Two Democrats secured seats in the Oklahoma and New Hampshire legislatures in special elections on Tuesday, September 12, 2017. (Photo: justgrimes/Flickr/cc)
In Districts Where Trump Dominated, These Dems Just Delivered Stunning Blow to GOP
A series of wins for Democrats in state-level legislative special elections signals a shift in conservative districts ahead of the midterms
In a pair of special elections on Tuesday, Democratic candidates flipped statehouse seats in Oklahoma and New Hampshire, winning by double digits in districts that voted for President Donald Trump in November, and adding to a growing list of party victories that could offer insight into coming elections.
In the New Hampshire race for a state House seat, Democrat and small-business owner Charles St. Clair secured 55 percent of the vote in a district that Trump won by 19 points. In Oklahoma, meanwhile, schoolteacher Jacob Rosecrants won 60 percent of the vote in his district, according to unofficial election results, becoming the third Democrat from the state to defeat a Republican challenger for a GOP-held seat this year.
Discussing Rosecrants' win, Carolyn Fiddler at Daily Kos notes:
Trump won this district 52-41 percent last fall, making this win a 31-point swing toward the Democrat. What's more, Rosecrants himself ran for this same seat and lost in 2016...by the same 60-40 margin he won by on Tuesday.
This dramatic shift tracks with the massive improvement in Democratic performance in the majority of special elections at both the congressional and state legislative level since Trump's election last November.
Although Democratic candidates in 2017 special elections for seats in the U.S. Congress have lost close contests in Georgia, Kansas, and Montana, Democrats have flipped six state-level seats in special elections this year. In addition to picking up the other two state legislative seats in Oklahoma this summer, Democrats also flipped a seat in both New Hampshire and New York earlier this year.
"Open seats are far more likely to flip party control than when an incumbent runs," CNN's Chris Cillizza acknowledges, but the combination of "Trump's unpopularity, historic midterm patterns for the president's party, and the early-warning signs" from state legislative districts that helped elect Trump suggest that this shift in key districts for Republicans could foreshadow future Democratic Party wins in coming state-level elections as well as the 2018 midterms.
Recent victories in red districts "bolster the party's attempt to regain nearly 1,000 legislative seats that Democrats have lost across the country since 2009," notes Daniel Marans for the Huffington Post, "and suggest they could make more significant gains in normal state-level elections in Virginia and New Jersey this November."
These state-level wins also come as three Republicans in Congress have announced they will not seek re-election for their competitive U.S. House seats next year, which multiple political analysts have indicated are positive developments for Democrats.
On Tuesday, the New York Times' Nate Cohn shared on Twitter a "telling chart" that shows a higher number of open seats among congressional Republicans for 2018.
And as David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report points out, in the 2008 election, seats vacated by Republicans led to Democratic gains in Congress.
Nathaniel Rakish, writing for FiveThirtyEight, observes that this recent "pattern of retirements appears to be generational as well as about representatives responding to the political environment," based on his analysis of U.S. representatives' retirements since the mid-1970s.
Although "a rash of retirements doesn't necessarily signal" guaranteed victories for the other party in the next election, Ravish concludes "the most fundamental takeaway is still this: Retirements from a competitive state or district hurt the party the member belongs to" because of incumbency advantage, so "the more Republicans in competitive districts who retire heading into 2018, the more seats Democrats can realistically go after."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In a pair of special elections on Tuesday, Democratic candidates flipped statehouse seats in Oklahoma and New Hampshire, winning by double digits in districts that voted for President Donald Trump in November, and adding to a growing list of party victories that could offer insight into coming elections.
In the New Hampshire race for a state House seat, Democrat and small-business owner Charles St. Clair secured 55 percent of the vote in a district that Trump won by 19 points. In Oklahoma, meanwhile, schoolteacher Jacob Rosecrants won 60 percent of the vote in his district, according to unofficial election results, becoming the third Democrat from the state to defeat a Republican challenger for a GOP-held seat this year.
Discussing Rosecrants' win, Carolyn Fiddler at Daily Kos notes:
Trump won this district 52-41 percent last fall, making this win a 31-point swing toward the Democrat. What's more, Rosecrants himself ran for this same seat and lost in 2016...by the same 60-40 margin he won by on Tuesday.
This dramatic shift tracks with the massive improvement in Democratic performance in the majority of special elections at both the congressional and state legislative level since Trump's election last November.
Although Democratic candidates in 2017 special elections for seats in the U.S. Congress have lost close contests in Georgia, Kansas, and Montana, Democrats have flipped six state-level seats in special elections this year. In addition to picking up the other two state legislative seats in Oklahoma this summer, Democrats also flipped a seat in both New Hampshire and New York earlier this year.
