SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Already offered the cover of the "whitewashed" supplemental background investigation by the FBI, the last remaining Senate holdouts on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination--namely Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republicans Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Jeff Flake of Arizona--were all given the additional opportunity to feel badly for the nominee on Thursday night when the Wall Street Journal was kind enough to offer him space on their editorial page for an op-ed in which he apologized for being "emotional" during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week and "said a few things I should not have said."
"When people show you who they are, believe them--even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise."
--Eddie S. Glaude Jr.
But while it remains to be seen if any of those senators--some of whom specifically expressed concern about the tone and content of Kavanaugh's prepared remarks and subsequent exchanges with committee members--will be moved by his quite obviously self-serving mea culpa on the eve of a procedural Senate vote scheduled for Friday morning, it was very clear indeed that critics across the internet were beyond unimpressed with the effort.
"Anyone who has to write [an op-ed titled "I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge"] on his own behalf is clearly not," remarked Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, right after the piece was published.
As further evidence, here are an additional ten tweets as a small but representative sample:
\u201cWhen people show you who they are, believe them\u2014even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise. https://t.co/ySDOOnio53\u201d— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@Eddie S. Glaude Jr.) 1538697456
\u201c1) Kavanaugh penning a half-hearted OpEd for the \u2066@WSJ\u2069 should be disqualifying \n\n2)The coming home and crying routine is lame, played and pathetic https://t.co/d3H83b794l\u201d— Karine Jean-Pierre (@Karine Jean-Pierre) 1538706563
\u201cyou don't write this unless you don't have the votes and/or realize your credibility has been shot https://t.co/RXPUCaQxbO via @WSJOpinion\u201d— Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin (@Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin) 1538699009
\u201cYour shameful and deliberately polarizing performance in that hearing room was in total contradiction to the sweet reason expressed in this op-ed. That's why 2400+ law professors https://t.co/V5wfv1NOqc said you do not belong on the court. https://t.co/iQLbDU6IyC\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1538698924
\u201cBrett Kavanaugh's op-ed is written in the language of every abuser: lash out in anger, apologize for that anger, blame outside influences for that anger, promise that's not "who you are" and you'll be better about your anger.\n\nRepeat.\u201d— Danielle Campoamor (@Danielle Campoamor) 1538699190
And finally:
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Already offered the cover of the "whitewashed" supplemental background investigation by the FBI, the last remaining Senate holdouts on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination--namely Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republicans Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Jeff Flake of Arizona--were all given the additional opportunity to feel badly for the nominee on Thursday night when the Wall Street Journal was kind enough to offer him space on their editorial page for an op-ed in which he apologized for being "emotional" during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week and "said a few things I should not have said."
"When people show you who they are, believe them--even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise."
--Eddie S. Glaude Jr.
But while it remains to be seen if any of those senators--some of whom specifically expressed concern about the tone and content of Kavanaugh's prepared remarks and subsequent exchanges with committee members--will be moved by his quite obviously self-serving mea culpa on the eve of a procedural Senate vote scheduled for Friday morning, it was very clear indeed that critics across the internet were beyond unimpressed with the effort.
"Anyone who has to write [an op-ed titled "I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge"] on his own behalf is clearly not," remarked Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, right after the piece was published.
As further evidence, here are an additional ten tweets as a small but representative sample:
\u201cWhen people show you who they are, believe them\u2014even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise. https://t.co/ySDOOnio53\u201d— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@Eddie S. Glaude Jr.) 1538697456
\u201c1) Kavanaugh penning a half-hearted OpEd for the \u2066@WSJ\u2069 should be disqualifying \n\n2)The coming home and crying routine is lame, played and pathetic https://t.co/d3H83b794l\u201d— Karine Jean-Pierre (@Karine Jean-Pierre) 1538706563
\u201cyou don't write this unless you don't have the votes and/or realize your credibility has been shot https://t.co/RXPUCaQxbO via @WSJOpinion\u201d— Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin (@Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin) 1538699009
\u201cYour shameful and deliberately polarizing performance in that hearing room was in total contradiction to the sweet reason expressed in this op-ed. That's why 2400+ law professors https://t.co/V5wfv1NOqc said you do not belong on the court. https://t.co/iQLbDU6IyC\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1538698924
\u201cBrett Kavanaugh's op-ed is written in the language of every abuser: lash out in anger, apologize for that anger, blame outside influences for that anger, promise that's not "who you are" and you'll be better about your anger.\n\nRepeat.\u201d— Danielle Campoamor (@Danielle Campoamor) 1538699190
And finally:
Already offered the cover of the "whitewashed" supplemental background investigation by the FBI, the last remaining Senate holdouts on Brett Kavanaugh's nomination--namely Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Republicans Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Jeff Flake of Arizona--were all given the additional opportunity to feel badly for the nominee on Thursday night when the Wall Street Journal was kind enough to offer him space on their editorial page for an op-ed in which he apologized for being "emotional" during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week and "said a few things I should not have said."
"When people show you who they are, believe them--even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise."
--Eddie S. Glaude Jr.
But while it remains to be seen if any of those senators--some of whom specifically expressed concern about the tone and content of Kavanaugh's prepared remarks and subsequent exchanges with committee members--will be moved by his quite obviously self-serving mea culpa on the eve of a procedural Senate vote scheduled for Friday morning, it was very clear indeed that critics across the internet were beyond unimpressed with the effort.
"Anyone who has to write [an op-ed titled "I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge"] on his own behalf is clearly not," remarked Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, right after the piece was published.
As further evidence, here are an additional ten tweets as a small but representative sample:
\u201cWhen people show you who they are, believe them\u2014even if they write an opinion piece claiming to be otherwise. https://t.co/ySDOOnio53\u201d— Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (@Eddie S. Glaude Jr.) 1538697456
\u201c1) Kavanaugh penning a half-hearted OpEd for the \u2066@WSJ\u2069 should be disqualifying \n\n2)The coming home and crying routine is lame, played and pathetic https://t.co/d3H83b794l\u201d— Karine Jean-Pierre (@Karine Jean-Pierre) 1538706563
\u201cyou don't write this unless you don't have the votes and/or realize your credibility has been shot https://t.co/RXPUCaQxbO via @WSJOpinion\u201d— Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin (@Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin) 1538699009
\u201cYour shameful and deliberately polarizing performance in that hearing room was in total contradiction to the sweet reason expressed in this op-ed. That's why 2400+ law professors https://t.co/V5wfv1NOqc said you do not belong on the court. https://t.co/iQLbDU6IyC\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1538698924
\u201cBrett Kavanaugh's op-ed is written in the language of every abuser: lash out in anger, apologize for that anger, blame outside influences for that anger, promise that's not "who you are" and you'll be better about your anger.\n\nRepeat.\u201d— Danielle Campoamor (@Danielle Campoamor) 1538699190
And finally: