A group of Cleveland Browns players kneel, supported by other teammates who remained standing, during the national anthem ahead of a pre-season game against the New York Giants last August.
(Photo: Joe Robbins/Getty Images)
May 23, 2018
National Football League (NFL) team owners were widely rebuked Wednesday for a new policy to penalize professional football teams whose players exercise their right to protest after athletes across the league locked arms, raised fists, or knelt during the national anthem the past two seasons to support a movement against racial injustice started by former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick.
"If NFL owners actually knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be having these Hamlet-esque meetings about how to clamp down on protest and would instead merely assert the basic truth: that players hold the right to protest, and fans should respect that right."
--Dave Zirin, The Nation
"A club will be fined by the league if its personnel are on the field and do not stand and show respect for the flag and the anthem," according to policy statement released by the NFL on Wednesday.
Commissioner Roger Goodell added that "personnel who choose not to stand for the anthem may stay in the locker room until after the anthem has been performed."
No NFL owners have come out in opposition to the move, but 49ers owner Jed York reportedly abstained from voting for the new policy, which also allows individual teams to craft additional rules, and was strongly condemned by football fans and civil libertarians alike.
\u201cThe NFL players\u2019 protests have never been about the military or the flag. They\u2019re about police brutality and white supremacy. Failing to protest injustice in America is not patriotic, it\u2019s dangerous. #TakeAKnee\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1527096060
\u201cSo the @NFL will fine teams who have players not stand during the forced nationalism portion of the game. Where does the money go? Causes to help Injustice or Roger's pocket?\u201d— Zac Coffman-Magaha (parody) (@Zac Coffman-Magaha (parody)) 1527093613
\u201cFines and penalties for taking a knee. I call #BullShit #NFL needs to get it together. Stop being Punked by the President.\u201d— Tim McTyer, MSc. (@Tim McTyer, MSc.) 1527094032
The policy announcement came after Sports Illustrated reported that at a private meeting on Tuesday, owners who oppose the player protests proposed issuing 15-yard penalties against teams whose players kneel. Critics called that plan "utterly absurd," "industrial-strength stupid," and "PATHETIC."
The Nation's sports editor, Dave Zirin, called it "among the worst ideas in the history of the National Football League," writing Wednesday that "one can only imagine an official saying, 'Exercising of constitutional rights. On the kicking team. 15 yard penalty. First down.'"
In addition to a First Amendment right to peacefullly protest, as Zirin explained, "NFL players have had the space to protest during the anthem not out of the noblesse oblige of ownership but because it is enshrined in the collective bargaining agreement with the union."
George Atallah of the league's players association, NFLPA, had said on Twitter that the labor group was not a part of the Tuesday discussion, and after the official announcement on Wednesday, the NFLPA issued a statement reiterating that "the NFL chose to not consult the union in the development of this new 'policy.'"
In its statement, the NFPLA also praised NFL players for showing "their patriotism through...protests to raise awareness about the issues they care about," and vowed to "review the new 'policy' and challenge any aspect of it that is inconsistent with the collective bargaining agreement."
"The idea that some owners would even propose this without speaking to the union is a sign of how drastically out of touch this group of aged billionaires are from the players in their league," Zirin concluded. "If NFL owners actually knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be having these Hamlet-esque meetings about how to clamp down on protest and would instead merely assert the basic truth: that players hold the right to protest, and fans should respect that right."
This post has been updated to reflect that the 49ers owner abstained from voting for the policy, according to ESPN, and to include comments from the ACLU.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just hours away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
National Football League (NFL) team owners were widely rebuked Wednesday for a new policy to penalize professional football teams whose players exercise their right to protest after athletes across the league locked arms, raised fists, or knelt during the national anthem the past two seasons to support a movement against racial injustice started by former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick.
"If NFL owners actually knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be having these Hamlet-esque meetings about how to clamp down on protest and would instead merely assert the basic truth: that players hold the right to protest, and fans should respect that right."
--Dave Zirin, The Nation
"A club will be fined by the league if its personnel are on the field and do not stand and show respect for the flag and the anthem," according to policy statement released by the NFL on Wednesday.
Commissioner Roger Goodell added that "personnel who choose not to stand for the anthem may stay in the locker room until after the anthem has been performed."
No NFL owners have come out in opposition to the move, but 49ers owner Jed York reportedly abstained from voting for the new policy, which also allows individual teams to craft additional rules, and was strongly condemned by football fans and civil libertarians alike.
\u201cThe NFL players\u2019 protests have never been about the military or the flag. They\u2019re about police brutality and white supremacy. Failing to protest injustice in America is not patriotic, it\u2019s dangerous. #TakeAKnee\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1527096060
\u201cSo the @NFL will fine teams who have players not stand during the forced nationalism portion of the game. Where does the money go? Causes to help Injustice or Roger's pocket?\u201d— Zac Coffman-Magaha (parody) (@Zac Coffman-Magaha (parody)) 1527093613
\u201cFines and penalties for taking a knee. I call #BullShit #NFL needs to get it together. Stop being Punked by the President.\u201d— Tim McTyer, MSc. (@Tim McTyer, MSc.) 1527094032
The policy announcement came after Sports Illustrated reported that at a private meeting on Tuesday, owners who oppose the player protests proposed issuing 15-yard penalties against teams whose players kneel. Critics called that plan "utterly absurd," "industrial-strength stupid," and "PATHETIC."