"Open seats are far more likely to flip party control than when an incumbent runs," CNN's Chris Cillizza acknowledges, but the combination of "Trump's unpopularity, historic midterm patterns for the president's party, and the early-warning signs" from state legislative districts that helped elect Trump suggest that this shift in key districts for Republicans could foreshadow future Democratic Party wins in coming state-level elections as well as the 2018 midterms.
Recent victories in red districts "bolster the party's attempt to regain nearly 1,000 legislative seats that Democrats have lost across the country since 2009," notes Daniel Marans for the Huffington Post, "and suggest they could make more significant gains in normal state-level elections in Virginia and New Jersey this November."
These state-level wins also come as three Republicans in Congress have announced they will not seek re-election for their competitive U.S. House seats next year, which multiple political analysts have indicated are positive developments for Democrats.
On Tuesday, the New York Times' Nate Cohn shared on Twitter a "telling chart" that shows a higher number of open seats among congressional Republicans for 2018.
And as David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report points out, in the 2008 election, seats vacated by Republicans led to Democratic gains in Congress.
Nathaniel Rakish, writing for FiveThirtyEight, observes that this recent "pattern of retirements appears to be generational as well as about representatives responding to the political environment," based on his analysis of U.S. representatives' retirements since the mid-1970s.
Although "a rash of retirements doesn't necessarily signal" guaranteed victories for the other party in the next election, Ravish concludes "the most fundamental takeaway is still this: Retirements from a competitive state or district hurt the party the member belongs to" because of incumbency advantage, so "the more Republicans in competitive districts who retire heading into 2018, the more seats Democrats can realistically go after."
In a pair of special elections on Tuesday, Democratic candidates flipped statehouse seats in Oklahoma and New Hampshire, winning by double digits in districts that voted for President Donald Trump in November, and adding to a growing list of party victories that could offer insight into coming elections.
In the New Hampshire race for a state House seat, Democrat and small-business owner Charles St. Clair secured 55 percent of the vote in a district that Trump won by 19 points. In Oklahoma, meanwhile, schoolteacher Jacob Rosecrants won 60 percent of the vote in his district, according to unofficial election results, becoming the third Democrat from the state to defeat a Republican challenger for a GOP-held seat this year.
Discussing Rosecrants' win, Carolyn Fiddler at Daily Kos notes:
Trump won this district 52-41 percent last fall, making this win a 31-point swing toward the Democrat. What's more, Rosecrants himself ran for this same seat and lost in 2016...by the same 60-40 margin he won by on Tuesday.
This dramatic shift tracks with the massive improvement in Democratic performance in the majority of special elections at both the congressional and state legislative level since Trump's election last November.
Although Democratic candidates in 2017 special elections for seats in the U.S. Congress have lost close contests in Georgia, Kansas, and Montana, Democrats have flipped six state-level seats in special elections this year. In addition to picking up the other two state legislative seats in Oklahoma this summer, Democrats also flipped a seat in both New Hampshire and New York earlier this year.
"Open seats are far more likely to flip party control than when an incumbent runs," CNN's Chris Cillizza acknowledges, but the combination of "Trump's unpopularity, historic midterm patterns for the president's party, and the early-warning signs" from state legislative districts that helped elect Trump suggest that this shift in key districts for Republicans could foreshadow future Democratic Party wins in coming state-level elections as well as the 2018 midterms.
Recent victories in red districts "bolster the party's attempt to regain nearly 1,000 legislative seats that Democrats have lost across the country since 2009," notes Daniel Marans for the Huffington Post, "and suggest they could make more significant gains in normal state-level elections in Virginia and New Jersey this November."
These state-level wins also come as three Republicans in Congress have announced they will not seek re-election for their competitive U.S. House seats next year, which multiple political analysts have indicated are positive developments for Democrats.
On Tuesday, the New York Times' Nate Cohn shared on Twitter a "telling chart" that shows a higher number of open seats among congressional Republicans for 2018.
And as David Wasserman of the Cook Political Report points out, in the 2008 election, seats vacated by Republicans led to Democratic gains in Congress.
Nathaniel Rakish, writing for FiveThirtyEight, observes that this recent "pattern of retirements appears to be generational as well as about representatives responding to the political environment," based on his analysis of U.S. representatives' retirements since the mid-1970s.
Although "a rash of retirements doesn't necessarily signal" guaranteed victories for the other party in the next election, Ravish concludes "the most fundamental takeaway is still this: Retirements from a competitive state or district hurt the party the member belongs to" because of incumbency advantage, so "the more Republicans in competitive districts who retire heading into 2018, the more seats Democrats can realistically go after."