SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Several nations around the world provided assistance to West African nations hit hardest by the Ebola epidemic in 2014. (Photo: European Commission/flickr/cc)
Global Alarm as Trump CDC Plans to 'Dramatically' Slash Epidemic Prevention
Democratic lawmakers and global health groups are calling on Republicans to continue funding for epidemic preparedness abroad
Feb 02, 2018
Global health experts and Democratic lawmakers are raising alarm about a plan by the nation's top public health agency to "dramatically" scale back its efforts to combat outbreaks of infectious diseases abroad due to uncertainty over future funding from the Republican-controlled Congress and the Trump administration.
With a one-time grant from Congress--allocated in 2014 to battle the Ebola epidemic in West Africa--slated to run out next year, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has decided to reduce or eliminate disease-fighting efforts in 39 countries, or nearly 80 percent of the nations that receive assistance from the agency, according to recent reports by the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal.
Democratic lawmakers have responded with demands for funding. While Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) pointed out that many infectious diseases "are only an airplane flight away from the United States," and blasted "the continuing and harmful spread of Trumpism's #AntiScience know-nothingism" for "endangering everyone," Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) warned that government officials "will surely come to regret" not providing more money for the global initiative.
A coalition of global health groups sent a letter (pdf) this week to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, imploring him to intervene with the Trump administration and work with Congress to secure sustained funding for epidemic prevention.
The letters emphasizes that "U.S. investments in global health security and deployed CDC personnel are making America safer today" and "these programs are essential to our national defense, forming critical links in the U.S. prevention, detection, and response chain for outbreaks."
The coalition warns that if Republicans decline to allocate more money, the U.S. "stands to lose vital information about epidemic threats garnered on the ground through trusted relationships, real-time surveillance, and research," and that "complacency in the wake of successful outbreak interventions leads to a cycle of funding cuts followed by ever more costly outbreaks."
Former CDC director Tom Frieden, who now serves as president and chief executive of the epidemic preparedness group Resolve to Save Lives, told the Journal that the planned reductions will result in fewer trained local experts, meaning "they're more likely to have outbreaks and less likely to be able to stop them themselves," and "we'll have to respond instead of having them respond."
Describing the initiative as "the front line against terrible organisms," Frieden explained to the Post that "you can't fight it just within our borders. You've got to fight epidemic diseases where they emerge."
While 10 "priority countries" with "strategic or regional importance for the CDC" will still receive agency support after October 2019 under the current plans, the Post notes that "countries where the CDC is planning to scale back include some of the world's hot spots for emerging infectious disease, such as China, Pakistan, Haiti, Rwanda, and Congo."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Global health experts and Democratic lawmakers are raising alarm about a plan by the nation's top public health agency to "dramatically" scale back its efforts to combat outbreaks of infectious diseases abroad due to uncertainty over future funding from the Republican-controlled Congress and the Trump administration.
With a one-time grant from Congress--allocated in 2014 to battle the Ebola epidemic in West Africa--slated to run out next year, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has decided to reduce or eliminate disease-fighting efforts in 39 countries, or nearly 80 percent of the nations that receive assistance from the agency, according to recent reports by the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal.
Democratic lawmakers have responded with demands for funding. While Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) pointed out that many infectious diseases "are only an airplane flight away from the United States," and blasted "the continuing and harmful spread of Trumpism's #AntiScience know-nothingism" for "endangering everyone," Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) warned that government officials "will surely come to regret" not providing more money for the global initiative.
A coalition of global health groups sent a letter (pdf) this week to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, imploring him to intervene with the Trump administration and work with Congress to secure sustained funding for epidemic prevention.
The letters emphasizes that "U.S. investments in global health security and deployed CDC personnel are making America safer today" and "these programs are essential to our national defense, forming critical links in the U.S. prevention, detection, and response chain for outbreaks."
The coalition warns that if Republicans decline to allocate more money, the U.S. "stands to lose vital information about epidemic threats garnered on the ground through trusted relationships, real-time surveillance, and research," and that "complacency in the wake of successful outbreak interventions leads to a cycle of funding cuts followed by ever more costly outbreaks."
Former CDC director Tom Frieden, who now serves as president and chief executive of the epidemic preparedness group Resolve to Save Lives, told the Journal that the planned reductions will result in fewer trained local experts, meaning "they're more likely to have outbreaks and less likely to be able to stop them themselves," and "we'll have to respond instead of having them respond."
Describing the initiative as "the front line against terrible organisms," Frieden explained to the Post that "you can't fight it just within our borders. You've got to fight epidemic diseases where they emerge."
While 10 "priority countries" with "strategic or regional importance for the CDC" will still receive agency support after October 2019 under the current plans, the Post notes that "countries where the CDC is planning to scale back include some of the world's hot spots for emerging infectious disease, such as China, Pakistan, Haiti, Rwanda, and Congo."
Global health experts and Democratic lawmakers are raising alarm about a plan by the nation's top public health agency to "dramatically" scale back its efforts to combat outbreaks of infectious diseases abroad due to uncertainty over future funding from the Republican-controlled Congress and the Trump administration.
With a one-time grant from Congress--allocated in 2014 to battle the Ebola epidemic in West Africa--slated to run out next year, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has decided to reduce or eliminate disease-fighting efforts in 39 countries, or nearly 80 percent of the nations that receive assistance from the agency, according to recent reports by the Washington Post and Wall Street Journal.
Democratic lawmakers have responded with demands for funding. While Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) pointed out that many infectious diseases "are only an airplane flight away from the United States," and blasted "the continuing and harmful spread of Trumpism's #AntiScience know-nothingism" for "endangering everyone," Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) warned that government officials "will surely come to regret" not providing more money for the global initiative.
A coalition of global health groups sent a letter (pdf) this week to U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, imploring him to intervene with the Trump administration and work with Congress to secure sustained funding for epidemic prevention.
The letters emphasizes that "U.S. investments in global health security and deployed CDC personnel are making America safer today" and "these programs are essential to our national defense, forming critical links in the U.S. prevention, detection, and response chain for outbreaks."
The coalition warns that if Republicans decline to allocate more money, the U.S. "stands to lose vital information about epidemic threats garnered on the ground through trusted relationships, real-time surveillance, and research," and that "complacency in the wake of successful outbreak interventions leads to a cycle of funding cuts followed by ever more costly outbreaks."
Former CDC director Tom Frieden, who now serves as president and chief executive of the epidemic preparedness group Resolve to Save Lives, told the Journal that the planned reductions will result in fewer trained local experts, meaning "they're more likely to have outbreaks and less likely to be able to stop them themselves," and "we'll have to respond instead of having them respond."
Describing the initiative as "the front line against terrible organisms," Frieden explained to the Post that "you can't fight it just within our borders. You've got to fight epidemic diseases where they emerge."
While 10 "priority countries" with "strategic or regional importance for the CDC" will still receive agency support after October 2019 under the current plans, the Post notes that "countries where the CDC is planning to scale back include some of the world's hot spots for emerging infectious disease, such as China, Pakistan, Haiti, Rwanda, and Congo."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.