SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Peace advocates are frustrated by a congressional budget deal that would more money to the Pentagon. (Photo: David B. Gleason/flickr/cc)
'Another Giant Spending Spree': Budget Deal Denounced as Wasteful Gift to War Profiteers
"Throwing more money at the Pentagon," one critic argued, "will only double down on the Trump administration's violence-first approach to the challenges we face."
Feb 08, 2018
Peace advocates are denouncing the new bipartisan budget deal, which was produced to prevent another government shutdown, because of an "outrageous" decision to boost military spending while education, infrastructure, an urgent renewable energy transition, and other programs remain underfunded.
"When our nation can't manage to turn the lights on for the people of Puerto Rico...how is it possible we can justify spending billions more on weapons that don't work to fight enemies that don't exist?"
--Stephen Miles,
Win Without War
Although the two-year $300 billion deal, which was announced by Senate leaders Wednesday and is expected to be voted on Thursday, would also fund less controversial priorities such as infrastructure and various healthcare programs, Win Without War director Stephen Miles remarked that this "budget deal means that once again, the Pentagon and defense industry CEOs--whose pockets are already deep and overflowing with cash--are about to get another giant spending spree, funded by American taxpayers."
As CODEPINK's Medea Benjamin and Elliot Swain wrote earlier this week, another massive military funding boost "means more Pentagon contracts will be awarded to private corporations that use endless war to line their pockets."
While offering praise for the push to fund domestic programs that benefit Americans, Miles noted "that those programs vie for funds from an increasingly shrinking pot," and posed the question: "When our nation can't manage to turn the lights on for the people of Puerto Rico, when we can't help those suffering from opioid addiction get treatment, and when we can't ensure education and healthcare to all of our citizens, how is it possible we can justify spending billions more on weapons that don't work to fight enemies that don't exist?"
The National Priorities Project said Wednesday that "too much military spending" had hindered programs that help Americans, and pointed to a video shared by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), which was "dedicated to the 13 million children who don't know where their next meal is coming from because our country values the Department of Defense budget over their wellbeing."
The major challenges facing the U.S. and the world, Miles added, "are not problems that have a military solution. Throwing more money at the Pentagon, while we continue to gut the State Department, will only double down on the Trump administration's violence-first approach to the challenges we face that has proven time and again to increase instability around the world."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Peace advocates are denouncing the new bipartisan budget deal, which was produced to prevent another government shutdown, because of an "outrageous" decision to boost military spending while education, infrastructure, an urgent renewable energy transition, and other programs remain underfunded.
"When our nation can't manage to turn the lights on for the people of Puerto Rico...how is it possible we can justify spending billions more on weapons that don't work to fight enemies that don't exist?"
--Stephen Miles,
Win Without War
Although the two-year $300 billion deal, which was announced by Senate leaders Wednesday and is expected to be voted on Thursday, would also fund less controversial priorities such as infrastructure and various healthcare programs, Win Without War director Stephen Miles remarked that this "budget deal means that once again, the Pentagon and defense industry CEOs--whose pockets are already deep and overflowing with cash--are about to get another giant spending spree, funded by American taxpayers."
As CODEPINK's Medea Benjamin and Elliot Swain wrote earlier this week, another massive military funding boost "means more Pentagon contracts will be awarded to private corporations that use endless war to line their pockets."
While offering praise for the push to fund domestic programs that benefit Americans, Miles noted "that those programs vie for funds from an increasingly shrinking pot," and posed the question: "When our nation can't manage to turn the lights on for the people of Puerto Rico, when we can't help those suffering from opioid addiction get treatment, and when we can't ensure education and healthcare to all of our citizens, how is it possible we can justify spending billions more on weapons that don't work to fight enemies that don't exist?"
The National Priorities Project said Wednesday that "too much military spending" had hindered programs that help Americans, and pointed to a video shared by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), which was "dedicated to the 13 million children who don't know where their next meal is coming from because our country values the Department of Defense budget over their wellbeing."
The major challenges facing the U.S. and the world, Miles added, "are not problems that have a military solution. Throwing more money at the Pentagon, while we continue to gut the State Department, will only double down on the Trump administration's violence-first approach to the challenges we face that has proven time and again to increase instability around the world."
Peace advocates are denouncing the new bipartisan budget deal, which was produced to prevent another government shutdown, because of an "outrageous" decision to boost military spending while education, infrastructure, an urgent renewable energy transition, and other programs remain underfunded.
"When our nation can't manage to turn the lights on for the people of Puerto Rico...how is it possible we can justify spending billions more on weapons that don't work to fight enemies that don't exist?"
--Stephen Miles,
Win Without War
Although the two-year $300 billion deal, which was announced by Senate leaders Wednesday and is expected to be voted on Thursday, would also fund less controversial priorities such as infrastructure and various healthcare programs, Win Without War director Stephen Miles remarked that this "budget deal means that once again, the Pentagon and defense industry CEOs--whose pockets are already deep and overflowing with cash--are about to get another giant spending spree, funded by American taxpayers."
As CODEPINK's Medea Benjamin and Elliot Swain wrote earlier this week, another massive military funding boost "means more Pentagon contracts will be awarded to private corporations that use endless war to line their pockets."
While offering praise for the push to fund domestic programs that benefit Americans, Miles noted "that those programs vie for funds from an increasingly shrinking pot," and posed the question: "When our nation can't manage to turn the lights on for the people of Puerto Rico, when we can't help those suffering from opioid addiction get treatment, and when we can't ensure education and healthcare to all of our citizens, how is it possible we can justify spending billions more on weapons that don't work to fight enemies that don't exist?"
The National Priorities Project said Wednesday that "too much military spending" had hindered programs that help Americans, and pointed to a video shared by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), which was "dedicated to the 13 million children who don't know where their next meal is coming from because our country values the Department of Defense budget over their wellbeing."
The major challenges facing the U.S. and the world, Miles added, "are not problems that have a military solution. Throwing more money at the Pentagon, while we continue to gut the State Department, will only double down on the Trump administration's violence-first approach to the challenges we face that has proven time and again to increase instability around the world."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.