SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"People are so afraid of Google now," said Barry Lynn of Open Markets. (Photo: Steve Rhodes/Flickr/cc)
Google Accused of Pushing Think Tank to Squash Critic of Corporate Power
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings."
Aug 30, 2017
In what critics are calling a "deeply troubling" indication of the power massive corporations have over ostensibly independent policy shops, New America--an influential Washington-based think tank--reportedly decided to oust a prominent anti-monopoly voice after he praised the European Union's June decision to fine Google for "abus[ing] its market dominance."
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings."
--Barry Lynn, Open MarketsBarry Lynn, then the head of New America's Open Markets initiative, penned a statement applauding the $2.7 billion penalty against Google shortly after the EU's decision was made public.
According to Lynn, this raised the ire of Eric Schmidt--executive chairman of Google's parent company Alphabet--who is also a major benefactor of New America. In addition, as the New York Times notes, New America has received over $20 million in donations from Google.
Shortly following Schmidt's complaints about the statement, New America CEO Anne Marie-Slaughter told Lynn in an email that "the time has come for Open Markets and New America to part ways."
"We are in the process of trying to expand our relationship with Google on some absolutely key points," Slaughter wrote in a separate email to Lynn, imploring him to "just THINK about how you are imperiling funding for others."
In an interview with the Times, Lynn charged that New America's decision to cut ties with the Open Markets program--which included a staff of ten full-time employees--was a direct result of Google pressure.
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings," Lynn told the Times. "People are so afraid of Google now."
Slaughter has claimed the Times story is "false," and New America released a statement challenging the report.
On social media, prominent critics of corporate consolidation--including New America fellows--expressed outrage at the think tank's decision to oust the Open Markets team.
"Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
-- Zephyr TeachoutZephyr Teachout, an Open Markets fellow and critic of money in politics, wrote in response to reports of New America's move: "Google has too much power."
The organization's decision to push out Lynn and the entire Open Markets team was a result of Google's realization "that anti-monopoly critics are gaining popular support and must be squashed," Teachout concluded. "Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
Others similarly argued that the New America story is part of a much broader problem of excessive corporate concentration and influence.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In what critics are calling a "deeply troubling" indication of the power massive corporations have over ostensibly independent policy shops, New America--an influential Washington-based think tank--reportedly decided to oust a prominent anti-monopoly voice after he praised the European Union's June decision to fine Google for "abus[ing] its market dominance."
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings."
--Barry Lynn, Open MarketsBarry Lynn, then the head of New America's Open Markets initiative, penned a statement applauding the $2.7 billion penalty against Google shortly after the EU's decision was made public.
According to Lynn, this raised the ire of Eric Schmidt--executive chairman of Google's parent company Alphabet--who is also a major benefactor of New America. In addition, as the New York Times notes, New America has received over $20 million in donations from Google.
Shortly following Schmidt's complaints about the statement, New America CEO Anne Marie-Slaughter told Lynn in an email that "the time has come for Open Markets and New America to part ways."
"We are in the process of trying to expand our relationship with Google on some absolutely key points," Slaughter wrote in a separate email to Lynn, imploring him to "just THINK about how you are imperiling funding for others."
In an interview with the Times, Lynn charged that New America's decision to cut ties with the Open Markets program--which included a staff of ten full-time employees--was a direct result of Google pressure.
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings," Lynn told the Times. "People are so afraid of Google now."
Slaughter has claimed the Times story is "false," and New America released a statement challenging the report.
On social media, prominent critics of corporate consolidation--including New America fellows--expressed outrage at the think tank's decision to oust the Open Markets team.
"Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
-- Zephyr TeachoutZephyr Teachout, an Open Markets fellow and critic of money in politics, wrote in response to reports of New America's move: "Google has too much power."
The organization's decision to push out Lynn and the entire Open Markets team was a result of Google's realization "that anti-monopoly critics are gaining popular support and must be squashed," Teachout concluded. "Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
Others similarly argued that the New America story is part of a much broader problem of excessive corporate concentration and influence.
In what critics are calling a "deeply troubling" indication of the power massive corporations have over ostensibly independent policy shops, New America--an influential Washington-based think tank--reportedly decided to oust a prominent anti-monopoly voice after he praised the European Union's June decision to fine Google for "abus[ing] its market dominance."
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings."
--Barry Lynn, Open MarketsBarry Lynn, then the head of New America's Open Markets initiative, penned a statement applauding the $2.7 billion penalty against Google shortly after the EU's decision was made public.
According to Lynn, this raised the ire of Eric Schmidt--executive chairman of Google's parent company Alphabet--who is also a major benefactor of New America. In addition, as the New York Times notes, New America has received over $20 million in donations from Google.
Shortly following Schmidt's complaints about the statement, New America CEO Anne Marie-Slaughter told Lynn in an email that "the time has come for Open Markets and New America to part ways."
"We are in the process of trying to expand our relationship with Google on some absolutely key points," Slaughter wrote in a separate email to Lynn, imploring him to "just THINK about how you are imperiling funding for others."
In an interview with the Times, Lynn charged that New America's decision to cut ties with the Open Markets program--which included a staff of ten full-time employees--was a direct result of Google pressure.
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings," Lynn told the Times. "People are so afraid of Google now."
Slaughter has claimed the Times story is "false," and New America released a statement challenging the report.
On social media, prominent critics of corporate consolidation--including New America fellows--expressed outrage at the think tank's decision to oust the Open Markets team.
"Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
-- Zephyr TeachoutZephyr Teachout, an Open Markets fellow and critic of money in politics, wrote in response to reports of New America's move: "Google has too much power."
The organization's decision to push out Lynn and the entire Open Markets team was a result of Google's realization "that anti-monopoly critics are gaining popular support and must be squashed," Teachout concluded. "Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
Others similarly argued that the New America story is part of a much broader problem of excessive corporate concentration and influence.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.