Green groups maintain that Exxon Mobil knew for decades about the effects of its oil and gas development on the climate, and lied to the public and its shareholders about climate crisis. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Aug 03, 2018
New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood said Friday that she would continue her probe into Exxon Mobil's knowledge of the climate crisis following the Security and Exchange Commission's (SEC) decision to drop its own two-year investigation without recommending any action be taken against the oil giant.
"Our investigation remains ongoing," Amy Spitalnick, Underwood's communication director, said in a statement.
Under the Obama administration in 2016, the SEC's Fort Worth, Texas office began investigating whether Exxon Mobil knew that its oil and gas extraction practices could have adverse effects on the Earth's climate, and lied about its knowledge to its investors.
As Inside Climate News tweeted this week, internal documents going back decades have shown that Exxon scientist Roger Cohen told environmental affairs manager Al Natkin in 1982, "Over the past several years a clear scientific consensus has energed regarding the expected climatic effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. The consensus is that a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide from its pre-industrial revolution value would result in an average global temperature rise of [about 3 degrees Celsius]."
\u201c22/ In 1982, Roger Cohen told an Exxon company executive: "There is unanimous agreement in the scientific community that a temperature increase of this magnitude would bring about significant changes in the earth's climate."\n\nRead the full document here: https://t.co/dVQmPaAdxp\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1533146667
\u201c23/ We called our series Exxon: The Road Not Taken because by the late 1980s, Exxon and its allies chose to pivot to using scientific uncertainty as a shield against forceful action on global warming. \n\nRead it here: https://t.co/Fp5ES9tWwv\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1533146667
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey is also investigating Exxon's knowledge of the climate crisis. In March, a federal judge rejected Exxon's latest attempt to have the case dismissed. The company had sued Healey and Underwood, claiming that its free speech rights were being violated by their subpoena of documents showing Exxon officials knew the risks of contributing to the climate crisis.
"We're gratified that multiple courts have now rejected Exxon's arguments regarding our investigation--fully dismissing Exxon's lawsuit against our office, and ordering Exxon and its accounting firm to produce the documents we subpoenaed," Spitalnick told Bloomberg.
\u201cExxon's heavy contributions to the GOP and right-wing think tanks pays off, big time. https://t.co/cBC38UcIAj\u201d— Bruce Bartlett (@Bruce Bartlett) 1533319065
Spitalnick as well as 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben both noted that the SEC's decision came a day after President Donald Trump announced he would roll back fuel efficiency standards for automobiles and try to keep states including California from adopting their own anti-pollution rules.
\u201cAs @business notes, on the same day the Trump admin rolled back #CleanCarStandards, the SEC dropped its investigation into #Exxon. \n\n@NewYorkStateAG\u2019s investigation remains ongoing \u2013 and federal and state courts have rejected Exxon\u2019s efforts to block it. https://t.co/gpPzJEfN66\u201d— Amy Spitalnick (@Amy Spitalnick) 1533320979
"The Trump administration is full of gifts for the fossil fuel industry--first an end to fuel-efficient cars and a day later a free pass on its funky climate accounting," McKibben told Bloomberg.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood said Friday that she would continue her probe into Exxon Mobil's knowledge of the climate crisis following the Security and Exchange Commission's (SEC) decision to drop its own two-year investigation without recommending any action be taken against the oil giant.
"Our investigation remains ongoing," Amy Spitalnick, Underwood's communication director, said in a statement.
Under the Obama administration in 2016, the SEC's Fort Worth, Texas office began investigating whether Exxon Mobil knew that its oil and gas extraction practices could have adverse effects on the Earth's climate, and lied about its knowledge to its investors.
As Inside Climate News tweeted this week, internal documents going back decades have shown that Exxon scientist Roger Cohen told environmental affairs manager Al Natkin in 1982, "Over the past several years a clear scientific consensus has energed regarding the expected climatic effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. The consensus is that a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide from its pre-industrial revolution value would result in an average global temperature rise of [about 3 degrees Celsius]."
\u201c22/ In 1982, Roger Cohen told an Exxon company executive: "There is unanimous agreement in the scientific community that a temperature increase of this magnitude would bring about significant changes in the earth's climate."\n\nRead the full document here: https://t.co/dVQmPaAdxp\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1533146667
\u201c23/ We called our series Exxon: The Road Not Taken because by the late 1980s, Exxon and its allies chose to pivot to using scientific uncertainty as a shield against forceful action on global warming. \n\nRead it here: https://t.co/Fp5ES9tWwv\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1533146667
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey is also investigating Exxon's knowledge of the climate crisis. In March, a federal judge rejected Exxon's latest attempt to have the case dismissed. The company had sued Healey and Underwood, claiming that its free speech rights were being violated by their subpoena of documents showing Exxon officials knew the risks of contributing to the climate crisis.
