Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) looks on Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) speaks during a brief press conference before an Armed Services conference committee meeting on the National Defense Authorization Act on Capitol Hill, October 25, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
McCain Drops 'Maverick' Facade to Deliver Massive Gift to Rich, Strip Healthcare from Millions
Arizona senator is a "maverick, except when Wall Street calls"
Senate Republicans moved a step closer to ramming through massive tax cuts for the wealthy on Thursday after "maverick" Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)--deploying thoroughly "unsound" justifications--fell in line with President Donald Trump and the Republican leadership by declaring his support for the GOP tax plan.
"The fact that McCain voted against George W. Bush's ugly tax cuts for the rich and then voted for this far worse bill--which includes partial ACA repeal--gives the lie to the idea that there's an underlying principle at work here."
--Ben Wikler, MoveOn.org"Though not perfect, this bill will deliver much-needed reform to our tax code, grow the economy, and provide long overdue tax relief for American families," McCain insisted, in a statement that ran afoul of countless analyses showing that the GOP plan would make the tax code more complicated, do little to grow the economy, and primarily deliver gains to CEOs and already affluent families--not workers.
While McCain's decision to support a plan that has been hashed out largely in secret may seem to conflict with his previous demand for "regular order," The Nation's John Nichols offered a simple explanation for the 180-degree turn.
McCain is a "maverick, except when Wall Street calls," Nichols observed.
New York Magazine's Eric Levitz similarly highlighted McCain's willingness to reverse his stance on issues of principle, contrasting the senator's 2001 vote against the Bush tax cuts with his support for the current GOP plan.
"I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle-class Americans who most need tax relief," McCain said then.
Despite the available evidence clearly showing that the Trump-GOP tax plan would do precisely what McCain once denounced, Levitz chided the Arizona senator--especially given that "economic inequality in America is dramatically more severe" now that it was 16 years ago--for handing Republicans a key vote as their bill hurtles toward passage.
"The fact that McCain voted against George W. Bush's ugly tax cuts for the rich and then voted for this far worse bill--which includes partial ACA repeal--gives the lie to the idea that there's an underlying principle at work here," concluded MoveOn.org Washington director Ben Wikler.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Senate Republicans moved a step closer to ramming through massive tax cuts for the wealthy on Thursday after "maverick" Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)--deploying thoroughly "unsound" justifications--fell in line with President Donald Trump and the Republican leadership by declaring his support for the GOP tax plan.
"The fact that McCain voted against George W. Bush's ugly tax cuts for the rich and then voted for this far worse bill--which includes partial ACA repeal--gives the lie to the idea that there's an underlying principle at work here."
--Ben Wikler, MoveOn.org"Though not perfect, this bill will deliver much-needed reform to our tax code, grow the economy, and provide long overdue tax relief for American families," McCain insisted, in a statement that ran afoul of countless analyses showing that the GOP plan would make the tax code more complicated, do little to grow the economy, and primarily deliver gains to CEOs and already affluent families--not workers.
While McCain's decision to support a plan that has been hashed out largely in secret may seem to conflict with his previous demand for "regular order," The Nation's John Nichols offered a simple explanation for the 180-degree turn.
McCain is a "maverick, except when Wall Street calls," Nichols observed.
New York Magazine's Eric Levitz similarly highlighted McCain's willingness to reverse his stance on issues of principle, contrasting the senator's 2001 vote against the Bush tax cuts with his support for the current GOP plan.
"I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle-class Americans who most need tax relief," McCain said then.
Despite the available evidence clearly showing that the Trump-GOP tax plan would do precisely what McCain once denounced, Levitz chided the Arizona senator--especially given that "economic inequality in America is dramatically more severe" now that it was 16 years ago--for handing Republicans a key vote as their bill hurtles toward passage.
"The fact that McCain voted against George W. Bush's ugly tax cuts for the rich and then voted for this far worse bill--which includes partial ACA repeal--gives the lie to the idea that there's an underlying principle at work here," concluded MoveOn.org Washington director Ben Wikler.
Senate Republicans moved a step closer to ramming through massive tax cuts for the wealthy on Thursday after "maverick" Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)--deploying thoroughly "unsound" justifications--fell in line with President Donald Trump and the Republican leadership by declaring his support for the GOP tax plan.
"The fact that McCain voted against George W. Bush's ugly tax cuts for the rich and then voted for this far worse bill--which includes partial ACA repeal--gives the lie to the idea that there's an underlying principle at work here."
--Ben Wikler, MoveOn.org"Though not perfect, this bill will deliver much-needed reform to our tax code, grow the economy, and provide long overdue tax relief for American families," McCain insisted, in a statement that ran afoul of countless analyses showing that the GOP plan would make the tax code more complicated, do little to grow the economy, and primarily deliver gains to CEOs and already affluent families--not workers.
While McCain's decision to support a plan that has been hashed out largely in secret may seem to conflict with his previous demand for "regular order," The Nation's John Nichols offered a simple explanation for the 180-degree turn.
McCain is a "maverick, except when Wall Street calls," Nichols observed.
New York Magazine's Eric Levitz similarly highlighted McCain's willingness to reverse his stance on issues of principle, contrasting the senator's 2001 vote against the Bush tax cuts with his support for the current GOP plan.
"I cannot in good conscience support a tax cut in which so many of the benefits go to the most fortunate among us, at the expense of middle-class Americans who most need tax relief," McCain said then.
Despite the available evidence clearly showing that the Trump-GOP tax plan would do precisely what McCain once denounced, Levitz chided the Arizona senator--especially given that "economic inequality in America is dramatically more severe" now that it was 16 years ago--for handing Republicans a key vote as their bill hurtles toward passage.
"The fact that McCain voted against George W. Bush's ugly tax cuts for the rich and then voted for this far worse bill--which includes partial ACA repeal--gives the lie to the idea that there's an underlying principle at work here," concluded MoveOn.org Washington director Ben Wikler.