SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
According to an administration official, the White House enjoyed a "reprieve" from negative press in recent days as the nation focused its attention on the deaths of 17 people in a school shooting in Florida--but the angry responses of students, teachers, and parents have assured that more criticism is coming. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
White House Official: Deadly Shooting Offered 'Reprieve' From Negative Trump Coverage
As students express fury over lax gun legislation and president's NRA ties, the "distraction" is unlikely to last long
Feb 19, 2018
A Washington Post interview with a White House official garnered stunned reactions on social media when the anonymous staffer said that last week's school shooting in Parkland, Florida had offered the Trump administration a "reprieve" from negative media coverage.
"For everyone, it was a distraction or a reprieve," said the official. "A lot of people here felt like it was a reprieve from seven or eight days of just getting pummeled. But as we all know, sadly, when the coverage dies down a little bit, we'll be back through the chaos."
The quote, which many saw as reflecting the administration's callous view of the shooting that killed 17 people and injured 14, was quickly denounced on social media.
\u201cThe White House thought seventeen people being murdered in cold blood was a \u201creprieve.\u201d\u201d— Jared Yates Sexton (@Jared Yates Sexton) 1519072585
\u201cHere's some Republicans working in or with the White House talking about what a lucky break for them the murder of 17 kids and teachers was. https://t.co/YQh250yV1C\u201d— Mark Harris (@Mark Harris) 1519070143
\u201c"How the White House is dealing with stuff" stories are already bad in that they completely sidestep policies in favor of "wins" and "losses" which mean nothing for anyone but the political actors themselves. This story is taking that sort of thing to perverse extremes.\u201d— Craig Calcaterra (@Craig Calcaterra) 1519075205
\u201cThat, in this instance, the story is basically "White House gets a reprieve thanks to a mass murder of children" transforms a banal, pointless story into one that approaches the obscene.\u201d— Craig Calcaterra (@Craig Calcaterra) 1519075205
\u201cYou know you\u2019re working in a sh*thole administration when the murder of 17 kids & teachers is viewed as a \u201creprieve\u201d from the cesspool you\u2019re mired in.\n\n@realDonaldTrump https://t.co/fh0vY5OTgn\u201d— Moe Davis (U.S. Air Force, Retired) (@Moe Davis (U.S. Air Force, Retired)) 1519073752
The shooting followed several days of media coverage of physical abuse allegations against former White House staff secretary Rob Porter and suspicions that administration officials knew about the allegations far earlier than they admitted. It also came after ongoing coverage of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into President Donald Trump's ties to Russia, and reporting on the aftermath of the attack coincided with the news of Mueller's indictment of 13 Russian nationals for meddling in the 2016 election.
In light of the national response to the Parkland shooting, however, it appears unlikely that the White House's self-described "reprieve" from criticism will last long.
Students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, where Nikolas Cruz opened fire last Wednesday, have directly attacked Trump's failure to address gun control in the days after the shooting. Emma Gonzalez was among those who angrily called out the president for taking millions of dollars in donations from the National Rifle Association (NRA), which has aggressively promoted sales of the AR-15, the military-style semi-automatic firearm that was used to kill her classmates as well as dozens of other Americans in recent years.
Students in Washington, D.C. also held a "lie-in" demonstration on Monday, and young people across the country are planning nationwide protests in the coming months to demand stricter gun legislation.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A Washington Post interview with a White House official garnered stunned reactions on social media when the anonymous staffer said that last week's school shooting in Parkland, Florida had offered the Trump administration a "reprieve" from negative media coverage.
"For everyone, it was a distraction or a reprieve," said the official. "A lot of people here felt like it was a reprieve from seven or eight days of just getting pummeled. But as we all know, sadly, when the coverage dies down a little bit, we'll be back through the chaos."
The quote, which many saw as reflecting the administration's callous view of the shooting that killed 17 people and injured 14, was quickly denounced on social media.
