SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Unless something changes," wrote journalist Sonali Kolhatkar, "another 10 years will pass with Americans remaining blind to the reasons for the war and Afghans continuing to pay the price of our ignorance." (Photo: Carpetblogger/flickr/cc)
With Restrictions Loosened and Increased US Bombings, Afghan Civilian Deaths Surge
Uptick comes as U.S. beefs up Afghan air force's fleet and "Mad Dog" Mattis loosens restrictions on strikes
Oct 12, 2017
Days after the U.S. military said the number of airstrikes its coalition carried out in Afghanistan had soared, United Nations data released Thursday spotlights the human cost of the escalated bombing.
From the beginning of January until the end of September, UNAMA said, over 200 civilians died and 261 were injured from aerial attacks--a 52 percent increase compared to the same period last year.
The strikes have taken a particular toll on women and children, as they make up 68 percent of the victims.
The U.N. put the blame for 38 percent of the casualties from the airstrikes at the hands of the U.S.-led coalition, with Afghan forces, who are now carrying out their own airstrikes, being responsible for the bulk.
Their own fleet is being beefed up thanks to the U.S. military, which in turn is looking to carry out more strikes.
Portending more airstrikes carried out by Afghan air power, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Gen. John Nicholson, said last week, "A tidal wave of Afghan airpower is on the horizon."
Nicholson, speaking from a ceremony at the Kandahar airfield after two Black Hawks from the U.S. military--the first of 159--joined the Afghan fleet, said, "The momentum has shifted, and it is irreversible."
In another signal of potentially increasing causalities, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis told congressional committees last week he was loosening "proximity requirements" to strike the Taliban. "It used to be we have to basically be in contact with that enemy," he told the House Armed Services Committee.
"That is no longer the case," he said at the Senate Armed Services Committe. "So these kind of restrictions that did not allow us to employ the air power fully have been removed, yes."
The number of U.S. airstrikes in Afghanistan were at a seven-year high in September, recently released military data shows, thanks in part to President Donald Trump's war strategy for country. The U.S.-led coalition dropped 751 bombs last month, a nearly 50-percent increase from August.
Meanwhile, with the invasion of Afghanistan having reached its 16-year anniversary last week, peace groups continue their calls for a full withdrawal of U.S. forces.
"Unless something changes," wrote journalist Sonali Kolhatkar, "another 10 years will pass with Americans remaining blind to the reasons for the war and Afghans continuing to pay the price of our ignorance."
According to Middle East expert Phyllis Bennis, Trump's plan is "a recipe for permanent war."
"There is no military solution. We need diplomacy, not war," she stressed. "It's the only thing that will work."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Days after the U.S. military said the number of airstrikes its coalition carried out in Afghanistan had soared, United Nations data released Thursday spotlights the human cost of the escalated bombing.
From the beginning of January until the end of September, UNAMA said, over 200 civilians died and 261 were injured from aerial attacks--a 52 percent increase compared to the same period last year.
The strikes have taken a particular toll on women and children, as they make up 68 percent of the victims.
The U.N. put the blame for 38 percent of the casualties from the airstrikes at the hands of the U.S.-led coalition, with Afghan forces, who are now carrying out their own airstrikes, being responsible for the bulk.
Their own fleet is being beefed up thanks to the U.S. military, which in turn is looking to carry out more strikes.
Portending more airstrikes carried out by Afghan air power, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Gen. John Nicholson, said last week, "A tidal wave of Afghan airpower is on the horizon."
Nicholson, speaking from a ceremony at the Kandahar airfield after two Black Hawks from the U.S. military--the first of 159--joined the Afghan fleet, said, "The momentum has shifted, and it is irreversible."
In another signal of potentially increasing causalities, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis told congressional committees last week he was loosening "proximity requirements" to strike the Taliban. "It used to be we have to basically be in contact with that enemy," he told the House Armed Services Committee.
"That is no longer the case," he said at the Senate Armed Services Committe. "So these kind of restrictions that did not allow us to employ the air power fully have been removed, yes."
The number of U.S. airstrikes in Afghanistan were at a seven-year high in September, recently released military data shows, thanks in part to President Donald Trump's war strategy for country. The U.S.-led coalition dropped 751 bombs last month, a nearly 50-percent increase from August.
Meanwhile, with the invasion of Afghanistan having reached its 16-year anniversary last week, peace groups continue their calls for a full withdrawal of U.S. forces.
"Unless something changes," wrote journalist Sonali Kolhatkar, "another 10 years will pass with Americans remaining blind to the reasons for the war and Afghans continuing to pay the price of our ignorance."
According to Middle East expert Phyllis Bennis, Trump's plan is "a recipe for permanent war."
"There is no military solution. We need diplomacy, not war," she stressed. "It's the only thing that will work."
Days after the U.S. military said the number of airstrikes its coalition carried out in Afghanistan had soared, United Nations data released Thursday spotlights the human cost of the escalated bombing.
From the beginning of January until the end of September, UNAMA said, over 200 civilians died and 261 were injured from aerial attacks--a 52 percent increase compared to the same period last year.
The strikes have taken a particular toll on women and children, as they make up 68 percent of the victims.
The U.N. put the blame for 38 percent of the casualties from the airstrikes at the hands of the U.S.-led coalition, with Afghan forces, who are now carrying out their own airstrikes, being responsible for the bulk.
Their own fleet is being beefed up thanks to the U.S. military, which in turn is looking to carry out more strikes.
Portending more airstrikes carried out by Afghan air power, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, Gen. John Nicholson, said last week, "A tidal wave of Afghan airpower is on the horizon."
Nicholson, speaking from a ceremony at the Kandahar airfield after two Black Hawks from the U.S. military--the first of 159--joined the Afghan fleet, said, "The momentum has shifted, and it is irreversible."
In another signal of potentially increasing causalities, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis told congressional committees last week he was loosening "proximity requirements" to strike the Taliban. "It used to be we have to basically be in contact with that enemy," he told the House Armed Services Committee.
"That is no longer the case," he said at the Senate Armed Services Committe. "So these kind of restrictions that did not allow us to employ the air power fully have been removed, yes."
The number of U.S. airstrikes in Afghanistan were at a seven-year high in September, recently released military data shows, thanks in part to President Donald Trump's war strategy for country. The U.S.-led coalition dropped 751 bombs last month, a nearly 50-percent increase from August.
Meanwhile, with the invasion of Afghanistan having reached its 16-year anniversary last week, peace groups continue their calls for a full withdrawal of U.S. forces.
"Unless something changes," wrote journalist Sonali Kolhatkar, "another 10 years will pass with Americans remaining blind to the reasons for the war and Afghans continuing to pay the price of our ignorance."
According to Middle East expert Phyllis Bennis, Trump's plan is "a recipe for permanent war."
"There is no military solution. We need diplomacy, not war," she stressed. "It's the only thing that will work."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.