The Nation's sports editor, Dave Zirin, called it "among the worst ideas in the history of the National Football League," writing Wednesday that "one can only imagine an official saying, 'Exercising of constitutional rights. On the kicking team. 15 yard penalty. First down.'"
In addition to a First Amendment right to peacefullly protest, as Zirin explained, "NFL players have had the space to protest during the anthem not out of the noblesse oblige of ownership but because it is enshrined in the collective bargaining agreement with the union."
George Atallah of the league's players association, NFLPA, had said on Twitter that the labor group was not a part of the Tuesday discussion, and after the official announcement on Wednesday, the NFLPA issued a statement reiterating that "the NFL chose to not consult the union in the development of this new 'policy.'"
In its statement, the NFPLA also praised NFL players for showing "their patriotism through...protests to raise awareness about the issues they care about," and vowed to "review the new 'policy' and challenge any aspect of it that is inconsistent with the collective bargaining agreement."
"The idea that some owners would even propose this without speaking to the union is a sign of how drastically out of touch this group of aged billionaires are from the players in their league," Zirin concluded. "If NFL owners actually knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be having these Hamlet-esque meetings about how to clamp down on protest and would instead merely assert the basic truth: that players hold the right to protest, and fans should respect that right."
This post has been updated to reflect that the 49ers owner abstained from voting for the policy, according to ESPN, and to include comments from the ACLU.
National Football League (NFL) team owners were widely rebuked Wednesday for a new policy to penalize professional football teams whose players exercise their right to protest after athletes across the league locked arms, raised fists, or knelt during the national anthem the past two seasons to support a movement against racial injustice started by former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick.
"If NFL owners actually knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be having these Hamlet-esque meetings about how to clamp down on protest and would instead merely assert the basic truth: that players hold the right to protest, and fans should respect that right."
--Dave Zirin, The Nation
"A club will be fined by the league if its personnel are on the field and do not stand and show respect for the flag and the anthem," according to policy statement released by the NFL on Wednesday.
Commissioner Roger Goodell added that "personnel who choose not to stand for the anthem may stay in the locker room until after the anthem has been performed."
No NFL owners have come out in opposition to the move, but 49ers owner Jed York reportedly abstained from voting for the new policy, which also allows individual teams to craft additional rules, and was strongly condemned by football fans and civil libertarians alike.
\u201cThe NFL players\u2019 protests have never been about the military or the flag. They\u2019re about police brutality and white supremacy. Failing to protest injustice in America is not patriotic, it\u2019s dangerous. #TakeAKnee\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1527096060
\u201cSo the @NFL will fine teams who have players not stand during the forced nationalism portion of the game. Where does the money go? Causes to help Injustice or Roger's pocket?\u201d— Zac Coffman-Magaha (parody) (@Zac Coffman-Magaha (parody)) 1527093613
\u201cFines and penalties for taking a knee. I call #BullShit #NFL needs to get it together. Stop being Punked by the President.\u201d— Tim McTyer, MSc. (@Tim McTyer, MSc.) 1527094032
The policy announcement came after Sports Illustrated reported that at a private meeting on Tuesday, owners who oppose the player protests proposed issuing 15-yard penalties against teams whose players kneel. Critics called that plan "utterly absurd," "industrial-strength stupid," and "PATHETIC."
The Nation's sports editor, Dave Zirin, called it "among the worst ideas in the history of the National Football League," writing Wednesday that "one can only imagine an official saying, 'Exercising of constitutional rights. On the kicking team. 15 yard penalty. First down.'"
In addition to a First Amendment right to peacefullly protest, as Zirin explained, "NFL players have had the space to protest during the anthem not out of the noblesse oblige of ownership but because it is enshrined in the collective bargaining agreement with the union."
George Atallah of the league's players association, NFLPA, had said on Twitter that the labor group was not a part of the Tuesday discussion, and after the official announcement on Wednesday, the NFLPA issued a statement reiterating that "the NFL chose to not consult the union in the development of this new 'policy.'"
In its statement, the NFPLA also praised NFL players for showing "their patriotism through...protests to raise awareness about the issues they care about," and vowed to "review the new 'policy' and challenge any aspect of it that is inconsistent with the collective bargaining agreement."
"The idea that some owners would even propose this without speaking to the union is a sign of how drastically out of touch this group of aged billionaires are from the players in their league," Zirin concluded. "If NFL owners actually knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be having these Hamlet-esque meetings about how to clamp down on protest and would instead merely assert the basic truth: that players hold the right to protest, and fans should respect that right."
This post has been updated to reflect that the 49ers owner abstained from voting for the policy, according to ESPN, and to include comments from the ACLU.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.