Aug 17, 2018
Undeterred by lawsuits, federal court rulings, and widespread moral outrage over its efforts to strip life-saving healthcare from tens of thousands of vulnerable Americans, the Trump administration is reportedly planning to sign off on yet another flurry of waivers that would allow Republican governors like Wisconsin's Scott Walker to impose deeply cruel work requirements and other punitive restrictions on Medicaid recipients.
"If you're poor or disabled, the GOP wants you to die," actor and democratic socialist Rob Delaney wrote in response to a new Politico's report late Thursday detailing the Trump administration's plan to approve a "new round" of Medicaid restrictions in Maine, Arizona, and Wisconsin.
\u201cIf you\u2019re poor or disabled, the GOP wants you to die. Read this & register to vote: https://t.co/4sqGC2eLQs https://t.co/GT3MsKxj04\u201d— rob delaney (@rob delaney) 1534479481
"One of the most controversial changes sought by the states is Wisconsin's attempt to drug test its Medicaid applicants--an effort that advocates and lawyers say is illegal," Politicoreported, noting that Walker has been relentlessly pushing to drug test Medicaid and food stamp recipients for years.
While the White House isn't likely to approve Walker's full plan to drug test every Medicaid applicant and recipient due to legal barriers, "Wisconsin is expected to win approval to ask applicants to disclose on their Medicaid applications whether they've used drugs or are in recovery, but won't make coverage decisions based on the answers provided," Politico notes.
"The Trump administration seems intent on moving as quickly as possible to approve these harmful waivers which will clearly result in many more thousands of vulnerable people losing their Medicaid coverage."
--Joan Alker, Georgetown University
But, according to Joan Alker--head of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families--the very presence of such a question on a state Medicaid application could scare addicts and recovering addicts who badly need medical coverage.
"If people hear there's a drug testing requirement, that might be a deterrent from even applying," Alker noted. "The Trump administration seems intent on moving as quickly as possible to approve these harmful waivers which will clearly result in many more thousands of vulnerable people losing their Medicaid coverage."
While conservatives often frame their push for punitive work requirements and drug testing as an effort to control Medicaid costs, such restrictions have repeatedly proven to be less cost-effective and more bureaucratic than the current system, leading advocates for Medicaid expansion to conclude that the GOP's only true objective is to demonize the poor as lazy moochers and kick people off their healthcare.
Though the Republicans have proved more successful in recent years, efforts to foist drug tests on rich people in order to secure very large and unearned tax giveaways have so far failed:
\u201cDem bill would require rich people to undergo drug test before receiving tax breaks: https://t.co/5vvzg4HPnq\u201d— The Hill (@The Hill) 1466120412
Calling the right-wing notion that Medicaid recipients are lazy the "fundamental lie of work requirements," Splinter's Libby Watson pointed to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation study that showed "nearly 8 in 10 Medicaid enrollees have at least one family member who is working and a majority work themselves." The vast majority of those who don't work are either disabled or caretakers, the analysis found.
"Threatening poor people's lives--which is what getting rid of their healthcare coverage essentially means--is not a way to eradicate poverty, or increase employment, or improve anyone's lives. It is not, whatever they tell you, about self-reliance or dignity," Watson concluded. "It is simply a way to punish the poor for being poor, and an ideological commitment to being as grotesque as possible."
The Trump administration's latest effort to take healthcare from poor Americans comes just weeks after a federal court blocked Kentucky's Medicaid work requirements from taking effect. In his June ruling, District Judge James Boasberg concluded that the Trump administration's approval of Kentucky's punitive rules was "arbitrary and capricious."
And as Reutersreported on Tuesday, three advocacy groups are currently suing the Trump White House over its approval of Arkansas' Medicaid work requirements, which have been described as among the harshest in the nation.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Undeterred by lawsuits, federal court rulings, and widespread moral outrage over its efforts to strip life-saving healthcare from tens of thousands of vulnerable Americans, the Trump administration is reportedly planning to sign off on yet another flurry of waivers that would allow Republican governors like Wisconsin's Scott Walker to impose deeply cruel work requirements and other punitive restrictions on Medicaid recipients.
"If you're poor or disabled, the GOP wants you to die," actor and democratic socialist Rob Delaney wrote in response to a new Politico's report late Thursday detailing the Trump administration's plan to approve a "new round" of Medicaid restrictions in Maine, Arizona, and Wisconsin.
\u201cIf you\u2019re poor or disabled, the GOP wants you to die. Read this & register to vote: https://t.co/4sqGC2eLQs https://t.co/GT3MsKxj04\u201d— rob delaney (@rob delaney) 1534479481
"One of the most controversial changes sought by the states is Wisconsin's attempt to drug test its Medicaid applicants--an effort that advocates and lawyers say is illegal," Politicoreported, noting that Walker has been relentlessly pushing to drug test Medicaid and food stamp recipients for years.
While the White House isn't likely to approve Walker's full plan to drug test every Medicaid applicant and recipient due to legal barriers, "Wisconsin is expected to win approval to ask applicants to disclose on their Medicaid applications whether they've used drugs or are in recovery, but won't make coverage decisions based on the answers provided," Politico notes.
"The Trump administration seems intent on moving as quickly as possible to approve these harmful waivers which will clearly result in many more thousands of vulnerable people losing their Medicaid coverage."
--Joan Alker, Georgetown University
But, according to Joan Alker--head of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families--the very presence of such a question on a state Medicaid application could scare addicts and recovering addicts who badly need medical coverage.
