SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
President Donald Trump has triggered a steady stream of criticism in response to his decision to block House Democrats' response to a controversial memo released last week. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
'Outrageous': Widespread Anger After Trump Blocks Democrats' Takedown of Nunes Memo
Democratic lawmakers vowed to review the administration's proposed redactions in an effort to release their memo to the public soon
Feb 10, 2018
President Donald Trump's decision late Friday to block a memo by House Democrats--which rebuts a "cherry-picked" document released last week that's been decried as "propaganda" meant to discredit the ongoing probe into allegations of collusion and obstruction of justice levied against the Trump campaign--was met with outrage by Democratic lawmakers, ethics experts, and other political observers.
In a letter to the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.)--who served on Trump's transition team and is responsible for the creation of the "cherry-picked" memo--Trump's counsel wrote Friday that "although the president is inclined to declassify the [second] memorandum, because the memorandum contains numerous properly classified and especially sensitive passages, he is unable to do so at this time," and teased the possibility that Trump may approve the release of a redacted version.
Critics dismissed as disingenuous the president's claim that he had to block the second memo over national security concerns--pointing out that Trump ignored warnings from his own Justice Department about releasing the first memo, and even attacked top officials at the department and the FBI ahead of its release--and concluded that Trump simply wants to hide the takedown of the Nunes memo from the American public.
Rep. Adam Schiff (R-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and the author of his party's response to the "deeply flawed and inaccurate" Nunes memo, said the document blocked by Trump "sets out material facts that were necessary for the public to see that the FBI acted properly in seeking a FISA warrant on Carter Page," a former Trump campaign staffer.
Schiff vowed Friday that Democrats on the Intelligence Committee will be promptly reviewing the redactions proposed by Trump's Department of Justice and the FBI, and "look forward to conferring with the agencies to determine how we can properly inform the American people about the misleading attack on law enforcement by the GOP and address any concerns over sources and methods."
If efforts to redact the Democrats' memo to meet the Trump administration's demands fail, the other option is for the House committee--which voted unanimously to release the second memo--to overrule the president by putting the decision to a full House vote.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump's decision late Friday to block a memo by House Democrats--which rebuts a "cherry-picked" document released last week that's been decried as "propaganda" meant to discredit the ongoing probe into allegations of collusion and obstruction of justice levied against the Trump campaign--was met with outrage by Democratic lawmakers, ethics experts, and other political observers.
In a letter to the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.)--who served on Trump's transition team and is responsible for the creation of the "cherry-picked" memo--Trump's counsel wrote Friday that "although the president is inclined to declassify the [second] memorandum, because the memorandum contains numerous properly classified and especially sensitive passages, he is unable to do so at this time," and teased the possibility that Trump may approve the release of a redacted version.
Critics dismissed as disingenuous the president's claim that he had to block the second memo over national security concerns--pointing out that Trump ignored warnings from his own Justice Department about releasing the first memo, and even attacked top officials at the department and the FBI ahead of its release--and concluded that Trump simply wants to hide the takedown of the Nunes memo from the American public.
Rep. Adam Schiff (R-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and the author of his party's response to the "deeply flawed and inaccurate" Nunes memo, said the document blocked by Trump "sets out material facts that were necessary for the public to see that the FBI acted properly in seeking a FISA warrant on Carter Page," a former Trump campaign staffer.
Schiff vowed Friday that Democrats on the Intelligence Committee will be promptly reviewing the redactions proposed by Trump's Department of Justice and the FBI, and "look forward to conferring with the agencies to determine how we can properly inform the American people about the misleading attack on law enforcement by the GOP and address any concerns over sources and methods."
If efforts to redact the Democrats' memo to meet the Trump administration's demands fail, the other option is for the House committee--which voted unanimously to release the second memo--to overrule the president by putting the decision to a full House vote.
President Donald Trump's decision late Friday to block a memo by House Democrats--which rebuts a "cherry-picked" document released last week that's been decried as "propaganda" meant to discredit the ongoing probe into allegations of collusion and obstruction of justice levied against the Trump campaign--was met with outrage by Democratic lawmakers, ethics experts, and other political observers.
In a letter to the House Intelligence Committee chairman, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.)--who served on Trump's transition team and is responsible for the creation of the "cherry-picked" memo--Trump's counsel wrote Friday that "although the president is inclined to declassify the [second] memorandum, because the memorandum contains numerous properly classified and especially sensitive passages, he is unable to do so at this time," and teased the possibility that Trump may approve the release of a redacted version.
Critics dismissed as disingenuous the president's claim that he had to block the second memo over national security concerns--pointing out that Trump ignored warnings from his own Justice Department about releasing the first memo, and even attacked top officials at the department and the FBI ahead of its release--and concluded that Trump simply wants to hide the takedown of the Nunes memo from the American public.
Rep. Adam Schiff (R-Calif.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and the author of his party's response to the "deeply flawed and inaccurate" Nunes memo, said the document blocked by Trump "sets out material facts that were necessary for the public to see that the FBI acted properly in seeking a FISA warrant on Carter Page," a former Trump campaign staffer.
Schiff vowed Friday that Democrats on the Intelligence Committee will be promptly reviewing the redactions proposed by Trump's Department of Justice and the FBI, and "look forward to conferring with the agencies to determine how we can properly inform the American people about the misleading attack on law enforcement by the GOP and address any concerns over sources and methods."
If efforts to redact the Democrats' memo to meet the Trump administration's demands fail, the other option is for the House committee--which voted unanimously to release the second memo--to overrule the president by putting the decision to a full House vote.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.