"We're gratified that multiple courts have now rejected Exxon's arguments regarding our investigation--fully dismissing Exxon's lawsuit against our office, and ordering Exxon and its accounting firm to produce the documents we subpoenaed," Spitalnick told Bloomberg.
\u201cExxon's heavy contributions to the GOP and right-wing think tanks pays off, big time. https://t.co/cBC38UcIAj\u201d— Bruce Bartlett (@Bruce Bartlett) 1533319065
Spitalnick as well as 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben both noted that the SEC's decision came a day after President Donald Trump announced he would roll back fuel efficiency standards for automobiles and try to keep states including California from adopting their own anti-pollution rules.
\u201cAs @business notes, on the same day the Trump admin rolled back #CleanCarStandards, the SEC dropped its investigation into #Exxon. \n\n@NewYorkStateAG\u2019s investigation remains ongoing \u2013 and federal and state courts have rejected Exxon\u2019s efforts to block it. https://t.co/gpPzJEfN66\u201d— Amy Spitalnick (@Amy Spitalnick) 1533320979
"The Trump administration is full of gifts for the fossil fuel industry--first an end to fuel-efficient cars and a day later a free pass on its funky climate accounting," McKibben told Bloomberg.
New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood said Friday that she would continue her probe into Exxon Mobil's knowledge of the climate crisis following the Security and Exchange Commission's (SEC) decision to drop its own two-year investigation without recommending any action be taken against the oil giant.
"Our investigation remains ongoing," Amy Spitalnick, Underwood's communication director, said in a statement.
Under the Obama administration in 2016, the SEC's Fort Worth, Texas office began investigating whether Exxon Mobil knew that its oil and gas extraction practices could have adverse effects on the Earth's climate, and lied about its knowledge to its investors.
As Inside Climate News tweeted this week, internal documents going back decades have shown that Exxon scientist Roger Cohen told environmental affairs manager Al Natkin in 1982, "Over the past several years a clear scientific consensus has energed regarding the expected climatic effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. The consensus is that a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide from its pre-industrial revolution value would result in an average global temperature rise of [about 3 degrees Celsius]."
\u201c22/ In 1982, Roger Cohen told an Exxon company executive: "There is unanimous agreement in the scientific community that a temperature increase of this magnitude would bring about significant changes in the earth's climate."\n\nRead the full document here: https://t.co/dVQmPaAdxp\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1533146667
\u201c23/ We called our series Exxon: The Road Not Taken because by the late 1980s, Exxon and its allies chose to pivot to using scientific uncertainty as a shield against forceful action on global warming. \n\nRead it here: https://t.co/Fp5ES9tWwv\u201d— Inside Climate News (@Inside Climate News) 1533146667
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey is also investigating Exxon's knowledge of the climate crisis. In March, a federal judge rejected Exxon's latest attempt to have the case dismissed. The company had sued Healey and Underwood, claiming that its free speech rights were being violated by their subpoena of documents showing Exxon officials knew the risks of contributing to the climate crisis.
"We're gratified that multiple courts have now rejected Exxon's arguments regarding our investigation--fully dismissing Exxon's lawsuit against our office, and ordering Exxon and its accounting firm to produce the documents we subpoenaed," Spitalnick told Bloomberg.
\u201cExxon's heavy contributions to the GOP and right-wing think tanks pays off, big time. https://t.co/cBC38UcIAj\u201d— Bruce Bartlett (@Bruce Bartlett) 1533319065
Spitalnick as well as 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben both noted that the SEC's decision came a day after President Donald Trump announced he would roll back fuel efficiency standards for automobiles and try to keep states including California from adopting their own anti-pollution rules.
\u201cAs @business notes, on the same day the Trump admin rolled back #CleanCarStandards, the SEC dropped its investigation into #Exxon. \n\n@NewYorkStateAG\u2019s investigation remains ongoing \u2013 and federal and state courts have rejected Exxon\u2019s efforts to block it. https://t.co/gpPzJEfN66\u201d— Amy Spitalnick (@Amy Spitalnick) 1533320979
"The Trump administration is full of gifts for the fossil fuel industry--first an end to fuel-efficient cars and a day later a free pass on its funky climate accounting," McKibben told Bloomberg.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.