"If people hear there's a drug testing requirement, that might be a deterrent from even applying," Alker noted. "The Trump administration seems intent on moving as quickly as possible to approve these harmful waivers which will clearly result in many more thousands of vulnerable people losing their Medicaid coverage."
While conservatives often frame their push for punitive work requirements and drug testing as an effort to control Medicaid costs, such restrictions have repeatedly proven to be less cost-effective and more bureaucratic than the current system, leading advocates for Medicaid expansion to conclude that the GOP's only true objective is to demonize the poor as lazy moochers and kick people off their healthcare.
Though the Republicans have proved more successful in recent years, efforts to foist drug tests on rich people in order to secure very large and unearned tax giveaways have so far failed:
\u201cDem bill would require rich people to undergo drug test before receiving tax breaks: https://t.co/5vvzg4HPnq\u201d— The Hill (@The Hill) 1466120412
Calling the right-wing notion that Medicaid recipients are lazy the "fundamental lie of work requirements," Splinter's Libby Watson pointed to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation study that showed "nearly 8 in 10 Medicaid enrollees have at least one family member who is working and a majority work themselves." The vast majority of those who don't work are either disabled or caretakers, the analysis found.
"Threatening poor people's lives--which is what getting rid of their healthcare coverage essentially means--is not a way to eradicate poverty, or increase employment, or improve anyone's lives. It is not, whatever they tell you, about self-reliance or dignity," Watson concluded. "It is simply a way to punish the poor for being poor, and an ideological commitment to being as grotesque as possible."
The Trump administration's latest effort to take healthcare from poor Americans comes just weeks after a federal court blocked Kentucky's Medicaid work requirements from taking effect. In his June ruling, District Judge James Boasberg concluded that the Trump administration's approval of Kentucky's punitive rules was "arbitrary and capricious."
And as Reutersreported on Tuesday, three advocacy groups are currently suing the Trump White House over its approval of Arkansas' Medicaid work requirements, which have been described as among the harshest in the nation.
Undeterred by lawsuits, federal court rulings, and widespread moral outrage over its efforts to strip life-saving healthcare from tens of thousands of vulnerable Americans, the Trump administration is reportedly planning to sign off on yet another flurry of waivers that would allow Republican governors like Wisconsin's Scott Walker to impose deeply cruel work requirements and other punitive restrictions on Medicaid recipients.
"If you're poor or disabled, the GOP wants you to die," actor and democratic socialist Rob Delaney wrote in response to a new Politico's report late Thursday detailing the Trump administration's plan to approve a "new round" of Medicaid restrictions in Maine, Arizona, and Wisconsin.
\u201cIf you\u2019re poor or disabled, the GOP wants you to die. Read this & register to vote: https://t.co/4sqGC2eLQs https://t.co/GT3MsKxj04\u201d— rob delaney (@rob delaney) 1534479481
"One of the most controversial changes sought by the states is Wisconsin's attempt to drug test its Medicaid applicants--an effort that advocates and lawyers say is illegal," Politicoreported, noting that Walker has been relentlessly pushing to drug test Medicaid and food stamp recipients for years.
While the White House isn't likely to approve Walker's full plan to drug test every Medicaid applicant and recipient due to legal barriers, "Wisconsin is expected to win approval to ask applicants to disclose on their Medicaid applications whether they've used drugs or are in recovery, but won't make coverage decisions based on the answers provided," Politico notes.
"The Trump administration seems intent on moving as quickly as possible to approve these harmful waivers which will clearly result in many more thousands of vulnerable people losing their Medicaid coverage."
--Joan Alker, Georgetown University
But, according to Joan Alker--head of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families--the very presence of such a question on a state Medicaid application could scare addicts and recovering addicts who badly need medical coverage.
"If people hear there's a drug testing requirement, that might be a deterrent from even applying," Alker noted. "The Trump administration seems intent on moving as quickly as possible to approve these harmful waivers which will clearly result in many more thousands of vulnerable people losing their Medicaid coverage."
While conservatives often frame their push for punitive work requirements and drug testing as an effort to control Medicaid costs, such restrictions have repeatedly proven to be less cost-effective and more bureaucratic than the current system, leading advocates for Medicaid expansion to conclude that the GOP's only true objective is to demonize the poor as lazy moochers and kick people off their healthcare.
Though the Republicans have proved more successful in recent years, efforts to foist drug tests on rich people in order to secure very large and unearned tax giveaways have so far failed:
\u201cDem bill would require rich people to undergo drug test before receiving tax breaks: https://t.co/5vvzg4HPnq\u201d— The Hill (@The Hill) 1466120412
Calling the right-wing notion that Medicaid recipients are lazy the "fundamental lie of work requirements," Splinter's Libby Watson pointed to a recent Kaiser Family Foundation study that showed "nearly 8 in 10 Medicaid enrollees have at least one family member who is working and a majority work themselves." The vast majority of those who don't work are either disabled or caretakers, the analysis found.
"Threatening poor people's lives--which is what getting rid of their healthcare coverage essentially means--is not a way to eradicate poverty, or increase employment, or improve anyone's lives. It is not, whatever they tell you, about self-reliance or dignity," Watson concluded. "It is simply a way to punish the poor for being poor, and an ideological commitment to being as grotesque as possible."
The Trump administration's latest effort to take healthcare from poor Americans comes just weeks after a federal court blocked Kentucky's Medicaid work requirements from taking effect. In his June ruling, District Judge James Boasberg concluded that the Trump administration's approval of Kentucky's punitive rules was "arbitrary and capricious."
And as Reutersreported on Tuesday, three advocacy groups are currently suing the Trump White House over its approval of Arkansas' Medicaid work requirements, which have been described as among the harshest in the nation.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.