The European Parliament voted against a new copyright law which critics say would create a "censorship machine," controlling what users can say and share on the internet. (Photo: The Verge)
EU Votes Down 'Disastrous' Copyright Proposal Aimed at Transforming Internet Into Virtual 'Censorship Machine'
"The European Parliament has sent the copyright law back to the drawing board...Now let's keep up the pressure to make sure we Save Your Internet!"
Digital rights activists on Thursday applauded the European Parliament's rejection of a broad new copyright law proposal which critics warned would threaten the open internet and result in widespread censorship and control of users.
"Great success: Your protests have worked!" wrote German Member of European Parliament (MEP) Julia Reda, a member of the Pirate Party Germany, told supporters on Twitter. "The European Parliament has sent the copyright law back to the drawing board. All MEPs will get to vote on upload filters and the link tax September 10-13. Now let's keep up the pressure to make sure we Save Your Internet!"
The Copyright Directive was voted down by lawmakers, with 318 opposing the measure and 278 supporting it. The proposal contained two rules that were especially worrisome to internet companies and open internet defenders--Article 11 and Article 13.
The former sought to require websites like Facebook and Google--as well as smaller, far less wealthy and powerful websites--to pay news organizations in order to link to their content, a rule critics have derided as a "link tax."
Article 13 would implement a so-called "upload filter"--or what opponents have called a censorship machine--to screen all material uploaded to the internet for copyright infringement.
Article 13 would have dire implications for all internet users, argue critics--from people who create and share viral memes to start-ups which rely on user-generated content and aim to compete with large platforms like YouTube, to websites like Wikipedia which rely on community members uploading content.
"This [law] will lead to excessive filtering and deletion of content and limit the freedom to impart information on the one hand, and the freedom to receive information on the other," wrote 57 rights groups, including Human Rights Watch and Reporters Without Borders, last year in an open letter to EU legislators.
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Whales has called the Copyright Directive "disastrous," while the website's Italian platform shut down on Tuesday in protest of the proposal.
"Wikipedia itself would be at risk of closing," should the directive pass, wrote the site's editors. "If the proposal is approved, it may be impossible to share a newspaper article on social networks or find it on a search engine."
"The broad scope of Article 13 could have covered any copyrightable material, including images, audio, video, compiled software, code and the written word," wrote James Temperton at Wired after the measure was voted down.
The European Parliament will take up debate on the directive again in September.
"MEPs will now soon go on 'summer break' until the end of August. We will need to continue to encourage them do the right thing and to push back against an Article 13," wrote the #SaveYourInternet campaign.
Reda posted a video on social media urging supporters to continue pressuring their representatives to oppose the Articles 11 and 13.
"The fight is far from over," Reda said. "What we have achieved today as that the entire Parliament will have a debate in September and will vote on changes to this copyright reform. So we must be vigilant. We cannot stop the public pressure now."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Digital rights activists on Thursday applauded the European Parliament's rejection of a broad new copyright law proposal which critics warned would threaten the open internet and result in widespread censorship and control of users.
"Great success: Your protests have worked!" wrote German Member of European Parliament (MEP) Julia Reda, a member of the Pirate Party Germany, told supporters on Twitter. "The European Parliament has sent the copyright law back to the drawing board. All MEPs will get to vote on upload filters and the link tax September 10-13. Now let's keep up the pressure to make sure we Save Your Internet!"
The Copyright Directive was voted down by lawmakers, with 318 opposing the measure and 278 supporting it. The proposal contained two rules that were especially worrisome to internet companies and open internet defenders--Article 11 and Article 13.
The former sought to require websites like Facebook and Google--as well as smaller, far less wealthy and powerful websites--to pay news organizations in order to link to their content, a rule critics have derided as a "link tax."
Article 13 would implement a so-called "upload filter"--or what opponents have called a censorship machine--to screen all material uploaded to the internet for copyright infringement.
