's not clear who Trump is referring to when he says "they," but it's reasonable to assume--given that Trump says he didn't think anybody else knew about it--that it's the very same staff person or people who told Swan to ask him the question in the first place.
Watch:
But pushing back against the idea that Swan had somehow scooped a new White House proposal, other journalists warned that Swan was playing--wittingly or not--right into Trump's hands by letting the president and his White House staff put out into the world another piece of red meat for Trump's racist, xenophobic base.
\u201cGuys. Trump can\u2019t terminate amendments via executive order. To respond as if he\u2019s ending birthright citizenship because he told an outlet he is ending birthright citizenship is to allow him to be our assignment editor. It\u2019s an obvious stunt\u201d— Sam Stein (@Sam Stein) 1540894798
\u201cNews organizations shouldn\u2019t tweet quotes that are lies without labeling them lies. Many other countries, including Canada and Mexico, have birthright citizenship.\u201d— James Surowiecki (@James Surowiecki) 1540901241
\u201c30 countries offer birthright citizenship. https://t.co/J76DwMIige\u201d— Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org (@Dan Froomkin/PressWatchers.org) 1540901381
Sam Sacks, reporter and co-founder of the DC Sentinel, minced no words. "Jonathan Swan is an operative of the Trump White House and all his 'scoops' are really just messaging that this fascist administration wants disseminated to the public," Sacks said in a tweeted response to the report. "Much like Fox News, except Axios caters to beltway elites that have long enabled this extremism."
\u201cAxios enabling fascism. Notice how Jonathan Swan does a lot of the heavy lifting for Trump\u2019s racist and unconstitutional proposal by prefacing question with: \u201cSome legal scholars believe you can get rid of birthright citizenship without changing the constitution.\u201d\u201d— Sam Sacks (@Sam Sacks) 1540899182
And that wasn't the end of fellow journalists criticizing both the nature and implication of the reporting. Matthew Yglesia of Vox was among those pointing out how Trump's false legal claims went unchallenged by both Swan and VandeHei. The legal practice of birthright citizenship, also known by the Latin Jus Soli (or right of the soil), explained Yglesias, "is standard procedure in most Western Hemisphere countries and the rule Trump says nobody follows can be found in such exotic locales as Canada and Mexico." Also a very clear mistruth, he added, "The President cannot change the Constitution by executive order."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.