

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Protesters in Florida gathered in Florida earlier this month to demand a diplomatic approach to tensions with Kim Jong-un's regime. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
President Donald Trump offered more tough talk after North Korea performed its most recent missile launch over Japan, warning on Tuesday that "all options are on the table." But while Trump's approach to North Korea has involved both veiled and explicit threats of military action, polling shows that most Americans would prefer the president consider one option that he's left off the table in his rhetoric on the matter--that of high-level diplomatic discussions with Kim Jong-un's regime.
While behind-the-scenes talks have taken place between diplomatic officials from both countries, Trump has indicated that he sees military threats and action as the best way to approach the isolated regime.
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday morning, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said "enough is enough" from North Korea and warned that "something serious has to happen" in response to Monday's missile launch.
The missile North Korea fired into the Pacific Ocean on Monday was reportedly the same ballistic missile that it could potentially launch toward Guam, as it threatened to do earlier this month. Kim Jong-un threatened to attack Guam after Trump said the U.S. would respond with "fire and fury" if North Korea continued testing nuclear weapons. After the Guam threat, the president said of North Korea, "things will happen to them like they never thought possible" should they attack the U.S. territory.
The missile launch came a week after Trump boasted to a crowd in Phoenix, Arizona that Kim was "starting to respect" the U.S. following the president's threats. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson also remarked that week that Pyongyang had "certainly demonstrated some level of restraint" in recent days.
But after the quiet proved to be short-lived, Trump's newest threats continued the cycle that's been established in recent weeks between North Korea and the U.S.: violence met with threats of more violence. Meanwhile, South Korea dropped eight powerful bombs at a firing range near its border with North Korea, in order to "display a strong capability to punish" Pyongyang if war touches off.
As the international anti-nuclear group Global Zero pointed out on Monday, a majority of Americans oppose Trump's threats when it comes to North Korea and instead support diplomatic and non-military solutions to diminish tensions.
A Harvard-Harris poll conducted last week found that Trump's threats haven't been met favorably by most Americans. Fifty-three percent don't approve of how he has handled escalating tensions with North Korea, and 56 percent found his "fire and fury" comment, made spontaneously at a press conference on the opioid epidemic in the U.S., was "over the top and unhelpful," according to The Hill's report on the survey.
The United Nations Security Council is holding talks on Tuesday to discuss North Korea's latest action.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
President Donald Trump offered more tough talk after North Korea performed its most recent missile launch over Japan, warning on Tuesday that "all options are on the table." But while Trump's approach to North Korea has involved both veiled and explicit threats of military action, polling shows that most Americans would prefer the president consider one option that he's left off the table in his rhetoric on the matter--that of high-level diplomatic discussions with Kim Jong-un's regime.
While behind-the-scenes talks have taken place between diplomatic officials from both countries, Trump has indicated that he sees military threats and action as the best way to approach the isolated regime.
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday morning, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said "enough is enough" from North Korea and warned that "something serious has to happen" in response to Monday's missile launch.
The missile North Korea fired into the Pacific Ocean on Monday was reportedly the same ballistic missile that it could potentially launch toward Guam, as it threatened to do earlier this month. Kim Jong-un threatened to attack Guam after Trump said the U.S. would respond with "fire and fury" if North Korea continued testing nuclear weapons. After the Guam threat, the president said of North Korea, "things will happen to them like they never thought possible" should they attack the U.S. territory.
The missile launch came a week after Trump boasted to a crowd in Phoenix, Arizona that Kim was "starting to respect" the U.S. following the president's threats. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson also remarked that week that Pyongyang had "certainly demonstrated some level of restraint" in recent days.
But after the quiet proved to be short-lived, Trump's newest threats continued the cycle that's been established in recent weeks between North Korea and the U.S.: violence met with threats of more violence. Meanwhile, South Korea dropped eight powerful bombs at a firing range near its border with North Korea, in order to "display a strong capability to punish" Pyongyang if war touches off.
As the international anti-nuclear group Global Zero pointed out on Monday, a majority of Americans oppose Trump's threats when it comes to North Korea and instead support diplomatic and non-military solutions to diminish tensions.
A Harvard-Harris poll conducted last week found that Trump's threats haven't been met favorably by most Americans. Fifty-three percent don't approve of how he has handled escalating tensions with North Korea, and 56 percent found his "fire and fury" comment, made spontaneously at a press conference on the opioid epidemic in the U.S., was "over the top and unhelpful," according to The Hill's report on the survey.
The United Nations Security Council is holding talks on Tuesday to discuss North Korea's latest action.
President Donald Trump offered more tough talk after North Korea performed its most recent missile launch over Japan, warning on Tuesday that "all options are on the table." But while Trump's approach to North Korea has involved both veiled and explicit threats of military action, polling shows that most Americans would prefer the president consider one option that he's left off the table in his rhetoric on the matter--that of high-level diplomatic discussions with Kim Jong-un's regime.
While behind-the-scenes talks have taken place between diplomatic officials from both countries, Trump has indicated that he sees military threats and action as the best way to approach the isolated regime.
Speaking to reporters on Tuesday morning, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said "enough is enough" from North Korea and warned that "something serious has to happen" in response to Monday's missile launch.
The missile North Korea fired into the Pacific Ocean on Monday was reportedly the same ballistic missile that it could potentially launch toward Guam, as it threatened to do earlier this month. Kim Jong-un threatened to attack Guam after Trump said the U.S. would respond with "fire and fury" if North Korea continued testing nuclear weapons. After the Guam threat, the president said of North Korea, "things will happen to them like they never thought possible" should they attack the U.S. territory.
The missile launch came a week after Trump boasted to a crowd in Phoenix, Arizona that Kim was "starting to respect" the U.S. following the president's threats. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson also remarked that week that Pyongyang had "certainly demonstrated some level of restraint" in recent days.
But after the quiet proved to be short-lived, Trump's newest threats continued the cycle that's been established in recent weeks between North Korea and the U.S.: violence met with threats of more violence. Meanwhile, South Korea dropped eight powerful bombs at a firing range near its border with North Korea, in order to "display a strong capability to punish" Pyongyang if war touches off.
As the international anti-nuclear group Global Zero pointed out on Monday, a majority of Americans oppose Trump's threats when it comes to North Korea and instead support diplomatic and non-military solutions to diminish tensions.
A Harvard-Harris poll conducted last week found that Trump's threats haven't been met favorably by most Americans. Fifty-three percent don't approve of how he has handled escalating tensions with North Korea, and 56 percent found his "fire and fury" comment, made spontaneously at a press conference on the opioid epidemic in the U.S., was "over the top and unhelpful," according to The Hill's report on the survey.
The United Nations Security Council is holding talks on Tuesday to discuss North Korea's latest action.