\u201cThe White House thought seventeen people being murdered in cold blood was a \u201creprieve.\u201d\u201d— Jared Yates Sexton (@Jared Yates Sexton) 1519072585
\u201cHere's some Republicans working in or with the White House talking about what a lucky break for them the murder of 17 kids and teachers was. https://t.co/YQh250yV1C\u201d— Mark Harris (@Mark Harris) 1519070143
\u201c"How the White House is dealing with stuff" stories are already bad in that they completely sidestep policies in favor of "wins" and "losses" which mean nothing for anyone but the political actors themselves. This story is taking that sort of thing to perverse extremes.\u201d— Craig Calcaterra (@Craig Calcaterra) 1519075205
\u201cThat, in this instance, the story is basically "White House gets a reprieve thanks to a mass murder of children" transforms a banal, pointless story into one that approaches the obscene.\u201d— Craig Calcaterra (@Craig Calcaterra) 1519075205
\u201cYou know you\u2019re working in a sh*thole administration when the murder of 17 kids & teachers is viewed as a \u201creprieve\u201d from the cesspool you\u2019re mired in.\n\n@realDonaldTrump https://t.co/fh0vY5OTgn\u201d— Moe Davis (U.S. Air Force, Retired) (@Moe Davis (U.S. Air Force, Retired)) 1519073752
The shooting followed several days of media coverage of physical abuse allegations against former White House staff secretary Rob Porter and suspicions that administration officials knew about the allegations far earlier than they admitted. It also came after ongoing coverage of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into President Donald Trump's ties to Russia, and reporting on the aftermath of the attack coincided with the news of Mueller's indictment of 13 Russian nationals for meddling in the 2016 election.
In light of the national response to the Parkland shooting, however, it appears unlikely that the White House's self-described "reprieve" from criticism will last long.
Students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, where Nikolas Cruz opened fire last Wednesday, have directly attacked Trump's failure to address gun control in the days after the shooting. Emma Gonzalez was among those who angrily called out the president for taking millions of dollars in donations from the National Rifle Association (NRA), which has aggressively promoted sales of the AR-15, the military-style semi-automatic firearm that was used to kill her classmates as well as dozens of other Americans in recent years.
Students in Washington, D.C. also held a "lie-in" demonstration on Monday, and young people across the country are planning nationwide protests in the coming months to demand stricter gun legislation.
A Washington Post interview with a White House official garnered stunned reactions on social media when the anonymous staffer said that last week's school shooting in Parkland, Florida had offered the Trump administration a "reprieve" from negative media coverage.
"For everyone, it was a distraction or a reprieve," said the official. "A lot of people here felt like it was a reprieve from seven or eight days of just getting pummeled. But as we all know, sadly, when the coverage dies down a little bit, we'll be back through the chaos."
The quote, which many saw as reflecting the administration's callous view of the shooting that killed 17 people and injured 14, was quickly denounced on social media.
\u201cThe White House thought seventeen people being murdered in cold blood was a \u201creprieve.\u201d\u201d— Jared Yates Sexton (@Jared Yates Sexton) 1519072585
\u201cHere's some Republicans working in or with the White House talking about what a lucky break for them the murder of 17 kids and teachers was. https://t.co/YQh250yV1C\u201d— Mark Harris (@Mark Harris) 1519070143
\u201c"How the White House is dealing with stuff" stories are already bad in that they completely sidestep policies in favor of "wins" and "losses" which mean nothing for anyone but the political actors themselves. This story is taking that sort of thing to perverse extremes.\u201d— Craig Calcaterra (@Craig Calcaterra) 1519075205
\u201cThat, in this instance, the story is basically "White House gets a reprieve thanks to a mass murder of children" transforms a banal, pointless story into one that approaches the obscene.\u201d— Craig Calcaterra (@Craig Calcaterra) 1519075205
\u201cYou know you\u2019re working in a sh*thole administration when the murder of 17 kids & teachers is viewed as a \u201creprieve\u201d from the cesspool you\u2019re mired in.\n\n@realDonaldTrump https://t.co/fh0vY5OTgn\u201d— Moe Davis (U.S. Air Force, Retired) (@Moe Davis (U.S. Air Force, Retired)) 1519073752
The shooting followed several days of media coverage of physical abuse allegations against former White House staff secretary Rob Porter and suspicions that administration officials knew about the allegations far earlier than they admitted. It also came after ongoing coverage of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into President Donald Trump's ties to Russia, and reporting on the aftermath of the attack coincided with the news of Mueller's indictment of 13 Russian nationals for meddling in the 2016 election.
In light of the national response to the Parkland shooting, however, it appears unlikely that the White House's self-described "reprieve" from criticism will last long.
Students at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, where Nikolas Cruz opened fire last Wednesday, have directly attacked Trump's failure to address gun control in the days after the shooting. Emma Gonzalez was among those who angrily called out the president for taking millions of dollars in donations from the National Rifle Association (NRA), which has aggressively promoted sales of the AR-15, the military-style semi-automatic firearm that was used to kill her classmates as well as dozens of other Americans in recent years.
Students in Washington, D.C. also held a "lie-in" demonstration on Monday, and young people across the country are planning nationwide protests in the coming months to demand stricter gun legislation.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.