

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Inflatable figures of President Donald Trump in KKK garb and former Sheriff Joe Arpaio in prisoner uniform outide a rally in Phoenix, Arizona on Tuesday, August 22. (Photo: Monica D. Spencer/flickr/cc)
Human rights groups and advocates were outraged when President Donald Trump, from his controversial rally in Arizona Tuesday night, strongly implied he would pardon Joe Arpaio, the notorious former sheriff of Maricopa County who has been convicted of violating a federal court order to stop discriminating against Latinos in his county.
"So was sheriff Joe convicted for doing his job?" Trump asked a roaring crowd. "I'll make a prediction: I think he's going to be just fine, OK?" Trump said of Arpaio, who is scheduled to be sentenced in October. "But I won't do it tonight because I don't want to cause any controversy."
Watch:
The condemnation was swift:
The president's remarks Tuesday followed his admission to Fox News last week that he was "seriously considering" a pardon for the former sheriff. Trump's relationship with Arpaio pre-dates his presidency, and as Vox notes, "Arpaio played a key role in validating Donald Trump, whose candidacy was initially seen as a joke, as the champion of hardline immigration policies and the cultural anxieties that came alongside them." Arpaio participated in Trump's first major campaign rally in Phoenix in August 2015, and that following January the former sheriff formally endorsed Trump for president.
As Trump continued his long-winded and bizarre speech from Arizona on Tuesday night, rights advocates began raising alarms over renewed concerns that 85-year-old Arpaio won't be held accountable for demonstrating, as the judge put it, a "flagrant disregard" for the court mandate to stop systemically racially profiling and detaining county residents based on suspicions about their immigration status.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) began circulating a petition, and offered five reasons Arpaio wasn't just "doing his job." In addition to highlighting his racial profiling of Latinos, the ACLU acknowledges denouncements of the former sheriff's actions from the Justice Department and federal courts, outlines the conditions of his infamous Tent City, and details accusations that Arpaio "ignored hundreds of sex crime cases," all while using his powerful position to intimidate his critics.
Calling the potential pardon a "direct attack on the rule of law, as well as the U.S. Constitution," ACLU deputy legal director Cecillia Wang explained the history and established precedents for the presidential pardon in a series of tweets:
Many other rights advocates, legal experts, and journalists condemned Arpaio's pending pardon on Twitter:
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Human rights groups and advocates were outraged when President Donald Trump, from his controversial rally in Arizona Tuesday night, strongly implied he would pardon Joe Arpaio, the notorious former sheriff of Maricopa County who has been convicted of violating a federal court order to stop discriminating against Latinos in his county.
"So was sheriff Joe convicted for doing his job?" Trump asked a roaring crowd. "I'll make a prediction: I think he's going to be just fine, OK?" Trump said of Arpaio, who is scheduled to be sentenced in October. "But I won't do it tonight because I don't want to cause any controversy."
Watch:
The condemnation was swift:
The president's remarks Tuesday followed his admission to Fox News last week that he was "seriously considering" a pardon for the former sheriff. Trump's relationship with Arpaio pre-dates his presidency, and as Vox notes, "Arpaio played a key role in validating Donald Trump, whose candidacy was initially seen as a joke, as the champion of hardline immigration policies and the cultural anxieties that came alongside them." Arpaio participated in Trump's first major campaign rally in Phoenix in August 2015, and that following January the former sheriff formally endorsed Trump for president.
As Trump continued his long-winded and bizarre speech from Arizona on Tuesday night, rights advocates began raising alarms over renewed concerns that 85-year-old Arpaio won't be held accountable for demonstrating, as the judge put it, a "flagrant disregard" for the court mandate to stop systemically racially profiling and detaining county residents based on suspicions about their immigration status.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) began circulating a petition, and offered five reasons Arpaio wasn't just "doing his job." In addition to highlighting his racial profiling of Latinos, the ACLU acknowledges denouncements of the former sheriff's actions from the Justice Department and federal courts, outlines the conditions of his infamous Tent City, and details accusations that Arpaio "ignored hundreds of sex crime cases," all while using his powerful position to intimidate his critics.
Calling the potential pardon a "direct attack on the rule of law, as well as the U.S. Constitution," ACLU deputy legal director Cecillia Wang explained the history and established precedents for the presidential pardon in a series of tweets:
Many other rights advocates, legal experts, and journalists condemned Arpaio's pending pardon on Twitter:
Human rights groups and advocates were outraged when President Donald Trump, from his controversial rally in Arizona Tuesday night, strongly implied he would pardon Joe Arpaio, the notorious former sheriff of Maricopa County who has been convicted of violating a federal court order to stop discriminating against Latinos in his county.
"So was sheriff Joe convicted for doing his job?" Trump asked a roaring crowd. "I'll make a prediction: I think he's going to be just fine, OK?" Trump said of Arpaio, who is scheduled to be sentenced in October. "But I won't do it tonight because I don't want to cause any controversy."
Watch:
The condemnation was swift:
The president's remarks Tuesday followed his admission to Fox News last week that he was "seriously considering" a pardon for the former sheriff. Trump's relationship with Arpaio pre-dates his presidency, and as Vox notes, "Arpaio played a key role in validating Donald Trump, whose candidacy was initially seen as a joke, as the champion of hardline immigration policies and the cultural anxieties that came alongside them." Arpaio participated in Trump's first major campaign rally in Phoenix in August 2015, and that following January the former sheriff formally endorsed Trump for president.
As Trump continued his long-winded and bizarre speech from Arizona on Tuesday night, rights advocates began raising alarms over renewed concerns that 85-year-old Arpaio won't be held accountable for demonstrating, as the judge put it, a "flagrant disregard" for the court mandate to stop systemically racially profiling and detaining county residents based on suspicions about their immigration status.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) began circulating a petition, and offered five reasons Arpaio wasn't just "doing his job." In addition to highlighting his racial profiling of Latinos, the ACLU acknowledges denouncements of the former sheriff's actions from the Justice Department and federal courts, outlines the conditions of his infamous Tent City, and details accusations that Arpaio "ignored hundreds of sex crime cases," all while using his powerful position to intimidate his critics.
Calling the potential pardon a "direct attack on the rule of law, as well as the U.S. Constitution," ACLU deputy legal director Cecillia Wang explained the history and established precedents for the presidential pardon in a series of tweets:
Many other rights advocates, legal experts, and journalists condemned Arpaio's pending pardon on Twitter: