Sep 14, 2017
As Democratic leaders and President Donald Trump make a public display over what was or wasn't agreed to during a closed-door meeting about the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program Wednesday night, the Dreamers themselves say their demand to lawmakers remains clear: a clean bill enshrining current protections, one that doesn't further sacrifice immigrant communities to harsh policies and more deeply militarized enforcement.
Despite a joint statement, released late Wednesday from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), saying they had agreed to "enshrine" DACA protections quickly along with enacting border security measures that excluded the president's long-promised border wall between the United States and Mexico, Trump said in a series of Tweets Thursday morning that "no deal was made" and--contradicting comments from the White House legislative director earlier this week--any DACA agreement must include a game plan for the wall.
\u201cNo deal was made last night on DACA. Massive border security would have to be agreed to in exchange for consent. Would be subject to vote.\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1505383896
Rights activists expressed their immediate objections:
\u201cWe can't allow Schumer and Pelosi to make a deal that includes interior enforcement for #DACA protection. We are not your bargaining chip! https://t.co/cpwJpoqMuQ\u201d— Erika Andiola (@Erika Andiola) 1505359516
Noting updates to existing border fencing, Trump also vowed the wall "will continue to be built." His rebuff followed similar remarks from White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who reportedly said, "While DACA and border security were both discussed, excluding the wall was certainly not agreed to." A spokesman for Schumer responded to the contradictory series of messages, saying, "The president made clear he would continue pushing the wall, just not as part of this agreement."
In a pair of follow-up tweets, Trump also appeared to offer support for DACA recipients--often called "Dreamers," in reference to the DREAM Act, a legislative proposal that's been debated in Congress the past 16 years, and was reintroduced by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) in July.
\u201cDoes anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!.....\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1505384921
As New Yorker writer Ryan Lizza summarized the conflicting comments:
\u201cTrump this morning: one tweet insisting there's no deal and two tweets outlining the exact deal Pelosi and Schumer announced last night.\u201d— Ryan Lizza (@Ryan Lizza) 1505389108
Immigrants rights advocates--who vocally condemned and protested the president's decision to end DACA--were more critical about the meeting and mixed messages.
In a series of tweets in response to the reports, the National Immigration Law Center praised the Democrats and Trump for recognizing that DACA needs attention, but also noted "Dreamers are also border residents, and their communities are already too militarized," and denounced any deal that would target other immigrants, thus positioning Dreamers as a bargaining chip.
\u201cThe devil is in the details, and details that hurt other communities won't work. 3/\u201d— National Immigration Law Center (@National Immigration Law Center) 1505356335
Other groups and individuals expressed concern that a deal with Trump and other Republicans would negatively impact the broader communities of immigrants in the United States.
Protect "Dreamers" while adding border packages that impact communities of color?
Not a good deal to me.
We demand a clean #DreamAct. https://t.co/vrlvjTrtiS
-- Rodrigo Huertas (@orrchards) September 14, 2017
\u201cDeal? No deal without us. We've been clear about what our community needs: clean #DREAMAct now! @UNITEDWEDREAM https://t.co/2kgXusCXc4\u201d— Cristina Jim\u00e9nez (she/ella) (@Cristina Jim\u00e9nez (she/ella)) 1505357436
\u201cOn the deal tonight: Our demand is clear - clean #DreamAct now #HereToStay\u201d— United We Dream (@United We Dream) 1505357072
\u201c#DACA deal announced by Dem Ldrs & partly disputed by #WH shows reason to be skeptical until bill signed. We need #DREAMAct short of #CIR\u201d— Mi Familia Vota (@Mi Familia Vota) 1505358902
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As Democratic leaders and President Donald Trump make a public display over what was or wasn't agreed to during a closed-door meeting about the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program Wednesday night, the Dreamers themselves say their demand to lawmakers remains clear: a clean bill enshrining current protections, one that doesn't further sacrifice immigrant communities to harsh policies and more deeply militarized enforcement.
Despite a joint statement, released late Wednesday from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), saying they had agreed to "enshrine" DACA protections quickly along with enacting border security measures that excluded the president's long-promised border wall between the United States and Mexico, Trump said in a series of Tweets Thursday morning that "no deal was made" and--contradicting comments from the White House legislative director earlier this week--any DACA agreement must include a game plan for the wall.
\u201cNo deal was made last night on DACA. Massive border security would have to be agreed to in exchange for consent. Would be subject to vote.\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1505383896
Rights activists expressed their immediate objections:
\u201cWe can't allow Schumer and Pelosi to make a deal that includes interior enforcement for #DACA protection. We are not your bargaining chip! https://t.co/cpwJpoqMuQ\u201d— Erika Andiola (@Erika Andiola) 1505359516
Noting updates to existing border fencing, Trump also vowed the wall "will continue to be built." His rebuff followed similar remarks from White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who reportedly said, "While DACA and border security were both discussed, excluding the wall was certainly not agreed to." A spokesman for Schumer responded to the contradictory series of messages, saying, "The president made clear he would continue pushing the wall, just not as part of this agreement."
In a pair of follow-up tweets, Trump also appeared to offer support for DACA recipients--often called "Dreamers," in reference to the DREAM Act, a legislative proposal that's been debated in Congress the past 16 years, and was reintroduced by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) in July.
