SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"The Justice Department's let-them-off-easy approach not only is a moral outrage, it is an invitation for Wall Street and megacorporations to thumb their noses at the law," said Public Citizen's Robert Weissman. (Photo: Nick Garrod/flickr/cc)
'Travesty of Justice' as Trump DOJ Lifts Prosecution Threat for Banking Giant HSBC
Original agreement had been criticized as "the world's largest wrist slap."
Dec 11, 2017
A consumer advocacy organization lamented the "travesty of justice" on Monday after HSBC said that it no longer had to worry about the possibility of criminal charges for laundering hundreds of millions of dollars in drug cartel money and violating other federal laws since the bank's deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the Department of Justice expired.
"HSBC lived up to all of its commitments, and, therefore, under the DPA, the Department of Justice will file a motion with the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York seeking the dismissal of the charges deferred by the agreement," the banking giant said in a statement released Monday.
That agreement, reached in 2012, meant HSBC paid a then-record $1.9 billion fine, submitted to an outside monitor, and committed to reforms. The agreement also pushed off any criminal prosecutions--making it a deal one observer said at the time amounted to "the world's largest wrist slap."
In a statement responding to the DOJ's latest reported action, Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, echoed that sentiment. "A megabank was able to evade pleading guilty to a raft of criminal violations--kind consideration for lawbreakers that almost certainly would not have been afforded to a small bank, let alone a street dealer," he said. And with the threat of prosecution now over, "the Trump Justice Department is doubling down on this manifest injustice," Weissman added, calling the DPA and its reported dismissal "perks of corporate giantism."
The HSBC statement boasted that "the Department of Justice has recognized HSBC's progress in strengthening its anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance capabilities over the past five years." But Weissman countered that, saying that in the five years since the DPA was inked, "HSBC has been: caught up in a foreign exchange fraud case; subject to a compliance report reportedly indicating the bank resisted reforms at least in the first year of the DPA; alleged to have engaged in recent or ongoing money-laundering abuses. This is hardly the profile of a 'reformed' business."
"The Justice Department's let-them-off-easy approach not only is a moral outrage, it is an invitation for Wall Street and megacorporations to thumb their noses at the law," he continued. "Why not, when the consequences of being caught for systematic, large-scale, profitable and consequential violations are so trivial?"
(Since the agreement stipulated the bank had to partially defer bonus compensation for top executives, the end of the DPA may also mean a giant check waiting for the execs.)
The New York Times reports that filings related to dismissing the charges lingering over HSBC had not been made by late morning in New York.
The development follows an analysis by the Wall Street Journal in August that found the nation's largest financial institutions are faring well under Trump, with fines by Wall Street regulatory agencies in the first half of 2017 down almost two-thirds compared with the first half of 2016.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A consumer advocacy organization lamented the "travesty of justice" on Monday after HSBC said that it no longer had to worry about the possibility of criminal charges for laundering hundreds of millions of dollars in drug cartel money and violating other federal laws since the bank's deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the Department of Justice expired.
"HSBC lived up to all of its commitments, and, therefore, under the DPA, the Department of Justice will file a motion with the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York seeking the dismissal of the charges deferred by the agreement," the banking giant said in a statement released Monday.
That agreement, reached in 2012, meant HSBC paid a then-record $1.9 billion fine, submitted to an outside monitor, and committed to reforms. The agreement also pushed off any criminal prosecutions--making it a deal one observer said at the time amounted to "the world's largest wrist slap."
In a statement responding to the DOJ's latest reported action, Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, echoed that sentiment. "A megabank was able to evade pleading guilty to a raft of criminal violations--kind consideration for lawbreakers that almost certainly would not have been afforded to a small bank, let alone a street dealer," he said. And with the threat of prosecution now over, "the Trump Justice Department is doubling down on this manifest injustice," Weissman added, calling the DPA and its reported dismissal "perks of corporate giantism."
The HSBC statement boasted that "the Department of Justice has recognized HSBC's progress in strengthening its anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance capabilities over the past five years." But Weissman countered that, saying that in the five years since the DPA was inked, "HSBC has been: caught up in a foreign exchange fraud case; subject to a compliance report reportedly indicating the bank resisted reforms at least in the first year of the DPA; alleged to have engaged in recent or ongoing money-laundering abuses. This is hardly the profile of a 'reformed' business."
"The Justice Department's let-them-off-easy approach not only is a moral outrage, it is an invitation for Wall Street and megacorporations to thumb their noses at the law," he continued. "Why not, when the consequences of being caught for systematic, large-scale, profitable and consequential violations are so trivial?"
(Since the agreement stipulated the bank had to partially defer bonus compensation for top executives, the end of the DPA may also mean a giant check waiting for the execs.)
The New York Times reports that filings related to dismissing the charges lingering over HSBC had not been made by late morning in New York.
The development follows an analysis by the Wall Street Journal in August that found the nation's largest financial institutions are faring well under Trump, with fines by Wall Street regulatory agencies in the first half of 2017 down almost two-thirds compared with the first half of 2016.
A consumer advocacy organization lamented the "travesty of justice" on Monday after HSBC said that it no longer had to worry about the possibility of criminal charges for laundering hundreds of millions of dollars in drug cartel money and violating other federal laws since the bank's deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the Department of Justice expired.
"HSBC lived up to all of its commitments, and, therefore, under the DPA, the Department of Justice will file a motion with the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York seeking the dismissal of the charges deferred by the agreement," the banking giant said in a statement released Monday.
That agreement, reached in 2012, meant HSBC paid a then-record $1.9 billion fine, submitted to an outside monitor, and committed to reforms. The agreement also pushed off any criminal prosecutions--making it a deal one observer said at the time amounted to "the world's largest wrist slap."
In a statement responding to the DOJ's latest reported action, Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, echoed that sentiment. "A megabank was able to evade pleading guilty to a raft of criminal violations--kind consideration for lawbreakers that almost certainly would not have been afforded to a small bank, let alone a street dealer," he said. And with the threat of prosecution now over, "the Trump Justice Department is doubling down on this manifest injustice," Weissman added, calling the DPA and its reported dismissal "perks of corporate giantism."
The HSBC statement boasted that "the Department of Justice has recognized HSBC's progress in strengthening its anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance capabilities over the past five years." But Weissman countered that, saying that in the five years since the DPA was inked, "HSBC has been: caught up in a foreign exchange fraud case; subject to a compliance report reportedly indicating the bank resisted reforms at least in the first year of the DPA; alleged to have engaged in recent or ongoing money-laundering abuses. This is hardly the profile of a 'reformed' business."
"The Justice Department's let-them-off-easy approach not only is a moral outrage, it is an invitation for Wall Street and megacorporations to thumb their noses at the law," he continued. "Why not, when the consequences of being caught for systematic, large-scale, profitable and consequential violations are so trivial?"
(Since the agreement stipulated the bank had to partially defer bonus compensation for top executives, the end of the DPA may also mean a giant check waiting for the execs.)
The New York Times reports that filings related to dismissing the charges lingering over HSBC had not been made by late morning in New York.
The development follows an analysis by the Wall Street Journal in August that found the nation's largest financial institutions are faring well under Trump, with fines by Wall Street regulatory agencies in the first half of 2017 down almost two-thirds compared with the first half of 2016.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.