SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) (L) questions Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh during the second day of his confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill September 5, 2018 in Washington, DC. Kavanaugh was nominated by President Donald Trump to fill the vacancy on the court left by retiring Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
After Explosive Grilling by Sen. Leahy, Democrats Urged to Read Kavanaugh "Committee Confidential" Files Into Public Record
"Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee."
Sep 05, 2018
After an explosive line of questioning by Sen. Patrick Leah (D-Vt.) during the second day of hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, progressive groups are calling on Democrats on the GOP-controlled Judiciary Committee to read documents now labelled as "committee confidential" into the public record as a way to expose the possibility that the nominee may have knowingly received stolen emails ahead of previous sworn testimony before Congress.
"We have discovered evidence," Leahy announced, "that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee."
As Talking Points Memo reports, the questioning by Leahy appeared to throw :
Kavanaugh off his flow of so far providing steady and confident answers to senator's questions with a line of inquiry about allegations that emails were stolen from Leahy's office during the confirmation wars of the George W. Bush administration.
Kavanaugh at the time was involved in the judicial confirmation process for the White House, and on Wednesday Leahy zeroed in on testimony Kavanaugh later gave during his confirmation to a lower court judgeship.
Leahy presented Kavanaugh with claims the judge made during the mid-2000s confirmation hearings about never receiving the stolen emails. Kavanaugh said that his comments then were 100 percent accurate.
Watch part the key part of their exchange:
In response to the exchange and the accusations levied against Kavanaugh by Leahy, several progressive watchdog groups--namely Demand Justice, MoveOn, and NARAL Pro-Choice America--jointly called on Senate Democrats to "unilaterally release records that are currently in their possession," those marked "committee confidential," that might be able to confirm whether or not Kavanaugh lied under oath.
In a statement, the groups declared:
Based on Sen. Patrick Leahy's questioning of Kavanaugh, it's clear that documents Chairman Chuck Grassley has unilaterally declared "Committee Confidential" include emails that are highly relevant--and may show the extent of Judge Kavanaugh's knowledge and use of stolen information while working at the White House, directly contradicting his testimony in 2004 and 2006.
Chairman Grassley must not shield Judge Kavanaugh from evidence that Kavanaugh perjured himself in previous confirmation hearings, or any other documents or evidence relevant to his ability to serve on the highest court for a lifetime appointment. Democratic senators must put an end to this secretive sham. They know that nothing in the Senate Standing Rules or Judiciary Committee Rules grants Grassley sole authority to designate documents "Committee Confidential" or prohibit their public release.
If there are relevant records on this issue--or any other issue that requires public release-- they must immediately read them into the Senate record. The public has a right to know.
In a subsequent tweet, NARAL declared, "The American people deserve the truth."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After an explosive line of questioning by Sen. Patrick Leah (D-Vt.) during the second day of hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, progressive groups are calling on Democrats on the GOP-controlled Judiciary Committee to read documents now labelled as "committee confidential" into the public record as a way to expose the possibility that the nominee may have knowingly received stolen emails ahead of previous sworn testimony before Congress.
"We have discovered evidence," Leahy announced, "that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee."
As Talking Points Memo reports, the questioning by Leahy appeared to throw :
Kavanaugh off his flow of so far providing steady and confident answers to senator's questions with a line of inquiry about allegations that emails were stolen from Leahy's office during the confirmation wars of the George W. Bush administration.
Kavanaugh at the time was involved in the judicial confirmation process for the White House, and on Wednesday Leahy zeroed in on testimony Kavanaugh later gave during his confirmation to a lower court judgeship.
Leahy presented Kavanaugh with claims the judge made during the mid-2000s confirmation hearings about never receiving the stolen emails. Kavanaugh said that his comments then were 100 percent accurate.
Watch part the key part of their exchange:
In response to the exchange and the accusations levied against Kavanaugh by Leahy, several progressive watchdog groups--namely Demand Justice, MoveOn, and NARAL Pro-Choice America--jointly called on Senate Democrats to "unilaterally release records that are currently in their possession," those marked "committee confidential," that might be able to confirm whether or not Kavanaugh lied under oath.
In a statement, the groups declared:
Based on Sen. Patrick Leahy's questioning of Kavanaugh, it's clear that documents Chairman Chuck Grassley has unilaterally declared "Committee Confidential" include emails that are highly relevant--and may show the extent of Judge Kavanaugh's knowledge and use of stolen information while working at the White House, directly contradicting his testimony in 2004 and 2006.
Chairman Grassley must not shield Judge Kavanaugh from evidence that Kavanaugh perjured himself in previous confirmation hearings, or any other documents or evidence relevant to his ability to serve on the highest court for a lifetime appointment. Democratic senators must put an end to this secretive sham. They know that nothing in the Senate Standing Rules or Judiciary Committee Rules grants Grassley sole authority to designate documents "Committee Confidential" or prohibit their public release.
If there are relevant records on this issue--or any other issue that requires public release-- they must immediately read them into the Senate record. The public has a right to know.
In a subsequent tweet, NARAL declared, "The American people deserve the truth."
After an explosive line of questioning by Sen. Patrick Leah (D-Vt.) during the second day of hearings for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, progressive groups are calling on Democrats on the GOP-controlled Judiciary Committee to read documents now labelled as "committee confidential" into the public record as a way to expose the possibility that the nominee may have knowingly received stolen emails ahead of previous sworn testimony before Congress.
"We have discovered evidence," Leahy announced, "that Judge Kavanaugh misled the Senate during his 2004 and 2006 hearings. Truthfulness under oath is not an optional qualification for a Supreme Court nominee."
As Talking Points Memo reports, the questioning by Leahy appeared to throw :
Kavanaugh off his flow of so far providing steady and confident answers to senator's questions with a line of inquiry about allegations that emails were stolen from Leahy's office during the confirmation wars of the George W. Bush administration.
Kavanaugh at the time was involved in the judicial confirmation process for the White House, and on Wednesday Leahy zeroed in on testimony Kavanaugh later gave during his confirmation to a lower court judgeship.
Leahy presented Kavanaugh with claims the judge made during the mid-2000s confirmation hearings about never receiving the stolen emails. Kavanaugh said that his comments then were 100 percent accurate.
Watch part the key part of their exchange:
In response to the exchange and the accusations levied against Kavanaugh by Leahy, several progressive watchdog groups--namely Demand Justice, MoveOn, and NARAL Pro-Choice America--jointly called on Senate Democrats to "unilaterally release records that are currently in their possession," those marked "committee confidential," that might be able to confirm whether or not Kavanaugh lied under oath.
In a statement, the groups declared:
Based on Sen. Patrick Leahy's questioning of Kavanaugh, it's clear that documents Chairman Chuck Grassley has unilaterally declared "Committee Confidential" include emails that are highly relevant--and may show the extent of Judge Kavanaugh's knowledge and use of stolen information while working at the White House, directly contradicting his testimony in 2004 and 2006.
Chairman Grassley must not shield Judge Kavanaugh from evidence that Kavanaugh perjured himself in previous confirmation hearings, or any other documents or evidence relevant to his ability to serve on the highest court for a lifetime appointment. Democratic senators must put an end to this secretive sham. They know that nothing in the Senate Standing Rules or Judiciary Committee Rules grants Grassley sole authority to designate documents "Committee Confidential" or prohibit their public release.
If there are relevant records on this issue--or any other issue that requires public release-- they must immediately read them into the Senate record. The public has a right to know.
In a subsequent tweet, NARAL declared, "The American people deserve the truth."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.