Environmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt answers reporters' questions during a briefing at the White House June 2, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Feb 15, 2018
Under intense scrutiny for taking expensive first class flights and staying in luxury hotels on the taxpayer's dime, EPA chief Scott Pruitt informed the public of the real reason he stays away from coach: to avoid uncomfortable interactions with people who are mad at him for trying to destroy the planet.
"If you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class."
--Rep. Keith Ellison
"We live in a very toxic environment politically," Pruitt explained in an interview with the New Hampshire Union Leader this week--an interesting choice of words, given that the EPA chief's policy moves have greatly contributed to the toxicity of the actual geophysical environment.
In separate remarks to New Hampshire's WMUR TV, Pruitt said "there have been instances, unfortunately, during my time as administrator, as I've flown and spent time, of interaction that's not been the best."
"And, so, ingress and egress off the plane...that's all decisions all made by our [security] detail team, by the chief of staff, by the administration," Pruitt added. "I don't make any of those decisions."
\u201cI thought it was safety? This is a pretty amazing statement, if you think about it. He\u2019s saying that there will be fewer people opposed to his policies in first class. https://t.co/TCmckhk5xq\u201d— Jake Sherman (@Jake Sherman) 1518638149
Pruitt's comments came during his short stint in New Hampshire--where he arrived on a first-class flight--to meet with Republican Gov. Chris Sununu and tour a toxic waste site.
Since the Washington Postreported on the dozens of first-class flights Pruitt has taken during his tenure--which have cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars--the EPA has been scrambling to explain why such expensive flights were justified.
Originally, the agency claimed in response to the Post's reporting that Pruitt had received a "blanket waiver" to travel first class whenever he pleases. But after Politicoexplained that such a waiver would be illegal, the EPA reversed course and said Pruitt "submits a waiver to fly in either first or business class" for every trip.
Critics were quick to ridicule Pruitt's comments on social media and raise serious questions about the claim that "unpleasant interactions" with people who disagree with the EPA's pro-fossil fuel policy agenda constitute a security threat.
\u201cIf you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class. https://t.co/aJMT0lG19x\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1518638954
\u201cThis guy is a public servant paid by the people he's seeking to avoid https://t.co/yHqzDAtR5c\u201d— Astead (@Astead) 1518638633
\u201cfrom the damage control playbook, they may have emphasized honesty a little *too* much https://t.co/vVj65bXBmK\u201d— Eric Schultz (@Eric Schultz) 1518638661
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Under intense scrutiny for taking expensive first class flights and staying in luxury hotels on the taxpayer's dime, EPA chief Scott Pruitt informed the public of the real reason he stays away from coach: to avoid uncomfortable interactions with people who are mad at him for trying to destroy the planet.
"If you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class."
--Rep. Keith Ellison
"We live in a very toxic environment politically," Pruitt explained in an interview with the New Hampshire Union Leader this week--an interesting choice of words, given that the EPA chief's policy moves have greatly contributed to the toxicity of the actual geophysical environment.
In separate remarks to New Hampshire's WMUR TV, Pruitt said "there have been instances, unfortunately, during my time as administrator, as I've flown and spent time, of interaction that's not been the best."
"And, so, ingress and egress off the plane...that's all decisions all made by our [security] detail team, by the chief of staff, by the administration," Pruitt added. "I don't make any of those decisions."
\u201cI thought it was safety? This is a pretty amazing statement, if you think about it. He\u2019s saying that there will be fewer people opposed to his policies in first class. https://t.co/TCmckhk5xq\u201d— Jake Sherman (@Jake Sherman) 1518638149
Pruitt's comments came during his short stint in New Hampshire--where he arrived on a first-class flight--to meet with Republican Gov. Chris Sununu and tour a toxic waste site.
Since the Washington Postreported on the dozens of first-class flights Pruitt has taken during his tenure--which have cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars--the EPA has been scrambling to explain why such expensive flights were justified.
Originally, the agency claimed in response to the Post's reporting that Pruitt had received a "blanket waiver" to travel first class whenever he pleases. But after Politicoexplained that such a waiver would be illegal, the EPA reversed course and said Pruitt "submits a waiver to fly in either first or business class" for every trip.
Critics were quick to ridicule Pruitt's comments on social media and raise serious questions about the claim that "unpleasant interactions" with people who disagree with the EPA's pro-fossil fuel policy agenda constitute a security threat.
\u201cIf you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class. https://t.co/aJMT0lG19x\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1518638954
\u201cThis guy is a public servant paid by the people he's seeking to avoid https://t.co/yHqzDAtR5c\u201d— Astead (@Astead) 1518638633
\u201cfrom the damage control playbook, they may have emphasized honesty a little *too* much https://t.co/vVj65bXBmK\u201d— Eric Schultz (@Eric Schultz) 1518638661
Under intense scrutiny for taking expensive first class flights and staying in luxury hotels on the taxpayer's dime, EPA chief Scott Pruitt informed the public of the real reason he stays away from coach: to avoid uncomfortable interactions with people who are mad at him for trying to destroy the planet.
"If you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class."
--Rep. Keith Ellison
"We live in a very toxic environment politically," Pruitt explained in an interview with the New Hampshire Union Leader this week--an interesting choice of words, given that the EPA chief's policy moves have greatly contributed to the toxicity of the actual geophysical environment.
In separate remarks to New Hampshire's WMUR TV, Pruitt said "there have been instances, unfortunately, during my time as administrator, as I've flown and spent time, of interaction that's not been the best."
"And, so, ingress and egress off the plane...that's all decisions all made by our [security] detail team, by the chief of staff, by the administration," Pruitt added. "I don't make any of those decisions."
\u201cI thought it was safety? This is a pretty amazing statement, if you think about it. He\u2019s saying that there will be fewer people opposed to his policies in first class. https://t.co/TCmckhk5xq\u201d— Jake Sherman (@Jake Sherman) 1518638149
Pruitt's comments came during his short stint in New Hampshire--where he arrived on a first-class flight--to meet with Republican Gov. Chris Sununu and tour a toxic waste site.
Since the Washington Postreported on the dozens of first-class flights Pruitt has taken during his tenure--which have cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars--the EPA has been scrambling to explain why such expensive flights were justified.
Originally, the agency claimed in response to the Post's reporting that Pruitt had received a "blanket waiver" to travel first class whenever he pleases. But after Politicoexplained that such a waiver would be illegal, the EPA reversed course and said Pruitt "submits a waiver to fly in either first or business class" for every trip.
Critics were quick to ridicule Pruitt's comments on social media and raise serious questions about the claim that "unpleasant interactions" with people who disagree with the EPA's pro-fossil fuel policy agenda constitute a security threat.
\u201cIf you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class. https://t.co/aJMT0lG19x\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1518638954
\u201cThis guy is a public servant paid by the people he's seeking to avoid https://t.co/yHqzDAtR5c\u201d— Astead (@Astead) 1518638633
\u201cfrom the damage control playbook, they may have emphasized honesty a little *too* much https://t.co/vVj65bXBmK\u201d— Eric Schultz (@Eric Schultz) 1518638661
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.