SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
After President Donald Trump announced he would end the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, people took the the streets nationwide to call on Congress to pass immigration legislation. (Photo: Ethan Miller/Getty Images)
As Dems and Trump Bicker, Dreamers Make Clear: 'No Deal Without Us!'
'We are not your bargaining chip,' say activists following late-night meeting between Democratic leaders and president
Sep 14, 2017
As Democratic leaders and President Donald Trump make a public display over what was or wasn't agreed to during a closed-door meeting about the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program Wednesday night, the Dreamers themselves say their demand to lawmakers remains clear: a clean bill enshrining current protections, one that doesn't further sacrifice immigrant communities to harsh policies and more deeply militarized enforcement.
Despite a joint statement, released late Wednesday from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), saying they had agreed to "enshrine" DACA protections quickly along with enacting border security measures that excluded the president's long-promised border wall between the United States and Mexico, Trump said in a series of Tweets Thursday morning that "no deal was made" and--contradicting comments from the White House legislative director earlier this week--any DACA agreement must include a game plan for the wall.
Rights activists expressed their immediate objections:
Noting updates to existing border fencing, Trump also vowed the wall "will continue to be built." His rebuff followed similar remarks from White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who reportedly said, "While DACA and border security were both discussed, excluding the wall was certainly not agreed to." A spokesman for Schumer responded to the contradictory series of messages, saying, "The president made clear he would continue pushing the wall, just not as part of this agreement."
In a pair of follow-up tweets, Trump also appeared to offer support for DACA recipients--often called "Dreamers," in reference to the DREAM Act, a legislative proposal that's been debated in Congress the past 16 years, and was reintroduced by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) in July.
As New Yorker writer Ryan Lizza summarized the conflicting comments:
Immigrants rights advocates--who vocally condemned and protested the president's decision to end DACA--were more critical about the meeting and mixed messages.
In a series of tweets in response to the reports, the National Immigration Law Center praised the Democrats and Trump for recognizing that DACA needs attention, but also noted "Dreamers are also border residents, and their communities are already too militarized," and denounced any deal that would target other immigrants, thus positioning Dreamers as a bargaining chip.
Other groups and individuals expressed concern that a deal with Trump and other Republicans would negatively impact the broader communities of immigrants in the United States.
Protect "Dreamers" while adding border packages that impact communities of color?
Not a good deal to me.
We demand a clean #DreamAct. https://t.co/vrlvjTrtiS
-- Rodrigo Huertas (@orrchards) September 14, 2017
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
As Democratic leaders and President Donald Trump make a public display over what was or wasn't agreed to during a closed-door meeting about the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program Wednesday night, the Dreamers themselves say their demand to lawmakers remains clear: a clean bill enshrining current protections, one that doesn't further sacrifice immigrant communities to harsh policies and more deeply militarized enforcement.
Despite a joint statement, released late Wednesday from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), saying they had agreed to "enshrine" DACA protections quickly along with enacting border security measures that excluded the president's long-promised border wall between the United States and Mexico, Trump said in a series of Tweets Thursday morning that "no deal was made" and--contradicting comments from the White House legislative director earlier this week--any DACA agreement must include a game plan for the wall.
Rights activists expressed their immediate objections:
Noting updates to existing border fencing, Trump also vowed the wall "will continue to be built." His rebuff followed similar remarks from White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who reportedly said, "While DACA and border security were both discussed, excluding the wall was certainly not agreed to." A spokesman for Schumer responded to the contradictory series of messages, saying, "The president made clear he would continue pushing the wall, just not as part of this agreement."
In a pair of follow-up tweets, Trump also appeared to offer support for DACA recipients--often called "Dreamers," in reference to the DREAM Act, a legislative proposal that's been debated in Congress the past 16 years, and was reintroduced by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) in July.
As New Yorker writer Ryan Lizza summarized the conflicting comments:
Immigrants rights advocates--who vocally condemned and protested the president's decision to end DACA--were more critical about the meeting and mixed messages.
In a series of tweets in response to the reports, the National Immigration Law Center praised the Democrats and Trump for recognizing that DACA needs attention, but also noted "Dreamers are also border residents, and their communities are already too militarized," and denounced any deal that would target other immigrants, thus positioning Dreamers as a bargaining chip.
Other groups and individuals expressed concern that a deal with Trump and other Republicans would negatively impact the broader communities of immigrants in the United States.
Protect "Dreamers" while adding border packages that impact communities of color?
Not a good deal to me.
We demand a clean #DreamAct. https://t.co/vrlvjTrtiS
-- Rodrigo Huertas (@orrchards) September 14, 2017
As Democratic leaders and President Donald Trump make a public display over what was or wasn't agreed to during a closed-door meeting about the future of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program Wednesday night, the Dreamers themselves say their demand to lawmakers remains clear: a clean bill enshrining current protections, one that doesn't further sacrifice immigrant communities to harsh policies and more deeply militarized enforcement.
Despite a joint statement, released late Wednesday from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), saying they had agreed to "enshrine" DACA protections quickly along with enacting border security measures that excluded the president's long-promised border wall between the United States and Mexico, Trump said in a series of Tweets Thursday morning that "no deal was made" and--contradicting comments from the White House legislative director earlier this week--any DACA agreement must include a game plan for the wall.
Rights activists expressed their immediate objections:
Noting updates to existing border fencing, Trump also vowed the wall "will continue to be built." His rebuff followed similar remarks from White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders, who reportedly said, "While DACA and border security were both discussed, excluding the wall was certainly not agreed to." A spokesman for Schumer responded to the contradictory series of messages, saying, "The president made clear he would continue pushing the wall, just not as part of this agreement."
In a pair of follow-up tweets, Trump also appeared to offer support for DACA recipients--often called "Dreamers," in reference to the DREAM Act, a legislative proposal that's been debated in Congress the past 16 years, and was reintroduced by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) in July.
As New Yorker writer Ryan Lizza summarized the conflicting comments:
Immigrants rights advocates--who vocally condemned and protested the president's decision to end DACA--were more critical about the meeting and mixed messages.
In a series of tweets in response to the reports, the National Immigration Law Center praised the Democrats and Trump for recognizing that DACA needs attention, but also noted "Dreamers are also border residents, and their communities are already too militarized," and denounced any deal that would target other immigrants, thus positioning Dreamers as a bargaining chip.
Other groups and individuals expressed concern that a deal with Trump and other Republicans would negatively impact the broader communities of immigrants in the United States.
Protect "Dreamers" while adding border packages that impact communities of color?
Not a good deal to me.
We demand a clean #DreamAct. https://t.co/vrlvjTrtiS
-- Rodrigo Huertas (@orrchards) September 14, 2017
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy