SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Environmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt answers reporters' questions during a briefing at the White House June 2, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Under intense scrutiny for taking expensive first class flights and staying in luxury hotels on the taxpayer's dime, EPA chief Scott Pruitt informed the public of the real reason he stays away from coach: to avoid uncomfortable interactions with people who are mad at him for trying to destroy the planet.
"If you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class."
--Rep. Keith Ellison
"We live in a very toxic environment politically," Pruitt explained in an interview with the New Hampshire Union Leader this week--an interesting choice of words, given that the EPA chief's policy moves have greatly contributed to the toxicity of the actual geophysical environment.
In separate remarks to New Hampshire's WMUR TV, Pruitt said "there have been instances, unfortunately, during my time as administrator, as I've flown and spent time, of interaction that's not been the best."
"And, so, ingress and egress off the plane...that's all decisions all made by our [security] detail team, by the chief of staff, by the administration," Pruitt added. "I don't make any of those decisions."
\u201cI thought it was safety? This is a pretty amazing statement, if you think about it. He\u2019s saying that there will be fewer people opposed to his policies in first class. https://t.co/TCmckhk5xq\u201d— Jake Sherman (@Jake Sherman) 1518638149
Pruitt's comments came during his short stint in New Hampshire--where he arrived on a first-class flight--to meet with Republican Gov. Chris Sununu and tour a toxic waste site.
Since the Washington Post reported on the dozens of first-class flights Pruitt has taken during his tenure--which have cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars--the EPA has been scrambling to explain why such expensive flights were justified.
Originally, the agency claimed in response to the Post's reporting that Pruitt had received a "blanket waiver" to travel first class whenever he pleases. But after Politico explained that such a waiver would be illegal, the EPA reversed course and said Pruitt "submits a waiver to fly in either first or business class" for every trip.
Critics were quick to ridicule Pruitt's comments on social media and raise serious questions about the claim that "unpleasant interactions" with people who disagree with the EPA's pro-fossil fuel policy agenda constitute a security threat.
\u201cIf you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class. https://t.co/aJMT0lG19x\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1518638954
\u201cThis guy is a public servant paid by the people he's seeking to avoid https://t.co/yHqzDAtR5c\u201d— Astead (@Astead) 1518638633
\u201cfrom the damage control playbook, they may have emphasized honesty a little *too* much https://t.co/vVj65bXBmK\u201d— Eric Schultz (@Eric Schultz) 1518638661
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Under intense scrutiny for taking expensive first class flights and staying in luxury hotels on the taxpayer's dime, EPA chief Scott Pruitt informed the public of the real reason he stays away from coach: to avoid uncomfortable interactions with people who are mad at him for trying to destroy the planet.
"If you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class."
--Rep. Keith Ellison
"We live in a very toxic environment politically," Pruitt explained in an interview with the New Hampshire Union Leader this week--an interesting choice of words, given that the EPA chief's policy moves have greatly contributed to the toxicity of the actual geophysical environment.
In separate remarks to New Hampshire's WMUR TV, Pruitt said "there have been instances, unfortunately, during my time as administrator, as I've flown and spent time, of interaction that's not been the best."
"And, so, ingress and egress off the plane...that's all decisions all made by our [security] detail team, by the chief of staff, by the administration," Pruitt added. "I don't make any of those decisions."
\u201cI thought it was safety? This is a pretty amazing statement, if you think about it. He\u2019s saying that there will be fewer people opposed to his policies in first class. https://t.co/TCmckhk5xq\u201d— Jake Sherman (@Jake Sherman) 1518638149
Pruitt's comments came during his short stint in New Hampshire--where he arrived on a first-class flight--to meet with Republican Gov. Chris Sununu and tour a toxic waste site.
Since the Washington Post reported on the dozens of first-class flights Pruitt has taken during his tenure--which have cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars--the EPA has been scrambling to explain why such expensive flights were justified.
Originally, the agency claimed in response to the Post's reporting that Pruitt had received a "blanket waiver" to travel first class whenever he pleases. But after Politico explained that such a waiver would be illegal, the EPA reversed course and said Pruitt "submits a waiver to fly in either first or business class" for every trip.
Critics were quick to ridicule Pruitt's comments on social media and raise serious questions about the claim that "unpleasant interactions" with people who disagree with the EPA's pro-fossil fuel policy agenda constitute a security threat.
\u201cIf you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class. https://t.co/aJMT0lG19x\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1518638954
\u201cThis guy is a public servant paid by the people he's seeking to avoid https://t.co/yHqzDAtR5c\u201d— Astead (@Astead) 1518638633
\u201cfrom the damage control playbook, they may have emphasized honesty a little *too* much https://t.co/vVj65bXBmK\u201d— Eric Schultz (@Eric Schultz) 1518638661
Under intense scrutiny for taking expensive first class flights and staying in luxury hotels on the taxpayer's dime, EPA chief Scott Pruitt informed the public of the real reason he stays away from coach: to avoid uncomfortable interactions with people who are mad at him for trying to destroy the planet.
"If you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class."
--Rep. Keith Ellison
"We live in a very toxic environment politically," Pruitt explained in an interview with the New Hampshire Union Leader this week--an interesting choice of words, given that the EPA chief's policy moves have greatly contributed to the toxicity of the actual geophysical environment.
In separate remarks to New Hampshire's WMUR TV, Pruitt said "there have been instances, unfortunately, during my time as administrator, as I've flown and spent time, of interaction that's not been the best."
"And, so, ingress and egress off the plane...that's all decisions all made by our [security] detail team, by the chief of staff, by the administration," Pruitt added. "I don't make any of those decisions."
\u201cI thought it was safety? This is a pretty amazing statement, if you think about it. He\u2019s saying that there will be fewer people opposed to his policies in first class. https://t.co/TCmckhk5xq\u201d— Jake Sherman (@Jake Sherman) 1518638149
Pruitt's comments came during his short stint in New Hampshire--where he arrived on a first-class flight--to meet with Republican Gov. Chris Sununu and tour a toxic waste site.
Since the Washington Post reported on the dozens of first-class flights Pruitt has taken during his tenure--which have cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars--the EPA has been scrambling to explain why such expensive flights were justified.
Originally, the agency claimed in response to the Post's reporting that Pruitt had received a "blanket waiver" to travel first class whenever he pleases. But after Politico explained that such a waiver would be illegal, the EPA reversed course and said Pruitt "submits a waiver to fly in either first or business class" for every trip.
Critics were quick to ridicule Pruitt's comments on social media and raise serious questions about the claim that "unpleasant interactions" with people who disagree with the EPA's pro-fossil fuel policy agenda constitute a security threat.
\u201cIf you think you're too good to sit next to people who have to work for a living, you're also going to be fine cutting programs they rely on, so you can give even more to your buddies in first class. https://t.co/aJMT0lG19x\u201d— Keith Ellison (@Keith Ellison) 1518638954
\u201cThis guy is a public servant paid by the people he's seeking to avoid https://t.co/yHqzDAtR5c\u201d— Astead (@Astead) 1518638633
\u201cfrom the damage control playbook, they may have emphasized honesty a little *too* much https://t.co/vVj65bXBmK\u201d— Eric Schultz (@Eric Schultz) 1518638661