Article 13 would have dire implications for all internet users, argue critics--from people who create and share viral memes to start-ups which rely on user-generated content and aim to compete with large platforms like YouTube, to websites like Wikipedia which rely on community members uploading content.
"This [law] will lead to excessive filtering and deletion of content and limit the freedom to impart information on the one hand, and the freedom to receive information on the other," wrote 57 rights groups, including Human Rights Watch and Reporters Without Borders, last year in an open letter to EU legislators.
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Whales has called the Copyright Directive "disastrous," while the website's Italian platform shut down on Tuesday in protest of the proposal.
"Wikipedia itself would be at risk of closing," should the directive pass, wrote the site's editors. "If the proposal is approved, it may be impossible to share a newspaper article on social networks or find it on a search engine."
"The broad scope of Article 13 could have covered any copyrightable material, including images, audio, video, compiled software, code and the written word," wrote James Temperton at Wired after the measure was voted down.
The European Parliament will take up debate on the directive again in September.
"MEPs will now soon go on 'summer break' until the end of August. We will need to continue to encourage them do the right thing and to push back against an Article 13," wrote the #SaveYourInternet campaign.
Reda posted a video on social media urging supporters to continue pressuring their representatives to oppose the Articles 11 and 13.
"The fight is far from over," Reda said. "What we have achieved today as that the entire Parliament will have a debate in September and will vote on changes to this copyright reform. So we must be vigilant. We cannot stop the public pressure now."
Digital rights activists on Thursday applauded the European Parliament's rejection of a broad new copyright law proposal which critics warned would threaten the open internet and result in widespread censorship and control of users.
"Great success: Your protests have worked!" wrote German Member of European Parliament (MEP) Julia Reda, a member of the Pirate Party Germany, told supporters on Twitter. "The European Parliament has sent the copyright law back to the drawing board. All MEPs will get to vote on upload filters and the link tax September 10-13. Now let's keep up the pressure to make sure we Save Your Internet!"
The Copyright Directive was voted down by lawmakers, with 318 opposing the measure and 278 supporting it. The proposal contained two rules that were especially worrisome to internet companies and open internet defenders--Article 11 and Article 13.
The former sought to require websites like Facebook and Google--as well as smaller, far less wealthy and powerful websites--to pay news organizations in order to link to their content, a rule critics have derided as a "link tax."
Article 13 would implement a so-called "upload filter"--or what opponents have called a censorship machine--to screen all material uploaded to the internet for copyright infringement.
Article 13 would have dire implications for all internet users, argue critics--from people who create and share viral memes to start-ups which rely on user-generated content and aim to compete with large platforms like YouTube, to websites like Wikipedia which rely on community members uploading content.
"This [law] will lead to excessive filtering and deletion of content and limit the freedom to impart information on the one hand, and the freedom to receive information on the other," wrote 57 rights groups, including Human Rights Watch and Reporters Without Borders, last year in an open letter to EU legislators.
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Whales has called the Copyright Directive "disastrous," while the website's Italian platform shut down on Tuesday in protest of the proposal.
"Wikipedia itself would be at risk of closing," should the directive pass, wrote the site's editors. "If the proposal is approved, it may be impossible to share a newspaper article on social networks or find it on a search engine."
"The broad scope of Article 13 could have covered any copyrightable material, including images, audio, video, compiled software, code and the written word," wrote James Temperton at Wired after the measure was voted down.
The European Parliament will take up debate on the directive again in September.
"MEPs will now soon go on 'summer break' until the end of August. We will need to continue to encourage them do the right thing and to push back against an Article 13," wrote the #SaveYourInternet campaign.
Reda posted a video on social media urging supporters to continue pressuring their representatives to oppose the Articles 11 and 13.
"The fight is far from over," Reda said. "What we have achieved today as that the entire Parliament will have a debate in September and will vote on changes to this copyright reform. So we must be vigilant. We cannot stop the public pressure now."