\u201cDoes anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!.....\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1505384921
As New Yorker writer Ryan Lizza summarized the conflicting comments:
\u201cTrump this morning: one tweet insisting there's no deal and two tweets outlining the exact deal Pelosi and Schumer announced last night.\u201d— Ryan Lizza (@Ryan Lizza) 1505389108
Immigrants rights advocates--who vocally condemned and protested the president's decision to end DACA--were more critical about the meeting and mixed messages.
In a series of tweets in response to the reports, the National Immigration Law Center praised the Democrats and Trump for recognizing that DACA needs attention, but also noted "Dreamers are also border residents, and their communities are already too militarized," and denounced any deal that would target other immigrants, thus positioning Dreamers as a bargaining chip.
\u201cThe devil is in the details, and details that hurt other communities won't work. 3/\u201d— National Immigration Law Center (@National Immigration Law Center) 1505356335
Other groups and individuals expressed concern that a deal with Trump and other Republicans would negatively impact the broader communities of immigrants in the United States.
Protect "Dreamers" while adding border packages that impact communities of color?
Not a good deal to me.
We demand a clean #DreamAct. https://t.co/vrlvjTrtiS
-- Rodrigo Huertas (@orrchards) September 14, 2017
\u201cDeal? No deal without us. We've been clear about what our community needs: clean #DREAMAct now! @UNITEDWEDREAM https://t.co/2kgXusCXc4\u201d— Cristina Jim\u00e9nez (she/ella) (@Cristina Jim\u00e9nez (she/ella)) 1505357436
\u201cOn the deal tonight: Our demand is clear - clean #DreamAct now #HereToStay\u201d— United We Dream (@United We Dream) 1505357072
\u201c#DACA deal announced by Dem Ldrs & partly disputed by #WH shows reason to be skeptical until bill signed. We need #DREAMAct short of #CIR\u201d— Mi Familia Vota (@Mi Familia Vota) 1505358902
As Democratic leaders and President Donald Trump make a public display over what was or wasn't agreed to during a closed-door meeting about the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program Wednesday night, the Dreamers themselves say their demand to lawmakers remains clear: a clean bill enshrining current protections, one that doesn't further sacrifice immigrant communities to harsh policies and more deeply militarized enforcement.
Despite a joint statement, released late Wednesday from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), saying they had agreed to "enshrine" DACA protections quickly along with enacting border security measures that excluded the president's long-promised border wall between the United States and Mexico, Trump said in a series of Tweets Thursday morning that "no deal was made" and--contradicting comments from the White House legislative director earlier this week--any DACA agreement must include a game plan for the wall.
\u201cNo deal was made last night on DACA. Massive border security would have to be agreed to in exchange for consent. Would be subject to vote.\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1505383896
Rights activists expressed their immediate objections:
\u201cWe can't allow Schumer and Pelosi to make a deal that includes interior enforcement for #DACA protection. We are not your bargaining chip! https://t.co/cpwJpoqMuQ\u201d— Erika Andiola (@Erika Andiola) 1505359516
Noting updates to existing border fencing, Trump also vowed the wall "will continue to be built." His rebuff followed similar remarks from White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who reportedly said, "While DACA and border security were both discussed, excluding the wall was certainly not agreed to." A spokesman for Schumer responded to the contradictory series of messages, saying, "The president made clear he would continue pushing the wall, just not as part of this agreement."
In a pair of follow-up tweets, Trump also appeared to offer support for DACA recipients--often called "Dreamers," in reference to the DREAM Act, a legislative proposal that's been debated in Congress the past 16 years, and was reintroduced by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) in July.
\u201cDoes anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!.....\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1505384921
As New Yorker writer Ryan Lizza summarized the conflicting comments:
\u201cTrump this morning: one tweet insisting there's no deal and two tweets outlining the exact deal Pelosi and Schumer announced last night.\u201d— Ryan Lizza (@Ryan Lizza) 1505389108
Immigrants rights advocates--who vocally condemned and protested the president's decision to end DACA--were more critical about the meeting and mixed messages.
In a series of tweets in response to the reports, the National Immigration Law Center praised the Democrats and Trump for recognizing that DACA needs attention, but also noted "Dreamers are also border residents, and their communities are already too militarized," and denounced any deal that would target other immigrants, thus positioning Dreamers as a bargaining chip.
\u201cThe devil is in the details, and details that hurt other communities won't work. 3/\u201d— National Immigration Law Center (@National Immigration Law Center) 1505356335
Other groups and individuals expressed concern that a deal with Trump and other Republicans would negatively impact the broader communities of immigrants in the United States.
Protect "Dreamers" while adding border packages that impact communities of color?
Not a good deal to me.
We demand a clean #DreamAct. https://t.co/vrlvjTrtiS
-- Rodrigo Huertas (@orrchards) September 14, 2017
\u201cDeal? No deal without us. We've been clear about what our community needs: clean #DREAMAct now! @UNITEDWEDREAM https://t.co/2kgXusCXc4\u201d— Cristina Jim\u00e9nez (she/ella) (@Cristina Jim\u00e9nez (she/ella)) 1505357436
\u201cOn the deal tonight: Our demand is clear - clean #DreamAct now #HereToStay\u201d— United We Dream (@United We Dream) 1505357072
\u201c#DACA deal announced by Dem Ldrs & partly disputed by #WH shows reason to be skeptical until bill signed. We need #DREAMAct short of #CIR\u201d— Mi Familia Vota (@Mi Familia Vota) 1505358902
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.