

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"People are so afraid of Google now," said Barry Lynn of Open Markets. (Photo: Steve Rhodes/Flickr/cc)
In what critics are calling a "deeply troubling" indication of the power massive corporations have over ostensibly independent policy shops, New America--an influential Washington-based think tank--reportedly decided to oust a prominent anti-monopoly voice after he praised the European Union's June decision to fine Google for "abus[ing] its market dominance."
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings."
--Barry Lynn, Open MarketsBarry Lynn, then the head of New America's Open Markets initiative, penned a statement applauding the $2.7 billion penalty against Google shortly after the EU's decision was made public.
According to Lynn, this raised the ire of Eric Schmidt--executive chairman of Google's parent company Alphabet--who is also a major benefactor of New America. In addition, as the New York Times notes, New America has received over $20 million in donations from Google.
Shortly following Schmidt's complaints about the statement, New America CEO Anne Marie-Slaughter told Lynn in an email that "the time has come for Open Markets and New America to part ways."
"We are in the process of trying to expand our relationship with Google on some absolutely key points," Slaughter wrote in a separate email to Lynn, imploring him to "just THINK about how you are imperiling funding for others."
In an interview with the Times, Lynn charged that New America's decision to cut ties with the Open Markets program--which included a staff of ten full-time employees--was a direct result of Google pressure.
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings," Lynn told the Times. "People are so afraid of Google now."
Slaughter has claimed the Times story is "false," and New America released a statement challenging the report.
On social media, prominent critics of corporate consolidation--including New America fellows--expressed outrage at the think tank's decision to oust the Open Markets team.
"Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
-- Zephyr TeachoutZephyr Teachout, an Open Markets fellow and critic of money in politics, wrote in response to reports of New America's move: "Google has too much power."
The organization's decision to push out Lynn and the entire Open Markets team was a result of Google's realization "that anti-monopoly critics are gaining popular support and must be squashed," Teachout concluded. "Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
Others similarly argued that the New America story is part of a much broader problem of excessive corporate concentration and influence.
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In what critics are calling a "deeply troubling" indication of the power massive corporations have over ostensibly independent policy shops, New America--an influential Washington-based think tank--reportedly decided to oust a prominent anti-monopoly voice after he praised the European Union's June decision to fine Google for "abus[ing] its market dominance."
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings."
--Barry Lynn, Open MarketsBarry Lynn, then the head of New America's Open Markets initiative, penned a statement applauding the $2.7 billion penalty against Google shortly after the EU's decision was made public.
According to Lynn, this raised the ire of Eric Schmidt--executive chairman of Google's parent company Alphabet--who is also a major benefactor of New America. In addition, as the New York Times notes, New America has received over $20 million in donations from Google.
Shortly following Schmidt's complaints about the statement, New America CEO Anne Marie-Slaughter told Lynn in an email that "the time has come for Open Markets and New America to part ways."
"We are in the process of trying to expand our relationship with Google on some absolutely key points," Slaughter wrote in a separate email to Lynn, imploring him to "just THINK about how you are imperiling funding for others."
In an interview with the Times, Lynn charged that New America's decision to cut ties with the Open Markets program--which included a staff of ten full-time employees--was a direct result of Google pressure.
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings," Lynn told the Times. "People are so afraid of Google now."
Slaughter has claimed the Times story is "false," and New America released a statement challenging the report.
On social media, prominent critics of corporate consolidation--including New America fellows--expressed outrage at the think tank's decision to oust the Open Markets team.
"Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
-- Zephyr TeachoutZephyr Teachout, an Open Markets fellow and critic of money in politics, wrote in response to reports of New America's move: "Google has too much power."
The organization's decision to push out Lynn and the entire Open Markets team was a result of Google's realization "that anti-monopoly critics are gaining popular support and must be squashed," Teachout concluded. "Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
Others similarly argued that the New America story is part of a much broader problem of excessive corporate concentration and influence.
In what critics are calling a "deeply troubling" indication of the power massive corporations have over ostensibly independent policy shops, New America--an influential Washington-based think tank--reportedly decided to oust a prominent anti-monopoly voice after he praised the European Union's June decision to fine Google for "abus[ing] its market dominance."
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings."
--Barry Lynn, Open MarketsBarry Lynn, then the head of New America's Open Markets initiative, penned a statement applauding the $2.7 billion penalty against Google shortly after the EU's decision was made public.
According to Lynn, this raised the ire of Eric Schmidt--executive chairman of Google's parent company Alphabet--who is also a major benefactor of New America. In addition, as the New York Times notes, New America has received over $20 million in donations from Google.
Shortly following Schmidt's complaints about the statement, New America CEO Anne Marie-Slaughter told Lynn in an email that "the time has come for Open Markets and New America to part ways."
"We are in the process of trying to expand our relationship with Google on some absolutely key points," Slaughter wrote in a separate email to Lynn, imploring him to "just THINK about how you are imperiling funding for others."
In an interview with the Times, Lynn charged that New America's decision to cut ties with the Open Markets program--which included a staff of ten full-time employees--was a direct result of Google pressure.
"Google is very aggressive in throwing its money around Washington and Brussels, and then pulling the strings," Lynn told the Times. "People are so afraid of Google now."
Slaughter has claimed the Times story is "false," and New America released a statement challenging the report.
On social media, prominent critics of corporate consolidation--including New America fellows--expressed outrage at the think tank's decision to oust the Open Markets team.
"Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
-- Zephyr TeachoutZephyr Teachout, an Open Markets fellow and critic of money in politics, wrote in response to reports of New America's move: "Google has too much power."
The organization's decision to push out Lynn and the entire Open Markets team was a result of Google's realization "that anti-monopoly critics are gaining popular support and must be squashed," Teachout concluded. "Time for a national anti-monopoly movement! Time to start enforcing antitrust again!"
Others similarly argued that the New America story is part of a much broader problem of excessive corporate concentration and influence.