White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders answers reporters' questions during a news conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House October 30, 2017 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Oct 30, 2017
In the middle of a news day dominated by the indictment of President Donald Trump's former campaign chair Paul Manafort and his business partner Rick Gates, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders began Monday's press briefing with an attempt to explain why cutting taxes for the rich is a good thing, using a "convoluted" beer-drinking analogy lifted almost verbatim from a right-wing email forward that has been circulating for nearly two decades.
"Is this the kind of thing that your drunk Fox-watching MAGA uncle forwards you from his e-mail account? You damn betcha."
--Charles Pierce, Esquire
Noting that House Republicans are set to release the details of their tax bill on Wednesday, Sanders promptly dove into what she described as "an anecdote that we can all understand."
No one understood. Watch to find out why:
\u201cHere's that whole anecdote from Sarah Huckabee-Sanders that, to my ear, sounded like an email your relative would forward you\u201d— Colin Jones (@Colin Jones) 1509386037
"Is this the kind of thing that your drunk Fox-watching MAGA uncle forwards you from his e-mail account?" Esquire's political columnist Charles Pierce asked. "You damn betcha."
The story is a long-winded attempt to justify tax cuts for the rich by claiming that rich people will simply leave the country if their taxes are too high. If they do leave, the tale suggests, the government won't be able to "pay the bill."
It also repeats the familiar and easily debunked argument--used previously by White House officials--that it is extremely difficult to not give tax cuts to the wealthy, given that they pay a large share of U.S. taxes.
Analysis after analysis has shown the Trump-GOP tax proposals would almost exclusively favor the wealthiest Americans while raising taxes on some middle-class families and exploding the deficit.
Though not a single reporter raised a follow-up question about Sanders' "analogy" or challenged its assumptions, social media had a field day:
\u201cSarah Sanders is using thousands of words to say: Yes, top earners will get a tax cut.\u201d— Dan Primack (@Dan Primack) 1509385096
\u201cHUCKABEE-SANDERS: A farmer has to get a fox, a chicken, and a tax reform bill across a river, but can only fit one at a time in his boat.\u201d— Professor Selfsuck (@Professor Selfsuck) 1509385180
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In the middle of a news day dominated by the indictment of President Donald Trump's former campaign chair Paul Manafort and his business partner Rick Gates, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders began Monday's press briefing with an attempt to explain why cutting taxes for the rich is a good thing, using a "convoluted" beer-drinking analogy lifted almost verbatim from a right-wing email forward that has been circulating for nearly two decades.
"Is this the kind of thing that your drunk Fox-watching MAGA uncle forwards you from his e-mail account? You damn betcha."
--Charles Pierce, Esquire
Noting that House Republicans are set to release the details of their tax bill on Wednesday, Sanders promptly dove into what she described as "an anecdote that we can all understand."
No one understood. Watch to find out why:
\u201cHere's that whole anecdote from Sarah Huckabee-Sanders that, to my ear, sounded like an email your relative would forward you\u201d— Colin Jones (@Colin Jones) 1509386037
"Is this the kind of thing that your drunk Fox-watching MAGA uncle forwards you from his e-mail account?" Esquire's political columnist Charles Pierce asked. "You damn betcha."
The story is a long-winded attempt to justify tax cuts for the rich by claiming that rich people will simply leave the country if their taxes are too high. If they do leave, the tale suggests, the government won't be able to "pay the bill."
It also repeats the familiar and easily debunked argument--used previously by White House officials--that it is extremely difficult to not give tax cuts to the wealthy, given that they pay a large share of U.S. taxes.
Analysis after analysis has shown the Trump-GOP tax proposals would almost exclusively favor the wealthiest Americans while raising taxes on some middle-class families and exploding the deficit.
Though not a single reporter raised a follow-up question about Sanders' "analogy" or challenged its assumptions, social media had a field day:
\u201cSarah Sanders is using thousands of words to say: Yes, top earners will get a tax cut.\u201d— Dan Primack (@Dan Primack) 1509385096
\u201cHUCKABEE-SANDERS: A farmer has to get a fox, a chicken, and a tax reform bill across a river, but can only fit one at a time in his boat.\u201d— Professor Selfsuck (@Professor Selfsuck) 1509385180
In the middle of a news day dominated by the indictment of President Donald Trump's former campaign chair Paul Manafort and his business partner Rick Gates, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders began Monday's press briefing with an attempt to explain why cutting taxes for the rich is a good thing, using a "convoluted" beer-drinking analogy lifted almost verbatim from a right-wing email forward that has been circulating for nearly two decades.
"Is this the kind of thing that your drunk Fox-watching MAGA uncle forwards you from his e-mail account? You damn betcha."
--Charles Pierce, Esquire
Noting that House Republicans are set to release the details of their tax bill on Wednesday, Sanders promptly dove into what she described as "an anecdote that we can all understand."
No one understood. Watch to find out why:
\u201cHere's that whole anecdote from Sarah Huckabee-Sanders that, to my ear, sounded like an email your relative would forward you\u201d— Colin Jones (@Colin Jones) 1509386037
"Is this the kind of thing that your drunk Fox-watching MAGA uncle forwards you from his e-mail account?" Esquire's political columnist Charles Pierce asked. "You damn betcha."
The story is a long-winded attempt to justify tax cuts for the rich by claiming that rich people will simply leave the country if their taxes are too high. If they do leave, the tale suggests, the government won't be able to "pay the bill."
It also repeats the familiar and easily debunked argument--used previously by White House officials--that it is extremely difficult to not give tax cuts to the wealthy, given that they pay a large share of U.S. taxes.
Analysis after analysis has shown the Trump-GOP tax proposals would almost exclusively favor the wealthiest Americans while raising taxes on some middle-class families and exploding the deficit.
Though not a single reporter raised a follow-up question about Sanders' "analogy" or challenged its assumptions, social media had a field day:
\u201cSarah Sanders is using thousands of words to say: Yes, top earners will get a tax cut.\u201d— Dan Primack (@Dan Primack) 1509385096
\u201cHUCKABEE-SANDERS: A farmer has to get a fox, a chicken, and a tax reform bill across a river, but can only fit one at a time in his boat.\u201d— Professor Selfsuck (@Professor Selfsuck) 1509385180
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.