SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Amazon pitched its facial recognition system to ICE earlier this year as the Trump administration was observing its family-separation policy at the U.S.-Mexico border. (Photo: Getty)
Over Employees' Protests, Amazon Aggressively Pitched Facial Recognition Software to ICE At Height of Child Detention Crisis
"If being 'progressive' (raising wages, being pro-LGBTQ) makes them money, they'll do it; if working with ICE makes them money, they'll do it. They have zero actual morals or beliefs outside of profit."
Oct 24, 2018
Over the objections of its employees, Amazon pitched its facial recognition software to the Department of Homeland Security at the height of the family separation crisis earlier this year and offered the system as one that could help agents identify and detain undocumented immigrants.
According to emails obtained by the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) and published by the Daily Beast, Amazon officials told the agency that its Rekognition software could be used by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers during immigration investigations.
"Being implicated in the deeply immoral way the Trump administration has treated immigrants and those seeking refuge in the U.S. is a strange choice for a company that wants to simultaneously paint itself as progressive." --Amazon employee"We are ready and willing to support the vital Homeland Security Investigations mission," wrote an Amazon sales official on June 15.
Several Amazon employees spoke to Vanity Fair on Wednesday about the revelation, expressing outrage over their company's support for the Trump administration's anti-immigrant agenda.
"Being implicated in the deeply immoral way the Trump administration has treated immigrants and those seeking refuge in the U.S. is a strange choice for a company that wants to simultaneously paint itself as progressive," one worker said.
"They're playing both sides of the immigration debate," another added. "If being 'progressive' (raising wages, being pro-LGBTQ) makes them money, they'll do it; if working with ICE makes them money, they'll do it. They have zero actual morals or beliefs outside of profit."
The Rekognition technology has already been used by police departments in Oregon and Florida, despite concerns over its accuracy, especially when identifying people of color. In July, the software incorrectly identified 28 members of Congress as people who were being investigated for crimes, according to a test run by the ACLU.
Amazon's discussions with ICE came a week before employees of the company signed a letter imploring CEO Jeff Bezos to reject any immigration-related contracts for the use of Rekognition.
"We refuse to build the platform that powers ICE, and we refuse to contribute to tools that violate human rights," wrote the workers.
"It is disturbing that Amazon continues to actively ignore warnings from members of Congress, civil rights groups, the public, and its own shareholders and employees about the dangers of its technology," Jacob Snow, technology and civil liberties attorney for the ACLU of Northern California, told the Daily Beast.
Despite its employees' warnings, Amazon spent $3.63 million between July 1 and September 30 on lobbying the government regarding several issues including facial recognition software. The company also provides cloud computing services for the CIA and is in the running to win a similar $10 billion contract with the Pentagon.
On Tuesday, the ACLU called on Congress to pass legislation to put serious constraints on the use of facial recognition technology by law and immigration enforcement agencies.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Over the objections of its employees, Amazon pitched its facial recognition software to the Department of Homeland Security at the height of the family separation crisis earlier this year and offered the system as one that could help agents identify and detain undocumented immigrants.
According to emails obtained by the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) and published by the Daily Beast, Amazon officials told the agency that its Rekognition software could be used by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers during immigration investigations.
"Being implicated in the deeply immoral way the Trump administration has treated immigrants and those seeking refuge in the U.S. is a strange choice for a company that wants to simultaneously paint itself as progressive." --Amazon employee"We are ready and willing to support the vital Homeland Security Investigations mission," wrote an Amazon sales official on June 15.
Several Amazon employees spoke to Vanity Fair on Wednesday about the revelation, expressing outrage over their company's support for the Trump administration's anti-immigrant agenda.
"Being implicated in the deeply immoral way the Trump administration has treated immigrants and those seeking refuge in the U.S. is a strange choice for a company that wants to simultaneously paint itself as progressive," one worker said.
"They're playing both sides of the immigration debate," another added. "If being 'progressive' (raising wages, being pro-LGBTQ) makes them money, they'll do it; if working with ICE makes them money, they'll do it. They have zero actual morals or beliefs outside of profit."
The Rekognition technology has already been used by police departments in Oregon and Florida, despite concerns over its accuracy, especially when identifying people of color. In July, the software incorrectly identified 28 members of Congress as people who were being investigated for crimes, according to a test run by the ACLU.
Amazon's discussions with ICE came a week before employees of the company signed a letter imploring CEO Jeff Bezos to reject any immigration-related contracts for the use of Rekognition.
"We refuse to build the platform that powers ICE, and we refuse to contribute to tools that violate human rights," wrote the workers.
"It is disturbing that Amazon continues to actively ignore warnings from members of Congress, civil rights groups, the public, and its own shareholders and employees about the dangers of its technology," Jacob Snow, technology and civil liberties attorney for the ACLU of Northern California, told the Daily Beast.
Despite its employees' warnings, Amazon spent $3.63 million between July 1 and September 30 on lobbying the government regarding several issues including facial recognition software. The company also provides cloud computing services for the CIA and is in the running to win a similar $10 billion contract with the Pentagon.
On Tuesday, the ACLU called on Congress to pass legislation to put serious constraints on the use of facial recognition technology by law and immigration enforcement agencies.
Over the objections of its employees, Amazon pitched its facial recognition software to the Department of Homeland Security at the height of the family separation crisis earlier this year and offered the system as one that could help agents identify and detain undocumented immigrants.
According to emails obtained by the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) and published by the Daily Beast, Amazon officials told the agency that its Rekognition software could be used by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers during immigration investigations.
"Being implicated in the deeply immoral way the Trump administration has treated immigrants and those seeking refuge in the U.S. is a strange choice for a company that wants to simultaneously paint itself as progressive." --Amazon employee"We are ready and willing to support the vital Homeland Security Investigations mission," wrote an Amazon sales official on June 15.
Several Amazon employees spoke to Vanity Fair on Wednesday about the revelation, expressing outrage over their company's support for the Trump administration's anti-immigrant agenda.
"Being implicated in the deeply immoral way the Trump administration has treated immigrants and those seeking refuge in the U.S. is a strange choice for a company that wants to simultaneously paint itself as progressive," one worker said.
"They're playing both sides of the immigration debate," another added. "If being 'progressive' (raising wages, being pro-LGBTQ) makes them money, they'll do it; if working with ICE makes them money, they'll do it. They have zero actual morals or beliefs outside of profit."
The Rekognition technology has already been used by police departments in Oregon and Florida, despite concerns over its accuracy, especially when identifying people of color. In July, the software incorrectly identified 28 members of Congress as people who were being investigated for crimes, according to a test run by the ACLU.
Amazon's discussions with ICE came a week before employees of the company signed a letter imploring CEO Jeff Bezos to reject any immigration-related contracts for the use of Rekognition.
"We refuse to build the platform that powers ICE, and we refuse to contribute to tools that violate human rights," wrote the workers.
"It is disturbing that Amazon continues to actively ignore warnings from members of Congress, civil rights groups, the public, and its own shareholders and employees about the dangers of its technology," Jacob Snow, technology and civil liberties attorney for the ACLU of Northern California, told the Daily Beast.
Despite its employees' warnings, Amazon spent $3.63 million between July 1 and September 30 on lobbying the government regarding several issues including facial recognition software. The company also provides cloud computing services for the CIA and is in the running to win a similar $10 billion contract with the Pentagon.
On Tuesday, the ACLU called on Congress to pass legislation to put serious constraints on the use of facial recognition technology by law and immigration enforcement agencies.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.