SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Gul Rahman was tortured and died at a CIA black site in 2002. (Photo: Courtesy of Gul Rahman's family/AP)
Where Is the Body of This Man Tortured to Death by the CIA?
The family of Gul Rahman is demanding answers as lawmakers prepare to revisit the agency's legacy of torture during Gina Haspel's confirmation hearing
Apr 19, 2018
As the Senate prepares to reexamine the CIA's dark history of torture amid mounting opposition to Gina Haspel's nomination to run the agency, the family of an Afghan man who was tortured to death at a black site near Kabul, Afghanistan is demanding answers about what happened to his body.
Gul Rahman vanished from a refugee camp in October of 2002 and was taken to a secret CIA prison called "the Salt Pit," where he was "beaten, doused with cold water, and left shackled in a cold cell, naked from the waist down." He was found dead in his cell on November 20, 2002.
While internal investigations "recorded that the CIA ordered a freezer to preserve the body for an autopsy, and summarized an autopsy report that listed the likely cause of death as hypothermia," the Guardian notes that "no records relating to the disposition of Rahman's remains have been released."
In 2015, his nephew sued the pair of psychologists who were hired to design the CIA's torture program. The lawsuit led to a settlement that acknowledged "Gul Rahman was subjected to abuses in the CIA program that resulted in his death and pain and suffering to his family," but pleas that the government "at least present the dead body to us" have gone unfulfilled.
Now, Rahman's family, with help from the ACLU, has sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the U.S. government in hopes of finding out what happened to his remains.
"Honoring this small but significant request will help bring his family, including his mother, his wife, and three daughters, long-needed closure," ACLU attorney Steven Watt told the Guardian. "It will also shed further light on one of the most controversial and tragic aspects of the CIA's now-defunct torture program."
The CIA's torture program is facing renewed scrutiny after President Donald Trump's appointed Haspel to serve as the agency's new director. In the early 2000s, as Common Dreams has reported, Haspel played a "leading role in running an agency black site where detainees were systematically and gruesomely abused."
Haspel's nomination requires a Senate confirmation, and human rights advocates from across the globe have rallied together to pressure lawmakers to reject her nomination.
In a letter to senators on Thursday, a coalition of rights groups wrote that it "remains undisputed that Ms. Haspel was deeply involved in the CIA's now-defunct torture program" and argued "a vote to confirm her is incompatible with a meaningful commitment to the prohibition on torture."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As the Senate prepares to reexamine the CIA's dark history of torture amid mounting opposition to Gina Haspel's nomination to run the agency, the family of an Afghan man who was tortured to death at a black site near Kabul, Afghanistan is demanding answers about what happened to his body.
Gul Rahman vanished from a refugee camp in October of 2002 and was taken to a secret CIA prison called "the Salt Pit," where he was "beaten, doused with cold water, and left shackled in a cold cell, naked from the waist down." He was found dead in his cell on November 20, 2002.
While internal investigations "recorded that the CIA ordered a freezer to preserve the body for an autopsy, and summarized an autopsy report that listed the likely cause of death as hypothermia," the Guardian notes that "no records relating to the disposition of Rahman's remains have been released."
In 2015, his nephew sued the pair of psychologists who were hired to design the CIA's torture program. The lawsuit led to a settlement that acknowledged "Gul Rahman was subjected to abuses in the CIA program that resulted in his death and pain and suffering to his family," but pleas that the government "at least present the dead body to us" have gone unfulfilled.
Now, Rahman's family, with help from the ACLU, has sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the U.S. government in hopes of finding out what happened to his remains.
"Honoring this small but significant request will help bring his family, including his mother, his wife, and three daughters, long-needed closure," ACLU attorney Steven Watt told the Guardian. "It will also shed further light on one of the most controversial and tragic aspects of the CIA's now-defunct torture program."
The CIA's torture program is facing renewed scrutiny after President Donald Trump's appointed Haspel to serve as the agency's new director. In the early 2000s, as Common Dreams has reported, Haspel played a "leading role in running an agency black site where detainees were systematically and gruesomely abused."
Haspel's nomination requires a Senate confirmation, and human rights advocates from across the globe have rallied together to pressure lawmakers to reject her nomination.
In a letter to senators on Thursday, a coalition of rights groups wrote that it "remains undisputed that Ms. Haspel was deeply involved in the CIA's now-defunct torture program" and argued "a vote to confirm her is incompatible with a meaningful commitment to the prohibition on torture."
As the Senate prepares to reexamine the CIA's dark history of torture amid mounting opposition to Gina Haspel's nomination to run the agency, the family of an Afghan man who was tortured to death at a black site near Kabul, Afghanistan is demanding answers about what happened to his body.
Gul Rahman vanished from a refugee camp in October of 2002 and was taken to a secret CIA prison called "the Salt Pit," where he was "beaten, doused with cold water, and left shackled in a cold cell, naked from the waist down." He was found dead in his cell on November 20, 2002.
While internal investigations "recorded that the CIA ordered a freezer to preserve the body for an autopsy, and summarized an autopsy report that listed the likely cause of death as hypothermia," the Guardian notes that "no records relating to the disposition of Rahman's remains have been released."
In 2015, his nephew sued the pair of psychologists who were hired to design the CIA's torture program. The lawsuit led to a settlement that acknowledged "Gul Rahman was subjected to abuses in the CIA program that resulted in his death and pain and suffering to his family," but pleas that the government "at least present the dead body to us" have gone unfulfilled.
Now, Rahman's family, with help from the ACLU, has sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the U.S. government in hopes of finding out what happened to his remains.
"Honoring this small but significant request will help bring his family, including his mother, his wife, and three daughters, long-needed closure," ACLU attorney Steven Watt told the Guardian. "It will also shed further light on one of the most controversial and tragic aspects of the CIA's now-defunct torture program."
The CIA's torture program is facing renewed scrutiny after President Donald Trump's appointed Haspel to serve as the agency's new director. In the early 2000s, as Common Dreams has reported, Haspel played a "leading role in running an agency black site where detainees were systematically and gruesomely abused."
Haspel's nomination requires a Senate confirmation, and human rights advocates from across the globe have rallied together to pressure lawmakers to reject her nomination.
In a letter to senators on Thursday, a coalition of rights groups wrote that it "remains undisputed that Ms. Haspel was deeply involved in the CIA's now-defunct torture program" and argued "a vote to confirm her is incompatible with a meaningful commitment to the prohibition on torture."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.